Skip to main content

2008 does not mark the first time Michigan challenged the Democratic Party's primary schedule.  The Wolverine State challenged the Democratic Party's primary schedule four years ago.  Reads syndicated columnist Mark Shields's blog:

Four years earlier [2004], Michigan threatened — in the words of the state’s respected, but highly exercised, U.S. Sen. Carl Levin — to go "outside the primary window."

The Democratic national chairman, in a very heated exchange in Levin’s office, told the senator, "If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses, we will have chaos."

An unconvinced Levin challenged the chairman, "You won’t deny us seats at the convention." To which the Democratic chairman fired back: "Carl, take it to the bank. They will not get a credential. The closest they’ll get to Boston (the convention city) will be watching it on television."

So who was that bold and wise Democratic Party chairman in 2004?  It was none other than Democratic Party fundraiser extrodinaire Terry McAuliffe.  [I apologize for saying that McAuliffe was the worst DNC chairman ever since he obviously got one thing right.]  Now chairing Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, McAuliffe, neglecting his moral responsibility as a former DNC chair, believes the Florida and Michigan results were fair, and that the Florida and Michigan primary results should be either honored or their should be a re-vote.

Howard Dean last year, rightly in my view, stripped Michigan and Florida of its delegates.  Even the 50% penalty that Republicans used still gave the Sunshine State and the Wolverine State, which had disobeyed party rules, infinitely more influence in choosing the Republican nominee than did Pennsylvania, which followed the rules.  Is this fair?  More important, what is to say in 2012 that Pennsylvania and other large states won't move up their primaries even more even if that means accepting a 50%, a 75%, or even a 90% percent penalty?  Because the state is large and delegates are at stake, the state will still have considerably more influence than a state that actually follows party rules.

So now we go to the Democrats.  Should Michigan and Florida have a revote, what is it to say that in 2012 a state won't move up its primary and accept the x% penalty, or if completely stripped of their delegates, just suddenly change their primary schedule to a date that gives the state more political influence?

Terry McAuliffe meant business in 2004 when he threatened not to allow Michigan voters any influence had they disobeyed the party rules.  Howard Dean should do the same.  [Just split the each state's delegations 50-50, and allow the superdelegates, whose role is independent of the voters, also to be seated at the convention.]  Does Howard Dean really want a legacy of spreading chaos in the Democratic primaries?

Originally posted to jim bow on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:15 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site