Well, maybe not slam.
In his blog, Krugman writes:
OK, this is pretty dumb. Hillary Clinton wants a high-level commission to analyze ways to resolve the mortgage crisis — including Alan Greenspan.
Yes, I know people still listen when Greenspan speaks — and John McCain once joked about taking Greenspan’s advice even if he’s dead. But for those in the know, AG is a key villain in the whole affair.
I mean, why not add Charles Prince, Stanley O’Neal, and Angelo Mozilo to the commission?
Now, I love Paul Krugman and he's one of my favorite Princeton academics, but for the last few months, he seemed to have this vendetta against Obama, my preferred candidate. It seemed to me that he was in the tank for Hillary and was starting to effect my regard for him. Now, this blog post isn't much, but it's a small sign to me that though he may seem to be a Hillary backer, he's not shutting up and letting what he thinks is BS slide.
Maybe I was too quick to question my stance on Krugman.
I can't wait for this primary season to end so we're all aiming our guns in the same direction.