Is this what we can expect from a HRClinton administration - intramural squabbling, staff rivaries that undermine the chief executive's agenda, conflicts of interest, and a generally flawed strategy based on micro-trndiness and triagulation? If you answer "no", then I'd like to hear the reasons why you think her administration would be any different from her campaign. I think we can read a lot into the way HRC and BHO have run their campaigns - both from a stratgic and tactical standpoint, as well as a managerial perspective. WJClinton's White House was not known for being a model of efficiency; can Hillary's?
From the outside, it appears HRC assembled a team that could not work together. Would she do the same with a cabinet if given the chance? Would her west wing devolve into the kind of sniping, backbiting, bickering bunch that she has running her campaign?
BHO has run a brilliant campaign - following the rules and expanding the Democratic Party base as he rolled to more delegates, more state wins, and more popular vote totals than HRC's bunch could muster. What does this say about a real (but getting slimmer) chance of another Clinton White House?
I respectfully await your collective Kos wisdom....