Skip to main content

I have to admit that I probably like Chris Matthews more than many here, although I certainly don't take him very seriously.  I enjoy "Hardball" mainly because it's straight up politics, with good guests and lively discussion.  The orientation is politics as blood sport, not issues, and hence I find it entertaining rather than enlightening--which is fine for the time slot.  

But Chris is, of course, an odd duck, and remarkably flawed as a television personality, like some irrepressible child that was given the keys to the car and allowed to drive.  You can see everyone adjusting to his presence, right on screen, while the show goes on.  His rampant sexism, his narcissism, and his insecurities are all on display.  The only thing that makes it all tolerable (for me at least) is his general sense of bonhomie--which of course leads to trivialization of political issues, but at least is a nice relief from the bombastic negativism of Fox News, Rush, Tucker, and many of the other talking heads.

Anyway, on the NYT website there's a preview of a Sunday Times Magazine article on Chris Matthews, which exhaustively explores his personality quirks, places it in the context of contemporary political telejournalism, and is chock full of juicy observations by those who know and work with him.  I for one found it to be fascinating, if a bit of a guilty pleasure.  I thought some of you other Tweety-watchers might enjoy it as well.  

Originally posted to Making Sense of Psychiatry on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 07:04 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site