Pass this video along or watch it whenever you need a little pick-me-up.
Better yet, I hope undecided superdelegates watch this and ask themselves: Is this how we're going to win the general election?
The Clinton campaign have moved their goal posts so many times, it's been hard to keep up (sort of like... Iraq?). We're already seeing it now:
"You have to win Indiana," Ford told Barack Obama (via an interview on MSNBC). And, Ford added, Obama has to "steamroll" Clinton in the other state with a primary two Tuesdays from now, North Carolina.
I may be missing something here, but doesn't each contest become a must-win for the one that is behind, and not the one who is ahead?
Clinton supporters are even denying the legitimacy the Texas Caucus :
My observations in Texas were that caucuses were broadly illegitimate. In a few well-run counties, Hillary's caucus vote was the same or better than the popular vote, but in chaotic counties, she fell behind by double digits. While Texas is the only state to have both a binding popular vote and a caucus vote, we saw similar results in Washington State, where Obama's numbers plunged in the unofficial primary compared to the caucuses.
Clinton logic: if I didn't win, it doesn't count.