I just have to get a little peeve off my chest. Something that has been bothering me lately. We have been using the term low information voter to describe some of these voters that are easily swayed by flat wrong facts, or media distractions. This term is not fitting, just as the term, "friendly fire" is not fitting. There is nothing friendly about getting shot accidentally from your own side.
We have been using the name, Low Information Voters, to label people that are easily swayed by viral emails, robocalls, and misleading campaign mailings. I don't think that this label is appropriate, because it implies that the low information is some information, but the problem here isn't that they aren't informed, it is that they are informed by lies, and deceptions, and they are voting according to the misinformation they may have gotten from friends, mailers, and emails. Sometimes these voters are getting too much information, and are confused by what are the real facts. Shouldn't we just call them, Misinformation voters? A few others could be, Out of touch, easily swayed, easily confused, gullible, or just unable to distinguish the difference between propaganda, rhetoric, and fact.