Skip to main content

Don't have a lot of information, but MSNBC just reported that a decision came down against the policy of dismissing military personnel simply because they are gay.  Here's a link

It was just a handful of sentences on a morning news update, but the anchor said the decision didn't overturn don't ask don't tell.  The ruling apparently told the military to actually prove why gays are an institutional detriment to the military.

I'll leave it to you to read the link, but apparently the dissenting judge in the 2-1 decision thought the decision didn't go far enough.  Also, the air woman in the case is a nurse who was given a citation from President Bush in 2003 for her service in Oman supporting OEF and was suspended without pay after eighteen years of service, leaving her two years short of eligibility for retirement benefits.

From my personal experience, we had an obvious homosexual in our hodgepodge reserve unit when I was mobilized two years ago.  He was a supply specialist and despite his obvious homosexuality he was accepted by some of the most conservative members in the enlisted ranks.  He eventually came out to his first sergeant before we were deployed because he couldn't live with the lie and helped us finish up our training and mobilization while his discharge went through.  Beyond the fact that I thought Clinton's don't ask don't tell policy was bullshit when I was twelve, seeing the discriminatory policy in action was a disappointing reminder of the ground we still need to cover in to fight for equality in this country.

this was previously posted here by maxomai

Originally posted to slothlax on Thu May 22, 2008 at 02:19 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site