Skip to main content

People who claim to be upset that the Democratic Party "appointed" Barack Obama are firing away on the blogosphere, wildly claiming that women's rights were violated. And self-righteous and self-serving bloggers, like Larry C. Johnson, try to give these claims some legitimacy.

You can't argue with rants; you cannot reason with those that are unreasonable, but you can point out their historical ignorance. And they've got a doozy of one right now; the current rally cry co-opts and misquotes the words of one of our greatest Americans.

From Larry C. Johnson's "No Quarter," this morning:

“No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her” -Susan B Anthony, 1872.

And it's not just on Johnson's blog you find this quote. Google it and you'll find it's moving rapidly across blogosphere. Problem is, Susan B. Anthony never said that!

This is what Susan B. Anthony said, and it was in regards to the women's suffrage movement:

I have not allied and shall not ally myself to any part or any measure save the one of justice and equality for woman; but the time has come when I strike, and proclaim my contempt for the tricksters who put their political heel on the rights of women at the very moment when their help is most needed. I never, in my whole forty years’ work, so utterly repudiated any set of politicians as I do those Republicans of Kansas. When it is a mere matter of theory, a thousand miles from a practical question, they can resolve pretty words, but when the crucial moment comes they sacrifice us without conscience or honor. The hubbub with the Republicans show they have been struck in the right place. I was never surer of my position that no self-respecting woman would wish or work for the success of a party which ignores her political rights.

This quote comes from pg. 794 from the book, "The Life and Work of Susan B. Anthony," by Ida Husted Harper. It was published in 1898.

If you look at the full context of the quote—without it being co-opted and twisted—it speaks in regard of Anthony's work in the women's rights and suffrage movement and speaks directly at her personal experience with politicians who have tried to deny women their rights, specifically their right to vote.

Today, nobody in the Democratic Party is denying the right of women to vote, nobody in the party is trying to take away from individuals or groups of individuals—whether they be women or minorities—their Constitutional protection to vote. What happened in Michigan and in Florida, were unfortunate events put in place by politicians long before Barack Obama was even considered to be making a serious vie for the Democratic nomination. This was an unfortunate game of chicken where the fat-cat politicians in two large states tried to deny the voters from 90 percent of the states in having a real say in the candidate that we picked as our nominee. In the end, more people voted, and more votes really mattered, than in any other presidential primary season that I can remember.

How would you feel if you were a woman in Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Illinois, North Carolina, etc., if the Democratic leaders of Michigan and Florida had gotten their way and had virtually ended the primary season in the first three weeks? How would you feel if you were a woman in New York and men like Carl Levin, Mark Brewer and Ken Pruitt (a Republican male nonetheless) had cancelled out your vote?

I made calls to Pennsylvania for Barack Obama. I talked to many woman who were excited that, for the first time in their lives, their votes counted. The Pennsylvania primary wasn't an afterthought for the first time in their memory. Some of these women never voted in primaries before because they felt they didn't matter or count. But they voted and they were counted.

The momentum created by having such a large amount of delegates already decided would have virtually ended the primary season for all intents and purposes. But the DNC stopped Florida and Michigan, and in 45 other states, women's votes counted, because a Michigan/Florida early-January juggernaut didn't decide the nomination.

Again, what happened in Michigan and Florida was unfortunate and I hope it never happens again, but please, this was not an attempt to keep women from deciding these primary contests.

Susan B. Anthony, if she were alive today, would have been proud to see that more women had a chance to decide the Democratic nominee for President than ever before. And again, if she were here, she would have been right behind Hillary Clinton on that podium and she would endorse Barack Obama for the presidency.

This diary is cross-posted at my blog Left of the Hudson.

Originally posted to NYaltnews on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:13 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Agreed (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pris from LA

    however, linking to and quoting anti-unity garbage is of questionable value right now.

    The best way to make those folks stfu is for them to hear....crickets.  Outrage only tells them they have hit a nerve and should get louder.  

    I really encourage we reward any anti-unity talk/writing whether it be here or elsewhere with nothing.

    Any attention is better than no attention.

    "He who fears something gives it power over him."--Arab proverb

    by crazyshirley2100 on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:18:19 AM PDT

    •  I'm still worried... (0+ / 0-)

      ...these people haven't given up and I fear that we've got to fight them as we have to fight the Republican Party. In fact, I think that much of this movement comes from the Republican Party. It's not about party unity, it's about maintaining the Democratic Party's reputation as the party for women.

      I'm so bitter that people grimace when they see me walking down the street.

      by Junkyard Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:23:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  My thoughts (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Pris from LA

        I am over 50, was a feminist before it was cool, etc etc, who respects Hillary Clinton and campaigns for Obama.

        Here goes:

        Women, like the many gays who strongly back Clinton, have nowhere else to vote except Obama.  There is no comparison to McCain.  They will complain, they will take their time, but they will vote for Obama.  Freedom of Speech can also be defined as Right to Complain.

        Obama will help this along by continuing to speak admiringly of Clinton and other strong, Democratic women.  (His supporters would be wise to do the same.)  We will see several of these women speaking at the national convention in key spots of honor.  We will see advance publicity of several of these women being given places of importance in the 2009 Democratic posse.

        And life will go on.  

        I wish I were as confident about GLBT.  I do not have the numbers, but how many openly GLBT does Obama have on his campaign staff?  I would like to see some commitment on his part there.

        "He who fears something gives it power over him."--Arab proverb

        by crazyshirley2100 on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:34:17 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  We can't ignore them (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Pris from LA

      We can hold hands and sing kumbaya, but we can't ignore the misinformed voters who are being mislead by a small group of angry, bitter activists. The blogosphere is effectively defining the political discourse, and we should be proud of our work here. However, don't think that others don't understand the power of the keyboard. We have to worry that they may misuse this power.

  •  Tips? (5+ / 0-)

    I'm so bitter that people grimace when they see me walking down the street.

    by Junkyard Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:21:59 AM PDT

  •  Larry Johnson is a liar? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:


  •  While I agree... (0+ / 0-)

    ...that it's pointless to try to pull words written over a century ago out of context to apply to this year's primary election, I'm similarly skeptical of any attempt to predict how Susan B. Anthony would feel about this race were she alive today.

    •  Okay, I see your point about that... (0+ / 0-)

      But that was hyperbole on my part. Basically what I was saying is that the spirit of the women's rights movement should follow Clinton's endorsement of Obama.

      I'm so bitter that people grimace when they see me walking down the street.

      by Junkyard Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 08:46:20 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Hillary Clinton supports Obama (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Junkyard Dem

    so if you respect Hillary Clinton and have been a supporter of Clinton you will support Obama as well.
     If you disrespect Hillary Clinton by not supporting Obama then you never supported Hillary and are not a Democrat.
     Only republicans support McCain.  If you hate Freedom,like to give your money to the very rich,if you like the slaughter of women and children then you vote McCain.
     If you support Freedom,Peace,The Rule Of law,The rights of all people then you Vote Obama.
      McCain = poverty,death and tyranny
       Obama = Freedom,peace,stability,prosperity and Justice
     Mccain calls his wife a cunt and lives off her money.

     Obama loves his wife and shares an equal partnership in life with her.

  •  Back the Democrat (0+ / 0-)

    If Obama lost this primary race, I would have backed Hillary with my own blood if that's what it came to. This election is so important that we need to understand that it is imperative for women to vote for their rights in 2008.

    It's not just Roe v. Wade we're defending, we're defending many smaller, less-known property issues that benefit women as well.

    I'm so bitter that people grimace when they see me walking down the street.

    by Junkyard Dem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:38:25 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site