Skip to main content

Not long ago, in the earlier portion of the Hundred Years War, Edward III of England faced off against Philip VI of France in a battle viewed to be one of the most historically significant of all time.  Near the town of Crécy-en-Ponthieu, two great armies faced off.  I will use my incisive and highly germane skills of political analysis to examine why the English came away with a decisive victory against a numerically superior French force.

First of all King Philip VI failed to prepare adequately for the caucus states, then known as "long bowmen."  Though they had political machines in place -- then known as "Genoese mercenary crossbowmen," the political machines had a much slower rate of fire than the caucus states.

In addition, the early endorsers, then known as "cavalry" were highly vulnerable to the obstacles placed by English soldiers, the "caltrops" we now refer to Internets.

After the political machines were mercilessly slaughtered by the caucus states, the French early endorsers made several ill-fated charges into unfavorable terrain littered with Internets.  Their horses slowed on the Internets and retreating political machines and were easy prey for still more volleys from the caucus states.  The few cavalry that made it through the hail of caucus state fire found themselves disorganized and easy prey for the late endorsing superdelegates, then known as "spearmen."

So in the face of caucus states, Internets and late endorsing spearmen, tens of thousands of political machines and early endorsers fell prey to the English army, and Edward III carried the day.

Originally posted to Anarchofascist on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:53 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site