Skip to main content

Scandals are breaking out everyday.

Monday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a new draft Report and hundreds of documents detailing the extensive contacts and close working relationship between Jack Abramoff, his Team and the Bush White House.

It is rich in scandal details and I could write 20 Diaries about it if I had the time.

This was on the heels of the latest guilty plea in the Abramoff scandal that I wrote about the other day.

I find myself spending time talking to researchers, reporters and sources from Alaska to Florida (and many States in between) and helping them connect the dots.

Time is running short and I need some help.

I need a Research Posse:

dengre research posse

To the Jump...

The corruption of the Bush Administration is breathtaking. And they are only the latest chapter in a 40-year war waged by the Conservative movement to destroy the Government of the United States. This is incompetence by design. It is the Shock Doctrine.

(Those who want to know what we are up against may want to pre-order the new book by Thomas Frank (the author of What’s the Matter with Kansas and a progressive voice on the WSJ opinion page). It is called "The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule" and it will be out in August.)

There is a reason why there is so much Republican Corruption—it is part of their plan.

Jack Abramoff is a key player in this story. For 25 years he was a bag-man for the hard right-wing of the Republican Party. This week’s Report from Waxman’s Committee underscores Jack’s deep ties to the modern Republican Party.

Perhaps Jack said it best when he told Vanity Fair:

"Any important Republican who comes out and says they didn’t know me is almost certainly lying," he says. Such lies are not just, well, lies, but dumb to boot, he adds, for, as his own humiliations suggest, old e-mails never die; they just sit on hard drives, waiting to be subpoenaed and then to be leaked to the press. "This is not an age when you can run away from facts," he declares. "I had to deal with my records, and others will have to deal with theirs."

Since 1999 I had been researching the Republican Culture of Corruption. My entry point was the system of forced sweatshops, prostitution, human trafficking, money laundering and other abuses flourishing on the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). I could not understand how the US Congress was protecting this perversity of the human spirit and American values. Then I found Jack Abramoff, Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich and the gang. The more I dug the more connections I found. Then I began to share my research. Soon, I saw my work being used in books and news reports. When the Abramoff scandal broke in February 2004, my research became used in more outlets. By the 2006 mid-term elections I worked to identify and defeat the Abramoff 65 a group of Republican Candidates tied to Jack Abramoff and the Culture of Corruption.  We won 20 of those seats. We could have won more.

This year is far more intense than the 2006 cycle. Back then, a lot of my effort went into my Dairies about Abramoff that I posted here on Daily Kos. As the 2006 went on, I began to share my research with netroots researches and bloggers as well as campaigns and reporters. In May and June of 2006 I was photocopying thousands of pages of documents and shipping them off (time consuming and expensive).

These days, I have converted tens of thousands of pages of documents to searchable PDFs. I’m adding more pages all the time. I can upload these pages to an online storage site and easily share them as needed.

These documents are in need of deeper level of examination. They are loaded with names, relationships and actions—as well as patterns of behavior—that really should be fed into a database for analysis.

They call out for a Research Posse to help connect the corruption dots to specific Elected Officials, lobbyists and members of the Bush Administration.

I have found that these are scandals hiding in plain sight, but that they take work to expose. These documents are often maps, rosetta stones and clues to scandal that become apparent when compared to other data points in the public record.  

Some scandal details add to the reasons that folks like Doolittle, Young and DeLay are in trouble.

And some times digging through these documents and their relationship to the public record leads you to uncover evidence making a fresh scandal link between a Member of Congress and the Culture of Corruption. A fresh link that is news. For example, in July of 2006, I made such a link to John Sweeney and the story broke in his local papers in October. Sweeney is not in Congress anymore.  With your help we can repeat that success in this cycle.

Between the Republicans running for Congress and the Senate this cycle, there are quite a few connected to the Abramoff Scandal. I could easily put together an Abramoff 50 for 2008 and there is a definite Dirty Dozen that can and should be defeated. I’ve been trying the find the time to put this list together for weeks, months really, but I find that I am pulled away to help this or that active and emerging story. I consider that progress. It means that reporters, researchers and campaigns are more interested into digging into the Culture of Corruption in 2008 than they were in 2006. This is a good thing, even if it means I have less time to post Diaries at DKos.

In 2006, the Republicans invested a lot of time trying to convince everybody that Corruption would not matter (they are at it again this year). In 2006, they were aided by the special election to fill Duke Cunningham’s seat. Francine Busby ran an awful campaign. Among other failings, her people would not hit Bilbray on his ethical lapses and his long-standing ties to Jack Abramoff and corruption. I know this for a fact as I spent much of my time two years ago trying to get somebody, anybody on her campaign to pay attention to my research and Bilbray’s deep, deep ties to Jack and the abuse on the Mariana Islands.

When Bilbray won, the Republican spin was that corruption was a "dead" issue. Perhaps it was years of Pavlovian training that GOP spin must always be accepted or maybe it was something else, but regardless of the cause, many DC Consultants and Democratic Campaigns moved away from using corruption as an issue. Worse, fighting Democrats who were attacking hard on the corruption issue, like Charlie Brown in the CA-04, could not get resources or support from the DNC and DCCC for many, many critical months. With just a little timely support he would have won.

By the fall of 2006, everybody realized that corruption was indeed playing with voters. In election after election it was suddenly the tipping point. My phone was ringing off the hook and my inbox was full with Campaigns looking for last minute ways to tie their Republican opponent to Abramoff and the Culture of Corruption. For many campaigns it was too late. It was an opportunity lost.

We can not repeat that mistake in 2008.  

Now is the time to research the corrupt so they can be exposed before November.

To help expose the wrongdoing of Republican candidates for the Senate, House, Governors and Statehouse, I need a Research Posse.

Join me if you want to do more than complain. Join me if you want to channel your energy into action.

It is way pass time to take this Country back.

This time out, there is also a Presidential election in the mix and John McCain has some explaining to do.

I have written about John McCain’s investigation cover-up of the Abramoff Scandal and I need a Research Posse to expose lying weasel.

For example, I have also written about the 750,000 pages of documents that he gathered in that effort. Far less than 7,000 pages of those documents were ever released. For a while I thought and said that these documents were still in the control of the Senate’s Indian Affairs Committee.

They are not.

I have been looking into the status of these documents and if they will ever be available for review. The news is not good.

McCain released his Report in June of 2006. By August the Committee closed their investigation and transferred the documents to the National Archives. As best I can tell at this moment, the status of the documents is "confidential". That means they will sit sealed in the Archives for 50 years. Then they will be released. There may be some circumstances where some or all of the documents could be released earlier, but it is a long shot.

McCain has covered his tracks.

A fifty year stay in a warehouse is the arrangement that McCain made for these 750,000 pages of documents.

It is an action that is part of his cover-up.

By the time the Democrats took control of the Senate in January 2007, the documents were already gone.

So, what can we do?

A few actions come to mind. The first is not to give up.

All the documents gathered by McCain can still re-acquired through a subpoena. Any current Senate and House Committees could launch a new investigations into the Abramoff scandal and go after them. A real ethics investigation into the complicity of Members of the House, the Senate and their staff would also be good.  Over the last four years massive evidence of corruption has been uncovered. It is clear that Members of Congress and the Senate were breaking the law. And yet, the Ethics Committees of both bodies sit on the sidelines. We should be outraged.

A civil lawsuit by parties with standing could also get some documents released.

And then there is John McCain’s investigation cover-up of the Abramoff Scandal. It is time to push for a fresh examination about what he did and did not do.

We could beg a media outlet to conduct the review. Or we could do it and force them to cover it.

While we do not have the 750,000 pages of documents, there are thousands of documents that are now in the public record.

Some were released by the Senate’s Indian Affairs Committee.

Before they went to cold storage at the National Archives, SIAC shared their documents with the Senate’s Finance Committee which released another Report and more documents.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee relied on fresh subpoenas to gather the research for the Reports and documents they released.

Then there are the CNMI Billing Records released by the CNMI’s Office of Public Auditor.

Then there are many other documents and details that have been released as part of civil and criminal court proceedings.

Finally, there is the public record of news stories and public source documents.

Together, these documents contain the details that prove John McCain’s investigation of Abramoff was a cover-up.

On November 17, 2004 John McCain made a promise to Native American Tribal Leaders:

I pledge, as a member of the Committee on Indian Affairs, that we will not stop until the complete truth is told.

 
He lied.

McCain is using his record on the Abramoff Scandal as proof of his Maverickiness.

It is his "strength" and we can turn it into a weakness just by telling the truth.

There are many documents to go through and details to expose. An open source research effort is needed. Together we can push out details that will force McCain to answer questions about the choices he made when the Abramoff scandal confronted him with clear evidence of corruption. The trail led to his colleagues. The trail led to his President and his Party. John McCain had a choice and the choice he made was to cover it up.

We do not need the 742,000 pages of documents in the National Archives to prove that McCain chose protection of his Party over Justice. The proof is in the record we already have, the details wait for exposure and the dots wait to be connected. You can help. The fact that McCain rushed the documents to the National Archives back in August 2006 is just another cover-up dot to connect.

I have quite a few documents and files. I know others have some that I do not have. We can gather them in one place and start an open source research project. I am certain that there is somebody reading this who knows how an open source research project can be organized—somebody with skills I do not have.

These documents can be compared and connected to details in the public record and there are plenty of great research sources for public information, for example:

The Sunlight Foundation has some great resources listed on their page, Insanely Useful Web Sites. This is a great place for discovering many useful research web sites (follow the link to learn more about: Congresspedia, Contractor Misconduct, DOJ TrainingDB, Earmark Watch, FedSpending, Follow the Money, Govtrack, Government Documents, Legistorm, LOUIS, MapLight, Metavid,  OpenCongress, OpenCRS, Open Hearings, Open Secrets, OS: Lobbyists, OS: Revolving Door, OS: Personal Financial Disclosure, OS: Travel, Project Vote Smart, Taxpayers for Common Sense, TRAC, and WashingtonWatch).

FedSpending, a project of OMB Watch is on the list and this database is very useful for tracking where the money goes.

Open Secrets is another of the sites they list. This is a very rich site with deep details on how gives, who gets, lobbyists, the revolving door, Leadership PACs and much more. It is rich with information.

Capital Eye, their online Newsletter did a great research piece on Abramoff last cycle. It is worth a look, I still use it when I’m researching Congresscritters.

Tax Payers for Common Sense is a great site for researching Earmarks, pork and the wasteful spending of our tax dollars:

Congresspedia is one of the many projects of Source Watch. This is a must visit research site for me (and one day when I have some time, I should add my files and research to the site—perhaps somebody would like to help me do that).

Thomas.gov is the Library of Congress site for information about Congress from  Legislation to the Congressional Record. I go here often.

The Government Printing Office has many other links to Hearings, Legislation, the Congressional Record and other documents like the Federal Registry. Here is the link to the GPO Congressional search page.

The Department of Justice maintains a database of everybody who had to register as a "foreign agent" under the terms of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Many documents cited in a search of the FARA filings can be viewed and downloaded as PDFs. You can search the FARA filings here.

There are many more as well, like Google, Lexis and your local library. Feel free to share your tips and ideas in the comments.

In the years that I have been posting at Daily Kos I have made some great connections and friendships with other citizen researchers/reporters who have followed their own pathways into examining a core sample of the glacier of Republican corruption.

We have an informal network of sharing details. It is time to widen the circle.

When the document dumps came out about the Attorney Scandal there was an effort to connect the dots. It was widespread across the netroots. We need a similar effort to expose McCain’s Abramoff cover-up and expose the Republicans he was protecting.

If you have ideas on next steps or you want to help, let me know. This effort needs a project manager. Perhaps that is you.

I will do what I can to help, but my talents and resources are limited. Together we can do this.

Now is the time.

Stories that are not researched and processed by the end of August will have a hard time impacting this cycle. I wrote about John Sweeney and Jack Abramoff in July 2006 and it took months to get it picked up in a daily newspaper. If I had written that story on Daily Kos in September of October it would not have had time to filter up and impact the race.

Now is the time to dig.

Join me.

And now is the time for me to sign off and answer an email about yet another Republican weasel.

Cheers

Originally posted to dengre on Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 09:58 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Research 101 (37+ / 0-)

    In my work on Abramoff, I have found that it is important to maintain focus: to pick a scandal thread and follow it. See where it goes. See what it connects to and then connect the dots to the larger puzzle.

    Through all the Republican scandals there are some common threads and these are great places to start digging:

    1. It is ALWAYS about Winning Elections.
    Every Republican scandal returns to electoral politics. They are about getting money to fund Republican victories. Most of these funds are off-the-books and hard to find. In fact, I always take any reported donation connected to Jack and his ilk, as being a sign to look for the hidden funds.

    Rove, Abramoff, Norquist, Black, Gillespie and the others were working to establish one-party-rule in the USA. An aspect of every Republican scandal was (and is) how it supported that effort. Finding that link is always important when digging in their scandal droppings.

    2. The Importance of 2002.
    2002 was the year. It was the height of Republican power and the year when they pulled out all stops to win the 2002 midterms. They spent so much money and engaged in wave after wave of dirty tricks and outright illegal actions. Any Republican elected to office in 2002 should be automatically suspect, especially if the race was their first victory to the Senate, House or as a Governor.

    From Texas to New Hampshire to Georgia to Maryland and the rest of the States, 2002 was a banner year for Republican corruption. When I start to look at a Republican running for any seat in 2008, I always ask, "What were they doing in 2002?" The answer to that question often connects them to the web of scandal and shines a light on where to dig.

    [As an aside: NO mention of 2002 is complete without including Iraq. Soon we will come to the 6th anniversary of the vote to authorize the War. This war, like all Republican scandals, was about winning an election. In this case it was the 2002 midterms. It worked. Many Democrats—included a number running for President—voted to endorse this naked electoral power play. Their lack of judgment will always bother me. This war was promoted years ago in a cynical effort to exploit 9-11, appeal to fear and defeat Democrats in November 2002. Since then, everybody seems to be committed to covering up the crass political origins of this disaster. In Washington the cover-up is always worse than the crime and everybody seems to have a stake in covering up the crass domestic political origin of the Iraq War. It was a war promoted to elect Republicans in the 2002 mid-terms. It worked—and then it got out of hand.]

    3. The Importance of Leadership PACS
    When I’m digging into the corruption connections of a given Republican, I always check for their links to Leadership PACS. These "Political Action Committees" are run by Members of Congress, Senators and other elected officials. Their growth tracks with the growth of lobbyist and earmarks in Washington DC. While connected to an elected official, they are called "Leadership PACS" because Party leaders get to influence how and where the money is raised and spent. This was especially true in the DeLay/Hastert Congress.

    Over the last decade "Leadership PACS" have primarily been a Republican tool, with the GOP accounting for roughly 70% of every "Leadership PAC" dollar raised and spent. It helps to think of the system as a series of interconnected money laundering machines. DeLay could direct donations to some Members, while others placed the earmarks the donor wanted as a "favor" for their support. Several donations to each other’s "Leadership PAC" would eventually get the money into the "right" pockets.

    When looking at PAC money received by Republicans candidates it is very common that most of it comes from the Leadership PAC system. It is a system that has survived DeLay’s departure and one that is the fuel of corruption in Washington DC.

    "Leadership PACS" should be banned, but in the meantime, they are a great place to dig for evidence of corruption.

    4. The Importance of Committee Assignments
    Committee assignments are also important. Any Republican House Member serving on the Resources Committee or the Transportation Committee between 1998 and 2006 should be considered as corrupt. These were Abramoff’s piggy banks and Jack was not the only one to use these Committees as ATMs. Members of the Appropriations committee, especially those on subcommittees related to Resources or Transportation, are also suspect.

    Depending upon where you are digging, other committees may also be relevant. It is here, in these committees that most of the "work" to reward political patrons is done. Connecting the dots is hard. Scandals are complicated by design. Focus is important. Pick an issue or an entry point and dig. Soon you will understand.

    5. What Will Rogers said...
    In my youth, I had a double LP of Will Rogers. On one record he was making fun of the Democrats, circa 1933. So many Democrats with so many ideas on how to deal with the Great Depression provided a solid foundation for humor. After a long time of wry comments about the various Democratic factions, Mr. Rogers mentioned the Republicans. He said that they were still there and that they also had a plan. And according to Will Rogers that was the problem—Republicans always had a plan and it was always the same plan and it always went a little like this (forgive my paraphrase):

    "Come on in boys, take anything you want. My back is turned and I ain’t going to look..."

    75 years later, the Republican Party is still running the same game plan. They’ve opened the Federal treasuries to their friends and patrons, they invite thievery and refuse to do oversight. It is a rich scandal environment. I’ve learned to not be surprised by the depth of their corruption—it is astounding.

    These stories need to be told. You can help. It is a way you can leverage your power as a citizen. You can make a difference.

    Pick a spot, grab a shovel and start digging.

    Cheers

    Time to clean up DeLay's petri dish! Help CNMI guest workers find justice! Learn more at Unheard No More.

    by dengre on Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00:48 PM PDT

  •  I Rec'd this before even getting (14+ / 0-)

    to the end - ha.  (Gotta go finish reading it...)

    It's impossible to thank you enough for all the work you have done, and are doing.  I always enjoy your diaries.

  •  all I can do is reccomend and ask others to do so (6+ / 0-)

    My thesis is due in two weeks and I am currently myred in figuring out Spinoza's epistemology

  •  I'm thinkin... (9+ / 0-)

    the work you do is very valuable to this community, and to the larger progressive community...

    the dkos community hired BiPM as a columnist, I'm sure they'd pony up for a research team...

    just throwing it out there...

  •  Personally I will do what I can (12+ / 0-)

    I would love to find a Gordon Smith thread and weave into a nice little cozy linking him to Abramoff.  As much as Gordo loves to golf, has taken several trips to Scotland and has spend over a million on one club, I believe he and Jack have had to have crossed paths at some time in the past. Gordo was out there, with his palms nicely greased...

    -6.25 -5.33 i will veto every single beer - homer mccain

    by dansk47 on Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 10:25:01 PM PDT

  •  I lack time for research these days, but my (9+ / 0-)

    heart is always in marketing anyway. I'm all about branding McCain as George Bush the Third.

    Available at cost right now, will be selling them for more at the convention.

  •  Hmmmmm (8+ / 0-)

    Stevan Pearce, NM-02.

    Elected 2002.  Resources Committee.

    Just beat out Heather Wilson in the primary to run for the Senate seat Domenici's retiring from.  Up against Tom Udall.  Udall's likely to win regardless.  But I suppose there's no harm in looking into his piece of the puzzle a little.

  •  ProPublica is a new organization (9+ / 0-)

    that will be focused on investigative journalism. This is from their About Us page.

    ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that will produce investigative journalism in the public interest. Our work will focus exclusively on truly important stories, stories with "moral force." We will do this by producing journalism that shines a light on exploitation of the weak by the strong and on the failures of those with power to vindicate the trust placed in them.

    Investigative journalism is at risk. Many news organizations have increasingly come to see it as a luxury. Today’s investigative reporters lack resources: Time and budget constraints are curbing the ability of journalists not specifically designated "investigative" to do this kind of reporting in addition to their regular beats. This is therefore a moment when new models are necessary to carry forward some of the great work of journalism in the public interest that is such an integral part of self-government, and thus an important bulwark of our democracy.

    The business crisis in publishing and — not unrelated — the revolution in publishing technology are having a number of wide-ranging effects.  Among these are that the creation of original journalism in the public interest, and particularly the form that has come to be known as "investigative reporting," is being squeezed down, and in some cases out.

    ProPublica is led by Paul Steiger, the former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal. Stephen Engelberg, a former managing editor of The Oregonian, Portland, Oregon and former investigative editor of The New York Times, is ProPublica’s managing editor.

    Lead funding for this effort is being provided by the Sandler Foundation, with Herbert Sandler serving as Chairman of ProPublica; other leading philanthropies also providing important support. A Board of Directors and a Journalism Advisory Board have also been formed.

    ProPublica is headquartered in Manhattan. Our offices are open; a staff is being actively recruited.

    It sounds like your Abramoff work is right up ProPublica's alley. Perhaps they would be interested in a collaborative project with you. The other organization that comes to mind that might be helpful is The Center for Public Integrity. I vaguely recall reading an article about their sophisticated database work a couple of years ago.

    I will happily rec your diary but I am hopeless at even following corruption stories so I would be much more of a hindrance than a help.

    McCain says overturn Roe v. Wade.

    by peraspera on Tue Jun 10, 2008 at 11:16:36 PM PDT

    •  Paul Kiel, formerly of TPM Muckraker, is now (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      peraspera, CodeTalker, nancelot

      at ProPublic. We have been in touch.

      I have pitched the idea of revisiting McCain's "investigation" of Abramoff. I think it would be the type of enterprise story that many media outlets would buy from them.

      ProPublica is an exciting project and I have been in touch with CPI as well. It may be possible that I will get somebody to bite on this story.

      Thanks for your suggestions, they help turn the wheels in my brain.

      Cheers

      Time to clean up DeLay's petri dish! Help CNMI guest workers find justice! Learn more at Unheard No More.

      by dengre on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:40:22 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Maybe 2002 cohort diary series (7+ / 0-)

    would be a good way of organizing the talent and energy here. The diarist picks a subject and teases up a handful of tentative connections. The readers swarm the internets and pull together the support to follow the most promising threads. I'm thinking something like the Gannon research, but made regular by the serial nature of the diaries.  While we tyically expect Dengre diaries to have the connections made and the documenting links in place, the series diaries would start with questions and speculations, and the evidence and substance would be found in the comments.

    It would need a sexy name too.

  •  I would like to help (8+ / 0-)

    but I'm not exactly sure where to start.

    I've always been pretty good at tracking down little threads that sometimes lead to big balls of yarn. My BA is in journalism, so I've done investigations of records and such, and I have an MA in English, which involved lots of research in documents and libraries.

    I know HOW to research, but I don't know WHAT you want us to research.

    I'm not an organizer, but if you point me in the right direction, I might be able to find out something to contribute to your efforts.

  •  My problem is (5+ / 0-)

    ... I need to get "McDooduck" in trouble.

    Of course, I am always an optimist ; )

    In the meantime, since the MSM has practically been blacking out the Democrat here in the race,  it's also important to write about the actual candidate.

    Don't forget that other versions of Abramoff are no doubt working now, and it would be good to catch them during instead of after.

  •  As an open source research project (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    peraspera, nancelot

    how would that work?
     Are these materials all digitized? On DVD's that can be mailed?
    .... and available to....but who? Everybody...including researchers, reepers, and monkeywrenchers?

    Or selected (how?) individuals, known here only by user names.

     If an online only  database it would need to be hosted someplace secure and widely distributed, right?

    How about Kos's server farm?

     I have a good intuition for this kind of thing, but little political research experience. I'm in, but worry I may just come up with interesting FUD.
     Send me my secret handshake...I'll do what I can...

    Add 60 and yahooo to my user name.

    Meatwad (R) for pResident.

    by KenBee on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 12:58:47 AM PDT

  •  Republicans are Sloppy (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CodeTalker, nancelot

    They ALWAYS leave a trail.

    Remember, THEY hate us for our Freedom! The freedom for the President to do as he damn well pleases.

    by Tuba Les on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 02:34:20 AM PDT

  •  As I've mentioned before.... (4+ / 0-)

    if you need help with statistical analysis or creating graphs, shoot me an e-mail

  •  If you are in the DC area (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    peraspera, nancelot

    we could talk this evening.

    I will be at the gathering for Barry Welsh that TeacherKen has written about.

    Here are the details: Hawk 'n Dove at 329 Pennsylvania Ave SE, from 5-7:30 this evening.

    Cheers

    Time to clean up DeLay's petri dish! Help CNMI guest workers find justice! Learn more at Unheard No More.

    by dengre on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 04:56:21 AM PDT

  •  Have you checked with (0+ / 0-)

    the folks at epluribusMedia ? They seemed to coalesce after the Gannon thing that SusanG started. I've been swamped with other "life demands", and haven't been to their site for a while, but I'm thinking those folks have all the tools in place and they've got the drill down.

  •  corruption in the CNMI (0+ / 0-)

    It's not over. It doesn't just start and end with Jack Abramoff. You obviously know that. I'm glad you're pursuing more threads, getting help, organizing.

    While you're doing that, would you please also look into WESPAC-a federal agency with huge amounts of money and huge amounts of control and huge amounts of influence-and from what I'm seeing in the CNMI right now, I suspect huge amounts of corruption. And this not only eats away our soul, it is also ruining our environment beyond repair.

    Just while you're looking anyway...

    And thanks for all you do.

    •  WESPAC is a major scandal (0+ / 0-)

      I've been working to get some attention paid to it.

      The same family that ran the sweatshops of Saipan is running the massive long line fishing fleets out of China and FSM. They oppose a Marine monument in the CNMI (but you know that). This is a rich and current scandal thread.

      I should mention that I am also working on several plans to get financing to the CNMI through micro-credit lending and other avenues.

      It is not enough to win a Legislative victory. We must pay attention and help all off the peoples on the islands of the Western Pacific have a sustainable economy.

      Feel free to contact me if you want an offline update.

      Cheers

      Time to clean up DeLay's petri dish! Help CNMI guest workers find justice! Learn more at Unheard No More.

      by dengre on Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 08:26:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site