This is the first time in my life that I have ever agreed with the often contemptuous Dick Morris. So, just this one time, Dick Morris gets my respect. It's scary! Read down to the bottom highlighted portion of Morris' editorial for the reason that Bush is doing this. It's not at all shocking!
Why is Bush Entertaining Abu Dhabi Crown Prince?
A Commentary By Dick Morris
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Why is the president of the United States entertaining Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince, Sheik Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, at Camp David when his own State Department has singled out the Sheik’s homeland, the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), for its continuing violations of human rights?
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/...
I never usually quote entire articles, and I won't here, but go to the link and read the whole article, it's worth reading...it's a clear window into the Bush hypocrisy that runs his foreign policy agenda and a snapshot of why Bush lost all credibility at home and through-out the world:
Abu Dhabi is one of seven oil-rich — and anti-Israel states — in the United Arab Emirates. Using its massive sovereign wealth fund of over $875 billion, Abu Dhabi has been gobbling up American assets, buying considerable stakes in U.S. businesses like Citigroup, the Carlyle Group, Advanced Micro Devices, and Toll Brother and is now bidding on the Chrysler Building.
At the same time, the U.S. Department of State has singled out the U.A.E. for its continuing violation of human rights. Here’s what it said in its latest report for 2007:
"Citizens did not have the right to change their government. In some cases, security forces reportedly employed flogging as judicially sanctioned punishment. Arbitrary detention and incommunicado detention remained problems..."
"The judiciary lacked full independence. The government restricted civil liberties, including freedoms of speech, press (including the Internet), assembly, association, and religion. There were limited reports of corruption, and the government lacked transparency."
"Domestic abuse of women remained a problem, and there were allegations that it was sometimes enabled by police. Trafficking in women and children and legal and societal discrimination against women and non-citizens also remained problems."
"The government severely restricted workers' rights, and the abuse of foreign domestic servants remained a problem...Political organizations, political parties, and trade unions are illegal."
Last year, Sheik Mohammed was dismissed from a Houston lawsuit brought by a former adviser to the U.A.E. royal family, alleging that he aided and abetted his brother Sheik Issa in brutal torture and false imprisonment. Without ruling on the merits of the plaintiff’s claims, the Court held that Sheik Mohammed had sovereign immunity and could not be tried because, among other things, such torture had not been demonstrated to be illegal in the U.A.E.
And, apparently, torture it was: tapes provided to the Associated Press "showed a man who appeared to be Sheik Issa beating another man with lumber, firing an automatic weapon into the sand around him and forcing an apparent cattle prod into his anus. The victim also appeared to have been partly run over by a SUV and had salt poured on his wounds... Lawyers said the video also showed the victim's genitals being lit on fire. They said the abuse began because the sheik felt he had been overcharged in a grain deal."
The U.A.E. does not permit Israeli citizens to enter the country and gives special scrutiny to those with Israeli stamps on their passports. Here’s what the U.S. State Department reported on institutionalized anti-Semitism:
"There was a small resident non-citizen Jewish population of unknown size. There were no synagogues. There were no reported acts of physical violence against or harassment of Jewish persons, however, anti-Semitism in the media was present in articles and editorial cartoons, which depicted negative images of Jews. ."
So why is the Crown Prince at Camp David? Maybe they’re talking about the obscene price of oil. Or, if history is any guide, one outcome of the visit might be a big donation to the George W. Bush Presidential Library. If Bush follows Clinton’s example — and his own father’s — he’ll be spending a lot of time at Camp David with prospective rich donors in the next six months.
One thing that is likely missing from the agenda is a discussion of human rights.
Now...I clearly remember George "W"orthless Bush in many Rose Garden speeches talking about democracy in Iraq, and how we're helping to create a "new democratic Middle East". So does this count? Entertaining the Crown Prince and dictator of Abu Dhabi at Camp David? Was it also helpful to walk hand in hand, kissing the lips of the Saudi Arabian Prince when he visited Bush on several occasions? Saudi Arabia is another country that is a brutal dictatorship. They jail and beat women "for" being raped. The Saudi's don't allow women to drive. They can't expose their faces nor can they speak to men. They must walk behind their husbands. Anti-semitism is "taught" in schools. The Saudi's raise cash for Palestinian suicider's families. 19 of the hijackers and perpetrators of 9-11 came from Saudi Arabia. Now, George Bush rewards both countries for their "dedication" to democracy and justice and equality for all. George Bush is a disgusting pig! He speaks out of both sides of his mouth, is hypocritical to the Nth degree and lies like a rug.
Remember the U.S. Port scandal two years ago involving Abu Dhabi and the UAE? Remember how Bush tried to give away our port security to the very people he shouldn't have even considered giving away part of our national security to? Bush was planning his library from the moment he was appointed President and the Arabs figured very highly into his donor list. While Bush "yaps" about bringing democracy to Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries, he stomps all over our own Constitution and rewards leaders and heads of state who continue to torture and rule over countries who afford their citizens no civil rights, whatsoever.
Dick Morris gets a high five for me for bringing this story to the fore. Im no fan of Dick Morris, he's always self serving and loves to conquer by division, but he's absolutely correct in this editorial. Hats off to Morris, for the first and probably the last time!