Skip to main content

As a former journalist and someone who was at the Unity convention that John Kerry and President Bush spoke at in 2004, I'm highly offended by this story.

Now, I will admit that the story seems to be well-written and mostly even handed. I will also admit when I was a journalist I wasn't very good at it and left the industry three years ago. So take this criticism for whatever it's worth.

The writer says that four minority organization are "largely Democratic" which, in my estimation, is probably true but he doesn't cite any statistic to back this assumption up. Also I'm glad he interviewed Leonard Pitts, who is one of my heroes, and made the most coherent arguments in the article. I would have put his quotes higher but I realize this my have been an editing decision.

I'm offended by the premise. I mean, just look at this title "Can minority journalists resist applauding Obama?" What the tarnation!?!?

This is offensive on many levels. And I'll use two antidotes to explain why.

Back when I just entered the industry, I was working for a small daily in a Southern state. Days after 9/11 I came to work wearing a Mecca sweater. Mecca was a popular brand at the time and the sweater was relative tame. It was tan and bland. I had a superior come to me and admonish me for wearing it fearing "some would take it the wrong way." Like how I asked? Would they assume I was a Muslim? If so, why is that a problem?

A few years after that I was at Unity and there was a panel of embedded war reporters. I asked one of the reporters at any time were they pressured to not cover certain stories or slant their stories a certain way -- something we would all learn not only had happened but happened systematically and on a large scale. He responded with an arrogant and pompous answer -- he cared more about the soldiers and their stories and not the critics of the war. In short, he brought the war rationale hook, line and sinker.

I guess my point is that in most cases newsrooms are ran, for the most part, by old white people. In both these instances, my superior and the war reporter, were older white people. And for the most part these people, like most, we're traumatized by the events of 9/11. Did anyone ask if these people could stop applauding or cheerleading the run-up to the war? Why is there an article that details whether minorities have the right to applaud someone?

I had another conservation with an editor of mine when I was working for a small daily in the Midwest. He's an older white guy who I respect a lot as a man and a journalist. He was also at Unity with Sen. Kerry and Pres. Bush. He said he thought it was a bit rude that the crowd didn't enthusiastically applaud Bush. I told him my opinion. First of all, as a black man, it's hard to applaud for a man who has demonized you as a either a criminal that needs to be punished or a pampered unqualified fool who can flash his platinum "race card" instantly and get anything he wants. Second of all, he didn't really take any questions from the crowd and he WAS AT A JOURNALIST CONFERENCE. Kerry did. Lastly, and more importantly, journalists are a tough crowd. We're trained to spot B.S. quickly. If you don't have anything of substance to say, it's not incumbent upon us to validate you.

The article makes a good point. We shouldn't just heap praise on anyone. And journalists should be objective in their stories. But in their clapping patterns as well? Are other journalists held to this standard? Do we question white journalists and their intentions or their clapping patterns? Did we question the overwhelmingly white "journalists" (and I do use that term lightly) at CPAC when Sen. McCain and Pres. Bush spoke there in February? Just seems like a weird question to ask. Almost like these journalists couldn't possibly be applauding this man because he's a qualified, skilled politician with a riveting ability to connect with audiences. No that couldn't possibly be it. Most be something else. This is what offends me.

Something that else that bothers me in this article is that some of the most disparging comments about "groupies" and "throwing panties on the stage" come from members of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and Native American Journalists Association. The quotes were almost set up as if it was sour grapes. In my experience at Unity, both of these organizations have gone out of their way to colloborate with the National Association of Black Journalists and vice versa. I'm not saying that their quotes are invalid or mean-spirited but I would like to have some type of context.

Ultimately, I think Leonard Pitts had the appropriate response.

"It's asking a little bit much to ask a room full of African-American journalists, or a room full of journalists of color, who have seen people like them and probably seem themselves excluded many times on the basis of color, not to have some sort of emotional reaction to the success of the person who may arguably become the first African-American president," said Pitts, who is black.

"Barack Obama is the Jackie Robinson of our era," said Pitts, the columnist. "There's no getting around that, there's no asking people not to respond to that. ... Journalists are recruited from the human race. And as long as they're recruited from the human race they're going to have emotions, and they're going to have feelings."

Originally posted to groove2227721 on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 12:13 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Can we resist the impulse to compare Obama... (4+ / 0-)

    to black figures of the past?

    Barack Obama is an inimitable figure.  He is an extraordinary man (period).

  •  Why should they have to resist? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mariva, Naniboujou, mama hearts obama

    Barack Obama is not simply a presidential candidate he is the first minority candidate to actually have a chance to succeed.

    Requiring minority journalist to overlook or underplay their enthusiasm is just ridiculous.  The whole premise should be for them to take this opportunity and ask questions about issues that the MSM overlooks.

    I think most of the journalists in attendance will totally understand the magnitude of the event and the candidate.

    The Truth is nonpartisan!

    by fedupcitizen on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 12:28:30 PM PDT

  •  FWIW, if I attend an event as a blogger, (0+ / 0-)

    I don't applaud. If I was being actually paid as a journalist, I wouldn't applaud and I'd de-register as a Democrat, becoming a decline to state" voter. And I's have to quit contributing to people I like.

    Also, I fixed your tags. Here are the tag guidelines.

    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. -8.25, -6.21

    by Jacques on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 12:44:18 PM PDT

    •  That may work for you but let's not fool (0+ / 0-)

      ourselves no such questions are being asked about white journalist and John McCain.

      It  is indicative of when John McCain went to the NAACP and the MSM journalist reported that African Americans were cordial to McCain.

      It was like they expected some type of disrespectful behavior.  Even if they disagreed they knew John McCain was speaking and went to hear him although many will vote for Obama.

      So now there is a question of how responsive professional minority journalist will be to Obama?

      It is a fabricated issue as far as I am concerned/

      The Truth is nonpartisan!

      by fedupcitizen on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 02:38:27 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  It really does make you wonder... (3+ / 0-)

    Why do white males clap for white men?  
    Why do white males vote for white males?
    Why do white men marry white women?  
    Why do white men go to white churches?
    The list goes on and on and on...

    I think we need to ask them that each and every time they demonstrate that "white" behavior.

    God, I miss Paul Wellstone.

    by Naniboujou on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 12:52:31 PM PDT

  •  Nice diary (0+ / 0-)

    but I have to let you know you have a really glaring typo.  It's "anecdotes" not "antidotes" and you can change it if you wish.

    Your political compass Economic Left/Right: -6.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.67

    by bythesea on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 03:33:52 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site