Skip to main content

The DOJ's report (compiled by the Office of Professional Responsibility and the Office of the Inspector General) on politicized hiring practices contains a politically explosive finding that could be a valuable weapon in the Democrats' arsenal against the Republican party as we prepare for the fall elections.

The particular findings of the report are generally as we expected... that Monica Goodling, Kyle Sampson and other Bush administration appointees violated federal law and Justice Department policy on two separate fronts:

  1. By using inappropriate political and ideological tests in hiring career U.S. attorneys and assistant U.S. attorneys; and
  1. Lying to investigators.

But the most potentially explosive finding has nothing to do with the violations of federal law itself, as damaging (and horrific) though that is.  In the midst of the recommendations, there is a paragraph (see the second full paragraph on p. 136 of the report, which you can find here) that should send chills through every Republican politician (or even every Democratic one) that has tied itself to the Bush administration's policies on fighting terror:

In addition, we determined that Goodling often used political or ideological affiliations to select or reject career attorney candidates for temporary details to Department offices, including positions in EOUSA that had not been filled by political appointees. Goodling’s use of political considerations in connection with these details was particularly damaging to the Department because it resulted in high-quality candidates for important details being rejected in favor of less-qualified candidates. For example, an experienced career terrorism prosecutor was rejected by Goodling for a detail to EOUSA to work on counterterrorism issues because of his wife’s political affiliations. Instead, EOUSA had to select a much more junior attorney who lacked any experience in counterterrorism issues and who EOUSA officials believed was not qualified for the position.

Folks, there's your money quote.  Bush appointees deliberately threatened national security for political purposes.

Anyone who has been promoting Republicans and the Republican Party as the better, safer hands in the waging of the War on Terror needs to be confronted by this finding.  The plain fact is, as we have known all along, the Bush administration and the Republican political machine that operates it, have been engaged in a systematic fraud on the American people.  

Far from fighting terrorism, the entire U.S. counter-terrorism operation at all levels has been a funnel through which taxpayer dollars, government jobs, and political favours can be funnelled to political friends.  The DOJ Report confirms this once again, on another front.  All there in black and white.

Originally posted to Tybalt on Mon Jul 28, 2008 at 08:50 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site