Skip to main content

Two years ago I published a bunch of diaries on Senate races, with elaborate graphs.  


 1.  I gathered polling data from and from brownsox's summaries.  I only included polls in 2008.
 2.  I assigned the undecided in two ways: 60% to the challenger (per general practice) and 50-50.  The first method is represented by solid boxes.  The latter method by hollow dots.  

 3.  I then added loess lines to all 4 series of boxes: Solid lines for the solid boxes, dotted lines for the hollow dots.  Good descriptions of loess (aka local regression) are here  (technical notes on local regression)

Some notes:
 1.   For any poll and for either method, the percentages add to 100.  
 2.  If the hollow box is far from the solid box, then there are a lot of undecideds. has its own charts, and there's nothing wrong with them.  I like mine better.  First, they have more information. I show different outcomes with different divisions of the undecided.  Second, I like my smooths better.  Third, I assign the undecideds, making things a little less choppy.  

there are  races, below the fold

There are now 15 states where the Senate race is judged by 538 to not be "safe". :
Nate Silver (aka poblano) rates these as

Safe Dem takeover: VA, NM
Likely Dem: AK, NH, NJ
Lean Dem: CO
Tilt Dem: none
Tilt Repub: none
Likely GOP: ID, TX, ME, KY, GA

Note that 14 of these (all but NJ) are currently Republican held

Since I have little interest in figuring out whether, e.g. John Kerry wins by 30 points or 40 points, I confine my analysis to these 15.

Nothing new since last time.  This is pretty close to 'safe', unless somehow Stevens wins the primary (very likely), goes to trial (somewhat likely), and gets acquitted before the election (not too likely)

Udall continues to gain on Schafer.  Also looking very good.

poblano now lists this one as "likely GOP":
Martin is gaining, fast.  No new polls since last time.


Still not many polls --- it doesn't look very promising, but you never know; lots of undecided voters (note that I had to change the scale!)



No new polls since last time. McConnell (R) is expanding his lead over Lunsford.  This is starting to look very difficult

Louisiana (note that 538 now has this as "safe Dem")

No new polls since last time, this is now looking safer than a few weeks ago


Also nothing new since last time.  Allen (D) has stopped making up ground against Collins (R).  Still, he isn't losing any ground, and the lead is only about 10 points.


Another with no new polls. Franken (D) appears to have stopped the decline and is now making up ground against Coleman (R).  This is looking more competitive.



The new polls here are bad for our side.... MS was always a bit of a longshot.

New Hampshire

Shaheen (D) has a fairly steady lead over Sununu (R), and new polls confirm it.  Probably our fourth most likely pickup (after VA, NM and AK) or maybe fifth (CO)

New Jersey

This looks pretty safe, to me.

North Carolina

Hagan (D) continues gaining ground on Dole (R), and is now slightly ahead!.


No new polls. After showing steady gains in the early part of the year, Merkley (D) has stopped gaining. But it's close, and November is still a ways off.  


Cornyn has a considerable lead over Noriega... and nothing is changed in the newest poll


Gaining exactly          Chance
2                         0.04%
3                         0.71%
4                         5.14%
5                        17.88%
6                        31.02%
7                        25.95%
8                        13.90%
9                         4.24%
10                        0.92%
11                        0.19%
12                        0.01%

Originally posted to plf515 on Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 10:12 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site