Skip to main content

The other day, I had a common experience. I was driving behind a pick-up truck, whose entire back window was covered with an image of the American flag, with a large bald eagle in the middle. I drew the conclusion anyone else would draw: I imagined I could make a shrewd guess about the political views of the driver.

As common as this experience is, we should not lose sight of the fundamental fact: the appropriation of the most common patriotic symbols by the right has been a strategic disaster for the left.The fact that the right has co-opted the flag and the eagle (see The Colbert Report) has resulted in a situation in which the use of those symbols by anyone on the left appears incongruous, even somewhat insincere. For once they come to represent a particular political ideology, it makes it seem peculiar for people with a quite different ideology to prominently display them. This leads quite directly to ridiculous episodes concerning lapel pins, and to repeated insinuations that the left is not really "patriotic". However idiotic these episodes may seem, they work. There are people who are influenced in their views by these sorts of symbolic gestures.

So far, this diary may seem to be like one about the weather: everyone complains but no one does anything about it. It is time to do something about it. And there is something we can do. All it takes is a collective act of will.

How can progressives close the "patriotic symbol" gap that conservatives have so effectively created? There is no way to take back the flag and the eagle: they have been so thoroughly "branded" right-wing that no amount of concerted effort will undo the damage. What we need is a patriotic symbol that has not been co-opted by the right, one that is not associated with policies  and ideologies we reject. But one that is clearly and unabashedly patriotic. I have a suggestion.

We the People. The first words of the Constitution, in their iconic script. Simple, dignified, unassailable. We the People on bumperstickers, T-shirts, and, yes, lapel pins. A symbol not tied to a particular campaign or a particular candidate, a symbol that can be used forever. A symbol more direct and contentful even than the flag: the flag symbolizes something, but the Constitution is the thing it symbolizes. And a symbol than will never be co-opted by the right. It is all too easy to incite people to shred the Constitution while waving the flag; it would be impossible to incite people to shred the Constitution while waving the Constitution!

All it would take to implement this idea is the will to implement it. If a large group of people decide they want We the People paraphenalia, the market will respond of its own accord. (Actually, the market would have some work to do- a quick search of the tubes failed to turn up a decent, simple We the People lapel pin.) What it takes is nothing more than a collective decision, by enough people all at once, and the left can have a patriotic symbol that had not been imbued with suggestions of right-wing views.

Perhaps concern about patriotic symbolism– or symbolism in general– seems shallow. But one cannot deny that symbolism of this kind is effective. It promotes solidarity, it allows people to display their feelings and take comfort in seeing the displays of others. Back in the day, the left was very, very good at symbols: there was both the peace symbol and the peace sign; there was the use of "Ms." to proclaim a commitment to gender equality. Indeed, the most plausible explanation for why the left got out of the symbol business is because the right got so heavily into it. But this has led to unilateral disarmament on the symbolic patriotism front. We can change all that. All we have to do is decide to do it.

Originally posted to twem on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 09:23 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I hope it works... (0+ / 0-)

    ...but three words is a little too much for the American attention span. By the time we  get to "people", we've forgotten the "We".

    I think the flag is still salvageable.

    "It is often pleasant to stone a martyr, no matter how much we admire him"...John Barth

    by Giles Goat Boy on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 09:31:49 AM PDT

  •  I Wear A Flag Pin Next To My Obama Button (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Indie Tarheel

    I thought of this several months ago and Gary Hart wrote an essay about taking back our symbols of patriotism on Huffington let's do it!!

  •  yesterday I saw a cup labled "patriotic" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    it had red and white stripes.  As it was in a dollar store, it was almost certainly made in China.

    I though about what an odd culture we live in, where someone might be considered patriotic for displaying such a cup, but not necessarily for doing something to help the country, like volunteering.

  •  The constitution as a symbol is fine, (0+ / 0-)

    But as retired military, I will let NO ONE take from me the right to embrace the flag that I served under.  The whole meme works because WE LET IT.

    A casual inquiry of those who display the flag may not necessarily bring you the results you assume.  To paraphrase Obama, there is no red partiotism, there is no blue patriotism, there is AMERICAN patriotism.

    The 2008 Presidential election is now nothing less than a referendum on the intellect of the American electorate.

    by Indie Tarheel on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 10:30:43 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site