Just when I thought my outrage fatigue would prevent me from being appalled at any new Bush appointee behavior, one of them refuses to provide Senator Dorgan with statistics on the number of criminal cases the DOJ is refusing to prosecute on Indian reservations.
If you remember, this issue was at the forefront of Amnesty International's report Maze of Injustice: The Failure to Protect Indigenous Women from Violence, which documented the appalling rates of sexual violence against Native American women, and the fact that the U.S. rarely prosecutes these cases, since most of the perpetrators are non-Native and the FBI therefore is in charge of deciding whether to prosecute them or not.
While it would be naive to think that Congress was unaware of this problem, considering that it had been reported to our representatives for years, Senator Dorgan must be commended for taking action after the Amnesty report made the wider public aware of this national disgrace. On Thursday he held one of several hearings on the issue.
P.S. Obama has promised to make Indian issues a priority in his administration (see video below), so I'm hoping we see some more excitement for his candidacy in Indian Country this voting season.
When we talk about Native American women's issues, on of the most important issues that arises is that crimes against women, specifically rape, are common, and rarely prosecuted. It was this community's collective outrage at this that led us to rescue a women's shelter on the Standing Rock Reservation, Pretty Bird Woman House.
On Thursday, at a hearing at the Subcommittee on Indian Affairs, Senator Dorgan, the committee chair, suggested to the U.S. Attorney for North Dakota, Drew Wrigley, who is a Bush nominee, that prosecuting crime was a low priority for the Bush Administration. Wrigley disputed the idea. What was his argument? Here's the account from an Indianz.com story
He said "zero" percent of Indian cases are declined due to lack of resources.
Then he proceeded to refuse to provide Senator Dorgan with statistics on just how many crimes the DOJ is refusing to prosecute in Indian Country,
But Wrigley, who was nominated by President Bush, defended the department's decision to withhold data that would explain why cases are declined. He said providing the information would mislead the public and jeopardize criminal investigations.
Other committee members weren't convinced. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the vice chair, said the data will help improve law enforcement in Indian Country because it can shed light on areas of the system that need to be fixed.
...snip...
But Wrigley refused to agree there is a "problem" with the criminal justice system on reservations. "We don't know how to help you," said [Senator] Tester of the refusal to provide information about declinations.
From the Argus Leader:
According to a database maintained by Syracuse University and cited by committee chairman Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., U.S. attorneys failed to prosecute 50 percent of murder and manslaughter cases committed on Indian reservations from 2004 to 2007, 58 percent of serious assaults, 72 percent of child sex crimes and 76 percent of sex crimes involving adults.
"Is there any wonder that many Native Americans have lost faith in the criminal justice system?" asked Dorgan, who threatened to subpoena the Justice Department to get the information. "This is a national disgrace, and it has to be dealt with."
..snip..
Overall, the violent crime rate on reservations is twice the national average, and methamphetamine addiction rates are three times higher, according to the committee. Meanwhile, fewer than 3,000 tribal and federal law enforcement officials patrol more than 56 million acres, less than half of the police presence in comparable non-Indian communities nationwide.
"(Violent crime) is one of the reasons we don't have economic development on reservations like we should have," said Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a committee member.
A national disgrace indeed. When I see how DOJ treats crime on Indian reservations I am often incredulous that we can tolerate this in the 21st Century. It is testimony to how invisible the Native American population has been to the rest of this country. THAT is the biggest disgrace of them all.
Now, considering the fact that Syracuse University has a Transitional Records Access Clearinghouse on cases the DOJ declines to prosecute, I wonder why the Bush Administration is refusing to provide information from the DOJ. Perhaps by refusing to confirm the data, it maintains some deniability, but really, this is just another lame and contemptuous Bushite thumbing his nose at the Congress, while continuing to fail at his job.
If you're interested in why getting the whole picture is so important, the Amnesty International testimony at the hearing did a good job of explaining the problem. I received it by email on Wednesday afternoon:
<span style="font-weight:bold;">
Declining to Prosecute: The Failure to Protect Native Women from Sexual Violence in the United States </span>
"<span style="font-style:italic;">To a sexual predator, the failure to prosecute sex crimes against American Indian women is an invitation to prey with impunity.</span>" - Dr. David Lisak, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Massachusetts
In April 2007 Amnesty International released a report entitled "Maze of Injustice: The failure to protect Indigenous women from sexual violence in the USA". Research on the sexual assault and rape of Native American women was initiated upon learning of U.S. Department of Justice statistics indicating that Native American and Alaska Native women are more than 2.5 times more likely than other women in the United States to be raped. According to these statistics, more than 1 in 3 Native American and Alaska Native women will be raped in their lifetimes, and 86 percent of the perpetrators of these crimes are non-Native men.
In order to achieve justice, Native American survivors of sexual violence frequently have to navigate a maze of tribal, state and federal law. Currently, tribal courts do not have authority to prosecute non-Native perpetrators meaning that only federal prosecutors can pursue such cases. Amnesty International’s research suggests that prosecutions for crimes of sexual violence against Native American women are rare in federal courts.
The lack of comprehensive and centralized data collection by federal agencies renders it impossible to obtain accurate statistics about prosecution rates for crimes of sexual violence against Native women. Amnesty International sent questionnaires to the 93 individual US Attorneys who prosecute crimes within Indian Country at the federal level seeking information on prosecution rates for crimes of sexual violence committed against Native American women. Amnesty International was informed by the Executive Office of US Attorneys that individual US attorneys would not be permitted to participate in the survey. The Executive Office for US Attorneys did provide Amnesty International with a list of some of the cases of sexual violence arising in Indian Country that had been prosecuted in recent years. Of the 84 cases provided, only 20 involved adult women. The remaining cases mostly involved children. In the cases listed, prosecutions for sexual violence against adult Native American women took place in only eight of the 93 districts, and only Arizona and South Dakota saw more than two.
While data on sexual violence specifically from Indian Country is not compiled, from October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003, federal prosecutors declined to prosecute 60.3 per cent of sexual violence cases. These statistics include all cases involving Native and non-Native victims, nevertheless, the numbers provide some indication of the extent to which these crimes go unpunished. Significantly, between 2000 and 2003, the Bureau of Indian Affairs was consistently among the investigating agencies with the highest percentage of cases declined by federal prosecutors.
Congress should develop comprehensive plans of action to stop violence against American Indian women and ensure that survivors have access to justice.
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Key Recommendations: </span>
* Federal authorities should, in consultation with Native American peoples, collect and publish detailed and comprehensive data on rape and other sexual violence that shows the Indigenous or other status of victims and perpetrators and the localities where such offences take place, the number of cases referred for prosecution, the number declined by prosecutors and the reasons why.
* Prosecutors should vigorously prosecute cases of sexual violence against Native American women, and should be sufficiently resourced to ensure that the cases are treated with the appropriate priority and processed without undue delay. Any decision not to proceed with a case, together with rationale for the decision, should be promptly communicated to the survivor of sexual violence and any other prosecutor with jurisdiction.
As with everything else, an Obama Administration will be a breath of fresh air. Here he promises to prioritize issues important to First Americans: