Daily Kos

Imagine Life Differently: New Year's Resolution revisited

Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:03:32 AM PDT

Who could've thunk it?

GHW Bush lies at the core of a driving motivation in my life.

The eldest President Bush was facing a reelection battle against Bill Clinton, and so advisers persuaded him to attend the world environmental summit in Rio de Janeiro, possibly the most optiistic moment in recent history.  Before he went, however, he told a press conference that "the American way of life is not up for negotiation."  If that's true, if we can't imagine living any differently, then all else is mere commentary.

One thing that unites Kossacks is our drive to imagine a different life, a different world, a better one, a better path forward ... and we all, in our own ways, fight to achieve those visions.  

I am imagining life differently. One path terrifies me.   am terrified at the world that we are creating at a head-long pace.  Global Warming ... I am terrified at economic prospects in coming years ... Peak Oil.  

And, I imagine life differently and it energizes me to fight to Energize America.

The quote comes from the 2006 paperback edition of Bill McKibben's The End of Nature. Put simply, The End of Nature should be required reading of all Americans, perhaps as a core part of High School 'global citizenship' programs that would help understand the interactions of our lives with those around us (human and otherwise), today and into the future, and how these feed back to affect our own lives (out into the future).  

The End of Nature is about Global Warming. Published first in 1989, it was the first mass accessible book about Global Warming.  "The End of Nature" refers to McKibben's (convincing) thesis that atmospheric changes due to CO2 (and related GHG) emissions have eliminated the concept of "untouched" wilderness and wrecked the notions of the constants of nature so central to core concepts of the world. (And, if serious in 1989, nearly 20 years later we are in a far worse situation for action as per Bill's latest article.) McKibben calls on us (US) to think differently to try to avert the consequences he (and many experts) saw looking into the future.

In particular, my "imagine life differently" focus relates to Peak Oil and Global Warming.  My casual concerns over these have, thanks to learning sparked by the likes of Jerome a Paris, Devilstower, Meteor Blades, Chapter1, BruceMcF, APSmith, and so many others here, turn to varying levels of fear and utter terror as I try to comprehend the world that we (collectively) are creating for ourselves and the future.  I am learning ever more about the feedbacks and interconnections that are such a part of The End of Nature.

Bill McKibben's article, Energizing America, appeared in the Sierra Club magazine in January 2007. McKibben, not for the first, time specifically called out the Energize America for praise (page 3)

Since Guillet's day job involves analyzing the economics of energy projects, he soon expanded his sphere to explaining the basics of the energy crisis. Before long, others on the site interested in the same issues found themselves working with Guillet to produce, revise, and then revise again a detailed 20-point plan they call "Energize America," a remarkably comprehensive energy strategy that pays full attention to political reality. Currently in version 5.0, the plan proposes ideas ranging from the Passenger Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Act and the Wind Energy Production Tax Credit Act to measures designed to boost telecommuting, experiment with state renewable energy efforts, and put solar panels on 20 million roofs. It's precisely the kind of full-blown proposal that, if adopted, might fundamentally reorient our energy future.

We (here at Daily Kos and, in my case, the Kossacks involved in Energize America) are striving to imagine life differently.  

I am a pessimistic optimist.  

My pessimism envisions an extremely bleak future (sadly within far near a term future), with terrifying economic (political, global, and perhaps conflict) havoc from Peak Oil and mass damage from Global Warming capped with a horrible die off to come.

My optimism drives a belief that I (that we) have something to say about this future. That we have the potential to change our path as I said at Yearly Kos II in Chicago, in 2007

I am a CarboHolic.  My last full tank was two days ago, my last plane flight a week ago, and I am beginning to feel withdrawal staved off by the CO2 emitted for the electricity to be on the web.

Let us face facts. ... Take a moment to put together a list of the top ten challenges for humanity for the 21st century. Your list might include global economic growth, health issues, hunger, environmental destruction, climate change, water, terrorism and others.  When considering such a list, there is at least one common thread.  All are worsened by a future dominated by an expensive, uncertain, unevenly available, polluting energy system.  And, all will face eased solution with a future dominated by a clean, sustainable, readily accessible, fairly distributed, and reasonably priced (if not inexpensive) power solutions.

At this time, the United States is hurtling toward the cliff like Thelma & Louise, but we’re in our Hummers rather than a convertible. And, we are dragging the world ... and future generations ... behind us, bound hand and foot by our dangerous habits and shaky energy structure.

My name is A Siegel.  And, I am a CarboHolic.  

Unlike President Bush, however, we are able to get past that first step in a twelve-step. We recognize the problem. And, we recognize that we are not powerless -- we have the ability to change, to take control of the situation, to turn ourselves away from that addiction. We decided to figure out what we (as individuals, communities, and country) could do about it.

And, we are acting to seek that change. To end that addiction.  To set the path to Energize America for a sustainable and prosperous energy future.

In my life, From the Home to the Globe, I am striving to do my part to affect this change.  Whether putting insulation in my roof, participating in The Climate Project, or communicating to others (including on Daily Kos), I am striving to turn us away from that cliff.

As part of those efforts, a year ago, I accepted. No, I embraced DannyInLA's Challenge.  A year ago, I promised to and repledge to diligently challenge those who seek to maintain a path hurtling over that cliff, whether that is inefficient Christmas light displays, McSUVs, not recyling aluminum cans, challenging astroturf or Global Warming enablers (like Robert J Samuelson). I will CHALLENGE those who threaten a path toward a Prosperous, Climate-Friendly Society.

Dannyinla's Challenge referred to Daily Kos. I will take up that challenge TO CHALLENGE those here who do not comprehend the reality of the threats that Peak Oil and Global Warming portend for us, US, and the future.  I will take up that challenge TO CHALLENGE thinking here at Daily Kos about energy and Global Warming threats and opportunities. I will take up that challenge TO CHALLENGE us all to imagine new and better paths forward, in an integrated conception of options to develop something better.

For example, I am absolutely fed-up with all the reactions here at DailyKos about gasoline taxes.  Now, I am not a believer any longer in gasoline tax (I want a Global Warming Impact Fee) but, the American "Way of Life" must be open for 'negotiation' or else we are calling into question the potential for even having a 'way of life' that is worth living for tomorrow's Americans (or, the later years of today's Americans -- both are true).  

But, my reaction to 'gas tax is impossible ... is immoral because X, Y, Z' is "if that is true, if we can't imagine living any differently, then all else is mere commentary."  

We must change and a gasoline tax might be part of the package for making the change. We can figure out how to use the revenues to fast convert charities, government, people lower on the economic scale to lower-GHG (better fuel mileage) transportation.  We can use the revenue in many ways, but exemptions; forget it, we want everyone (EVERYONE) to be seeking ways to cut their requirements for GHG-related fuels.  Exemptions cut at that incentive.

And, that same principle applies to pollution permits in a potential Cap and Trade program. Giving away permits (any permits) undercuts, by definition, effectiveness toward achieving a cleaner and survivable future economy.

And, I will be extremely happy to see the end of subsidies (direct and indirect) to oil, coal, etc ...

But, I can imagine life differently and I am terrified at the world that we are creating at a head-long pace.  Global Warming ... I am terrified at economic prospects in coming years ... Peak Oil.  

I cannot any longer leave stand any comment about 'gasoline taxes are regressive'. Not anymore. Is there any "tax" more regressive than the damage that we are doing to the globe and the dangers it creates for the potential of human life in the years ahead?  Politically inconvenient?  Perhaps -- but what is politics about but striving to create a better polity for all, and a better polity that is improving into the future. Without a meaningful confrontation of both Peak Oil and Global Warming, that future will not be better.

Nor can I leave stand comments about 'this is beyond us' or 'we can't do anything' or ... I refuse. I accept. I embrace Dannyinla's challenge to Challenge.  

As I contemplate a year's that has past, a year where I made a quite public pledge to Imagine Life Differently -- and a New Year's Resolution, I can see real successes and failures to live up to my ideals.

In 2007, I

  • Sought to educate others about the threats of Global Warming and Peak Oil and about options to deal with these.
  • Trained  (by Al Gore and others) as part of The Climate Project and have given presentations to a variety of audiences on Global Warming and action paths to change our destiny.
  • Challenged ... Global Warming deniers almost daily,  privately, in meetings, via blogging, and in the traditional media (including a letter in the Washington Post). Challenged ... in discussions here and elsewhere thinking about Energy and Global Warming. Chalenged ...
  • Aided others develop arguments, for publication and otherwise, in dealing with Global Warming.
  • Began working, as part of a team effort, with members of Congress and state legislators to turn blog-developed Energize America concepts into actual legislative action.
  • Formed Energize America as a non-profit (with Devilstower, Jerome A Paris, Meteor Blades, DoLittleSoThere, and others) as part of our efforts working with Congress and others to develop innovative, holistic energy policies and legislation to support radical change in our energy picture.
  • And, ... and otherwise.

Yet, while the failures were there, the to do list grows longer rather than dissipates, the need for action and real achievement intensifies.  There were failures, yet ... In my life, I do not know if I have ever made a New Year's Resolution with such import before last year.  And, I do not know if I've ever lived up to a New Year's resolution so resolutely before.  Thus, at the dawning of a New Year, it is time to pen one's hopes and plans for 2008.  

For 2008, my New Year's Resolution is clear. I pledge to continue to embrace DannyInLA's challenge to CHALLENGE.  And, I pledge to.

Imagine Life Differently ...

Imagine it Better ...

And

Seek to create that better life ...

Join me in this pledge.

We can all help make

America

Energy Smart.


Ask yourself:  


Are you doing your part to

ENERGIZE AMERICA?

Tags: recommended, energize america, Bill McKibben, gas tax, global warming, peak oil, action, sustainable energy action, energy, environment (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 112 comments

  •  Have you seen the Hummer ads on TV? (12+ / 0-)

    Hummers can drive through flooded streets in the middle of a hurricane when no other car can get through.  Imagine if every resident of New Orleans had owned a Hummer.  

    (last sentence is a snark)

    "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars." William Jennings Bryan

    by Navy Vet Terp on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:10:15 AM PDT

  •  A simple mantra (12+ / 0-)

    First you see it, then you be it.

    "No special skill, no standard attitude, no technology, and no organization - no matter how valuable - can safely replace thought itself."

    by xaxnar on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:19:46 AM PDT

  •  If I were to trust anyone named Bush.... (12+ / 0-)

    It would be the guy that makes the baked beans.
    The trailer trash royalty bush family from politics does not have the best interests of America or the world in mind.
    Energy policy must change and bushco and their assorted henchmen will not bring meaningful change.

    St. Ronnie was an asshole.

    by manwithnoname on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:20:23 AM PDT

  •  And a Happy New Year to you (24+ / 0-)

    Last year, we planted six new trees to shade our house in the increasing scorching summers, improved our gas mileage with a new Honda, and tried to walk to work half of the time. This year we are looking at a new water saving toliet to cut our water usage, and probably planting more trees on our corner lot.

    Thanks A Siegal for a year's worth of good energy diaries.

    Who will stop this war of lies? Keith Olbermann May 23rd, 2007

    by Ed in Montana on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:27:43 AM PDT

  •  Bravo, Adam (10+ / 0-)

    I agree fully with your position on gasoline taxes. Not to tax for the sake of taxing, but comprehensive plans to use the money wisely.

    My brother and I did not speak for months over an argument about lifestyle changes. He insisted that he had earned his lifestyle:  5 people / 5 cars, including 1 Expedition and 1 F150. No one was going to tell him he had to change. He wants gasoline subsidies!!!!  Ass.

    I recall, too, some of the dustups in Jerome's "Countdown" diaries regarding gasoline taxes as pretty wild rides.

    "You'd be surprised at what kind of party you can throw for the same amount of money that it takes to get someone to fuck Paul Wolfowitz. " --TBOGG

    by vicki on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:29:05 AM PDT

    •  It must be in the Bible somewhere (7+ / 0-)

      That God will reward good people with larger vehicles. Everyone in Montana has a large truck or SUV, whether they need them or not!

      Who will stop this war of lies? Keith Olbermann May 23rd, 2007

      by Ed in Montana on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:07:08 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Same here in Texas (10+ / 0-)

        I drive an Explorer and it is a small vehicle down here.  When I replace it, it will definitely be with a hybrid!

        That evacuation mentioned upthread, from Hurricane Rita - remember that fiasco?  People stuck for  hours and hours on the freeways out of Houston? Why?
        The multiple car households just HAD to get EVERY car on the road....no piling the entire family into one enormous vehicle!! Dad in his mega-cab towed his boat, Mom was in her suv, grandma in her sedan, the teenagers in their own cars....how many families like that?  Crazy. The entitlement and "I got mine!" attitude of so many greedy people is just breathtaking!!!  And sickening.

        Obama's my candidate! Fired up in Texas - let's turn Texas BLUE!

        by blue armadillo on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:18:15 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Including Ed? (0+ / 0-)

        Save Blue Sky Country, ride a horse/bicyle/pogo stick ...

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 09:52:22 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  2007 (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          koNko, A Siegel

          Was the first year in fifteen years that I have not had a pickup truck in Montana. We got rid of our truck (13mpg) and our Subaru (20mpg), and got a diesel van camper (17mpg) and a Honda Element (27mpg).

          When we can't walk to work or the grocery store, we use the Honda around town and save the van for longer camping trips, where it gets much better mileage than our truck did.

          People think you are a little weird not to have a pickup truck here in Big Sky Country!

          Who will stop this war of lies? Keith Olbermann May 23rd, 2007

          by Ed in Montana on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 01:05:56 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Yah, "Communist Honda Driver" (0+ / 0-)

            Hence, my "pogo-stick" remark. If you're going to act strange, may as well go all the way.

            When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

            by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 10:16:41 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  thank you! (8+ / 0-)

    Hey, this is a great way to look at things.... Thanks for the inspiring thoughts and great links.

    I have to remember to have some optimism, even if I'm pessimistic and cynical, and depressed at times. I have to remember that we create our reality by what we put out there.

    Keep fighting onward!

    •  imaging and acting (12+ / 0-)

      We've actually done quite a bit to Re Energize our daily lives.

      Winterizing: put another layer of insulation on the walls of the house and stucco; crawled under house to put insulation under the floorboards

      Much less driving because we are down to one car for 2 people.

      I ride my bike to work in the summer months, my husband walks to a place if it's within a mile.

      We grow a lot of veggies in the green house.

      •  Winterizing Chinese Style (4+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        CalNM, A Siegel, dotcommodity, Rick Winrod

        Open windows for fresh air, 3 layers of long underwear, a sweater, a jacket & a hot water bottle.

        Mrs koNko ready for action

        Photobucket

        Can't sleep with the windows closed.

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 10:20:45 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  snuggly! (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          koNko, A Siegel

          Good to see you in action, Mrs. koNko.

          Even with the insulation on the walls and under floor, and wood stove in one room and a gas heater in a central kitchen, we still wear long underwear and another warm layer, and maybe a sweater inside the house. Especially here in the office, at the computer where there is no heat source. Brrr. We still need to put more insulation under the floor, and maybe above the ceiling.

          •  Thick padded slipprs (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            CalNM, A Siegel

            Are a cheap solution until you get the floor insulated.

            In Asia we traditionally remove of shoes entering the house and the soles of winter slippers are normally about 15-40mm thick (about 3/4"vor greater).

            Keeping feet, neck & hands warm is essential. Warm body with cold feet still feels cold.

            BTW, when you insulate the floor you may wan to make it a raised floor with removable panels rounting water pipes in a channel under the floor to keep them from freezing.

            When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

            by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 10:14:36 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  thanks for the warm tips (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              A Siegel

              I do make sure to have warm socks or slippers on in the house. You're right - it really makes a difference in keeping body heat if the feet are warm.

              Yep, we have to be careful on how to insulate the pipes under the floor so they don't freeze. Not enough crawl space under the house for a drop floor, but we have wrapped the individual pipes with insulation.
              Very cold minus 20 degrees below zero F these past 2 weeks. Brrr.

              Cheers, friend!

  •  I pledge.. (12+ / 0-)

    to continue to make changes in my own life.  I pledge to continue to education myself on the issues of climate change and peak oil.  I pledge to continue to challenge ignorance and misinformation on these issues.  I pledge to raise "aware" children.    Thank you A Siegel and Happy New Year to you in all you do.

    Be the change you want!

    by BuyLocal on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:52:23 AM PDT

  •  I will not take such a pledge until... (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TXsharon, koNko, A Siegel, Bob Guyer

    While C.C. is my #1 issue, and I try to do a bit, I will not do anything major (like solar panels) until our govt. starts passing serious demands on corporations, eliminates oil subsidies, aggressively shifts to wind, solar, and batteries, and at least provides tax credits for making such changes.  If the major causes of C.C. are not systematically changed then my light bulbs won't mean squat.  

    "I am here because of Ashley." - Unknown Obama supporter.

    by rainmanjr on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 06:53:23 AM PDT

    •  Afraid you have a point there (eom). (0+ / 0-)

    •  Your bulbs empower yourself ... (14+ / 0-)

      When I give Climate Project presentations to elementary school students, I talk about how just one of them turning out the lights is nice but doesn't really have an impact, but imagine 10,000s or millions doing it.

      Individuals won't solve Global Warming.

      Nor will business action.

      Nor will government decree.

      Action at all levels ...

    •  Make the changes in your own life (13+ / 0-)

      while you continue educating others about corporate abuses.I agree that it seems hopeless for me to conserve water when worldwide oil and gas producers use 3,066,000,000,000 gallons of water which is then permanently removed removed from our hydrologic cycle but we all have to make changes. Besides, you might at well make the lifestyle adjustments now so you will be ahead of the game.

    •  Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. (16+ / 0-)

      The administration uses the excuse that we can't take action on climate change because China and India aren't and we don't want to give them a competitive advantage.  If everyone is waiting for the other guy to make the first move, we're stuck in place forever.

      Now, go spread some peace, love and understanding. Use force if necessary. - Phil N DeBlanc

      by lineatus on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:16:24 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  fortunately Europe is not waiting for them (10+ / 0-)

        they are cashing in bigtime selling them wind turbine technology etc, to the point that they may well become Big Wind and Big Solar, able to fight back against Big Oil and Big Coal...but it will be EU companies against our dinosaurs in their protected habitat.

        •  That's altogether too true. (5+ / 0-)

          Think of what a jump start it would give the economy to start investing in development of the technologies the world wants.  We are ceding the future to the countries who are willing to innovate.  Who would have thought a generation (or two or three or five) ago that the US would become a nation that balked at that?

          Now, go spread some peace, love and understanding. Use force if necessary. - Phil N DeBlanc

          by lineatus on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:35 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  Actually (4+ / 0-)

        China has grater environmenal problems than the USA but is doing more to address them including enacting standards and laws.

        However, I might add, both China and India have much lower CO2 emissions per capita and lower total CO2 emissions than the USA.

        If we were to translate the percapita emissions of the USA to China or India (let alone both) it would be a total disaster for the world.

        Thus, while poor countries must do thier part to develop responsibly and not use their disadvantages as an excuse not to, it's rediculous for wealthy countries with higher stasndards of living and higer emissions to make the excuses they do.

        One world, live or die together. No choice, simple fact.

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 11:39:17 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Yes only changing the system will work, but I (14+ / 0-)

      have found personal reasons for changing what I am doing on a personal level relative to energy use and overall consumption. The two reasons I found compelling for personal change were that I am learning new survival skills for when things get really bad, the other is that I am learning more about the psychology of change and how hard it is to change.

      The benefit of the learning I do now about growing food, living on less, using less car based transportation is that I am gradually developing some skills and confidence in doing things differently and I imagine that I will be better prepared as things go south climate and economy wise.

      Participating in my own personal psychology of change helps me understand how important and difficult the personal and cultural process of change is. As a country and species I think our most under appreciated aspect of the process of changing our energy system and consumption enough to stave off the worst case scenario of creating a hotter climate is that our identities have been formed in a culture of industrial capitalism and consumption driven economics. As I go through my own personal reactions to change I am better able to encourage others because I have some personal insight into my own resistance to change.

      I am in full agreement that individual change matters very little in contributing to turning this around unless we get the big players in line, and they really don't want to line up. I also get pissed when people act as if it is the fault of the consuming individual and that somehow the "consumer" just needs to stop asking the corporations to keep producing all this stuff and making cheap gas for us. The corporations like to play as if they are just the helpless pawns blown about by the irrational desires of the consuming public, what a bunch of crap. The corporations created this mess for their own benefit so they could accumulate huge profits and pay none of the price of their economic externalities.

      Love = Awareness of mutually beneficial exchange across semi-permeable boundaries. Political and economic systems either amplify or inhibit Love.

      by Bob Guyer on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:25:07 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Excellent, excellent comment, Bob (8+ / 0-)

        To sum it up (as I read it):

        - Making changes in my own life now makes me better equipped to survive our changing future

        - Making changes in my own life helps me understand the difficulty of making these changes, more sympathetic to those resisting the changes, and therefore less likely to browbeat and accuse those who are resisting change, and more likely to be genuinely helpful

        - The "bad" choices many consumers make are often the result of the limited choices available, and that limitation of choices has been created by corporate greed, moreso than consumer demands

        (Not that I think your comment was too long. I'm glad you explained your thoughts. I just wanted to reinforce your points.)

        I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. - Barbara Jordan

        by Janet Strange on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 08:03:59 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Thanks Janet, I'm motivated and change is hard (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Janet Strange, A Siegel

          for me. That is one of the big challenges, motivating people and then helping support them in a change process that isn't easy. When I struggle with change it helps me be less judgmental of others that struggle too.

          Love = Awareness of mutually beneficial exchange across semi-permeable boundaries. Political and economic systems either amplify or inhibit Love.

          by Bob Guyer on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 11:07:29 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  And btw . . . (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            A Siegel

            I didn't want to clutter up Adam's excellent diary with, gee I love your sigline, but . . .

            I really love your sigline. I've noticed and admired it several times. Now I've stolen it and put it in my "good quotes" doc. I'm a biology person, so I think the "semi-permeable" part is especially nice.

            I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. - Barbara Jordan

            by Janet Strange on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 08:32:50 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  It's part of my trying to imagine a new economic (2+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Janet Strange, A Siegel

              and political system that would be well suited to helping us live better with each other and with nature. A long time back I realized that our economic and political systems were not working well and I started to try to understand why.

              To make a long story short, I have been writing about what a new system should look like and I have come to the conclusion, at least for now, that modeling our economic and political system based on biology could help provide some guidance for system design and how we think and talk about our systems. Part of the process, since we are conscious biological creatures, is to define who we are. The most basic and meaningful thing I could come up with was that we are conscious, a pretty amazing fact, and that all the boundaries that comprise us at all levels, even the less physical ones of thought and emotion, are semi-permeable. When you look at it that way each one of us is an individual and not separate or truly apart from those we live with and the environment we all share, kind of like holding Buddha (the non reality of the separate self) and Maturana and varella (autopoesis) together in the same concept.

              My sig line comes from observing that life as a whole and human social interaction is far more cooperative than it is competitive. The ecological web of life in incredibly cooperative through all the interconnections all things have through their semi-permeable membranes, I include breathing, eating, sensing, and other processes as macro levels of semi-permeable boundaries, and social life is also incredibly cooperative. Competition stands out against a backdrop of cooperation which, like the remarkable fact that we are conscious, we sort of ignore.

              When you feel love, whether it is focused and specific or diffuse and universal, I think you are noticing the ever present backdrop of mutually beneficial exchange made possible through the existence of semi-permeable boundaries that define form of any kind. I like Maslow calling it unconditional positive regard but I wanted something that encompassed a broader observation of living systems so I made up the idea that Love = Awareness of mutually beneficial exchange across semi-permeable boundaries.

              Thanks for appreciating the idea, what's not to like about love. I have a lot of bio this and that on my website http://urpartofit.net if you want to see more.

              Love = Awareness of mutually beneficial exchange across semi-permeable boundaries. Political and economic systems either amplify or inhibit Love.

              by Bob Guyer on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 07:00:09 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Thanks (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                A Siegel

                Lovely comment. I've bookmarked your blog and I'm looking forward to exploring more of your thoughts. Right now, though, I'm "part of" a bring a dish birthday party later today, and must go cook. Later. . . .

                I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. - Barbara Jordan

                by Janet Strange on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 11:26:35 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

        •  I thought his answer was just fine. (0+ / 0-)

          I read it, understood it, agreed with it, and found his intelligence delightful.  He really didn't need any help.  Just saying...

          "I am here because of Ashley." - Unknown Obama supporter.

          by rainmanjr on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 02:30:32 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Sorry my comment came across that way (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            A Siegel

            I thought it was so perfect myself that I just wanted to say "what he said" again. It helped me think about it to write it out.

            I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. - Barbara Jordan

            by Janet Strange on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 08:36:50 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  Bob. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        A Siegel

        Note my remarks up-post were written offline before seeing your reply to others above.

        You could respond to mine or not, no need to repeast any statements contained above but I would like your thoughts on government verses corporate actions, and I'd like to stress that many corporations are good players and deserve credit (and business) for doing the right/smart things. You may also refer to my other posts here with address the subject.

        Your original post certianly gave me and other the impression you were making excuses, obviously that's not the case.

        So feel free to pass my sermon on to anyone meriting a read.

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 12:13:45 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Both government and the private sector (3+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          koNko, A Siegel, rainmanjr

          are required in order for us all, as you pointed out we are one world, to make it through this unusual period of time in our species history. I think the freedom of the private sector is less important than making a transition into a stable, livable, energy system and level of overall resource consumption. I think that government needs to be very aggressive in directing the private sector on the macro (standards, goals, infrastructure development, incentives, punishments, monitoring, and enforcement) level and keep its hands off the micro (product design, and innovation) level.

          I think credit for doing good is worth doing, as is making companies pay for the harm they do. I think technology development of all kinds related to climate change will make a positive contribution but will not be enough on their own.

          There are some industries that contribute more to the problem and resist change in significant ways, the oil and coal industry for example, and I think government should be used to force change in those areas.

          As far as individuals doing what they can that is a good thing in many ways but systemic change is absolutely required and it is large institutions that must move decisively in the systems area. We can push that politically as individuals and groups of people advocating change.

          We are in a situation where everyone must do as much as they can.

          Love = Awareness of mutually beneficial exchange across semi-permeable boundaries. Political and economic systems either amplify or inhibit Love.

          by Bob Guyer on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 01:20:50 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Thanks for your reply. (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            A Siegel, Bob Guyer

            Ditto.

            And I hope you realize I certianly support your point that laws, standards, incentives and punishments are all needed to make this work and I'm personally involved in drafting/promoting standards.

            The simple fact is people and companies need targets, motivation and help, and governments play a positive or negative role, with inaction being a negative.

            So despite my rant, I do recognine the system has to be there and fair.

            When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

            by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 10:06:28 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  That's just silly (10+ / 0-)

      Of course what you do makes a difference; it makes the difference you can make.

      I'm all for government action, but waiting for government action....well....

      some people freed their slaves before the emancipation proclamation

      some companies had safe workplaces before OSHA....

      etc.

      •  Many of the freed slaves.. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        dotcommodity

        wound up as slaves in other stables.  Many simply became hobos or drunken derelicts.  Many turned to crime and found solace in the structured prison life.  Didn't it make more sense to insist that they were free (by Federal Govt. mandate as opposed to individual states making smaller changes that wouldn't make them free, right away, but might free their grand-children)?  Wouldn't it have been better too set up govt. institutions to help them make the change from slave to freedom?
        Individual action is swell but it won't solve this mess.  If Govt. doesn't act it signifies to me that the population doesn't care enough to make it act.  If that's the case then I'll spend my money on beer, food and vacations instead of solar panels which will look great on our ghost-town house.
        But, that's not saying I do nothing.  I've held off buying a newer car until affordable electric vehicles are made.  I believe mine will last until then.  I try to conserve water, recycle, and drive efficiently (in a point-to-point circuit).  I lobby individuals to press govt. for changes and to vote for those offering such changes.  These are all I'm willing to do unless society indicates, to me, that they are demanding bigger changes.  This election will be a tip-off for that indication.    

        "I am here because of Ashley." - Unknown Obama supporter.

        by rainmanjr on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 02:45:08 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Actually .... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      A Siegel

      I don' think it's the issue of large corporations in many cases, but a failure of government policy.

      In fact, major US soporations have urged the Bush aAdministration to pass manditory standards so there would be a clear basis to set goals, plan, budget, etc with a true "level playing field".  In the absence of that, many are addoption EU or indusry consortia sandards since they must meet standards eslewhere, and to compete globally in obtaining busness they cannot wait for the government to act.

      Here is one such case if you Goggle and Wiki I'm sure you'll find others.

      Who this hurts more is small to medium enterprises that may only operate in the US and hence get left behind due to the uncertianty of what standard wiil/would be.

      In some cases, corporations are also far ahead of the government and even the public in general.

      The US benifits slightly by default by a trickle-down effect from International standards (eg, flash water heaters mentoined upthread have been used in Europe and Asia for years) but this does not put American business in a leading position.

      While Republicans assume the "free-market" and "volentary standards" will automatically promote innovation they are dreaming and have failed to do their homework on the rest of the world.Standards promote development and addoption of tecnology.

      If every phone or computer used a different protocol, would telecomunications exist?

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 11:03:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Rec'd to Disagree (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      A Siegel, dotcommodity

      You are taking exactly the attitude of companies resisting this change.

      In doing so, you make no positive contribution to solving the problem and also miss the benifits of doing so.

      If all Americans take your attitude, it will be hopless for any progress to be achieved and the US will continue to decline while other countries advance.

      I would like to point out that the many companies and individuals who are investing and innovating with or without government standards or regulations take some risk but also benifit from being leaders or fast followers. Those that wait too long will just be failures.

      Private citizens are just as responsible for environmental degradation as corporations if not more (private activities actually tend to be less energy efficient than corporate ones - and consumers drive producers).

      While I fully I recognize and support standardization and law (in fact I'm an active member of 3 standards organizations) the lack of standards is no excuse for inaction.

      What you are saying is you refuse to take responsibility for your own actions and purposely neglect what you can control - the decisions you can make.

      Do you always need a government regulation controling the behaviour of others to make decisions for yourself?

      Is that the best you can do? To be part of the problem instead of the solution?

      Sorry to put it so bountly, but I appreciate your honesty and hope you appreciate mine.

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 11:26:27 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The American way of life isn't negotiable (16+ / 0-)

    it's doomed.

    Some people recognize that now, some don't.

    But the idea of living in a suburb and driving to work in an urban area is just plain doomed.

    •  What is truly frightening (11+ / 0-)

      is that the emerging economies in Asia seem to be modeling their new, more affluent lifestyles on our model.

      Instead of learning from the mistakes we've made, they seem eager to dive headlong into their version of the American Dream, and it has proven that it cannot be sustained as it is...

      That really worries me.

      Obama's my candidate! Fired up in Texas - let's turn Texas BLUE!

      by blue armadillo on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:22:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yes and No. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        A Siegel

        Certianly the American lifesyle is sold globally and looks attractive, but if you dig deeper you will find very few people can actually afford such a lifestyle and government policies are generally aimed for the country verse the wealthy.

        For example, somewhere up/down thread I've commented on the Shangahi Metro system which is currently being expanded form 3 to 8 to 10 to 15 and eventially 18 lines.

        So while you'll find new highways as well (and pretty congested) in practice the big investments are in Mass transit and the usage tolls for highways really discourage personal use.

        You can also see this manifest is housing, where US style housing is addopted by some wealthy people, but the vast majority of housing is high-rise apartments a quarter or less the size of a typical US house. (My flat is 50m3 or ~ 500Ft2 for 3+2 people, a moderately sized home by Chinese standards). In fact, our government has recently enacted several laws and measures to foce developers to reduce the number of large sized "luxury" apartments since there is actually a shortage of modestly sized/priced homes and a glut (in some areas) of the afforementioned.

        The simple fact is we cannot afford to copy the USA very much and have pretty much reached the limits in some cities already.

        As I've noted above, if the US percapita CO2 emissions were translated to the population of China, the world would be in incredably worse condition.

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 11:59:38 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  What about home size? (13+ / 0-)

    I mean, maybe I missed it, but it seems to me that home size is a huge problem

    Bigger homes take more materials to build, more fuel to heat and cool, and so on.

    Then there are second homes....

    •  True, but design is a major component (10+ / 0-)

      Depending on the local environment and weather patterns, the housing should reflect intelligent design to incorporate functionality as well as aesthetics.

      Those McMansions may have accoutrements that Americans believe they "must" have, but many of those houses are nothing but McCookiecutter slab shells. Crap-tacular with problems looming for homeowners a few years down the road.

      Our... constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the power to control men's minds. Thurgood Marshall

      by bronte17 on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 07:27:44 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Very good point (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      A Siegel, plf515, lurks a lot, JohnnyRook

      I visited a friends' house about a month ago: she and her husband just bought a 5,000 sq.ft. home.  They share it with their small spaniel.  5,000 freaking square feet!  They currently have no plans to have kids or have either of their parents live with them.

      One of my initial reactions was to push them away: I feel like I don't want to visit ever again or even act too friendly towards them.  A Siegel lights a different kind of path: I shoul