Daily Kos

Imprisoned for Life in Washington for an Attempted Wallet Grab

Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 12:59:54 PM PDT

JOIN: 3-Strikes Rapid Response

Washington was the first state in the nation to impose a 3-strikes law.  Ours is onen of the harshest. Year after year, people who have committed only low-violence offenses struggle to keep hope under the weight of this permanent societal shunning which is administered with extreme racial disparity.

Below the fold is a guest post from Al-Kareem Shadeed, who is serving Life without Parole under Washington's 3-Strikes law for two robberies and an attempted robbery that he committed in his teens and early 20s.  His crimes involved no weapons and no injuries. They were not, by any stretch of the imagination, "worst of the worst" crimes.  Using his own description of his third strike, I think I'm safe in describing them as attempts to "bully" strangers on the street into giving him money to feed his addictions.  Al-Kareem, as a teen, needed help that he did not get. He and the people he victimized would be better off today if he had received that help. It is an affront to our humanity that he is imprisoned for life for these low-level offenses.   Contact: noemie (at) washblog (dot)(com) for Washington action.

Robbery 2 has been described by Washington's Sentencing Guidelines Commission (SGC) as an offense "involving little risk of physical injury." In fact, the SGC, the state body charged with recommending sentences to the legislature, recommended in its 2001 Sentencing Reform Act Review that Robbery 2 and some forms of Assault 2 be removed from the 3-strikes list. But these two crimes, instead, remain by far the most common crimes triggering life imprisonment under 3-Strikes in the state. Every year, Senator Adam Kline introduces legislation to comply with the SGC recommendation. (For example: SB 5349.) Every year these bills fail and additional people are sentenced to life imprisonment for crimes that involve no injuries, no weapons, and small amounts of money -- or no money at all. To deepen our state's shame, this law is administered with severe racial disparity. 45% of the people serving under 3-strikes are African American -- in a state that is 3.5% African American. Washington's 3-Strikes law will be reformed when there is enough public outcry. Contact noemie(at)(washblog)(dot)(com) to be notified of key times to contact Washington legislators in support of 3-Strikes reform.

Previous Stories in Series:

My name is Al-Kareem Shadeed. I'm 34 years old and I have received a life sentence without the possibility of parole under the 3 Strikes Law. None of my crimes involved a weapon and I have never, ever caused injuries to anyone!  Ironically, my sentence is the same as the Green River killer's sentence.  And, other people who have viciously murdered and raped women and children are getting out of prison while I never will.  Confused?  Let me explain.

In 1989, while still a juvenile, I had a problem with drugs.  Like many people, I decided to commit a crime of robbery to support my habit.  So came my first strike without any weapon and without any injuries to anyone.  My first strike went like this. I saw a man that I did not know.  I thought that he'd have some money because of the fancy clothes that he wore.  I figured that he would be easy to intimidate.  I thought that if I acted like I would fight him, which I really wasn't interested in doing, that he would give me the money I needed to get some more drugs. So I walked up to him and said "Hey man, give me your money."  To my surprise, he didn't show any resistance at all.  He just handed me his money.  I left and a short while later I got caught near where I stole the man's money.  As you can see, I wasn't much of a career criminal. I was acting more like a drug addict only interested in his drugs because I wasn't worried about getting caught. I surely needed guidance back then because my decisions were very poor and my thinking worse.  I did 8 months in prison for that crime.  But my thinking didn't get corrected while I was locked up. I was still a drug addict and I felt bad about what I did but I still didn't think much about the harm I had done to my victim.  Not much changed.  

My second strike was again to support my drug and alcohol habit.  I snatched a man's wallet out of his hands and I was charged with first degree Robbery since I touched the man.  Touching someone while taking from them makes the crime worse because it is like you are having a fight.  But, we didn't fight.  I just touched him as I grabbed his wallet.  I was told that if I went to court, things would go much worse for me since I already had a robbery conviction.  I was scared.  Since I didn't know anything about the law, I pled out to the lesser charge of Robbery 2 but I never knew it would be used as a strike against me.  I simply didn't know that.

For my third strike, I was convicted of second-degree attempted robbery, which normally carries a standard range of 13 months and a maximum of 5 years. Unfortunately, I had a few drinks and I wasn't thinking clearly. To this day, I have a distorted recollection of what happened. No doubt, I am ashamed of my actions because I am guilty of harassing that guy. I did not put my hands on him, and again I did not possess any weapons of any sort. As a matter of fact my victim was a standup guy because he wouldn't allow me to bully him out of his lunch money. Here's what happened. I tried to snatch his wallet but he saw what I was attempting to do. He wasn't going to let me get away with that so he pushed me away. So I made like I was going to fight him even though that wasn't my thing. I didn't want to hurt him, I just needed some money. I was looking for a way to break the thing off. A car was coming down the street and I told the man to "get out of here" but he got bold and was trying to fight me. I told him, "What? Do you want me to hurt you or something? Get on!" He was like following me and I wasn't in my right mind. The whole situation was weird so I just got out of there. I didn't think about what happened much because I didn't take anything from him and I didn't hurt him or anything like that. Several hours later I got arrested for this thing and I lied to the detectives about the ordeal but the victim's testimony was a little distorted too because we were both pretty excited at the time. I was willing to accept the consequences of my actions but I couldn't believe it when they started taking about sending me away from life under the Three Strikes Law.

I never knew about the 3-Strikes law until I was hit on the head with it by my court-appointed attorney. I can still remember my heart restricting my ability to swallow, let alone utter any words as he was speaking. Somehow, I did manage to get out a few words. And they were, "I ain't killed nobody."

No doubt that my actions warrant punishment. But this punishment is extremely harsh.  My heart has been ripped out of my chest. My life has been disregarded and the pain is unbearable.  Almost to the point where I've thought about committing suicide on a lot of occasions.  What stops me is hope.  Hope that people in authority's hearts will be softened by God's mercy upon the downtrodden. I am deeply ashamed of my mistakes and sincerely regret my actions from deep within my heart.  When I was younger I didn't understand that I could really traumatize someone if I didn't use force during the robbery. By now I know how the victim was affected.  I really sympathize with them and regret the duress I caused them and their families. So, I do what I can to give back.  I make $45 a month on my job. After buying the things I need like soap, toothpaste, stamps, and envelopes, I voluntarily give the remaining money to the children of greater need through a program called Feed The Children.  I do this only because of what is in my heart and my desire to do something positive for others in spite of what society may believe about me.

Hopefully, one day I can be a contributor to society and make a difference in someone's life.  Hopefully, someday I wall be able to see my mother and bothers and sisters again and hold them in my arms.  My life s salvageable!  I can make a difference.  People always speak of accountability.  Well, hold me accountable.  I can and will be a productive contributor to society, and no longer will such unlawful behavior be magnified and reflected by me again.  You can trust in that!

The following are quotes from Al-Kareem's third victim
Al-Kareem's third victim was a popular Garfield High School teacher by the name of Craig MacGowan. He spoke out after Al-Kareem's sentencing: "It just blows me away that the people in this state are willing to house this guy in prison for the next 50 years yet are so reluctant to pay a fraction of what that will cost to reduce class sizes and do other things to better education," McGowan told the Seattle Times in 1994.  "We aren't willing to do enough for kids like this when they are young and when we have a chance to make a difference, but we're willing to throw them away in prison for 10 times the cost."

Tags: criminal justice, institutional racism, 3-strikes laws, life imprisonment (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 26 comments

  •  Three strikes has go to go (15+ / 0-)

    It's the most absurd law I can think of, next to mandatory minimums.

    One failure after another and the final result is anarchy. -edscan

    by BoiseBlue on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 01:03:11 PM PDT

  •  Very sad (9+ / 0-)

    Three strikes is a bad idea - even most judges agree. Rec'd.

    This ain't no party. This ain't no disco. This ain't no foolin' around!

    by Snud on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 01:03:39 PM PDT

  •  Judicial discretion (13+ / 0-)

    Thanks BoiseBlue & Snud

    3-Strikes takes away judicial discretion.  Discretion is what judges are all about.  Our particular version is a real catastrophe.  This cannot stand -- and yet, year after year, it does.

  •  Unreal (6+ / 0-)

    Life imprisonment for petty crime.  America has gone insane.

    John McCain, Master of the Purpose Driven Lie.

    by DWG on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 01:09:56 PM PDT

  •  Leaving aside the ridiculous waste of a life (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    noemie maxwell, empathy, jlms qkw

    (not that there's anyway to leave aside something so significant), it will cost millions of dollars to hold each of the three strikes prisoners for a lifetime.  Why don't the law-n-order three-strikes backers, who seem to have a large crossover demographic with the no-taxes crowd, ever think that angle through?  If someone ever pointed out to them the actual number of $$ they're paying every year to feed and house non-violent criminals, we'd have reform in no time.  "Jail some petty thieves and small time dealers, or pay $300 less in taxes every year - it's your choice."

    ($300 is a number I pulled outa thin air, but you get the idea)

    Now, go spread some peace, love and understanding. Use force if necessary. - Phil N DeBlanc

    by lineatus on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 01:20:11 PM PDT

  •  Three strikes law was intended for violent (5+ / 0-)

    felonies.  He didn't have a weapon. He didn't use one.  No way shoudl three strikes aply. There's a guy in CA in the smae boat--his last offense was a drunken borrowing of someone's bike but the bike was wortht he above the amount so it became a felony.  NONE of his crimes were crimes of violence.  

    Someone who uses a gun to hold up a store three times? Sure. Three strikes applies.  Someone who rapes or abuses children? Sure.  DV? Sure (though all too often DV is considered a misdemeanor,a nd the guy never does hard time until he puts her in the hospital with serious injuries or kills her). Rape> SUre.

    But this shouldn't apply in thsi case.

    The last time we mixed religion and politics people got burned at the stake.

    by irishwitch on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 01:28:25 PM PDT

    •  no, "three strikes" (0+ / 0-)

      was intended to prevent violent felonies.  The rap sheets almost all start like this . . . a succession of burglaries or semi-violent (threat of violence) muggings.  And then things escalate . . .

      Too bad for this guy.  Good thing for those who would have been his subsequent victims.  Sparing them earns from me a sigh of relief.

      And I find the notion that we should wait for a third rape conviction (with almost certainly a lot of others that didn't get "resolved") before we get serious about it . . . unsatisfactory.  

      •  Preventing felonies: example, lead poisoning (4+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Woody, silence, empathy, rylly

        Far more felonies would be prevented by drug addiction treatment -- for much cheaper.  And by other common sense steps, like after-school programs, high-school retention programs, on and on.

        There are known tools for reducing the incidence and severity of social problems that result in crime.  One tiny example: lead poisoning reduces intelligence and impulse control and increases aggressiveness.  Here in Washington State there is a federal mandate to test all low-income children below a certain age for lead exposure.  Our state is breaking that law and children are being injured as a result.

        We are basing our policies on fear and hatred and scapegoating rather than on the evidence.

      •  Rape! Rape! Rape! (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        noemie maxwell

        Gee, it escalated pretty fast in your fantasy life, didn't it? We were talking about a guy who tried to snatch wallets from grown men -- and in your mind it went straight to RAPE!

        I haven't seen anyone obsess so publicly about a black man and RAPE with so little evidence since lynchings were outlawed.

        No expert thinks that RAPE escalates from wallet snatchings, or even purse snatchings. RAPE is a crime of power and control from disturbed minds. So very, very few rapists are drug addicts, because addicts are interested in getting drugs, not in dominating women (or helpless men).

        So let us discuss how to deal with petty criminals like Al-Kareem Shadeed. He admitted to some crimes for which he deserved some punishment. But for you to insert bullshit about

        a third rape conviction

        really amounts to slander of him, and of black men similarly situated.

        Please keep your racist RAPE fantasy to yourself. Unless you share it with your therapist, whch you really should do at once.

        •  perhaps you should read (0+ / 0-)

          the comment to which I responded.

          "Woody"

          By the way . . . have you ever seen a rapist's rap sheet?

          •  I have. Ex-rape crisis counselor (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            noemie maxwell

            here.  They usually start with peeping or flashing and then escalate to sexual assault.  Even though we know that these guys escalate in most cases, we can't prosecute them for crimes they (might* commit in the future, only the ones they have committed.And I DO know what I am talking about.  Rape laws got tighter in the 70s, and prosecutors became more willing to take rape to trial because of women like me who worked with them--back then, all rape counselors were unpaid volunteers.

            I tend to think sentences are too low myself--but juries are still unwilling to convict without a lot of circumstantial evidence and physical injury to the victim. If there was a prior relationship, and they were ever intimate sexually, you can still forgt about a conviction in many cases. Date rape is damned hard to get a conviction for.
            As for this

            intended to prevent violent felonies.  

            The three strikes law was intended only to prevent future violent felonies AFTER the felon has shown a propensity for violence and a pattern of committing violent crimes.   Which, since you apparently completely missed my point, means that you don't include non-violent crimes, only felonies in which a weapon was used or sexual violence was committed.  This man described in the diary did not commit violent felonies and therefore the ;aw shouldn't apply to him. Three strikes laws need to be written so that they are very narrow in scope.  Non-violent crimes should not apply--burglaries without the use of a weapon, for example should not count toward a strike.  Mug someone with a gun? Sure.  Hold up a store having a gun in the clerk's face? Yep.  Rape someone (with or without a weapon)? Sure. Unfortunately state legislators are often idiots with no legal training, and you wind up with tons of bad laws.

            Personally, I think the worst thing about state legislatures is that any bozo can run and then is free to write stupid laws without thinking (or knowing about) of the legal consequences. Here in GA we had a class act bozo who wanted to put sexual predators adults who have sex with a minor in jail for long terms. He failed to add a clause that ruled out consensual sex between two teens close in age--and several young men went to jail for up to 10 years--Genarlow Wilson is just the most notorious case. When the law was applied to teens, the legislator tried to get them to overturn his law because he hadn't intended it to qapply to such cases. The law was repealed and the kid got out because the courts overturned the conviction but he still has a record and he still spent  time in jail.

            The last time we mixed religion and politics people got burned at the stake.

            by irishwitch on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 10:15:49 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Irishwitch (0+ / 0-)

              I'd be interested in corresponding with you on what I should be aware of when approaching victims rights groups for their input on this issue.

              If you see this and would be amenable to helping me out here, please write noemie (at) washblog (d0t) (com)

              Thanks!

              Noemie

  •  Comment snafu (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    empathy, norahc

    I appreciate these comments -- but I can't read them from DWG's on down.  I click on the comment and the page kinda shimmers and then resets to the same screen with the comment still tucked behind its title.  I'll try rebooting my computer.  Write me (my email's in the story) if you have ideas/input (on WA's 3-strikes ... not my comment problem!)

    Thanks, guys.

  •  california has had this for a few years (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    noemie maxwell, empathy

    i believe they let non-violent 3-strikers out, due to overcrowding.  

  •  How bad does this country have (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    noemie maxwell

    to get before we turn this thing around..How many lives wasted and destroyed?

    Be the change you want to see in the world.

    by empathy on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 03:06:41 PM PDT

Permalink | 26 comments