Daily Kos

Why is our Media addicted to Idiot News?

Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 09:50:19 AM PDT

I know that the primary season kicks off this week. I just thought some could use some levity, a departure from the Obama/Edwards/Hillary sucks because XYZ for a minute.

Reading the headlines at MSNBC, one's eye is usually drawn to the sensationalistic. Sometimes, the human interest leaps off the page. Sometimes the human interest is so ridiculous, it really calls for a little deeper reading.

Leap, please.

MSNBC runs with an interesting story of a poor, middle-aged man who found a check on the ground for $185,000, made out to a woman.

Damone, who receives government-issued food stamps for low-income workers and works at a McDonald's fast food restaurant, said he did not think twice about trying to cash it. Instead, the 47-year-old took a bus Monday from his Jewett City home to a bank and returned the check to the niece of the landlord to whom the check was written.

She thanked Damone with a $50 bill.

What a great story. What a sterling example of a humble poor person who is honest and knows hard work is the only get rich quick scheme. And his reward was great. $50 is some tall corn for returning a useless piece of paper to someone instead of just tearing it in half and mailing it.

I would think that anyone who has the ability to make good on a check for $185,000 knows the system well enough that when the check turns up missing, to call the bank and put a stop payment on the check, possibly even changing the account number, as someone now has that person's checking account number and signature. Pain in the neck, sure.

MSNBC continues:

Damone said that although he knew $185,000 could pay his rent and other bills for a long time, he was never tempted to try to cash it and splurge.

He says he remembered his mother's words: If you take something, you lose three times that amount —and if you do something good, something good comes back to you.

Reggie Damone never had $185,000 in his hands. He had a worthless piece of paper that was probably already cancelled. What would his options be? If he walked into a currency exchange to cash it, they'd laugh, or call the cops, or both. If he walked into a bank and tried to open a bank account, claiming to be the woman on the check, the police would show up before he started filling out forms.

But nobody writes any of that in this 5 paragraph article, which was important enough to garner front page real estate on MSNBC. Feel-good pap about a poor man finding the equivalent of a bag of money. Except that he didn't.

I realize I'm being petty. It's just a human interest story. But the story isn't so simple that good old down home honest and upbringing and listening to one's mother kept someone from ill-gotten riches. Our banking system is set up so that this guy would have not even gotten to step one had he even "been tempted" to cash the check.

The real danger for the writer of the check was in having their bank account drained dry in 6 months, had anyone who knows the system found the check. Why did the lazy writer not explore that?

The worst part of this entire story is that 402 users gave this a rating of 4 out of 5. This isn't even feel-good pap!! We're 6 days away from Christmas!! Had the writer tied that in, it would be front page with a picture for half an hour.

The media makes me sick.

Poll

What would you do upon finding that check?

0%0 votes
7%2 votes
21%6 votes
10%3 votes
21%6 votes
14%4 votes
7%2 votes
0%0 votes
3%1 votes
3%1 votes
3%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
3%1 votes
3%1 votes

| 28 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: media, snark (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 10 comments

  •  Give it to me (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    bobinson, MikeTheLiberal

    I deserve it!!! Reach back to your heels, and just powder me one, not square in the face, but a glancing blow to the nose or chin, something sure to snap my head around, and buckle my knees, making me vulnerable to an unprotected undercut right to the stomach.

    klaatu barada nikto

    by JohnGor0 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 09:54:06 AM PDT

  •  Easiest diary headline question to answer... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    bobinson, JohnGor0, ExStr8

    stating the obvious...because "Idiot News" is what grabs the audience...thereto...we have an audience of idiots...self-perpetuating reality strikes again...

    "I always thought if you worked hard enough and tried hard enough, things would work out. I was wrong." --Katharine Graham

    by bobswern on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 09:57:14 AM PDT

  •  Missing white woman has run its course (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JohnGor0, Fabian

    Left a pretty huge vacuum to fill after the public soured on the gratuitous Natalie Holloway coverage. I guess it's news when someone chooses not to commit a felony.

    The plural of anecdote is not data.

    by bobinson on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 09:59:21 AM PDT

    •  The Golden Dikes (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      bobinson, JohnGor0

      over at TPM were embarrassing.  Sure they were all Republicans and quite a few were pathetic gay closet johns, but really - when did any Party have so much corruption and criminality in one year that you could actually make a contest out of deciding which one was the worst, the most blatant, the most clueless and so forth?

      Yes.  Someone who had the opportunity to enrich himself at the expense of a faceless stranger and didn't - that is news.  Because we know that if "Duke" Cunningham had found that check, he would have had some underling cash it for him and I doubt he'd even toss that peon $50.

      Proud member of the Cult of Issues and Substance!

      by Fabian on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 10:08:23 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sadly, it's not just the media. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JohnGor0, Fabian

    There's a reason for the non-stop, all-Britney/Paris/Lindsay, Greatest Loser/American Idol suckathon that passes for "news" these days.

    It's us.

    Well, not exactly us. Not the enlightened souls here at Dailykos. Rather, it's the average American shmoe. The guy who hangs sheetrock all day, drives a giant pickup, and has a wife working at BuyMore. Or the low-level white collar guy in the office park, with his girlfriend executive assistant. See, the average American these days actually likes the drivel on the tube. If he/she didn't, those eyes would be somewhere else. Television is all about eyes on the screen for the advertisers. And sadly, most Americans' eyes glaze over when any substantive news or analysis comes on, and his/her hand twitches on the remote...until Heroes or some pseudo-reality show comes up, and a blank smile settles on those vacant features, undisturbed by intelligent thought while munching through a bowl of Doritos.

    Just sayin.

    •  But it IS the Media! (0+ / 0-)

      I really don't think Joe Sixpack wants the pablum they get on television so much as they accept what they're presented with on television. Sure, they deserve a certain amount of scorn for being so completely uncritical, but really, if the television media actually acted in the public's interest imagine how much more sophisticated and knowledgeable their audience might be. It's kind of like blaming livestock for getting fattened for the slaughter.

      Despite the claims of the big-media monopolies, they're not "just giving their audience what they want" - they're purposefully limiting our options. If they were really giving us what we wanted, and acting on the Free-Market principles they claim are so important to the very foundations of our democracy, we'd have porn on our televisions, a la carte cable, and music that didn't suck on the radio.

      My other car is a pair of boots.

      by FutureNow on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 11:13:33 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Idiot English (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JohnGor0

    Why do idiots keep using "media" as singular?

Permalink | 10 comments