Skip to main content

The Senate is voting on the bailout today and the House will soon be following suit. The progressive Dems in the House have been pushing for a bill that will be focused on having real protections for the taxpayers, strong anti-predatory lending legislation, and will provide mandatory mechanisms for modifying many of the bad loans that are still out there.  

The National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) has been in the forefront for several years, trying to get the regulators, this Administration and Congress to address these issues. You can see NCRC’s talking points on the bailout out legislation here.

You can also weigh with Congress on this issue easily by going to this site where a simple clear message to your member of Congress will be generated on your behalf.

NCRC’s President and CEO, John Taylor has been working hard to get a progressive message out about this bailout. Over the jump you can read his latest letter to NCRC members and the general public.

Letter from John Taylor,
President & CEO
 of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition:

It is true that the economic well-being of our nation is in jeopardy and
consumer confidence and liquidity is badly needed in order to have any hope
of reversing this downward economic slide.
But it is equally true that the congressional focus on stopping the
foreclosures cannot be separated from the bailout of Wall Street.  I say
this not only because it is the right and fair thing to do, but rather
because the bailout won’t work without it.

NCRC’s leadership met with Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke 
Last week and he made it clear that another 2 million foreclosures were imminent. 
Treasury Sec. Paulson said he expects we’ll see 2.5 million foreclosures
this year.  These figures show a dramatic acceleration of the foreclosure
rates we have seen over the past few years. So if the foreclosures of these
past four years can drive the U.S. Economy to the brink of a depression,
what can we expect from a dramatic increase in those numbers?

Congress has a lower approval rating than President Bush.  Hard to do, but
they have earned it.  Few congressional leaders showed the leadership to
protect working Americans. Elected and appointed officials long ignored the
warnings from NCRC and our members who urged them to clamp down on 
these high cost, unsafe and unsound loans.  As far back as 2002 and every month
going forward we warned that these loans were unfair and would cause
problems for homeowners.  To this day, they have still not outlawed the
lending practices that got us here in the first place.

And now, after years of what Alan Greenspan described as “infectious greed
and malfeasance” we find America facing a deep and dark economic precipice
into which we are rapidly sliding.
The government has backed itself into this position through deregulation, 
non-enforcement of consumer protections and its inaction against a lending
and securitization industry gone wild. And now we have little choice but to
shore up the economy, but we must do so by focusing in on one very
fundamental reason for our economic decline, foreclosures.  

Any bailout of
Wall Street must be accompanied by meaningful, comprehensive and rapid loan
modifications in order to halt the massive numbers of home foreclosures
occurring at the rate of 300,000 foreclosure filings per month.

“It is about foreclosures, stupid.”

I said this over a year ago and it is
as true now as it was then.  Stop the foreclosures, save the economy.
If meaningful foreclosure mitigation is not in the next congressional Wall
Street bailout proposal, then we owe it to all Americans to oppose that
legislation. The millions of families who have lost, and millions more that
will lose, their homes due primarily to malfeasant lending practices and
Wall Street greed, are depending upon us to do the right thing.

Stop the foreclosures, save the economy. 

John Taylor
President & CEO

Remember you can take action now by going to this site where you can send a concise letter to your member of Congress.

Originally posted to bankbane on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 06:29 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  A interesting side note (0+ / 0-)

    According to a recent study by Ohio State University the mortgage crisis while grave ( $180 billion) it is not as grave for single family first mortgage holders. The vast majority of bad mortgages are here:

    Instead, the results suggest that the biggest losses in the mortgage crisis are not for owner-occupied homes, but for commercial real estate loans, and loans for houses bought as investments or built on speculation, Olsen said.

    "As a group, people who have mortgages on homes they live in have been more conservative and careful about their money than some of the big financial institutions," Olsen said.

    So out of this $180 Billion how many are truly loans that are in trouble through no fault of the borrower - misled and how many are because the borrower new they were doing something that they shouldn't?

    In the choice between changing ones mind and proving there's no need to do so, most people get busy on the proof.

    by jsfox on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 06:41:02 AM PDT

    •  As some one who does foreclosure counseling (0+ / 0-)

      I'd have to question that study. I get a few calls from landlords, but the bulk are coming from home owners. The foreclosure of rental units does create another problem however, because the renters usually have no way of knowing that they will have to move until the foreclosure process is pretty advanced.

      "The more they spoke of honor, the more I checked my wallet."

      by bankbane on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 06:45:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I wouldn't (0+ / 0-)

        doubt the majority of your calls come from individual homeowners. As I said $180 billion in bad single family mortgages is still a vary large number. However why would a speculator, or a flipper or somebody holding a commercial mortgage call you?

        However would a speculator, flipper or someone holding a mortgage on commercial property normally call you?  This is a curiosity question not a doubting one.

        In the choice between changing ones mind and proving there's no need to do so, most people get busy on the proof.

        by jsfox on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 06:50:51 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Commercial property occasionally (0+ / 0-)

          because there are a fair number of mom and pop landlords, at least in some of the smaller northern industrial cities.  Determining who was a speculator and who was a homeowner just buying a bigger loan isn't always a clear bright line.  

          They're expecting 300,000 foreclosure actions this month. If they average $100,000 in home value, that is $30 billion in one month, so I'd have to question the $180 billion figure, unless you meant for one year. In my experience about half the foreclosure calls I get involve good loans/life circumstances; the other half are crappy loans.

          "The more they spoke of honor, the more I checked my wallet."

          by bankbane on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 07:15:20 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Thanks for the clarification n/t (0+ / 0-)

            In the choice between changing ones mind and proving there's no need to do so, most people get busy on the proof.

            by jsfox on Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 07:22:59 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site