Suppose you wanted to undertake a significant new purchase. If you didn't have enough money now, you could still purchase it soon if you got a pay increase. If you didn't get a pay increase, you could cash in an asset or borrow against it. If you couldn't do that, you could take out a new loan, or else refinance an old loan at a lower interest rate. If you couldn't do any of those, you might have to cut back in other areas, or else forego the purchase.
The same applies to American consumers as a whole. When average American consumers have not had an improvement in their incomes, and have been unable to borrow against their existing assets, refinance old debt, or take on new debt, recession has followed.
American consumers:
- have not had an increase in household wealth
- have been unable to refinance at lower interest rates for more than 3 years
- have been unable to tap into increased wealth via stock or house price appreciation above previous levels
- and have chosen instead to cut back significantly on debt (more than 1/2%)
only twice in the last 27 years: during the recessions of 1981-2 and 1990-1. Recent data shows that in 2008, it has happened again.
Cross-posted at The Economic Populist
Back in August 2007 I wrote two diaries entitled, Are Hard Times near? The Great Decline in interest rates is ending, and Why American Consumers are sginaling recession that began with the following:
The American consumer has had largely stagnant wages since 1974. While from 1980 through 2006, the median income of an American household has risen only from $39,700 to $48,200 in real terms, house prices for example have shot up form nearly $125,000 to $246,500. Consumers have responded generally by taking on more and more debt. Total household debt service has risen from 16% in 1980 to 19.4% in 2006.
Fortunately for consumers, there has been a generation-long decline in interest rates since they peaked at 15.21% for the 30 year US Treasury bond in October 1981. This has allowed consumers to refinance their debts at ever lower rates every few years. They were assisted by a bull market in stocks that took the S & P 500 from 102 in 1982 to 1553 in 2000, and then this decade's housing bubble.
There are signs that this "Great Disinflation" of declining interest rates, that started in 1981, is coming to an end. Only twice in the last 27 years has the consumer been unable to refinance debt or tap into his or her stock or house ATM....
My thesis in this diary is a simple one. Wages for middle and working class Americans have not improved significantly since the 1970s....Thus, the only way American consumers have been able to significantly improve their lifestyles is either to take on debt, using assets which have appreciated in value as collateral, or to refinance their debt at lower interest rates. If consumers are unable to tap the value of assets, or to refinance, then without improvements in wages, they will pull back and cause a consumer-led recession.
In those diaries, I showed how wages, stock prices, home prices, and interest rates had all been simultaneously stagnant only twice since 1981, precisely coinciding with the 1982 and 1991 recessions. I noted that it appeared we were on course for the third such event.
That prediction has finally been shown to have come true, via data from the second quarter of this year that was just published within the last month.
Recently the Census Bureau updated its data on household income, showing that once again in 2007, the median American household was still making less than it had at the peak of the last expansion in 2000.
Thus to fuel expanding consumer expenses, either house prices or stock prices on investments would be necessary. But for the first time since 1991, neither were appreciating. In fact, over the last year, both housing and stock prices have deteriorated badly. Here is the Case-Schiller housing index for August 2008, showing a 16% or more decline since the previous year:
As a result, borrowing against Home Equity as virtually stopped as of the second quarter of 2008:
(Courtesy Calculated Risk).
And here is the chart of the S^P 500 from October 2007 through early October 2008, showing approximately a 30% decline in stock prices:
Meanwhile as shown by the blue line in the below graph, interest rates have still failed to make a new low since 2002. They have essentially trended sideways for 6 years, denying consumers the chance to refinance debt at lower rates:
With no increase in real earnings, no ability to refinance home equity, no ability to cash out stock market gains, and no ability to refinance at lower rates, American consumers are retrenching for only the third time in over 25 years, choosing to pay down debt instead of consume. The final piece of information is shown on this graph from the Federal Reserve, just released a few weeks ago, showing household debt obligations as a percentage of disposable income as of the second quarter of this year:
This is only the third time since 1981 that consumer debt has decreased by 1/2% or more. Both previous times were associated with recessions.
With all avenues of increased spending cut off, American consumers started to retrench earlier this year, a retrenchment that has increased substantially in the last month or so. And there is a long way to go before the problem is resolved, Here are two graphs showing the ratio of median home prices to median income:
and also the ratio of median home prices to disposable income:
As the New York Times noted yesterday:
In response to the falling value of their homes and high gasoline prices, Americans have become more frugal all year. But in recent weeks, as the financial crisis reverberated from Wall Street to Washington, consumers appear to have cut back sharply. ....
Recent figures from companies, and interviews across the country, show that automobile sales are plummeting, airline traffic is dropping, restaurant chains are struggling to fill tables, customers are sparse in stores.
When the final tally is in, consumer spending for the quarter just ended will almost certainly shrink, the first quarterly decline in nearly two decades.
Whatever residual calm left despite the panic in the shadow banking system was probably destroyed by Bush's Anti-FDR "Have FEAR!!!" speech of two weeks ago --
President Bush said yesterday that the credit crisis that has seized world markets could devastate the U.S. economy unless Congress acts quickly to approve a $700 billion bailout plan for the nation's financial system, a message aimed at reluctant lawmakers as much as a deeply skeptical public.
"Our entire economy is in danger," Bush said in an address from the White House, emphasizing that the massive bailout was not targeted at "any individual company or industry. It is aimed at preserving America's overall economy."
Warning that "America could slip into a financial panic," Bush blamed the crisis on "easy credit" in the housing market and "the faulty assumption that home values would continue to rise." As mortgage loans went bad and borrowers defaulted, he said, investors have succumbed to a "widespread loss of confidence" that threatens to shut down consumer lending, decimate the stock market, cause businesses and banks to fail -- and cost millions of Americans their jobs.
-- the final nail in the coffin.
Both of the last two charts above are slightly dated at this point, but suffice it to say, until house prices retreat to their historical norm, it is doubtful that neither are stock prices likely to make new highs, nor are consumer interest rates are likely to decline to new lows as they had in previous recessions. It will be quite some time until the forces unleashed in this "slow motion bust" are sufficiently favorable so that the American consumer will return to economic health.