Skip to main content

 When Wells Fargo Bank (WFB) won the right last week to acquire Wachovia Bank, it issued a statement that the acquisition

requires no financial assistance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.

 Ahh, but the catch is in the phrase "financial assistance."  Although WFB was not requiring "financial assistance" from "any other government agency" (since changed with the new stock purchase plan ), they did in fact receive non-financial assistance from the Internal Revenue Service in the way of a favorable ruling which would allow WFB and similar acquiring banks to recognize tax losses (of the acquired bank) up front.  

 Under IRC Sec. 382 corporations are subject to limitations in recognizing pre-acquisition losses (net operating losses as well as unrealized built-in losses) incurred by any corporation they acquire.  Such rules are in place to make it less tax beneficial for a corporation to just go around buying up corporations solely for their tax losses with little or no business purpose to the acquisition.  The limitations may not preclude a corporation from recognizing all of the pre-acquisition losses of the target company, but it will spread such recognition over a longer period of time.
 With loan losses rapidly mounting, but no one really knowing just how to tabulate all those losses, seems "healthy" banks needed more incentive than even Henry Paulson could give them with cash infusion (which had some strings attached.)
 Enter the IRS to the rescue.  It issued Notice 2008-83 (pdf) on Sept. 29, four days before WFB first announced its plan to merge with Wachovia Bank.  The Notice grants exceptions to the Sec. 382  limitations on built-in losses specifically for banks acquiring other banks (in their entirety, not just select assets.)
 The key portion of Notive 2008-83 is Section 2, which states -

For purposes of section 382(h), any deduction properly allowed after an ownership change (as defined in section 382(g)) to a bank with respect to losses on loans or bad debts (including any deduction for a reasonable addition to a reserve for bad debts) shall not be treated as a built-in loss or a deduction that is attributable to periods before the change date.

(emphasis mine)

The rule change was huge for Wells Fargo. Willens said the present-value benefit for the bank is about $20 billion.

"It basically offsets the entire purchase price," Willens said. "They're basically getting Wachovia for nothing."
Wells Fargo, though, can sell its bad Wachovia loans to the federal government and then, using the new IRS rule, write off any losses.

 This article  includes a timeline showing the merger battle in conjunction with the IRS Notice issuance.
 The above figures are for Wells Fargo Bank.  Who knows what the total benefit will be when Bank of America and other acquiring "banks" are included, but it could reach $100 billion or more.

If it is true that there are $1 trillion in housing-related losses in the U.S. banking system, and if only $585 billion of them have been taken into account to date, that suggests there may be as much as $400 billion in built-in losses still in the system. At a corporate statutory rate of 35 percent, that suggests a net nominal tax savings potential of something like $140 billion.

 Hey, what's another $100 or so billion in taxpayer underwriting of the bank bailout?

Originally posted to FoundingFatherDAR on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 10:29 AM PDT.


Do you own stock in an acquiring bank?

8%2 votes
16%4 votes
40%10 votes
36%9 votes

| 25 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site