Skip to main content

Martha Davis Ph.D., a Clinical Psychologist and a Visiting Scholar at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, has produced an important new documentary, Interrogation Psychologists: The Making of a Professional Crisis". The film premiered at a conference entitled "The Interrogation and Torture Controversy: Crisis in Psychology," held at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Center on Terrorism in New York City on September 12, 2008.

Dr. Davis describes the documentary:

"In 2005 the American Psychological Association endorsed the participation of military psychologists in detainee interrogations. This policy incited a firestorm of protest within the profession and around the world, but APA officials held fast, contending that the involvement of psychologists insured that interrogations were safe, ethical and effective. With interviews of experts and documentation of communications between APA and government officials, "Interrogation Psychologists" traces the origins of the policy and why the APA risked massive defections for it. The search leads to the emerging field of national security psychology, which has far-reaching implications for intelligence gathering operations and U.S. treatment of prisoners of war."

The 46 minute long documentary is a fascinating examination of the issues and history involved in the psychologist-ethics-torture debate. The organizational turn of the APA, as exemplified by its policies around interrogations, towards "national security psychology" is what led me to resign from that organization earlier this year. At that time, I wrote:

Unlike some others who have left APA, my resignation is not based solely on the stance APA has taken regarding the participation of psychologists in national security interrogations. Rather, I view APA’s shifting position on interrogations to spring from a decades-long commitment to serve uncritically the national security apparatus of the United States. Recent publications and both public and closed professional events sponsored by APA have made it clear that this organization is dedicated to serving the national security interests of the American government and military, to the extent of ignoring basic human rights practice and law. The influence of the Pentagon and the CIA in APA activities is overt and pervasive, if often hidden....

In the recently APA published book, Psychology in the Service of National Security (APA Press, 2006), the book’s editor, A. David Mangelsdorff, wrote, "As the military adjusts to its changing roles in the new national security environment, psychologists have much to offer" (p. 237). He notes the recent forward military deployment of psychologists, their use in so-called anti-terrorism research, and assistance in influencing public opinion about "national security problems facing the nation." L. Morgan Banks, himself Chief of the Psychological Applications Directorate of the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, a former SERE psychologist, and a member of the controversial APA Psychological Ethics and National Security or PENS panel [in 2005], wrote elsewhere in the same book about the "bright future" (p. 95) for psychologists working with Special Operations Forces.

"Befehl ist Befehl"

The Davis film takes the viewer through the post 9/11 story of the APA, from the introduction of psychologists to the Behavioral Science Consultation Teams (BSCTs) in Afghanistan and Guantanamo and Iraq, to the changes in the organization's ethical code which made adherence to military orders a valid option for psychologists, even if such orders went against a professional's ethical code or guidelines.

The primary culprit in this last case was the rewriting of APA's Ethics Code 1.02 back in 2002. It now infamously allows psychologists to obey commands and "governing legal authority," even when an action is at variance with professional ethics, remains a virtual get-out-of-jail card for military psychologists engaged in abusive interrogations. The code, rewritten after 9/11, places into APA's ethics code the Nazis' Nuremberg defense: "I was only following orders" ("Befehl ist Befehl"). The APA promised to insert a qualifying phrase about human rights into 1.02 back in 2006. No action has been taken to date.

Interrogation Psychologists takes the viewer on a guided tour of the political manipulations that guided APA's bureaucracy in the post-9/11 era, through the creation of a mysterious National Security Caucus within APA, and the stacking of the PENS panel that would assess ethical questions in this new national security environment with military and intelligence figures involved in the various dubious ethical misdeeds -- such as directing abusive interrogations at Guantanamo -- taking place under U.S. military and CIA command. Also covered by the documentary is the rise of a critical opposition within APA that would bring about numerous fights over anti-torture resolutions, and ultimately, a successful petition campaign to change APA official policy and pull the psychologists out of national security sites that violated international and domestic human rights laws.

The documentary appears to be a fusillade of sorts against the project of establishing a National Security Psychology (NSP) within the field of psychology proper. Dr. Davis describes NSP as providing jobs and funding for interrogation psychologists, intelligence research, and security screening and assessment. There are millions of dollars to be doled out in coming years, and already plenty of psychologists and psychology schools have lined up to suck up the funds. The greed has already spread down to the layers of the professional school movement, where schools like Pacific Graduate School in Palo Alto, have pitched in with military and CIA researchers to study the psychology of deception for homeland security purposes.

The Rise and Fall of CIFA

Until recently (and possibly still in some kind of existence), there was the Center for National Security Psychology (CNSP), as part of the Behavioral Sciences Directorate at the Department of Defense's agency for Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA). Established under Rumsfeld's Pentagon in 2002, CIFA was formally shut down last August, after being associated with scandals over infiltration of U.S. domestic peace groups and charges of domestic spying.

CNSP's chief was CIFA psychologist Kirk Kennedy, who, according to Linkedin, now works for the Defense Intelligence Agency. (I guess if you are a "national security psychologist," there's always some agency that will hire you.) The contributions of "national security psychologists" are not always nefarious. Take this snippet from a review of a talk by Dr. Kennedy at a Special Libraries Association meeting in 2006:

But the similarities between a psychopathic murder, or a suicidal person, to a terrorist are few. Kennedy and other terrorism psychologists believe that terrorism is complex, driven from many factors. One of these factors, though, is not abnormal or psychopathological (that is, the terrorists are NOT crazy)....

Kennedy wants us to understand these cultures and religions rather than declaring the perpetrators as criminals. We have to accept the fact that the actions of terrorists may be explainable but not always understandable.

According to Gulf Times:

The Defence Department said it had "disestablished" the Counterintelligence Field Activity office, or CIFA, created in February 2002 by former defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld to manage defence and armed service efforts against intelligence threats from foreign powers and groups such as Al Qaeda.

Those responsibilities will now be carried out by a new organisation called the Defence Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Center, overseen by the Pentagon’s Defence Intelligence Agency.

CIFA’s operations stirred concern among members of Congress and civil liberties advocates. A CIFA database known as Talon, set up to monitor threats against US military installations, was found to have retained information on US antiwar protesters including Quakers after they had been found to pose no security danger, officials said.

As Interrogation Psychologists points out, one of the main members of the initial APA policy units looking at national security and interrogations (PENS) was R. Scott Shumate, then director of the psychology unit for CIFA. I don't know if the CNSP still exists, or has migrated over to the new Defense Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Center of the Pentagon (DCHIC).

Will Psychologists Really Stop Assisting National Security Interrogations?

The world of national security intelligence is a shadowy one. The spooks who run it never give up, and it is unlikely that the new policy of APA which aims at pulling psychologists from national security interrogation centers in places like Guantanamo will quietly be implemented. What's more likely is that we will see obfuscation, lying, more cover-up, and covert, classified actions that are aimed at keeping counterinsurgency-based torture policies active. Already there are plenty of reports that doctors and psychiatrists have not absented themselves from DoD interrogations, despite the official policies of the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association against just such activity.

This is what Jonathan Marks and M. Gregg Bloche had to say in a recent issue of The New England Journal of Medicine:

... documents recently provided to us by the U.S. Army in response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) make clear that the Department of Defense still wants doctors to be involved and continues to resist the positions taken by medicine's professional associations. An October 2006 memo entitled "Behavioral Science Consultation Policy" ... fails to mention the APA statement and provides a permissive gloss on the AMA's policy, at some points contradicting it outright. The memo appears to claim that psychiatrists should be able to provide advice regarding the interrogation of individual detainees if they are not providing medical care to detainees, their advice is not based on medical information they originally obtained for medical purposes, and their input is "warranted by compelling national security interests." The advice envisaged by the memo includes "evaluat[ing] the psychological strengths and vulnerabilities of detainees" and "assist[ing] in integrating these factors into a successful interrogation"....

The policy memo also states that a "behavioral science consultant" may not be a "medical monitor during interrogation" and suggests that this is a "healthcare function." However, it appears to authorize monitoring as part of consultants' intelligence functions, since "physicians may protect interrogatees if, by monitoring, they prevent coercive interrogations." It asserts, more specifically, that "the presence of a physician at an interrogation, particularly an appropriately trained psychiatrist, may benefit the interrogatees because of the belief held by many psychiatrists that kind and compassionate treatment of detainees can establish rapport that may result in eliciting more useful information."

The government's position that physicians or psychiatrists can "protect interrogatees" is, of course, the same position taken by the American Psychological Association regarding the use of psychologists in interrogations. Or it was the position until a referendum by APA membership tossed out the old policy and instituted a new policy denying use of psychologists at governmental sites that deny basic human rights and engage in torture or other abusive treatment. How enforceable this policy will be, in the light of government inaction or obstruction, remains an open question. It is particularly unclear what goes on when psychologists work for the CIA, whose very prisons and even prisoners are mostly unknown and secret.

The Case of MKULTRA

It's important to remember, too, that this is not the first spate of scandals regarding the nefarious use of psychological knowledge. In the 1970s and 1980s, there were numerous revelations about CIA's recruitment of psychologists and other human behavior and medical specialists in government mind control programs, e.g. MKULTRA, and research into sensory deprivation and the "breaking" of prisoners. If I had any criticism of Davis's documentary, it was the failure to place the current controversy in the context of the decades-long history of the problem. One place the reader can start is with Patricia Greenfield's article in the APA Monitor (of all places) back in December 1977, CIA's Behavior Caper.

One major component of the CIA's program, dubbed ARTICHOKE, was described in a CIA memo of January 25, 1952, as "the evaluation and development of any method by which we can get information from a person against his will and without his knowledge." An internal review of the terminated ARTICHOKE program, dated January 31, 1975, lists ARTICHOKE methods has having included "the use of drugs and chemicals, hypnosis, and 'total isolation,' a form of psychological harassment." Another major component of the CIA's program, called MKULTRA, explored, according to a memo of August 14, 1963, "avenues to the control of human behavior," including "chemical and biological materials capable of producing human behavioral and physiological changes," "radiology, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and materials"....

While news of blatant attempts at behavioral control have had immediate shock value, the CIA's support of basic research has had the more lingering effect of posing many difficult and complex questions and issues for psychologists. How were psychologists and other social scientists enlisted by the CIA? What did they do? What, if any, is the scientist's responsibility for the applications of research? How are social scientists affected by social and political forces? What are the implications of covert funding?

Greenfield's questions are still pertinent today. We can add to them now the query as to how long psychologists will play operational roles in abusive interrogations and torture.

Documentaries like Martha Davis's Interrogation Psychologists help to bring the truth about how this process takes place out of the shadows of academia and government agencies into the full light of public exposure. Now it's up to us, the people, to demand an end to this barbarity.

Also posted at Invictus

Originally posted to Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:35 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (18+ / 0-)

    Just testing... seeing if a substantive diary on an ongoing important issue can break through the 24/7 all-Palin, all the time coverage Daily Kos has practically become.

    Of course, I'm as guilty as the rest, and read all the Palin diaries first, myself. So, what's sauce for the goose...

    Anyway, here's my offering for today...

    War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

    by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:37:36 PM PDT

    •  While this subject may not provoke a lot of (6+ / 0-)

      interest, I find it fascinating. The recent issue of "Monitor on Psychology" from the APA touched on this subject very briefly.

      I'm a student affiliate with the APA and was really dis-heartened to hear of the affairs going on.

      Thanks for a very substantial diary and I look forward to checking out the documentary.

      Without change, something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens.

      by FritztheCat on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:40:58 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I'm very heartened (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        heathlander, Chacounne, JG in MD

        to see student or otherwise affiliated APA members looking into the history of their organization. Too few bother. Perhaps you can turn on some of your peers...

        War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

        by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:45:49 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  What bothers me the most ... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Valtin, Chacounne

          ..well, there are a couple of things. First, in order to graduate I have to be a student affiliate with the APA so I can be insured for my 422 class. That seemed odd to me that I only had one option open for this insurance.

          The second is the reason why the APA was involved in the first place. They painted their involvement as being "guardians" if you will of proper interrogation techniques. My problem with that, that I've voiced to my instructors again and again, is that I feel the APA should have never been involved in the first place. The whole premise of torture is wrong no matter what kind of gift wrap you try to put on it. I felt that just by the APA's presence alone, the interrogators felt they had carte blanche credentials to do whatever they wanted as long as the APA advisor didn't frown on it.

          To me that is wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to start.

          I'm active duty right now and have just under 2 years until I retire. My goal is to be at least halfway through my Master's Degree by then and then use the GI Bill to complete my doctorate training. I really want to help veterans returning with PTSD here in my predominately military town as I'm seeing that care just isn't abundant for this traumatic disorder.  The APA has been pushed so much that it leaves one with the idea that there are no other organizations out there with the same benefits.

          It's frustrating but I'm not going to let some bad apples at the organizational level of the APA spoil it for me. I'll keep being a small voice against the current situation until I get hoarse or until it changes.  

          Without change, something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens.

          by FritztheCat on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:53:04 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Well, thank you (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, heathlander, Chacounne, JG in MD, dawnt

    I probably won't be able to sleep now, after reading this!

  •  This is VERY important (5+ / 0-)

    I hope it makes the rec list.

    John McCain traded your $10 job for $5 and called it a bargain.

    by dawnt on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:45:15 PM PDT

    •  I hope so, too (5+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      annan, heathlander, Chacounne, JG in MD, dawnt

      But these days, that's a lot to ask for. I don't know if it's the most important I've written, but it's a pretty good compendium of where we are now on the topic (and where we've come from). But it together with the documentary, and damn, if one shouldn't get school credit for this.

      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

      by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:47:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Excellent diary! (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, heathlander, Chacounne, JG in MD

    Detail-rich, thoughtful, important.

  •  Horrifying and important, as always, (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, JG in MD

    my friend.

    An update of a conversation we were having:My copy of

    Fixing Hell, An Army Psychiatrist Contfronts Abu Ghraib, by Col. (ret.) Larry C. James.

    is finally on it's way to me. I should have it an a week or so and will let you know how it strikes me as soon as I can.

        Hugs,
        For Dan,
        Heather  

  •  A Confession (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    annan, marina, Valtin, Chacounne

    I couldn't read it, except to skim. The thought that we torture is so gut-wrenching I can't read about it. I'm glad you wrote, because people need to know these things.

    I watch a lot of old TV shows that sometimes include torture in the plot, and it's always the very bad guys who do it to our guys. The assumption in the drama is that only the evil resort to torture, we never would.

    I remember when those shows were new and there wasn't any irony there at all.

    Joe Biden: Get up! Al Gore: Pray, and use your feet! Harriet Tubman: Keep going!

    by JG in MD on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:50:18 PM PDT

  •  Note my sig line, (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    annan, marina, Valtin, heathlander

    FWIW.  It's easier to demolish someone's psyche, I imagine, than it is to help heal it.

    A jackass can kick down a barn but it takes a carpenter to build one.--Sam Rayburn (D-TX)

    by Ice Blue on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 03:50:41 PM PDT

  •  you wanna see your career destroyed (0+ / 0-)

    like Arrigo's?

    tough row to hoe
    good luck

    •  Jean Marie Arrigo's career is not destroyed (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      annan, Chacounne, synductive99

      And it's strange that you would assert that. I know certain establishment figures are very angry at her, for she had the guts to speak out against the black ops conducted against APA members, known publicly as PENS. A former APA president even sent around scurrilous lies that her father, who had worked as an interrogator, had committed suicide. Total lie, straight from the rule book of the right-wing whackos that run this country. Same kind of BS is now aimed at Barack Obama, proving the provenance of the origins of such slanders.

      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

      by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 04:02:52 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sir, it's an excellent diary. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, synductive99

    I'm not a psychologist, I just studied psychology for a BA. But yeah, I've been interested in the policies taken by the APA, because many of the instructors whom I respected and whose instruction I valued were APA members. I thought the APA president's statement of lurve for government torture policy was overturned by whatever legislative body the APA has, though.

    Also,

    The influence of the Pentagon and the CIA in APA activities is overt and pervasive, if often hidden...

    ...is overt... if often hidden

    what

    John McCain: Senator, former POW, confusing the USA with Cadia since 2006.

    by Shaviv on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 04:00:42 PM PDT

    •  Overt (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      annan, Chacounne, Shaviv

      That is, is out in the open. Simply peruse the APA's Science Spin column. The pervasiveness is my editorial conclusion. The "hidden" part has to do with covert ops and secret funding. My diary speaks amply to the latter.

      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

      by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 04:05:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Also (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Chacounne, Shaviv

      Re the overturning of APA's policy: it occurred via membership petition and referendum, and the issue is covered in the diary above (see original above for links):

      Also covered by the documentary is the rise of a critical opposition within APA that would bring about numerous fights over anti-torture resolutions, and ultimately, a successful petition campaign to change APA official policy and pull the psychologists out of national security sites that violated international and domestic human rights laws.

      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, The lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade Invictus

      by Valtin on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 04:10:00 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks, very informative diary! nt (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, Chacounne

    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" Hamlet, 1:5

    by synductive99 on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 04:04:27 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site