Skip to main content

Palo Alto, California has a very tiny black and latino population, while the neighboring East Palo Alto, just across the county line, is largely black and latino.  Usually, Palo Alto residents don't think about the reasons why.

On October 31, the Palo Alto chief of police made a very simple statement:

When our officers are out there and they  see an African-American, in a congenial way, we want them to find out who they are

Like many towns across the west, midwest, and the north, Palo Alto is a sundown town.  In the 1940s, residents used the threat of violence to evict new black residents.

In more recent years, the city has, in fact had a de facto policy of police harassment of black and latino visitors.  Instead of burning down peoples' houses (as happened for example in Santa Cruz in 1951) or threatening landowners who dared rent blacks, Palo Alto has let its largely white police force stop and harass people seen as undesirable, irrespective of cause.

On Sunday, in response to Chief Johnson's comments, a couple hundred people set out from the East Palo Alto city hall:Marching down University

The crowd started largely as East Palo Alto residents, with a small number of Palo Alto residents mixed in.  We passed first through the old residential neighborhoods, where we saw few people, and soon reached downtown, where there were meaningful numbers of pedestrians.  To my surprise, when I stopped to talk to bystanders, none of those I spoke with were even aware of the police chief's remarks.

Rev. Anthony Darrington
Rev. Darrington

At the Palo Alto city hall, we found the Raging Grannies waiting for us, along with the mayor of Palo Alto and part (though not all) of the Palo Alto city council.  Speaker after speaker talked about their personal experiences with police harassment.  Rev. Darrington, the pastor of a Palo Alto church, described how he, and every other young-looking black male, is stopped by the police about once every three weeks.

The Palo Alto Mayor, Larry Klein, took the very helpful step of admitting that Palo Alto has a history of using racial profiling.  What he didn't do, and what needs to be done, is to take concrete measures to actually end it.  A large chunk of the city population is asking for the police chief to step down.  She hasn't, and so far, the city council hasn't made her.

So far, what we've done, and seen, is a very modest step.  Right now, much of the town seems to still be ignorant about what the police have done, and how racial profiling isn't terribly useful at preventing or solving crime.  The hard part isn't just letting a few politicians know that there's an issue — the march did that.  The hard part is what comes next, making sure the whole city knows.  At that point, change becomes thinkable.

I realize that most dailykos readers don't live in Palo Alto.  Nevertheless, my town's situation is one which found again and again across the US.  Look around you.  If your town is very much monoracial, there's a reason, and not just some accident of past settlement patterns.

Go read Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism by James Loewen. Talk to your neighbors.  Look in local archives.  See what you can do to make change happen where you are.

Update: On the evening after I posted the diary, the Palo Alto city council voted to condemn racial profiling, but did not fire the police chief.  There's clearly a lot more work to do.

Update 2: Under pressure, Chief Johnson stepped down on November 20, 2008.

Originally posted to silence on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 10:35 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site