Skip to main content

The anti-choice fanatics make a lot of arguments against choice.  Most of them are hogwash.  But one that at least sounds reasonable is that abortion causes psychological problems for the woman who has one.

There's one problem with this argument.

It isn't true.

More below the fold

I subscribe to Scientific American Mind which is full of fascinating articles.  This month, they had a short article about the risks of abortion.  Their summary:

Research shows no credible evidence that a single abortion causes psychological problems for women

In 2006, the American Psychological Association sponsored a task force of experts to review all studies of abortion published since 1989.  Although they found that some women do have sadness or even depression after an abortion, there is no evidence that rates of sadness are higher in women who have single, legal, first-term abortions than they are in women who deliver from an unplanned pregnancy.  

Many studies in this area are deeply flawed, most commonly by failing to include a suitable control group.  It is not appropriate to compare women who have abortions to women in general - because women who have abortions are already pregnant and wish not to be.  Therefore, the only proper control groups are women who have unplanned pregnancies.  Other flaws related to failure to account for factors that are known to be related to psychological problems - such things as poverty, substance abuse, exposure to violence, and a history of mental health problems.

The full APA report is available in a link at that site.  It runs to 105 pages.

Originally posted to plf515 on Mon Dec 08, 2008 at 02:06 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site