Skip to main content

If you're like me and haven't bothered to subscribe to DailyKos yet (and believe me, I've been meaning to do so... actually, I just did now, so no more ads for me!) then you've probably noticed a new advertiser's logo popping up in the ads on the site lately.

The new advertiser is "AIA", the Aerospace Industries Association.  AIA is an industry lobbying group made up of some huge aviation/defense corporations.

More after the fold...

The AIA represents a nearly perfect example of what the New York Times, in 2005, called "the Lobbying-Industrial Complex".

I like this term, because it so neatly sums up what's unfortunately happened to our nation.  It's become cheaper for large corporations, in ALL lines of business, to simply lobby the government for business (or tax breaks, or regulatory relief, or earmarks, or subsidies, or whatever.)

When you start looking at companies that do a lot of business with the government, it becomes even more blatant.  Rather than actually have to compete in the private marketplace, where they might face actual competition and demands from their customers, companies that get a lot of government contracts don't have to produce at all.

They get "cost-plus" contracts- and farm out tons of "work" to subsidiaries, making it appear as though their costs are really high... but in theory, the company with the contract is only making a minimum of profit (the "plus" part of "cost-plus".)  

Meanwhile, those subsidiary corporations are making THEIR profit and markup on the actual costs, so the overall holding company (and more importantly, its fatcat stockholders) make a fortune in dividends, profits, and higher stock prices.

(Well, maybe not so much that last one right now.)

Since the contractor's customer is the government, if the contractor can simply keep the "customer" from demanding better performance the contractor gets to keep raking in big, fat profits.

And the government is easy to keep off your back- just lobby, lobby, lobby like hell.  Don't spend money on silly things like research and development, or even marketing and advertising; all you have to spend money on is buying off the Congress and/or the Executive Branch!

So long as you can convince those folks that the government desperately needs what you're selling, you can do an absolutely pathetic job and STILL keep the contract.  In fact, you can get MORE contracts, until you get to the point where as much as 84% of your revenuecomes from the federal government.

How bad a job can a big corporation do?  They can cut the actual services provided to the citizens/users of the product by 50%, double the cost per user, and STILL hit the government up for more money under the "cost-plus" type of contract!

So, let's get back to these AIA guys.

The AIA, as I said, is an industry consortium made up of the biggest names in the aerospace/defense business.  Names like:

General Dynamics
General Electric
Lockheed Martin
Northrop Grumman
Rockwell Collins
United Technologies

Pretty much if a company builds something that flies, or blows up, or flies and blows up, or is even remotely related to something that flies or blows up or flies and blows up, the company probably belongs to the AIA.

So why are all these companies, through their lobbying group, suddenly advertising on Daily Kos, of all places?  Are DKos users buying a lot of missiles, or flight electronics, or technical stuff?  Are DKos users a group of midsized nations looking to upgrade their defense capabilities?

Ummm... highly unlikely.

But DKos has been identified, apparently, as a place where people who DO buy that kind of thing- or think about buying that kind of thing- hang out.  

Or... just maybe... there's a group of folks who're going to be moving into the halls of power in Washington DC who are going to have some insight and influence into whether or not the United States needs to buy some of that kind of stuff, and maybe those folks occasionally swing by DKos.

Or maybe those folks won't actually see the ads, but they'll read the diaries that are posted by the people who DO see the ads.

Hmmm... maybe now we're on to something here.

Let's look at the people in charge of AIA.

The AIA's new CEO (who came into office about a year ago) is Marion Blakey.  Blakey's most recent job, for 5 years, was to be the head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

At the FAA, Blakey made a name for herself by ruthlessly implementing the Rove/Bush Administration's vigorous anti-labor, anti-worker agenda.  In doing so, she destroyed the employee moraleof one of the most respected safety organizations in the world.

She spent some time prior to that as the head of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), but in actuality had very little real transportation or aviation experience.

(This is, of course, par for the course for the Bush Administration- remember the commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association, and the heck of a job he did with FEMA?)

Before getting into the political patronage positions she was appointed to, Blakey was in public relations.  Her old firm continues on- Blakey and Agnew.

What does Blakey and Agnew do?  Here's a quote from their site:

Blakey & Agnew is best characterized as a public affairs firm with demonstrated success in developing communication strategies that make complex regulatory, engineering, and legal issues more easily understood by broader audiences.

In other words, they talk the masses into supporting whatever their clients want/need.

As an example, under Marion Blakey they were (and continue to be) instrumental in selling local municipalities red-light camera systems.

(A side note:  While these systems seem to serve a worthy goal- trying to cut down on the growing epidemic of red-light-running- the reality is at least one study has shown that they actually make things more dangerous.  The vast majority of the red-light cameras that have been installed have been under contracts that give the equipment manufacturers a significant financial cut of any fines that result from the equipment.

This has led to a situation where municipalities are actively lobbied by the equipment companies, aided by Blakey's old firm, to "do something" about the red-light-running problem.  "Something" pretty much always turns out to be "install our equipment", which leads to all kinds of money for the company.

See how that works?  The red-light-camera company hires a firm to create an impression of "need" in the minds of locla government officials.  Those officials then turn around and buy... red-light-cameras.  The company, therefore, gets more of a return from "investing" money into their lobbying efforts than they do from anything else.

So Marion Blakey has plenty of experience with the notion of actively lobbying government to buy her clients' stuff by creating a perceived "need" for that equipment.

Rather than the governmental entity coming to the conclusion on its own that it has a certain situation and then solving it, this type of lobbying exposes how a smart PR campaign can work very well for the lobbying-industrial complex.

So back to Blakey.  In her reign as FAA Administrator, she wound up being loathed by the vast majority of the agency's employees.  

But you have to admire her, in a way.  In her present role, she's not only working to increase the perceived "need" for equipment and contracts that would lead to nice tidy profits for the AIA membership- she actually made the decision for the FAA to spend billions on that equipment and those contracts!

When Blakey was in charge of the FAA, she set the agency onto a course of spending billions of dollars on a system called "NextGen".  Blakey, as Administrator, slashed the pay of tens of thousands of FAA employees because (according to her) it was necessary to pay for NextGen.  (This was, of course, a big fat lie.)

Then, right as she leaves the FAA, she goes to work for the AIA... which is a bunch of companies that are going to be designing and manufacturing a bunch of new technology and equipment for NextGen.

As I said in a blog entry on The FAA Follies... You Do The Math.

So basically what we have, in AIA, is an industry group that's dedicated to selling more of its stuff- but a huge portion of its stuff happens to be stuff that only the government will buy.

Yet they're advertising here on DailyKos, a site of liberal bloggers, nearly all of them private citizens and not government officials, right?

And let's face it, folks- Marion Blakey has already proven that she can create a campaign that makes people think they need whatever stuff she's selling.

Under George W Bush, she got even better at her game, working for years to steer the Federal Aviation Administration towards buying billions of dollars worth of stuff... and then (surprise surprise) going to work for the same companies that are selling all of that stuff that she basically just signed the order forms for.

Remember what I said about the lobbying-industrial complex... well, AIA is a lobbying and PR arm of these giant corporations.

Finally, that same group of companies is now advertising here on DKos.

Well, now you know who they are.  Check out their ads and believe, or not believe, them at your own risk.

Just keep in mind that these companies are essentially the largest aerospace and defense corporations in the world, and that their lobbying group is being led by one of the biggest snakes ever to poison the public service, a snake who wound up profitting massively from her own decisions of what to do with billions of YOUR money.

That's who these AIA guys are.

Originally posted to Blue Eyed Buddhist on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 12:06 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  motives (4+ / 0-)

    In the example of Lockheed Martin advertising aircraft on a national cable channel, I'd wager one of the benefits LockMart thinks it's getting is editorial silence, if not support, regarding its policies.  Not likely to happen here, so maybe it's just to try to get people used to government aerospace defense expenditures so we won't think it's quite so out of the ordinary when it happens.  What else are they up to here?

    Government and laws are the agreement we all make to secure everyone's freedom.

    by Simplify on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 12:54:59 AM PST

  •  Reminds me of the time... (4+ / 0-)

    ...Pontiac used a Chumbawumba song to advertise for the Vibe. Paid the band a hundred grand, which they turned around and donated to anti-corporate activist groups.

    I think this is even better. Their advertising dollars appear to have gotten them, to a degree, out of obscurity long enough for us to show them contempt.

    But then, all publicity is good publicity. I guess.

    "I set up a stage, put up a few banners, stuck a podium up there, and started shouting 'Yes we can.' Next thing you know there's 150,000 people here." -Joe

    by Geiiga on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 01:17:37 AM PST

  •  My worry is what/how they want to proceed (3+ / 0-)

    with regard to American space policy.  While they may talk a good game, traditional big aerospace has always preferred cost-plus contracting, that doesn't move us towards the necessary self-sustaining space industries needed for a spacefaring society.  

    Now, maybe thats not the case, but I have my concerns.  

    •  Their interest is... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ...profit.  Pure and simple.  If they can believe that there's profit in space, they'll do space.  If they can believe there's more profit in bombing the snot out of Iraq, they'll happily provide the money for that.

      Right now, I think they're aligning themselves to convince the Congress (and us here at DKos, too!) that we need to continue onward with Blakey's plan to throw tens of billions of dollars at the FAA's "NextGen" proposal.

      Now, I don't think that's necessarily wrong; it's infrastructure, and we DO need infrastructure!  But there's some serious problems with how the plan is progressing and what we're spending our money on versus the return we are likely to get.

      •  Am I way out of line in thinking (0+ / 0-)
        that air traffic control should really be done by software the way good traffic lights are run by software that monitors traffic sensors?

        Of course, such a system would have to be monitored closely by real human controllers for years to ensure the bugs get worked out.  And controllers would always need to be available for emergencies.

        Air traffic congestion is quickly growing too complex for any human, or even network of humans, to manage.  The decisions made to direct traffic follow certain rules.  They are not, or should not be, instinct or judgement calls.  This is the perfect job for software.  Analyze tons of variables at once and follow a decision tree according to pre-defined rules.

        Once everything was worked out, it would mean the end of most air traffic controller jobs.  Well, we no longer have most crossing guards either.  Technology generally leads to prosperity in other areas even if it comes with growing pains.

  •  You may have to post again. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Blue Eyed Buddhist, jds1978

    I hate that this important diary is getting trumped by the plethora of multiple Warren outrage diaries of the last few days.

  •  Nice logo, though (2+ / 0-)

    I guess they aren't the American Institute of Architects,

    Those who hear not the music-think the dancers mad

    by Eiron on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 08:22:36 AM PST

  •  Akin to putting a Marlboro ad on an anti- (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    smoking web site. I don't get it either. And then the money generated gets spent on silly polls, exhausting permutations of Sarah Palin running for senate in 2010, etc. while we have not yet recovered from the greatest poll overload in history!  

    Yet, a popular DKos front pager like Bill of Cheers and Jeers has to rustle up his own money to keep going by asking readers to send money to PayPal (because he gets none of the benefits of the AIA and CNN advertising dollars).  It doesn't seem right for some reason.  

  •  Damn (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    And I was getting my hopes up, thinking that the American Institute of Architects had purchased ad space on Daily Kos.

    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." -- Sinclair Lewis, 1935

    by Living in Gin on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 09:06:56 PM PST

  •  And these people are giving *us* money (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Valtin, Blue Eyed Buddhist, SciVo

    Gotta love it.

    I'm tempted to click through, just to cost them more money.

    "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

    by mbayrob on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 10:16:26 PM PST

  •  Next time I buy flying/blowing up things, (5+ / 0-)

    I'm going straight to AIA. Advertising sells!

    Happy Holidays, Loofah.

    by Karl Rover on Sun Dec 21, 2008 at 10:21:26 PM PST

  •  Well, the aerospace defense corporations are (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    quaking in their boots because there's a real question whether the vision of aerial supremacy leading to global rule is going to be realized for the U.S.  I, for one, happen to think that our Air Force is largely superfluous and we can cut back by just letting the navy and army buy whatever air capability they actually need.

    Yes, the military/industrial complex has evolved into an industrial complex that not only rely on the military to back up its commercial interests, increasingly it relies on the military as the major component of its production.  Our manufacturers have become dependent on government purchases for most of their business.

    BTW, about those red-light cameras.  It seems that in the interest of generating more revenue from tickets for red-light violations (which the companies send out themselves), they've hit on the tactic of shortening the yellow light cycle, so more people get caught.  That's the report from Florida.

    How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

    by hannah on Mon Dec 22, 2008 at 03:09:57 AM PST

  •  Thank you. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I wish I could recommend or tip but it's too late.

  •  The bottom line is (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    that NEXTGEN will not significantly cut delays (even if it works as advertised).  Weather at the destination is the main reason for most aviation delays and NEXTGEN does very little to increase airport capacity in bad weather..
    So if you look at a cost benefit analysis, it is hard to see where any cost savings can be realized.

  •  Are you sure about this? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    You wrote, "They get "cost-plus" contracts- and farm out tons of "work" to subsidiaries, making it appear as though their costs are really high... but in theory, the company with the contract is only making a minimum of profit (the "plus" part of "cost-plus".)"

    Many years ago, I worked for a contractor that did lots of work for a company that had many government contracts.  We did all that work at a special rate that was significantly less than our commercial rate.  Even as a subcontractor, our books were audited to make sure our costs were real and our "plus" was within the approved limits.

    Of course, in recent years, they might have weakened those rules, or simply stopped enforcing them.

    •  The Bush "administration" goes in scare quotes (0+ / 0-)

      ...because they're radical laissez-faire ideologues who practice nonfeasance as a matter of course. It only looks like incompetence to us; it's actually the fulfillment of their campaign promises to "get government out of the way" of your making money.

      I want to live in a civilization.

      by SciVo on Mon Dec 22, 2008 at 12:46:19 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for the report (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Confirmed my first suspicion.

    Their tagline was pretty transparent: "Keep America the industry leader" or some such. (translation: "Keep America capable of blowing stuff up that didn't need to be blown up in the first place."


Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site