Daily Kos

Doomsday or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Vote Republican

Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 06:24:24 PM PDT

Hey folks,

Wading my way through the liberal blogosphere I find myself excited by the amount of passion people have for our fine candidates, but also a bit disheartened by the "fringe few" on both sides who seem to take pleasure in trashing fellow Dems. I'm not talking about the majority of bloggers who have valid policy criticisms, but the louder/more fanatacized few who constantly spew out comments that are either assanine or just down right hateful.

My question is - are we heading toward a 1968-like split in the party? Has the protracted and heated competition completly polarized our party, that no matter who wins the nomination, a large chunk of the other candidate's followers will sit out or vote for Grampa McCain? Without pointing fingers at either party, have we come to a point where the polarization is irreparable?

I'm wondering if these Doomsday scenarios are a few primaries away or figments of my paranoid imagination. With the amount of passion both sides feel for their candidates, it may be very difficult for either candidate to pull the others' supporters - especially if they feel marginalized, apathetic, or vengeful.  Take into account all of the intense feelings toward the MI/FL votes, Super Delegates, purported racism and sexism, etc...

(fyi - I'm an Obama supporter but would vote for Hillary in a General Election in a heartbeat).

Poll

Is it too late?

14%13 votes
68%61 votes
16%15 votes

| 89 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Feud, Polarization, John McCain, 2008 (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 16 comments

  •  At DKos you find all of the ... (7+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    linc, DrKate, ohlone, terra, Lujane, cameoanne, Coach Jay

    Hyper-Partisans...IRL there are people who look at the world in a more balanced way...we will come together...

    Go Democrats...Peace

    Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

    by dvogel001 on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 06:25:40 PM PDT

  •  Depends (0+ / 0-)

    on who gets the nom.

    We can heal if it's Obama... Clinton, I'm not so sure.  Then there is the question of whether or not the Dem party will be declared altogether dead once she loses in November.

    I'm one of those peeps who refuses to consider voting for her.  McCain would have to do something wild to get me off the couch in November should HRC be the nominee.

  •  If Ms Clinton does the stateswomanlike (4+ / 0-)

    thing and concedes to Mr. Obama and in so doing throws her full support behind him, it should be no problem. She can be a force in Democratic politics for years to come if she does this. I am sure she would bring her supporters with her.

    I am sure Ms Clinton will do the right thing.

    "The fact which the politician faces is merely that there is less honor among thieves than was supposed, and not the fact that they are thieves." Thoreau

    by shigeru on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 06:36:35 PM PDT

    •  I think they should run together (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      shigeru, cameoanne

      and no, I wouldn't advise your candidate to do this now either.  It's not over.

      Oh, and Hillary Clinton will continue to be a force in democratic politics and policy for years to come, whether she wins or loses this nomination race.  She stands in her own right, irresepective of Obama.

      sign the petition at http://www.impeachbush.org

      by DrKate on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 07:28:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  i think if you (0+ / 0-)

    refer to '68 are you talking about the democrats who went to chicago on the corporate dime vs the grassroots of the party?

    please pardon the poor keyboarding, i can never decide which two of my ten thumbs to use, so hopefully some of you are fluent in Typo

    by TAPayne on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 06:44:46 PM PDT

  •  If any party should fear schism its Republicans (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tmo

    Look at the way the conservatives hate McCain.  You throw a conservative third party candidate in there and watch their votes get scattered to the winds.

  •  doomsday is coming, anyway (0+ / 0-)

    irrespective of what happens in the democratic party.  Talk to Al Gore, he knows about this.

    None of the candiates are dealing with this at all.

    So in some ways, why not vote to expose the whole thing, just like Bush has been "good" because his role was to slap everyone in the face, such that there could be such interest in "change"....McCain will certainly continue this awakening, in fact, he just could provoke the revolution we just might need.

    sign the petition at http://www.impeachbush.org

    by DrKate on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 07:25:24 PM PDT

  •  I read that about 30% of the supporters of (0+ / 0-)

    Obama and Hillary, respectively, say they will vote for McCain if their candidate is not the nominee.
    I think McCain has a very strong chance of becoming President, which is a highly depressing though.

  •  You're asking the wrong people (0+ / 0-)

    Yes things can get a bit heated around here but in the end most folks on this site and in the party supporting Barack or Hillary would support the other in November.  The real question is to what degree would the new voters that Obama has energized, not to mention the independents and "Obamacans" be willing to vote for Hillary in November.  

    The answer is, "no body knows." We would probably loose some, but not all, perhaps not even most.  And would those loses be decisive?  Against any other Republican I wouldn't be worried, but we're up against that "maverick" McCain and his media fan club.  He could potentially beat Hillary; both because he'd get some independents and she would energize the conservative base that otherwise would be lackluster in their support of a McCain candidacy.

    In the final analysis politics is to unpredictable for any of this speculation to really matter.  People should just vote their consciences and let the chips fall where they may.

    This country does not have the luxury to entertain idiocy as if it is reasonable. --Digby

    by Thought Crime on Wed Feb 13, 2008 at 07:38:45 PM PDT

Permalink | 16 comments