Daily Kos

What Obama should say on public financing

Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 05:07:26 PM PDT

It may be a while before anyone asks Obama about public financing again, given the NYT's bombshell about McCain and his yet another inappropriate relationship with a lobbyist — McCain is doing pure damage control now, and if the Iseman story has legs it could be weeks before McCain can play offense again.

But if we do revisit the topic, I've thought a little about how Obama ought to respond.  Keep in mind that I'm no speechwriter, but I've tried to hit the points I think Obama should hit — and tied in some of Obama's strengths, and McCain's weaknesses, along the way.

To set the stage here, imagine that Obama is speaking to a large audience on the day that his campaign receives its one millionth donor (which will likely happen between now and March 4th).

I'm pleased to announce today that over one million people have donated to my campaign -- a milestone achieved by no other campaign in history.  I'd like to thank the people who are making this campaign possible:  The ones who have donated, and the millions more who've given their time, their energy, and their hope that together we can change our politics.

I'd also like to talk today about public financing of campaigns.  And about a pledge I made many months ago:  That if I were the Democratic nominee for President, I would work together with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.

Now, my supporters and I still have a lot of work to do to win the nomination:  There are millions of people in Texas and Ohio, in Vermont, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania and other states whose voices haven't been heard yet.  It's very early to discuss how I'd campaign if I were the nominee.  But I'll talk about it today because John McCain has been talking about it, has been calling on me to honor my pledge, and I want to respond.

I stand by the pledge I made.

I am willing to work together with Republicans, Democrats and independents to clean up our elections.  And clean election laws, like the one in John McCain's home state of Arizona, help make sure our politicians are concerned about millions of people instead of millions of dollars.  That's why I worked on ethics reform in the Senate, and in Illinois:  To change our politics.

So when I say I'm willing to work together with Republicans, I mean it.  But Sen. McCain doesn't understand when I talk about "working together".

Because "working together" is not how John McCain operates.

He's a maverick, he says — and I suppose if your party is taking the country into a war that never should have been fought, or if you're giving tax cuts to the wealthy who didn't ask for them, then going alone in a different direction might not be so bad.

But the last thing America needs is another president who fails to find common ground with the people he disagrees with.

The last thing we need is another president who can't work with his opponents.

The last thing we need is another president whose idea of "working together" is that you do what's best for me.

That's not what America needs from our president.  It might have worked for McCain as a Senator, but we don't need any more of it in the White House.

So when John McCain proposes I send back the donations that over a million people have given to my campaign, and that we both take public financing — while a handful of his supporters put a quarter billion of Swift Boat money into Ari Fleischer's hands — I say "no thank you".  When I talk about working together to ensure a fair election, that's not what I call fair.

When Sen. McCain agrees to public financing for his primary campaign, takes out a bank loan using public money for collateral, then invents a loophole and says he's opted out of public financing, I say, that's not what I call a clean campaign.

And when John McCain says I'm not honoring my pledge to work with him on public financing, to pursue an agreement with him, I say "John, that's not what I call working together."  

If John McCain wants a clean and fair election, we'll have one.

If he wants to debate issues that affect millions of people's lives, we will.  

But if John McCain and his supporters don't want to talk about policies — if they'd rather talk about whose wife is prouder of our country — then I look forward to John's debate with Michelle.  And I think she'll win it.

So if John McCain is the Republican nominee, and if I'm the Democratic nominee, I'll make every effort to work with him — and to reach an agreement that makes our election clean, fair, and publicly financed.  But if John were serious about taking me up on that pledge, his first step wouldn't have been to reach out to me through the media.  His first step wouldn't have been to say I've gone back on my word unless I agree to public financing on his terms, with his loopholes.  Those aren't the actions of a man who knows how to find common ground.  The Oval Office would bring out the worst in John McCain, and we can't afford that  — not after eight years of the worst president, the worst policies, and the most bitterly divisive politics of our lives.

We don't need another president who takes an issue we all agree on, and tries to use it to divide us and score political points.  We've had eight years of that, and I'm running for president because it's time for a change — and together with millions of people, we're working to make that change happen.  Thank you.

Tags: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, John McCain, Democrats, Republicans, framing, elections, public financing (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 4 comments

  •  i'm still trying to figure out how (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Crestingwave

    it got from something that could be discussed(paraphrase) to a pledge

    please pardon the poor keyboarding, i can never decide which two of my ten thumbs to use, so hopefully some of you are fluent in Typo

    by TAPayne on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 05:10:15 PM PDT

  •  Good work. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    opinionated

    So when John McCain proposes I send back the donations that over a million people have given to my campaign, and that we both take public financing — while a handful of his supporters put a quarter billion of Swift Boat money into Ari Fleischer's hands — I say "no thank you".  When I talk about working together to ensure a fair election, that's not what I call fair.

    I like this. The theme being, he can't shut off and silence millions of individual donors. It's the corporations and lobbyists that need to be shut down. Also the history of Republican tactics, like the Swiftboaters, demand that he keep an arsenal to blast back at diisingenuos attacks that are undoubtedly coming.

    When I had no roof / I made audacity my roof. --Robert Pinsky

    by Crestingwave on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 05:40:00 PM PDT

  •  A few suggestions. (0+ / 0-)

    I think there are other ways to deflect this attack.

    Point out that the real problem these days with money in elections are the "527s", the independent, non-coordinated expenditures that groups like the Swiftboaters and others use to raise millions of $$$ to use in false attacks. Point out that there is already a Republican 527 that has announced it will spend $250mil to attack Democrats this year. And that is just one group.

    Point out that the FEC, the cop that enforces the election rules, is out of commission at this moment because Bush has tried to stack that agency with Republican political operatives who would deny the vote to millions of the poor and minorities. And without a cop on the beat to enforce the laws, who would prevent McCain from breaking the rules?

    Point out that his contributions come from millions of individuals as opposed to the corporate financing of Republicans who are then beholden to corporate lobbyists. That Obama is proud that the people, as opposed to the corporations, are supporting his campaign and that he would be robbing these people of their hopes and dreams if he prevented them from contributing. In fact, that is the real agenda behind this attack on the individual voter - McCain and the Republican Party would like to prevent as many people as possible from voting, especially if they are poor, a minority, or even just middle class working people. They think this country belongs to the rich, the powerful, and the corporations. And Obama will deny them that goal by continuing to allow individuals to contribute with their money as well as their support and good will. This time, in this election, I will not allow the Republicans to deny the people their voice.

    Never defend, always attack. Turn the tables, put your opponent on defense. Muddle the question, bounce it back.

    -6.38/-3.79::'A man is incapable of comprehending any argument that interferes with his revenues.' Descartes

    by skrymir on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 05:55:26 PM PDT

  •  mcCain is talking about the General (0+ / 0-)

    funding. the 1 million donors are from the primary. Nothing to send back dumb argument.

    Hillary: channeling her inner Repuglican: Free at last

    by samddobermann on Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 03:59:14 PM PDT

Permalink | 4 comments