Daily Kos

ME-01: Minimum wage, maximum stimulus

Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 03:56:41 PM PDT

Update [2008-2-24 21:19:29 by Ethan Strimling]:: Thanks for stopping by folks!  See you next week.

Here in Maine, we’re experiencing a very tough winter.  Across the state, thousands of people are unable to heat their homes because of increases in fuel costs (it’s gotten so bad that a number of landlords are simply not buying heating oil for their tenants, because the expense is now so great they fear they’d be bankrupted and lose their properties while their tenants would be evicted).

But fuel’s not the only thing that is more expensive these days.  The Labor Department reports that core inflation—the rise in cost of consumer goods other than food and fuel—is almost as high as the general inflation rate.  As we slip further into recession and remain mired in a housing crisis, it’s clear that the people with the lowest incomes are going to get stuck bearing the greatest burden for our slowing economy.

Everything is more expensive for consumers these days, and it’s going to get worse at least until our economy improves.

This week, my bill to raise the minimum wage here in Maine to $8.40 and have it indexed thereafter will go into a work session in front of the Labor Committee, the Committee I Chair.  Hopefully we’ll be able to provide relief for families here before the situation deteriorates any more.  But the problem isn’t just in Maine, and it’s going to take a national effort to get us through this crisis and prevent more from arising in the future.

Paradoxically, the best way to get our economy growing again would be to get more money into the hands of those getting hit hardest by the economic downturn.  Americans who make less spend a higher proportion of their income at the market, re-injecting that income back into the economy and promoting economic stimulation.  If we want to speed up the economy, we should seek to do so in a way that helps those at the bottom, because that provides the fastest relief to everybody.  "Trickle-down" is no substitute for "speed up" when it comes to economic stimulus.

We in America now have the greatest income disparity between rich and poor since the Great Depression.  Our tax policy is nothing short of insane: we provide irresponsible tax giveaways to the richest and shift the burden onto the working and middle-class families.  Those who need our help don’t get it, and those who need nothing get everything.

If we are to correct this economic insanity, we need to begin by recognizing the value of our workforce.

Our Democratic Congress managed to raise the minimum wage for the first time in a decade last year.  During that decade, costs for basic goods skyrocketed, and without any increase in the minimum wage our workers saw their purchasing power disappear.  People went from poor to impoverished because of our inaction.

In Congress, I’ll not only support a higher minimum wage for America’s workers, but also nationally indexing that wage to the inflationary rate.  Indexing our federal minimum wage will ensure that the inaction and indifference of Washington won’t hurt our working families like this again.

Moreover, I’ll support legislation that won’t let Congress raise its own pay without raising the minimum wage by the same proportion.

As I prepare to leave the Maine Senate and continue this fight for fair wages in Washington, I hope I can count on you to keep the pressure up on your representatives and candidates.  Working together, we can send a message to the power-brokers of Washington that they need to stop taking America’s workforce for granted, or else we’ll replace them with leaders who will.

Sen. Ethan Strimling
Candidate for Congress, ME-01
ActBlue

(Cross-posted at TurnMaineBlue)

Tags: Minimum Wage, Economic Stimulus, Living Wage, Economy, Ethan Strimling, Maine, ME-01, 2008 (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 17 comments

  •  Your thoughts (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    eeff, exNYinTX, mcfly, daveygodigaditch

    What can we do to improve the economy and empower people?

    •  Forget the minimum wage. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Dar Nirron, 207wickedgood

      Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit.

      At the state and local level, require new construction to be Energy Efficient and alternative energy ready.  Require passive solar construction principles be considered.  Talk to your constituents about their success.

      -7.75 -4.67

      "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose."

      by Odysseus on Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 04:15:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Conditioned recommended Odysseus's remark. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        exNYinTX

        This part is good:

        At the state and local level, require new construction to be Energy Efficient and alternative energy ready.  Require passive solar construction principles be considered.  Talk to your constituents about their success.

        Expanding the earned income credit is fine.

        But we can never forget the minimum wage.  The diarist's analysis is correct:  the more money in the hands of people with the least income, the more money is flowing in general.  Money does not "trickle down;" it flows up.  Repeat:  "Money does not "trickle down;" it flows up."

        To say my fate is not tied to your fate is like saying, "Your end of the boat is sinking."--Hugh Downs

        by Dar Nirron on Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 04:34:30 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  No, higher minimum wage is easier and quicker. (0+ / 0-)

        As many as 5 million people are probably eligible for the credit but are not taking it, the IRS says.
        [..]
        But only about 75 percent of those eligible claim this benefit, the agency says.

        Link

        I agree that the EITC should be expanded to include more people and the $ amount should be increased, but a substantial increase in minimum wage would help a lot more people.

  •  Washington State Indexed Its Minimum Wage And (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    eeff, exNYinTX, Dar Nirron

    gives a COLA annually.

    The business community went crazy claiming they would go bankrupt, they would have to fire employees, and no one could afford their product or services.

    Instead the business owners decided they would rather get by on 6 SUVs instead of 7, 5 second homes instead of 6, and a 57 foot yacht instead of a 58 foot yacht than end their business.  Yes, you can see it's been tough on these business owners.

    http://www.lni.wa.gov/...

    •  Indexing is actually good for business (0+ / 0-)

      One of businesses primary arguments in the Maine Legislature is that we are always changing the playing field and creating an unpredictable environment for them to plan ahead.  Well, indexing creates a completely predictable environment year-to-year, and yet they still oppose it.

      They use the argument that serves them in the moment.

  •  I know that if you are an adult earning min wage (0+ / 0-)

    that life is tough. But, about 70% of those earning minimum wage are high school or college kids earning beer/video game money.

    Is there a way to increase the wages of working adults -- not by a puny dollar or two -- to a real living wage -- say $15 an hour?

    After all, $8-$9 even $10 an hour is NOT a living wage -- especially if you have kids.

    I would be in favor of a two tiered wage systems that paid the young (still living at home) with no dependents a different minimum wage than those trying to feed a family.

    Again, raising the minimum wage by a puny dollar of two helps, but it doesn't really bring us anywhere near a real living wage.

    •  Swaydo, that would simply provide an incentive (0+ / 0-)

      for businesses to hire high school kids instead of adults.  As if business doesn't already have multiple incentives to be hiring part-timers with no benefits!

      To say my fate is not tied to your fate is like saying, "Your end of the boat is sinking."--Hugh Downs

      by Dar Nirron on Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 04:36:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Actually over 70% of minimum wage earners are (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      exNYinTX, 0hio

      adults.  And over half of them are women suppurting their families.

      I don't support creating a two-tiered system (some suggest we do it based on age) because paying someone a sub-minimum wage for the same work that someone else is doing at minimum wage is unjust.

      That said, I fully support creating a livable wage.  My bill pushes us up to $8.40 in Maine.  If someone earns just 5 hours of overtime in a given week at this increased minimum wage, they will actually be earning a livable wage for a single person.  Should be able to do it on a 40 hour a week wage, but at least we'll get closer.

      •  Not according to the BLS (0+ / 0-)

        According to the BLS, the vast majority of minimum wage earners are under 25. With a huge chunk under 19. Plus 75% work part time.

        http://www.bls.gov/...

        Still, while $8.40 is a step in the right direction, a living wage would be around double that.

        Again, my teenage son works 10-15 hours a week for beer/video game money. I still pay all of his real expenses like housing/tuition/clothes/car/car insurance.

        Giving my son a few extra dollars a week will not change his life one bit. But, some of the people he works with have kids. They are barely making it and they need real help.

        We need to find a way to put money in the hands of the working poor. Raising the minimum wage is an inefficient way to do this. We need a more targeted approach.

  •  Thanks for running Ethan! (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks also for taking up the minimum wage issue. We need many more like you in Congress.

    Minimum wage was increased last year but before that, the last time minimum wage was increased was 1997. From 1997-2007 congress received approx. a $30,000 increase in their wages, from $133,000 - $165,000. Yet even though their wages increased $30,000+, they wouldn't authorize a single minimum wage increase.

    The audacity is stunning.

    Also, do you support time and a half after an 8 hour workday or only after a 40 hour workweek?

    •  Interesting question (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      exNYinTX

      Haven't thought about it.  My wife is a nurse and she works three 12.5 hour shifts a week, and gets overtime when she is above 40 for the week.  It seems to work well for her and I am quite sure she would not want to work 5 eight hour days if we mandated overtime and the hospital responded by changing shifts.

      Tell me more.

      •  Hmmm, I never thought about that. (0+ / 0-)

        I don't really know anymore besides what I've heard. The company I used to work for, brought in some folks from California who under CA law, got paid O/T after 8 hours. So if we all worked a 12 hour shift they got paid 4 hours O/T, while I got all straight time until I hit 40 hours.

        I guess the main benefit would be if you worked less than 40 each week, but more than 8 per day. But as you pointed out, if the employer responded with 8 X 5 it might not be beneficial to everyone.

Permalink | 17 comments