Daily Kos

Daily Dose: What's new with Hillary?

Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:34:27 PM PDT

Hello everyone.  

Sorry that the Daily Dose hasn't lived up to its name, But hey thanks to the last two editions of Daily Dose, Hillary was able to win Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island.  I tell you, this is the power of the Creative Class (TM) at its finest.  Daily Dose is of course too modest to take all the credit, and is sure that the efforts of those volunteers getting about 3 hours of sleep each night prior to the primaries had some little effect too.  

So I decided to give it another shot.  Lots of goodies here, follow me overleaf.  

We start with the best endorsement of the campaign.  From a 91-year old woman by the name of Jewell Hodges.  The video came from the Texas Town Hall.  Without further ado, here is the amazing video:

Doesn't that woman look and sound amazing?  I can't believe she is 91 years old.  Listen to how she speaks.  So strong and so sharp.  Bonus: see if you can spot Chelsea in the audience.

Anna Quindlen of Newsweek has an article about the double standard in the press.  She is one of the best columnists.   Let Anna take it away:

But just because all this makes it difficult to parse the double standard surrounding Senator Clinton's candidacy doesn't mean the double standard no longer exists, or shouldn't be acknowledged. There may be many reasons apart from her gender—past, positions, personality—that have led people to turn away. But there has also been an inescapable undercurrent of bias. It's summed up in the word "calculating," which is often used to describe the senator in as witchy a way possible. There is no male politico equivalent for "calculating," except perhaps "business as usual."

And here:

But Senator Clinton has not only had to prove she is strong enough to be commander in chief, she has had to prove she is soft enough to feel your pain. For a man in a position of leadership to be sure and sympathetic is a bonus; for a woman it's base line. When Michelle Obama talked of how she had taken to the campaign trail and left her two girls in the care of their grandmother it was seen as praiseworthy, a woman helping her husband realize his dreams. But if Michelle Obama were away from her children pursuing her own political ambitions, I can guarantee a spate of articles about whether that was bad for the kids.

Newsweek's cover story (Hear Her Roar! ) is also on Hillary, and further, appropriately on the International Day of Women, Newsweek devotes lots of space to Hillary's campaign and the press coverage of it, like here: Just Leave Your Mother Out of It.  There is also an Interview with Hillary Clinton, in which she says:

We both have strong constituencies. I think my constituencies are broader and deeper and more likely to produce winning margins in the general election. But he also has obviously energized African- American voters, young voters, and we need to bring them together. We need to have a unified Democratic Party because we're going to win in November.

Don't miss these goodies: James Wolcott (courtesy of The Confluence (aka: goldberry)), and also at the Confluence, The latest on MI and FL.  Also check Howard Kurtz in Washington Post and Bill Maxwell in St. Petersburg Times.

Last point: It seems like SNL has very little regard for our sensibilities.

I mean, what do they think they are doing putting funny stuff out about this election?  Instead, they should get politicians to show up at Halloween as themselves, to prove that they are normal and comfortable in their own skin, not to mention have nothing to hide.  Now, that would be laugh-out-loud funny.  But making a spoof of Our Candidate?? I agree completely, guys.  Any show that makes fun of The Candidate of People (defined as the people on dkos and Huffingtonpost) should be on the boycott list.

This brings me to Jane Austen, of whom I am a fan. If you get a chance, check out Jane Austen's Juvenilia.  It's her best snark.  There is this gem of a quote that perfectly matches the SNL Halloween (I am comfortable to dress as myself) skit.  Here, we meet Charles Adams dressed as the Sun:

The Beams that darted from his Eyes were like those of that glorious Luminary, tho' infinitely superior. So strong were they that no one dared venture within half a mile of them; he had therefore the best part of the Room to himself, its size not amounting to more than 3 quarters of a mile in length and half a one in breadth. The Gentlemen at last finding the fierceness of his beams to be very inconvenient to the concourse by obliging them to croud together in one corner of the room, half shut his eyes by which means, the Company discovered him to be Charles Adams in his plain green Coat, without any Mask at all.

Feel free to add links and videos in the comments.  

(Aside note: the author is a Canadian who should know better, but cannot cure him/herself of addiction to American News.  The author frequently has pulled his/her hair out in frustration when seeing the treatment that competent, intelligent, caring candidates such as Al Gore and Hillary Clinton have received in the hands of American media.)

Poll

This edition of Daily Dose is simply great.

17%7 votes
37%15 votes
7%3 votes
17%7 votes
20%8 votes

| 40 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: President, Hillary Clinton, 2008 (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 119 comments

  •  Tip jar! (17+ / 0-)

    Thanks for reading.  Please share good links and stay civil.

    Sometimes, a cackle is the best medicine!

    by ghost2 on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:33:57 PM PDT

  •  Tom Watson (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Trix, Alegre, kck, gooderservice, NewHampster

    Has a good piece on Hillary bloggers:

    The Few, the Proud...the Clinton Bloggers

    I wouldn't have these links, if it wasn't for the great new blog, The Confluence, and its comments section.

    Sometimes, a cackle is the best medicine!

    by ghost2 on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:38:24 PM PDT

  •  Mrs. Hodges is truly a jewel. (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Alegre, belly, kck, gooderservice, NewHampster

    Thanks for the wonderful video, ghost.  Made smile through tears.

  •  Wow. I hope I am that lucid (5+ / 0-)

    if I live that long.  Great diary!!!

    The ...Bushies... don't make policies to deal with problems. ...It's all about how can we spin what's happening out there to do what we want to do. Krugman

    by mikepridmore on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:40:36 PM PDT

  •  glad some of you hillary supporters are still (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    boatsie, psychodrew, jamesia, otheruser

    around after all the defeats.  you guys show a lot of heart.  keep your heads up.  i get tired of the obama echo chamber sometimes.  

    let's talk about your girls 35 years of experience.

    what has she accomplished?  i'm just curious

  •  sexism? media bias? (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    gooderservice, boatsie, ggottlie, yuppers

    As someone who wavered between Obama and Clinton until just before New Hampshire and as a representative of the male of the species, I would like to offer some observations.

    Anna Quindlen: "There may be many reasons apart from her gender—past, positions, personality—that have led people to turn away. But there has also been an inescapable undercurrent of bias. It's summed up in the word "calculating," which is often used to describe the senator in as witchy a way possible. There is no male politico equivalent for "calculating," except perhaps "business as usual.""

    Why is this inescapable - what evidence does she offer? I think Senator Clinton is calculating just as her husband was - one of the reasons I hesitated in choosing her. So that is ridiculous to posit there is no male equivalent - it actually comes from her connection to the politics of her husband and is not because she is a woman.

    From your diary: "But making a spoof of Our Candidate?? I agree completely, guys.  Any show that makes fun of The Candidate of People (defined as the people on dkos and Huffingtonpost) should be on the boycott list."

    Well written sarcasm, so points for that. However, it a point that perhaps there is not media bias against Clinton to the degree people think and in fact, when one analyzes the last 2 weeks with the same methodology used by others to claim a pro-Obama bias, we will see a pro-Clinton bias. WaPo did not have Obama's win in Wyoming on Front page today but a story on Clinton convincing superdelegates to stay uncommitted for now. NYT had a negative story on Obama and no mention of Wyoming win on front page.

    So, not everything is sexism and not everything is media bias. Clinton had this nomination walking away last fall and winter. It was not sexism and media bias that changed that - it was her campaign's incompetence and lack of clear compelling message - that now has her fighting for her political life. She seems to have found her message now and her campaign has revitalized itself.

    And I am glad you HRC supporters are still here. Let's engage in this sort of reasoned debate! Thanks

    We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard. Voltaire, Dictionnaire Philosophique, 1764

    by MMW on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:51:13 PM PDT

    •  I agree (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      gooderservice, boatsie, MMW

      Thanks for your post MMW, this is the type of discussion I would like to be involved in — not the pointless shouting matches that have developed recently.  I hope your post receives serious responses, but I am afraid that the debate may have become so poisoned that something lacking antagonism will be left without response.

      "Change will not come if we wait for some other person, or if we wait for some other time -- we are the ones we've been waiting for." Barack Obama

      by ggottlie on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:03:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  yep, inflammatory = responses (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        ggottlie

        sad to say.

        There was a serious response below until the last line: "And you know what?  I'm entitled to my damn opinion and to express it, and to hell with the childish Obama supporters who want to post juvenile comments."

        It seems we just can't escape getting back at the other side. I do occasionally throw out something, more in humor and good taste I hope and not as red meat designed to raise someone's blood pressure.

        We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard. Voltaire, Dictionnaire Philosophique, 1764

        by MMW on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:35:08 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  I think Hillary was leading in the polls (0+ / 0-)

      in the very beginning just due to name recognition and the media going gaga over here.  I was not impressed with her policies as I was with John Edwards.  He was specific and she was not.

      Then Obama became a super star over night.  I was starting to get drawn to him, but when I listened to him, it was all hope all the time.  That's a good thing, but I wanted to hear more specifics, but I never did.  Although I did hear some serious, down to earth speeches by Michele Obama.

      I was voting for Edwards on Super Tuesday... just days before he quit us.  Then I had to make a choice.

      I chose Hillary, not that I was "excited" about voting for her, but I believed she could do a better job than Obama... based on, mainly, watching her responses in the debates versus his responses.  That was my barometer.  

      Frankly, all this campaign rhetoric, talking points, he said/she said doesn't interest me.  I don't care if Hillary's campaign said this and Obama's campaign said that.  I'm just listening to their plans and what they say they will do, and I like Hillary's ideas better.  

      I certainly don't like this "crossing the aisle" style in this political climate.  I watch too much C-Span and see these republican reps and senators and I realize they have no desire to "cross the aisle."

      I need a fighter in there, which is what I believe Hillary is.  Her "fighting" in the campaign is just what is needed to combat unreasonable republicans.

      If the country was more unified, then I would probably have to rethink if I voted the right way for me.

      And you know what?  I'm entitled to my damn opinion and to express it, and to hell with the childish Obama supporters who want to post juvenile comments.

      If the measure of good leadership during a war is how many times the leader visited the country, that would explain why Bush has been a miserable failure.

      by gooderservice on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:25:45 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks for your post. (0+ / 0-)

      It's late, but I just want to say that you have to be commended for trying to articulate your points and have a civil discussion.  Many pro-Hillary diaries, as you may know, invite a bunch of people from other side, whose sole function is to be disruptive, and they absolutely refuse to engage in any discussions.  

      I agree with your point that her campaign made mistakes.  No one disputes that.  

      The coverage may have gotten a bit better in the last two weeks, thanks to SNL (seriously!). But the bias existed to a large degree and it still exists.  There is a bias against her personally, and there is also sexism.  Lots of pundit class are not comfortable with a woman being in charge.  Now, I know that to prove this latter point, I have to really have a think tank at my disposal, and even then, can't convince many of those inclined otherwise.  But it's not co-incidence that women have finally had it and are speaking up.  They recognize sexism, and there is plenty of it.

      I realize that this has become a bit of my point vs. yours.  But really, I think those links I gave, give it better than I can.  At a bonus, check www.dailyhowler.com.  It's a good site for keeping media honest.  Bob Somerby goes through media claims with care and precision, and exposes them for what they are.  

      Sometimes, a cackle is the best medicine!

      by ghost2 on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 11:27:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Wow — Ms. Hodges is amazing! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    belly

    Nice job bringing in Jane Austen as well (even though I find your Charles Adams/Barack Obama comparison somewhat offensive, it is nice to see someone bringing literature into DKos) — out of curiosity, where would you recommend someone begin reading Austin (I have read Persuasion, but nothing else)?

    "Change will not come if we wait for some other person, or if we wait for some other time -- we are the ones we've been waiting for." Barack Obama

    by ggottlie on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:52:53 PM PDT

  •  Hillary lost Texas (3+ / 0-)

    Obamananaramonotophiliac

    by jamesparenti on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 07:53:27 PM PDT

  •  Recommended. (7+ / 0-)

    Great diary for your candidate.  Bravo.

    cheers,

    an Obama supporter.

    JOHN McCAIN = George W. Bush's 3rd term.

    by chumley on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:06:08 PM PDT

  •  Jewell Hodges for VP!! (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    belly, psychodrew

    I love Ms.Hodges, Hillary should hire her to write speeches or as a surrogate for CNN shows.

    HR 676 is the best health reform proposal worth my vote.

    by kck on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:09:22 PM PDT

    •  I have a little tip for the Hillary (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      kck

      campaign, but actually all of them.

      If they want older people like this, and I do mean "older," to talk about something, I wish they would give them a chair to sit in.

      Don't get me wrong, I loved what these women had to say.  It was so touching to watch the whole thing.  Thank you for diarying it.  I just sent it around to quite a few people.

      But I'm not kidding... after dealing with a few elderly people -- GIVE THEM A STOOL OR CHAIR.  Thank you.  ;)

      And no matter what happens with the campaign, Hillary should invite these women out to dinner, or to her house in New York and take them to a show.  These are very special ladies... they deserve to be treated like royalty.

      If the measure of good leadership during a war is how many times the leader visited the country, that would explain why Bush has been a miserable failure.

      by gooderservice on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 08:34:07 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  could someone please explain (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    kck, jamesia

    if the Clinton camp is including in their calculations the fact that Rove is now working as an advisor to McCain ... and we may just be seeing 2000 and 2004 tactics at work again to hold onto the WH?
    not only did heavy Republican turnout in TX to vote for Hillary (note how many counties show '0" replican votes) decide that primary popular vote in favor of HRC, but also now it appears this is the case in Ohio:
    There is clear statistical evidence that many Republican voters did cross-over. The Democratic Party "won at least 141,785 new voters in the four-county region" of Warren, Clermont, Hamilton, and Butler counties according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner told the New York Times that in Clermont and Summit Counties, paper ballots ran out mostly due to a large number of independent and Republican voters crossing over to vote in the Democratic primary.

    In Warren and Clermont counties, in southwestern Ohio, the number of votes cast in the Democratic primary are telling. The Cincinnati Enquirer reported that in Warren County, for example, there were 12,440 registered Democrats (9.49%) and 41,377 registered Republicans (31.57%) and 77,237 nonpartisan voters (58.94%). In Tuesday’s primary, 27,855 voters (48.53%) asked for Democratic ballots, representing 223.91% of the registered Democrats in that county.

    Warren County is notorious for a "homeland security" alert called by county officials on Election Day 2004, causing the ballots to be diverted to and counted in a restricted unauthorized warehouse. FreePress

    •  I would love to see more data on this in all.... (0+ / 0-)

      ...50 states. Your comment is very important.

      I agree, my gut sense is that they're purposely lowering contributions to candidates in favor of their 527 and influencing primary votes.

      I know for a fact an entire RW religious community in NJ (hundreds - thousand members) said they were going to re-register as Dems and vote for Obama to stop Hillary. At the last minute they got one of those "Obama emails", on an Ill abortion law, and they got cold feet. The two I know personally followed through though.

      If the Democrats lose to voter fraud a third time with all of the money flowing into the Party then we deserve to lose until we get better leaders.

      HR 676 is the best health reform proposal worth my vote.

      by kck on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 09:04:44 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I was in Cincinnati, and (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      boatsie

      on the AM radio bands Bill Cunningham (the same guy that said "Barack Hussein Obama" and other Muslim things before McCain spoke here) was encouraging people to vote for Hillary. It's not something to be taken lightly. This is the same guy that literally put Mean Jean over the top here... twice.

      •  right wing media radio (0+ / 0-)

        ... and yes, i heard about this ... but i don't think it is JUST the media telling people, do you? I mean, I don't think that would be sufficient to turn out tens of thousands... motivation must be more than that ...

        •  No. It definitely is. (0+ / 0-)

          At the only place I worked in while living in Cincinnati (for 5 years) people literally had this station (400 WLW) playing ALL DAY. I'm not exaggerating.

          It's not the media TELLING them to vote Hillary. It's more like something they all find amusing. I mean, the political viewpoint among white Ohioan Republicans is pretty homogeneous.

          I sincerely hope Victory Wulsin can beat Mean Jean, but with Billy Cunningham and the others... I dunno.

  •  info from a previous diary i wrote (0+ / 0-)

       Hillary Clinton said on Fox and Friends that no Texas Republicans crossed-over to vote for her, to prolong the race so that the democrat candidates will continue to vet each other, beating each other down, all to the benefit of the Republicans, but Hillary is so far off the mark that it vividly displays her pride and stubbornness, as if she would not welcome republican votes under any circumstances, as she denies that the Republicans caused her to win in Texas.

       Houston Chronicle columnist Rick Casey reports today that of the roughly 3,000,000 voters in the Texas Democrat Primary, a whopping 700,000 did not cast votes for a Democrat U.S. Senate candidate, which portrays the obvious, there were no Democrat senatorial candidates for whom those 700,000 wanted to vote.  And why is this?  Well obviously, the vast majority of them were Republicans!

       Hillary won by about 100,000 votes, so for her to say that no Republican support caused her victory is one of the strangest statements you will ever want to hear. Dancing from Genes

    My Question: shouldn't we all be uniting to look into this?

    •   What does Gov. Dean say? (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      boatsie

      The party leadership better have resources dedicated to making sure we don't get tricked again.

      HR 676 is the best health reform proposal worth my vote.

      by kck on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 09:09:57 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  i think this is why (0+ / 0-)

        the Dems have decided to remain 'uncommitted' right now. there was so much talk last tues of ending it after TX, OH, (RIchardson in particular) and all this talk about a flurry of SDs for Obama ... then we had this crossover affecting the primaries the other way ... I don't think the Dems believed those crossing over in previous primaries to vote for Obama would return to their own party in the Gen. but it appears very obvious that the movement to ensure Clinton wins so she is the candidate is manufactured and that the Republicans who are supporting her will return and vote republican.

        Dean say something? Did anyone say anything about the Ohio or NM in o4? They can't say anything because they are probably not 'clean' as well. I recall reading after the 06 that Rove had it in to change the vote tally by 3% ... but the Dems won by much more than that; that he really thought he had it covered... interesting that 3% is the percentage they are talking about in TX...

  •  Thank you (0+ / 0-)

    for posting that video!  That literally brought tears to my eyes.

    With that kind of heart behind her, Hillary can't lose!

    Another proud Clintonista opposing John McCain.

    by psychodrew on Mon Mar 10, 2008 at 01:44:35 AM PDT

Permalink | 119 comments