Daily Kos

The GOP's 800 Pound Gorilla

Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 01:59:47 PM PDT

Being a science writer, I can't help but gravitate toward scientific metaphors. So imagine for a second if two famous primate experts were interviewed for a nature program while an 800 pound gorilla tore the studio apart in the background. And in the midst of that chaos, the scientists avoided any mention of gorillas, while Calmly and Seriously discussing the theoretical danger posed by bunny rabbits.

Something like that happened last weekend: NBC News "chief" Tim Russert interviewed two leading 'conservative intellectuals,' Andrew Sullivan author of The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It, How to Get It Back, and Christopher Hitchens who wrote God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Both guests have been incessantly congratulated for, as the title of their books indicate, their admirable courage in transcending previously defined conservative boundaries and confronting the pernicious influence fringe ideologues and religious fundamentalists exert on the conservative movement.

Amazingly, during an hour long show, I can't recall either ‘critic’ or host raising a single question or making one comment concerning the stranglehold the religious right has on the modern Republican Party. Just for example, there was not one word spoken about conservative foreign cult figure Sun-myung Moon, his ownership of the Washington Times, its sister publication Insight which published the false story that Obama attended a hard-line militant Madrassa as a child, or any of the dozens of other scandalous connections joining ultra right wing religious icons -- some of whom who routinely concoct wild and ugly religious fabrications -- irrevocably to the Republican Party. The fact that McCain political adviser Charlie Black organized a coronation where Moon was literally crowned the Messiah in a US Senate building, and duped two US lawmakers into not just attending, but physically placing a crown on Mister and Mrs. Messiah's head did not rise to the attention of Russert or his guests. Not like there's any shortage of material.

Instead, two or three full segments of the program were exclusively dedicated to Pastor Jeremiah Wright's comments on the electoral prospects for democratic front runner Barack Obama. (To be fair, Sullivan, an outspoken Obama supporter, took time to at least try and put the issue in context.)

  • ::

If reports of right-wing religious influence on senior members of the Whitehouse and the Republican leadership were common place, the events last Saturday on Russert's show would be no big deal. Two 'great conservative thinkers,' both with books out on the subject of the Republican-religious connection just 'happened' to avoid any mention of those issues they're ostensibly best qualified to discuss. But that's the whole point: this wasn't isolated. It was a virtual carbon copy of innumerable discussions that came before and no doubt the many that will follow. Each and everyone merely one more symptom of the feverish hypocrisy and systemic mediocrity running unchecked throughout our national media.

Joe Scarborough is yet another familiar face with the rep of a conservative nobly conflicted by his staunch, admirable convictions juxtaposed against the unseemly religious and political abyss the GOP has stumbled into. But has one day gone by in the past month when Scar or one of his guests did not criticize Obama for failing to preemptively leave Wright's church years ago, or more forcefully condemning Wright in the aftermath? Can you recall the last time, if ever, you saw someone on Morning Joe point out, even in passing, that the father and brother of a sitting US President even now tour the world enthusiastically promoting Sun-myung Moon, or demand that leading Republican Party members publicly repudiate the controversial cult leader?

I use Sun-myung Moon above only because I'm more familiar with his specific brand of lunacy, thanks to author John Gorenfeld. But I could have used any creepy right-wing religious opportunist and focused on any number of news shows featuring guests who fancy themselves Serious and Responsible Journalists right down to their shallow souls. The only thing notable about Tim Russert's and his guests' fascination with Wright last Saturday evening and their collective apathy over Moon, Pat Hagee, Robertson, Falwell, Eric Rudolph, Hal Turner, etc., is that it's not notable at all. It's the same rancid, slanted drivel giving right-wing religious fanatics a pass, cut from the same corrupt mold beamed into US homes every day, all day long, starting with MSNBC's Joe Scarborough at daybreak and finishing up with Hannity and Colmes in the evening.

It is extraordinarily difficult to see our national media as anything other than an embarrassing joke manned by a collection of painted circus clowns when they repeatedly elevate stories about orange juice or bowling over the legalization of torture and secret prisons by a factor of a hundred to one. But when two conservative 'critics' with stated concerns over right-wing religious leaders dragging the entire GOP down the drain appear in a premier program like Russert's show, in the midst of a contentious political season on the heels of the least popular President in recent memory, studiously avoid any mention of the many fat, juicy religious nutcases infecting our political discourse, it's it even more difficult to see our Serious and Responsible traditional media superstars as anything other than willing collaborators with some of the ugliest,  most controversial, religious leaders this side of the West Bank.

But then what do I know? I'm just the shrill blogger pointing out the 800 lb. Republican Gorilla in the room.

Update 8:05 EST DS: Some readers have correctly pointed out that Hitchens is not easily labeled as a conservative. Agreed, hence the use of the scare quotes above describing both Sullivan and Hitchens as 'conservative thinkers.' However, if we stipulate he is indeed not a conservative and in no way beholden to conservatives -- all of which is a bit of a stretch imo considering his many apologetics offered on behalf of conservative ideology -- then the whole question of why he would helpfully join in bashing Obama over Wright's remarks, while avoiding any of the endless, revolting counter examples provided by icons of the religious right, is even more perplexing and advances the argument for religious media bias and outright hypocrisy even further than I indicated above.

Tags: moon (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 166 comments

  •  Karen (47+ / 0-)

    Wehrstein did the gorilla image.  Speaking of cable news programming re Morning Joe: can anyone think of a single progressive-conservative duo where the progressive wasn't playing the diminutive effeminate figure up against the domineering, loudmouthed, masculine conservative? The only thing I can remember that even comes close was Ron Reagan and Monica Crawley. Which of course didn't last, and Monica was pretty well, domineering, wasn't she?

    Read UTI, your free thought forum

    by DarkSyde on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:00:11 PM PDT

  •  I think the media is scared of being (11+ / 0-)

    portrayed as "liberal". Since "reality has a known liberal bias", the "logical" end to this is to stop reporting reality.

    On the same lines, if reality is that an entire political party has hijacked and looted the country to the ground, reporting will be construed as bias.

    New GOP Slogan: "Change you deserve. In Pennies."

    by bhagamu on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:02:50 PM PDT

    •  Elaborating on your point... (4+ / 0-)

      Television is the medium of the black and white, the simple, the cooked-down and reduced, the images as communication, perceived to be as "accurate" or even more-so, than the written or spoken word, which of course, it is not.

      I think of those early years of primate research and education

    •  "liberal media" is a Republican whine... (7+ / 0-)

      ...That whole "liberal media" thing is a result of Republicans constantly whining about having their escapades reported factually and accurately.

      The Republican party  depends on omerta to thrive and flourish.  The biggest threat to the Republican party is for the American 4th estate to serve as a watchdog to all of their criminal activities.

      They can't use the government as a giant racketeering office if they have authentic reporters  snooping around.

      The Republican party as we know it would cease to exist of all of their bullshit was being reported factually.

      The Republican overlords realize this, so they constant attack the messenger.  

      Of course, since our media personalities are a bunch of shallow cowards who should be selling  encyclopedias for a living instead of playing journalist,  this strategy has worked.

      "So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause."--Padmé Amidala

      by wyvern on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 03:11:53 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Welcome to MediaWorld! (0+ / 0-)

      I think the media is scared of being
      portrayed as "liberal". Since "reality has a known liberal bias", the "logical" end to this is to stop reporting reality.

      I've been saying for some time now that the media--or that portion which isn't enslaved to its corporate masters' interests--are Limbaugh dancing, bending over backwards as far as they can in hopes ol' Rush won't find something to whine about in the inch their shoulders are off the floor.

      Something like that happened last weekend: NBC News "chief" Tim Russert interviewed two leading 'conservative intellectuals,' Andrew Sullivan author of The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It, How to Get It Back, and Christopher Hitchens who wrote God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Both guests have been incessantly congratulated for, as the title of their books indicate, their admirable courage in transcending previously defined conservative boundaries and confronting the pernicious influence fringe ideologues and religious fundamentalists exert on the conservative movement.
      Amazingly, during an hour long show, I can't recall either ‘critic’ or host raising a single question or making one comment concerning the stranglehold the religious right has on the modern Republican Party. Just for example, there was not one word spoken about conservative foreign cult figure Sun-myung Moon, his ownership of the Washington Times, its sister publication Insight which published the false story that Obama attended a hard-line militant Madrassa as a child, or any of the dozens of other scandalous connections joining ultra right wing religious icons -- some of whom who routinely concoct wild and ugly religious fabrications -- irrevocably to the Republican Party. The fact that McCain political adviser Charlie Black organized a coronation where Moon was literally crowned the Messiah in a US Senate building, and duped two US lawmakers into not just attending, but physically placing a crown on Mister and Mrs. Messiah's head did not rise to the attention of Russert or his guests. Not like there's any shortage of material.

      Given the media mindset, it's a wonder that this stuff hadn't happened a lot sooner. Without getting into an argument about who's the more Conservative Democrat or which way the "reverse psychologists" would want to spin the primary campaign, let's just say that they begrudge the Clintons too deeply to strike at Obama at a time it could help nominate Hillary.

      Overturn Bush v. Gore II, Impeach the R. A. T. S.

      by Judge Moonbox on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 05:37:15 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Yes, it's good to point these things out... (10+ / 0-)

    Frederick Clarkson, co-founder of Talk To Action, was pointing out the influence of the Unification Church roughly two decades ago, and I was writing, until I got bored with it, a bit about the influence of the Christian right in the GOP last year.

  •  Yeah! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Neon Mama

    Free Sex, Free Sex, Free Sex1!,, oh wait a minute he's against "free sex" isn't he. What's he want "expensive sex"? That didn't help Spitzer much did it?

    CHRISTIAN, n. One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor. A. Bierce

    by irate on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:05:30 PM PDT

  •  New 3rd Rail of Politics (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    TX Unmuzzled, JML9999, Neon Mama, JeffW

    I think religion has become the new 3rd rail of politics. You touch upon religion's insidious uses by the republicks and you face death. In fact, some of this electrical insulation may have inadvertently protected Sen. Obama from criticism about Rev. Wright. Once you start criticizing one facet of religion, it does not take long for other facets to be exposed, such as Hagee et. al.

    McCain - lost bearings, lost moorings. Won't somebody please buy the poor man a compass and an anchor so he can sail off into the sunset?

    by edg on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:05:36 PM PDT

    •  This is why I'm so angry in HRC (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      dufffbeer, Neon Mama

      She was the one who was pushing Wright more than any of the other principal actors. Huckabee defended Wright and Obama. McCain was more or less silent. Since the attacks came from Clinton (admitted by campaign), the right has been able to avoid "turnabout", but still get the advantage of the attack. When the GE rolls around, the Republicans won't bring up Wright at all. They'll just hope the old attacks linger and settle into voters minds. They don't want their own associations looked at closely, which is what would happen if they pushed Wright actively.

  •  I think you are making this up (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Judge Moonbox

    The Religious Right has an influence on the GOP?  This is like that story about "Orange Juice" being real.

    Tim Russert said its just not true.

  •  But, but... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JML9999

    If the religious right really has a stranglehold, how the hell do you explain John McCain?

    Free speech? Yeah, I've heard of that. Have you?

    by dinotrac on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:06:50 PM PDT

  •  There's nothing shrill about this post... (4+ / 0-)

    The degree to which our movement sometimes can't see the forest for the trees is discouraging. That said, we started our own media, which is encouraging.

  •  Well of course, the media follows their script (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    dufffbeer, Judge Moonbox

    and can't be expected to deviate from that - ever.

    Remember - Democrats hate god and guns and their candidates are effete elites. Republicans love Jesus and .45 handguns and their candidates are strong masculine men who love America.

    the shane life The story of a boy alone in New York City. God help the city.

    by Shane Hensinger on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:08:26 PM PDT

  •  Politics makes strange bedfellows edition .... (6+ / 0-)

    Right-wingers who care only about their pocketbooks have long looked pretty peculiar in flagrante with those care only about their souls.  However one can't tell by outward professions which is which, eh?  

    "The extinction of the human race will come from its inability to EMOTIONALLY comprehend the exponential function." -- Edward Teller

    by lgmcp on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:53 PM PDT

    •  indeed ;-) (5+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      sayitaintso, walkshills, lgmcp, brein, Junah

      Matthew 7:15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so, every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, but a corrupt tree bringeth forth bad fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth bad fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore, by their fruits ye shall know them."

  •  Wish I had seen that Russert show (0+ / 0-)

    I caught only the last two minutes and thought how interesting it might have been considering the pairing of guests - one of whom I have always loathed (A.S.), and the other, a Rorschach of interesting and absurd for me.

    I thought Hitchens had been vocal about the RR in his career, but I defer to your expertise ;-)

  •  OK, what you've missed is that (4+ / 0-)

    behavior and opinion that's obedient/subservient to an authority, any authority, is ipso facto more moral and to be preferred.  Any behavior or belief that an individual espouses on the basis of his own knowledge or conviction is ispo facto suspect.
    That's because moral is what someone else demands.  If somebody's ordered it, whether it's an action or a belief, it's good.  So, of course, it gets the most attention.

    One could argue that mores have become confused with morals, but that wouldn't be understood.  Morality has been reduced to obedience and that's what they're comfortable with.

    Those who obey are good; those who don't obey are bad.

    How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

    by hannah on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:15:40 PM PDT

  •  Finally! (5+ / 0-)

    I believe the the Liberal blogesphere has finally begun the concerted campaign needed to shake up the Traditional Media. If there is one thing that has become painfully clear is the T.M. will only change when they are continuously exposed and made very uncomfortable with unrelenting pressure.

    Disabled Viet Vet ret. My snark is worse than my bite

    by eddieb061345 on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:16:23 PM PDT

  •  what does moon say at 2:00? (0+ / 0-)

    "Oppose me?" Then he goes off and they segue into "Swing Low"

    Seriously, I must know WHAT he says and IF I oppose him on this specific issue, for I KNOW that convex and concave bit preceeding the unintelligible part was  undeniably strange and the repetition of 'free sex' made him look a more than slightly lascivious.

    Ignorance is natural. Stupidity takes commitment. --Solomon Short

    by potty p on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:18:18 PM PDT

  •  I want the Moonie - GOP connection exposed (10+ / 0-)

    and I want every Republican to have to answer questions about it.

    However, a question:

    The fact that McCain political adviser Charlie Black organized a coronation where Moon was literally crowned the Messiah in a US Senate building, and duped two US lawmakers into not just attending, but physically placing a crown on Mister and Mrs. Messiah's head did not rise to the attention of Russert or his guests.

    I might buy that someone was duped into attending, but duped into putting a crown on the Moons' heads?

    No one can force you to do something that freaking stupid, unless they're controlling you electronically.

    Hillary Clinton: champion of the downtrodden White Race!

    by chumley on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:19:37 PM PDT

  •  Yes, the Moon thing is totally bizarro (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    walkshills, lotlizard, jds1978, daliscar

    and it was done in all seriousness and with decorum...some of the attending congresspeople wore their uniforms and white gloves. That the Bush clan is so close to the Moon family is another strange twist of policital irony and theater.  You just can't make this shit up.

  •  The show apparently had the opposite aim (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    lotlizard, Junah

    Rather than point out how the GOP is completely dominated by vile rightwing religious dingbats and foaming-at-the-mouth tax-cutters (who, in turn, are wholly owned by billionaires), the very presentation of Sullivan and Hitchens as "conservatives" is meant to show that the GOP must be more inclusive than people give it credit for.

    This sounds like deliberate propaganda to resuscitate the myth of the GOP "big tent."

    But the big tent, these days, really is nothing but a hollowed out shell inhabited by the loopiest of the loopy.

    For the record, we still have more than enough petroleum to trigger runaway greenhouse effects before the stuff runs out for good.

    by Minerva on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:29:14 PM PDT

  •  Sullivan's very critical of the Religious Right (9+ / 0-)

    He's been an outspoken critic of the Christian Right's stranglehold on the GOP.  He even coined the term 'Christianist' (parallel to 'Islamist') to describe the Christian Right.  

    I'd blame Russert.  He's a pretty docile Lap Dog for GE Branch of The Corporation that owns the GOP and has run the country for the last seven years.  He won't bring up any subject that might offend his boardroom masters.

  •  The right wing's influence is also in the editing (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Dr Wu, lotlizard, Neon Mama, CanyonWren

    room. Not only do they ignore the 800 lb gorilla in the room which is the authoritarian stranglehold over the Republican party, instead they put the magnifying glass with the gain set to 10 on trivial concerns: Obama's pastor, Clinton's memory lapses. I don't give a damn about the religious views of the owner but I care everything about the political criminality that comes from their imposition of their authoritarian ideology upon us.
        We have a chunk of ice the size of Texas breakng off the Antarctic and that story is history in one news cycle. Cheney, Rice, and Powell are signatures to torture authorization and nobody's talking about it. But they're still pushing the "Democrats can't win in November" idea. And that goddamn "newsmedia has a liberal bias" nonsense... That people drink this koolaid and ask for more exasperates me no end. Is everyone in the Simpson jury?
       

    This is just to say Forgive us victory tastes delicious so sweet and so cold

    by Dave the Wave on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:32:19 PM PDT

  •  Interesting... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    johngorenfeld

    do you have the proof that Charlie Black organized this?

    •  Yeah. (8+ / 0-)

      On May 7, 2004, at 11:16 AM, CHARLIE BLACK wrote:

      >
      > I don't know if it is annual, but they have done similar events.  I
      > don't
      > know Reverend Moon, but work with the management of the Washington
      > Times
      > and their foundation occasionally on conservative causes.  I think the
      > dinner committee list included a number of us "secular" conservatives.
      >
      >
      > Charlie Black
      > BKSH & Associates
      > (202) 530-0500

                            John Gorenfeld
      >                       <john@gorenfeld.n        To:       "CHARLIE <br>> BLACK" <CHARLIE_BLACK@was.bm.com>
      >                       et>                      cc:
      >                                                Subject:  Re: Moon
      > event at Dirksen Senate Office Building, 3/23
      >                       05/06/2004 09:31
      >                       PM
      >
      >
      > Dear Mr. Black,
      >
      > Thanks for your reply.
      >
      > It's kind of an amazing event, with Moon being coronated as the king
      > and declaring himself the Messiah at a federal building. Can you tell
      > me how you got involved with inviting people? Is this an annual event,
      > or just a one-time thing?
      >
      > sincerely,
      >
      > John
      >
      >
      > On Apr 28, 2004, at 10:34 AM, CHARLIE BLACK wrote:
      >
      >> John,
      >>
      >> I lent my name and sent invitations to a few friends.  Unfortunately,
      >> I had
      >> a conflict and couldn't go to the event.
      >>
      >> Charlie
      >>
      >> Charlie Black
      >> BKSH & Associates
      >> (202) 530-0500

    •  Maro (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      lotlizard, Joy Busey

      John Gorenfeld has a time stamped email from Black acknowledging his role in the coronation ceremony and has spoken to Black firsthand about it.

      Read UTI, your free thought forum

      by DarkSyde on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:48:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        johngorenfeld, Joy Busey, Neon Mama

        John beat me to it. Isn't it amazing that Wright's remarks garnered such attention, but the only place I've seen Black tied to Rev Moon ever whispered is the progressive blogosphere. And Charlie Black is just the tip of the iceberg. We know top GOP operatives including Karl Rove and Bush 1 are in cahoots with this guy. Can you imagine what a genuine journalistic investigation by someone with the resources of say, Dana Priestly, might uncover?

        Read UTI, your free thought forum

        by DarkSyde on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:52:47 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Reality has an obfuscation bias (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    esquimaux, arlene, jds1978

    When do the media, including this esteemed blog, and both parties, begin to talk about the fact that Israel is not a secular state, and that its agenda has damaged Americans immeasurably.  PNAC, as we all know but few will say, had deep roots in the Israeli agenda.  I for one will always believe that impeachment movement flamed out due to Democratic fear of crossing the Israel lobby, which loves the Iraq war and wants to expand it into Iran at the earliest possible moment.

    Sure, let's finally get real about the damage that Rev. Moon does.  At the same time Norman Podhoretz, Joe Lieberman, Douglas Feith, and their myriad allies, IN BOTH PARTIES, need to face the same merciless scrutiny.

    Fair and balanced reporting.

    The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein -- best book ever, I nominate for a Nobel Prize!

    by xaxado on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:38:13 PM PDT

  •  Hey, is it just me? (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    lotlizard, jds1978, Neon Mama, CanyonWren

    ...or is Sun-Myung Moon out of his goddam freakin' gourd?  

    I mean, if you judged strictly by the soundtrack you could easily picture "The Reverend" standing unsteadily on a city street corner, unshaven and disheveled, waving his arms wildly and delivering his crackpot rant while people scurry past, averting their gazes and clutching their children.

    Instead he drools this demented drivel from a podium to a bunch of neatly dressed gated-community type boneheads who probably all forked over $500 to be there! I notice that the woman at 1:27 can't help but roll her eyes and stifle a giggle but her date takes it all in with a straight face.  

    Hilarious!!!  

  •  Good God (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    walkshills

    please let there be a guest list of those who attended Moon's anniversary ceremony -- the woman in the white dress only reflected smugness -- not horror -- how did no one stand up and say: "WTF are you talking about?"  I'm concave, myself, so maybe I am misspeaking.

    My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total. Barbara Jordan 1974

    by gchaucer2 on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:40:54 PM PDT

  •  Because Russert is a Hard Partisan Republican (7+ / 0-)

    The 800-pound gorilla in any room with Tim Russert is Tim Russert. He is a multimillionaire corporate Republican operative who lies about journalistic "balance" to examine stories from only a Conservative Republican POV, and grind only Conservative Republican axes.

    But like an 800-pound gorilla, he is just the heavyweight silverback of the species. The "liberal media" is of course the corporate mass media, when it's lying about itself to cover up its consistent selfserving bias. From Fox through CNN through Disney/ABC, GE/NBC and Viacom/CBS, it's all corporate news all the time.

    I mean, it's been almost 2 years since Democrats routed Republicans in the biggest Congressional turnover in generations, not losing a single incumbent race but winning every race needed for majority, in both House and Senate. Democrats are turning out in the presidential primaries at double (or more) the rate of Republicans, even in Republican majority districts. Democrats are raising much more money from many many times more donors, despite the Republicans' corporate fundraising advantages. All the political activity in America in 2008 is Democratic, as is the majority of Congress and the clear favorite across the board for November, including the president. But the TV commentary is still dominated by Conservative Republicans, despite their dwindling, discredited minority.

    Because those Conservatives are not a minority in the corporate America that owns the mass media. So to the fatcats in that bubble, the faces in the mass media look representative of the "America" that is the only one they know. In which fat old White men are the world, and condescend to let cooperative minority people (and blondes) have the mike once in a while, for "fair play". In that world, Conservatives are the dominant majority, and are never wrong, because they cannot allow themselves to be.

    Especially in Russert's room, where his bulk outweighs anyone who isn't a Conservative Republican.

    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST

    by DocGonzo on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:42:14 PM PDT

  •  Because Conservative Religion is Correct, and (7+ / 0-)

    liberal religion is incorrect.

    Is there some confusion around this point?

    Conservative religion variously supports or at best accepts an aristocratic economy, and all conservative religion supports authoritarian society. Much of it supports a punitive approach to individual behavior and toward oppositional nations and peoples of the outside world.

    This is the correct belief system for empire, it is the correct belief system for industry, it is the correct belief system for mass communication, and it is the correct belief system aristocracy.

    Liberal religion argues against all of these conservative ideals, which is why it is incorrect. It's why liberal churches require supervision and takeover, and it's why academia requires forced balancing and chaperoning.

    I have to keep asking, what part of "conquest" remains unclear?

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:42:16 PM PDT

  •  It was obvious to me (0+ / 0-)

    that the Religious Right controlled them the minute Mike Huckabee won the nomination.

    •  except I heard (0+ / 0-)

      Dobson and some other religious guru say during the run up, that Huckabee was terrible.  They even said McCain was better because he might listen...Huckabee had a liberal social idealology.  

      At that time Dobson was talking about running himself since Huck was not on the same page as the rest of the true Christian Conservatives

      They were quite nasty about agreeing how bad he was.  He wanted to give people stuff.

    •  Yeah (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      walkshills, Neon Mama

      after he made a hard right into dominionist land and their only other real choice was a Mormon. Some right-wing religious leaders are still holding out, pretending they can't quite endorse McCain, that is until they work out a deal where the televangelist winguts will have a veto over any SCOTUS nominees and are assured of no stop in the faith based dollars pouring into their coffers.

      Read UTI, your free thought forum

      by DarkSyde on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 03:31:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Yeah but Huckster was all about that JESUS-Y (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      DarkSyde, Neon Mama, ppl can fly, Junah

      kind of Christianity. He was not all about the Right kind of Christianity - the "God hates Gays" kind.

      He wanted to feed the poor, fer Crissakes. Where the fuck did he get those kind of hippy bullshit ideas?

      Huckabee's Misguided "Compassion"

      Betsy Hagan, Arkansas director of Schlafly's Eagle Forum, says that outside of a few key social issues, Huckabee governed as a liberal.

      Huckabee is a sucker for social spending. In April 2006, he raised the state's minimum wage from $5.15 to $6.25 an hour, levying yet another tax on businesses and consumers -- one that destroys entry-level jobs.

      Huckabee is particularly proud of his ArKids First program, which greatly expanded government-paid health insurance for children. Compassionate? Sure -- except it's one more small step on the road to socialized medicine -- which hasn't worked that well for the Brits and Canadians who've died waiting for operations, due to the inevitable shortage of medical services in a state-run system.

      Huckabee supports a mandatory cap on the release of greenhouse gases. "It goes to the moral issue," the governor intones. "We have a responsibility to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions...."

      In a 2003 radio address, Huckabee told the citizens of Arkansas: "I looked into the eyes of immigrant Mexican children and was moved. These children often don't have enough to eat, don't have good clothes and don't have a dry place to sleep... And I was reminded we can give something back by offering a helping hand to those who follow the American dream along Interstate 30 and Interstate 40 into Arkansas."

      Effing hippy Jesus freak.

  •  ruling class media... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    lotlizard, jds1978, Neon Mama

    What do you expect? Critiques of the Republican Party? And besides, "conservative intellectuals" is an oxymoron or a contradiction in terms. Hitchens is to intellectual as Bush is to sage(brush cutter)

    Watching the ruling class bobbleheads on TV is such a waste!

    Of course , you don't want to be an elitist--you do want most Americans do, watch TV.

    So, to wrap up, Americans are TV addicted, shopalot,and as, our friend from Concord noted --lead lives of quiet desperation--this includes the walking/talking inebriate, Hitchens and the seeker of lost conservative souls, Andrew Sullivan (memo to Sullivan, give up the ghost) and, lastly Tim Russert, a long, lost cause.

    Follow ruling class media (RCM) and your mind will become mush...

    Dr Wu, the last of the big time thinkers

    by Dr Wu on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:47:59 PM PDT

  •  I blog love you DarkSyde. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    johngorenfeld

    Hitchens is not just a socially awkward member of the conservative class, he's an Atheist. So come on, if anyone's going to call out the McCainocrats  on pandering to the most batshit insane religious freakouts in America, you'd think it'd be Smarty McNoGodPants himself. But no, we get a tag-team of clueless and Sullen. Maybe Big Russ told them actual political insight was off limits.

  •  Hitchens calling out Hillary for being directly.. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    William Jacques

    responsible for bosnian genocide was pretty good stuff though!.

    The only person peddling false hope is Hillary Clinton!

    by terence on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:50:52 PM PDT

  •  It's John Hagee (5+ / 0-)

    Paster Strangelove. I've learned more than I've ever wanted to know about him since he's here in Texas. All of these guys have managed to have power because they're not held accountable for their money or anything, really.

    Religious organizations are considered non-profit organizations, but unlike all other non-profits, they don't have to file a Form 990 so that the public can see where their money is coming from and/or what they are spending it on.

    Because of these people, this must change. We just can't trust churches anymore.

    Thank you for your diary. Excellent.

    "I have very strong feelings about how you lead your life. You always look ahead, you never look back." ~ Ann Richards (Governor of Texas, 1990-94)

    by suswa on Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 02:59:25 PM PDT

  •  I don't understand the gorilla reference. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DarkSyde, rini6

    I think you're mixing metaphors, or somesuch here. I think you actually mean to use the phrase 'the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about'.

    Usually, when people talk about 800 lb gorillas, they use it thusly: 'Where does an 800 lb gorilla sit?' 'Anywhere it wants.'

    I know, the gorilla graphic is too nice to pass up, but still. Otherwise, an excellent, on-point article.