McCain Gaffe: No clue as to military command structure in ME, didn't listen to Petraeus testimony
Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:56:34 AM PDT
HuffPost:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona may not have been paying the closest of attention last week during hearings on the Bush administration's Iraq policy.
Speaking Monday at the annual meeting of the Associated Press, McCain was asked whether he, if elected, would shift combat troops from Iraq to Afghanistan to intensify the search for al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.
"I would not do that unless Gen. [David] Petraeus said that he felt that the situation called for that," McCain said, referring to the top U.S. commander in Iraq.
Petraeus, however, made clear last week that he has nothing to do with the decision. Testifying last week before four congressional committees, including the Senate Armed Services Committee on which McCain is the ranking Republican, Petraeus said the decision about whether troops could be shifted from Iraq to Afghanistan was not his responsibility because his portfolio is limited to the multi-national force in Iraq.
Decisions about Afghanistan would be made by others, he said.
Well, McCain, the guy who is the expert on the commandery in chief stuff a) punts an issue to the military commander Petraeus without having any particular opinion of his own and b) sorta missed that the under the current command structure, the military commander doesn't have jurisdiction over the question and c) missed the big testimony where Petraeus said JUST THAT.
Of course, Petraeus's refusal to say whether it would be better to move troops out of Iraq to Afghanistan was huge news among democrats. McCain doesn't think it's a decision for the president to make in the first place.
Addendum:
Bush hides behind Petraeus's skirts and ensures bad strategic decision, by which I mean, continuing Bush's bad strategic decisions.
By not letting Petraues weigh between afghanistan and Iraq, and giving him the power to decide what Iraq needs, it games the decision making. Nobody is noting what Petraeus's demands COSTS us in being unable to act in other areas. Petraeus isn't able to weigh what it costs us, Bush won't.
Petraus decides what IRAQ needs, and that's all that counts in the final decision. Afghanistan, and other costs, are simply not in the mix.
Permalink | 15 comments