Daily Kos

The Clintons: A Greek Tragedy

Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 04:46:51 AM PDT

There is an elemental shift occurring in American politics and the Clintons could have helped birth it. Instead they are seeking to stifle it for selfish reasons. It is unforgivable. It is a travesty. It goes against everything they have ever stood for. Of course, they do not care – the thirst for power dwarfs all other feelings, even sensible considerations. Years from now, when this story is told, it would be told like a classic Greek tragedy, a situation that need not have occurred.

The Clinton campaign cannot be analysed enough, their shenanigans, their strategy for the winning the nomination cannot be examined comprehensively enough. This is a tragedy of indefinable proportions. When the campaign for the nomination started a little over a year ago, many people – including myself – thought Senator Clinton was going to be the Democratic nominee, many people even thought she would be the next President of the United States. This was a fair assessment considering the fact that she is married to a former President, she was perceived as a tough and capable individual, and at that point, there really was no other candidate in the horizon who could conceivably beat the Clintons.

Fast-forward to April, 2008, all that has changed. As I have said numerous times, I first heard of the name ‘Obama’ in a song by the American rapper Jadakiss, in the second verse, there was the line: Why is Bush acting like he trying to get Osama? Why don’t we impeach him and elect Obama? Out of curiosity, I hit the browser, loaded up Google and here I am. Despite all the flaws Barack Obama has, despite the self confidence mistakable for arrogance, despite his occasional deviation from what I consider to be progressive/liberal principles, he is the best candidate on this field and he has proven himself to be most deserving of the nomination and I daresay, Presidency. As a non-citizen, what I find most attractive about his candidacy is his prudent inclination with regard to foreign policy and his openness to vigorous and robust diplomacy. The general Western attitude towards foreign policy, spearheaded by George W Bush, has been alarmingly short-sighted, poisonously uninformed and soaked in neo-conservative ideology. It is indisputable that some sort of new approach is direly needed. Obama represents such a shift. He unashamedly embraced this approach when he indicated his willingness to constructively engage with countries like Iran.

Former President Clinton was an individual who commanded respect and admiration. People looked past his imperfections as a man and the imprudent mistakes of his Presidency because he was a man who was difficult to dislike. Of course, all that has changed. Before Barack Obama’s victory in Iowa, back when he was 20 points behind in the national polls, back when it was a dead-heat in Iowa, President Clinton opined that he ‘loved’ all the Democratic candidates and he was not against anyone. Inevitably, after Obama took Iowa, the former President went through a melt-down of indescribable proportions; he has made injudicious racial statements unbefitting of a former President, he has made political remarks that can at best be described as ill-considered and he has lowered himself into the political arena in such a way that painful to watch. The question one as to ask is: why?

The Clintons feel that they should be in the White House in 2009. To them, it is a right. The sense of belonging or sense of entitlement is probably comparable to the kind a man feels towards his wife. In short, it cannot be aptly described. But it is patently clear. They have run a campaign predicated on a mixture of the following: a dashing sense of urgency, paranoia, panic and selfish idiocy. Andrew Sullivan points out; "[t]he Clintons are prepared to use any argument, any Republican tactic, and any social or cultural division to stay in the game. By tactically morphing into Rove Republicans, they are deliberately pivoting off a myth about Obama to make him unelectable."

It is my inclination that regardless of what happens in this cycle, the Clintons will not be returning to the White House in 2009. Here are the two ultimate scenarios: Number one, the race drags on for a long while with the Clintons maintaining the current level of negativity, they somehow eek out the nomination after having successfully propagated the notion that Obama is unelectable by assassinating his character. In this scenario, they will lose the general election. Indeed, the Democratic Party would probably fare badly in corollary races like the local, senate and house races. Obviously, it would be difficult for Obama’s supporters not to feel robbed. The black vote, the young vote, all the various constituencies Obama has energised would be lost to the Democratic Party. This is not to suggest that they would all somehow vote for McCain, but the apathy would be direly felt considering the fact that Clinton would energise the Republican Party by default. Of course, in this scenario, this can probably be averted by offering Obama the VP slot, but this suggestion proceeds from the point that Obama will even accept it in the first place. And to be perfectly clear, if Obama accepted the VP slot in such a circumstance, the very essence of his message, the logic of his candidacy would have conflicted with his conduct in an unforgivably devastating way.

The second scenario is Obama ultimately becomes the nominee, when it’s all said and done, but he is fatally damaged as a consequence of the Clintons’ negativity. Hence, he ultimately loses to McCain. In such a circumstance, apart from the fact that the Clintons would not return to the White House, the Democratic loss would be their legacy. You see, at this point, Bill Clinton has shredded the good will he enjoyed in American politics beyond recognition. There is nothing left. Nothing. Zero. In yesterday’s Daily Mail – I think – he was described as a "power hungry ex-President who was paid millions by businesses to help close deals." He has conducted himself in a shameful way; he continues to conduct himself in a despicable manner and his latest conduct of directly accusing the Obama campaign of hostility to working class voters is testament to his depraved loss of statesmanship. Senator Clinton on the other hand has morphed into something else who has threatened to "totally obliterate Iran". This kind of talk should not emanate from the Democratic Party, this is not why I started following its politics; this is not why I support its candidates. This is madness.

In the future, the Clintons will realise that this race they ran was fundamentally, totally unnecessary. It was totally unneeded. To put it crudely, what did the Clintons forget in the White House? What pressing policy did they omit to institute that they would engage in the most despicable political hatchet-job of contemporary politics against a candidate that is internationally beloved? They could have played a different position in this election and they could have played it from the back. There is an elemental shift occurring in American politics and the Clintons could have helped birth it. Instead they are seeking to stifle it for selfish reasons. It is unforgivable. It is a travesty. It goes against everything they have ever stood for. Of course, they do not care – the thirst for power dwarfs all other feelings, even sensible considerations. Years from now, when this story is told, it would be told like a classic Greek tragedy, a situation that need not have occurred. Senator Clinton, while a capable individual in her own right, is not the right person for this time. Senator Obama is. It is hard not to come to this conclusion if one looks at things through objective glasses.

In sum, I will lay the blame of the pending calamity at the foot of the Democratic Party. An American friend of mine who is traditionally Republican but supports Obama in this cycle said the reason he is not a Democrat is because institutionally, they have not demonstrated intelligence over the years (these are not my words). The Democrat Party is embarking on a collective suicide mission that will not only affect their chances in the general elections but in the future. There is no fair way for the Clintons to win the nomination. This is clear to every observer, and practically every participant. At this point, all the remaining contests will probably have to be concluded, but the Party establishment is allowing the Clintons plant a divisive seed with many potential sprouts – the scariest of which is racial. The success of the Democratic Party thus far has been predicated on how they have been able to accommodate Blacks, Whites, Latinos, Asians, Jews and every other conceivable stripe. When the Clintons are done damaging this umbrella, the Democratic Party will have played a complicit part.

Bless.

Tags: Senators Clinton, Obama, Bill Clinton, Democratic Party (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 18 comments

  •  Tips, stings, comments (18+ / 0-)

    Bless.

    A Tiger does not always show his Tigritude -- African Proverb

    by The British Observer on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 04:47:24 AM PDT

    •  Failure to act is not complicity (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      mommaK

      Complicity implies active participation; in my view, certain elements of the Democratic Party are merely failing to intervene in a strong and timely manner.

      But this is not the whole party, and is not active participation in the destruction of the party. It is negligence -- failing to act to prevent injury that is foreseen or foreseeable.

  •  Many thought I was delusional, (0+ / 0-)

    but a year ago, I knew Barack was going to be the nominee.  And all my friends and family thought I was crazy.  They said they would vote for him, but there was no way he was going to be the nominee.

    And when he won Iowa, I cried my eyes out because it was a dream come true.

  •  All true...and sad (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    jhutson, mommaK

    I am not recognizing the political landscape anymore.  I NEVER thought George. W could win not only one, but two elections.  And, I never thought Bill or Hillary would stoop to the level they have to win...seemingly at any cost.  It makes me sad and leaves me feeling that this country is in such peril if John McCain wins in November.  I can't believe he will win, but as I have just stated...I have been wrong before.

  •  tragic? (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Scarce, corvo, jhutson, shunpike

    I think you're inflating their stature by calling this tragic.  There is a whiff of Macbeth about them, but that's a superficial similarity (power couple gone crazy).  I see no trace of inner anguish or struggle in either one, just garden variety grandiosity.

    But your point about the path they didn't take is spot on - how different they would have been perceived had they welcomed and supported Obama.  She'd still be a Senator, they'd be filthy rich, he'd still be respected.  But they threw that away.

    I think the more fitting analogy (not mine) is to Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby - portrait of a rich, reckless duo that left ruin in their wake.  No regard for consequences or anything beyond their own interests and momentary impulses.  

    Anyway, the good news is that I believe Obama will be the next President of the United States.  It will be a bumpy ride, but he's on his way, and many of us are going with him.  And the worst of it, for the narcissistic Clintons, is that he'll be seen in history as a minor President - completely eclipsed by Bush 2 and Obama, who will each have changed the US for both ill & good.

    Pass the popcorn!

  •  Not so much a tragedy as a farce. (0+ / 0-)

    Because all those who now support Hillary "because America is not ready for a black President" in the General would vote McCain "because America is not ready for a woman President".

    We're shocked by a naked nipple, but not by naked aggression.

    by Lepanto on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 05:30:01 AM PDT

  •  Hubris did Oedipus in (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    mommaK, synductive99

    He thought he could outwit the oracle.

    Hubris plus an obsession with power are invariably a highly toxic mix.

    Man learns from History that man learns nothing from History - Hegel

    by nailmaker on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 05:30:26 AM PDT

  •  I think (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    JFinNe

    of LBJ as a tragic figure; he did so much good for the country but brought ruin because of Cold War ideology that impelled him to fight communism in the swamps of VietNam. The Clintons made their choice. They have run a campaign that has been disgraceful quite willingly. There is a difference dramatically between being flawed and being a villain.

  •  A complicated power struggle (0+ / 0-)

    My husband said yesterday that he can hardly bear to look at John McCain without exploding.  I said I can only have one hard on at a time and it is focused on Hillary.  Both she and Bill are out of control, but acting with the blessings from the Democratic establishment.  BC and HRC represent their interests, and Howard Dean be damned.

    "Man's life's a vapor Full of woe. He cuts a caper, Down he goes. Down de down de down he goes.

    by JFinNe on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 05:31:20 AM PDT

  •  It will be a little entertaining, I guess, (0+ / 0-)

    to see every single interview for the rest of Clinton's life begin with, "What the hell were you thinking?"

  •  One way to stop the tragedy (0+ / 0-)

    I've thought for a long time that if Bill became convinced that his "legacy" was forever tarnished by this stuff, he'd be the only one who could talk her into quitting. How?

  •  You Think the Clintons Stood for Something? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    corvo

    Bwa hahahahahaha.

    This aggression will not stand, man.

    by kaleidescope on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 06:42:09 AM PDT

  •  How quickly people turn (0+ / 0-)

    Look, I'm an Obama supporter -- a pretty staunch one, even though I think he's far from perfect. I simply prefer his foreign policy (and most of his policies, in fact, except health care), and I love the bottom-up movement he's practically conjured into being.

    But I've also tried to give Hillary Clinton the benefit of the doubt, because I saw straight away that there was an awful lot of sexism out there -- a lot of it on this site, to the shame of all Kossacks with a conscience. However, it's getting harder and harder to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt. I won't say her recent Iran comments were the last straw, and I'll still vote for her (from overseas!) if she's the nominee. But she's making it really hard for me.

  •  Selfish. (0+ / 0-)

    For years I've thought Hillary's intention to run for President was merely a selfish use of her power.  Instead of supporting others in the party, she has to take the limelight.  When Obama is the nominee, will she redeem herself by encouraging her voters to defeat McCain?

Permalink | 18 comments