Daily Kos

Sticking up for Wright

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 05:43:19 AM PDT

Judging by the comments here on Kos, this Wright affair is really shaking people's faith in Obama. I have never read so many comments from wavering Obama supporters here - although thankfully that's still a big minority. The average opinion goes: "Yeah, Wright is nuts, but we can survive this, yes we can!" For shame you self styled liberals and progressives! Have we forgotten what we stand for? We're the ones who are supposed to be open minded to different voices, and to encourage oppressed peoples to stand up. And if it's rattled even the progressives like us, then believe that it's got the white blue collar voter all freaked out. Now our will is tested, and our conscience as well. More after the flip.

Rev. Wright is essentially a compassionate individual. In fact, he's exactly what Obama said he is: a truly caring, good person, blessed with an enormous intellect, but forever tangled in the emotional struggles of our racist history. The reality from which he comes exists, just as the reality of the Holocaust still exists, and the reality of what has become of millions of Iraqis today exists. But we have succeeded in blanking out that reality from many regions of our mind and country.

Wright represents a vision of today: of the crippling poverty millions are born into in this USA, because of the color of their skin. Of the drugs and violence and the destruction and incarceration of an ethnic people in the name of US profit. Wright represents skin color, not as an accident, free from history or predjudice, as we would prefer to see it, but as it actually is: steeped in a long and unfortunate history that is so tangled and tortured that it has been almost impossible to unravel and heal. How can we forget that black poverty and violence and other symptoms of endemic culture, for example, the fact 1 in 24 black men are in prison today, are the result of institutional bigotry and violence past and present? How can black people forget when that story is written on their very skin? Some may have missed in Wright Q&A the other night when he said, quote:

It isn't (Rev. Farrakhan's) fault that I was put in chains. It isn't his fault that my skin is this color

What Rev. Wright was referring to was not the blackness of his skin - that would have been a meaningless statement - but that his skin is so white. He refers to the fact that in his past is the rape of his black female ancestors by white men - their "owners".

Imagine how difficult that would be to swallow, for anyone, let alone a man or woman of voluminous intelligence. Imagine if that was you or me who had to face the indignity of a slave past, and not as a single incidence, forgotten in a generation, but as a shared cultural memory of shame, and a continued story of depravity. Have you ever met an older Jewish person with a number tatooed on their hand? It is the same for many in the black community, only that stigma is burnt into their very skin, their DNA, their most immediate visual cue. Imagine if every time that you looked at most of your friends, your brothers and sisters, your parents, your mirror, you might see a reminder of an atrocity and rape of your great grandparents. And imagine if that wasn't merely a distant memory but was a continued story of poverty, discrimination, and violence that echoed that same history in your everyday life.

Reverend Wright isn't wrong about his anger. He's not crazy, he's not a "loose cannon". Instead he's like Hamlet, blessed with an almost unholy knowledge of his own history, and by extension the history of our nation, and all people. Wright is a complex figure, he is a hero, and not a mad-man or a fool. We (even 30 something white folks like myself) need to have the courage stand up for him and try to understand how he can exist. Even more, we ought to honor his voice.

In the face of horrific history, in the presence of the realization of hell echoed everywhere in his present, the Reverend Wright has found a message of profound good and compassion. His life's work has been a reflection of the strength and selflessness that he discovered in himself. It is well known, and popularly pronounced by prominent men of all colors that Wright has been a servant to the poor and downtrodden. This isn't just talk. Rev. Wright has absorbed a tortured drama in a profoundly emotional and intellectual way, but he's done so for the brilliant purposes of speech and service. For every pundit out spanking this story to death in the noon day sun (for their own benefit I might add), there are thousands of people who Rev. Wright has helped either directly or indirectly. He has brought men and women out of poverty, offered them a sense of self worth and meaning, and even healed them from drugs and alcohol. And he has been a pinnacle of hope and brought life and meaning to a desperate and impoverished community in a broken city through the use of his voice.

This is the story that needs to be echoed in our media chambers - that the anger of Jeremiah Wright is the anger of our whole nation. It sounds black, but it is universal. It is the sound of pure rage at shared indignity - the kind we all here at Kos feel over the state of our world and our government. Do you feel as angry about the gutting of our constitution, the breaking of laws, the contracting of torture, the manufacturing of war? How about the extinction of diversity, the destruction of the environment, and the possible, irreversible destruction to human kind as result? Do you feel angry about the innocent blood shed for oil? About the atrocities of greed and inequality happening around the globe and in our own country today? If you had a tradition of voicing your frustration for hundreds of years the way the black community has, then you would sound a lot like Rev. Wright. Don't fear it, feel it as one kind of truth. The voice of black anger is on our side: it is also the voice of white anger and human anger.

It's OK to feel anger about the state of the world and the history that has brought us here. These feelings must be talked about in every venue outside of the control of the media spectacle in order for us to change their false reality. If we take a fair look at Reverend Wright, at what he has actually said and done, and if we consider his words outside of his feelings, then we are doing our part in living up to the truth of our history and our world. The Rev. Wright says, and Obama says, that we are one people, despite our religion, our color, our gender, or any difference at all. This message of unity is the only thing that can save us at this point. Believe it.

So speak up in defense of Rev. Wright in your private sphere if you can. It is a chance to stand strong for this candidate we believe in. We know he doesn't share the angry tone of his pastor, and that his world view is richer and broader, both in pragmatism and real experience. We also know he shares the compassion that Rev Wright does for racial inequality as well as gender inequality, and the class inequality that drive them, and that are driving our endless wars and killing our planet.

Now is the time to fight back and to stand for something. We need to be unafraid to defend the true story of Rev. Wright - his good deeds and compassion, and to combat the tone of anger and the fearful reaction that are quickly becoming the popular narrative. We are people who understand that when the Main Stream Media calls something "hate speech", then they are trying to manipulate the public, and that is the real "hate speech". We need to recognize that we are its answer. Wherever we can we need to make our voices heard and speak out against the false, fabricated narratives invented by the media corporations. This is our calling as the commentators and voices of a new media.

Tags: Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama, 2008 (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 43 comments

  •  Huh? (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    frandor55, gwilson, bugscuffle

    "I have never read so many comments from wavering Obama supporters here"

    What the hell are you talking about?

  •  We can stand up and fight for Rev. Wright... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    frandor55, montecristo

    ...and lose the nomination, the election, a thousand more soldiers, the Constitution, and our Republic.

    I agree that what was done to Wright was shameful.

    As Shakespeare once wrote:

    All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players: they have their exits and their entrances...

  •  oh come on (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    slinkerwink, frandor55

    I was ready to defend Wright until he went on his ego driven talking spree.  He had his 15 minutes of fame and wanted to make the most of it for his own selfish ($$) reasons.  

    If you are in DC see Man of La Mancha at the Church Street Theater opening 7/10/08

    by BDA in VA on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 05:52:01 AM PDT

  •  Wright Hs Done Many Good Deeds... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    BDA in VA, RoCali

    It's just that he saw Obama's candidacy as a chance to promote his own views and that was damaging to the campaign. Obama took the needed action.

    Well I've been from Tucson to Tucumcari... Tehachapi to Tonopah--Lowell George/Little Feat

    by frandor55 on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 05:53:18 AM PDT

  •  You publish one concern troll diary.... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    BDA in VA

    after another. Always hand wringing, hoping "us Obamabots" can come together to stem the rising tide of HRC.

    Give it a rest. The only people coming to Wright's defense are Hilarista's trying to stoke the only remaining issue they have on the Dem nominee.

  •  If Wright were as you described him (0+ / 0-)

    then he would have thrown himself under the bus instead of Obama. You know, like apologize for the kernels of truth in the supposed lies about him. Nobody invented God damn America.

    Time to move on, something Wright hasn't done.

  •  Reverend Wright Lost Me When . . . (0+ / 0-)

    I have been defending him until this week.  He has the right to say and do what he pleases and no one can dismiss the social environment in which he came of age nor the positive effect he has had on members of his church.  However, he, much like Bill Clinton, is squandering his legacy and good works for payback to Obama, a young whippersnapper in his eyes, who dares to judge him or at least disagree with the delivery of his message.  I believe Wright is much more egocentric and narcissistic than anyone realized and he is relishing his 15 minutes of fame.

    Senator Obama and the rest of us have every right to view him as a whole person with warts and all.  Much like McCain, whose service I admire, but whose policies I disdain, has sold his soul for the nomination and no longer is the "maverick" he once was.  Hillary is a chameleon, being whatever any particular group wants her to be.  She stands for nothing anymore.  

    In my opinion, Obama is the only person in this race who has tried desperately to stay true to his ideals and original purpose of his candidacy, which is to lift us up and forge the way for a new brand of politics.  Hillary, McCain and, now, Reverend Wright have sold out for their own personal gain.  Wright is enjoying the spotlight immensely and, if he really cared about Obama or the future of this country, he would not be throwing Obama under the bus.  Obama did not do this to him until Wright went 'round the bend to incite, shock and inflame. He may get a good book deal out of it and some speaking engagements but he has diminished himself as a leader.

    I agree that our collective anger needs to be discussed but it must be a civil discourse with less inflammatory rhetoric and more commonality of cause.

    I want my country back
    and a good dream to stand up for . . .
    ~Greg Brown, "Homeland"

    by doghaven on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:05:56 AM PDT

    •  i don't agree (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Vyan

      I think that the black community gives Wright a lot more credit than is publicly acknowledged. What I saw at the NAACP was the celebration of his voice and service. I do agree that Obama has stuck to his ideals, but I don't agree that discussing our collective anger, as you put it, will happen if we aren't allowed to communicate how angry we are. Remember, we were supposed to have solved all this race stuff decades ago. Civic discourse can be a euphemism for shut the hell up sometimes.

      Say something you don't agree with!

      by Christian Coulon on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:03:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Anger is OK (0+ / 0-)

        I beleive it's absolutely OK to express anger and it's often necessary to do so to get to the crux of the situation.  What I have a problem with is grandstanding, inflammatory rhetoric for its sake only, with no point.  I agree that "civil discourse" often means "shut the hell up sometimes" but this is not what I'm encouraging.  I want the discussion, with or without anger.  What I don't want is someone in power, who has a personal vendetta, using the stage or pulpit to inflict harm against an individual under the guise of speaking for an entity rather than for himself.  Honesty, that's all I'm looking for.  

        As far as solving the race thing decades ago, no way.  I've lived in rural areas most of my adult life, by choice, and racism is alive and well in the backwoods, so I've been under no delusion of our progress or lack of same.  I'm still hopeful, however, and I believe an Obama presidency would go a long way in healing us in this way.  I figure I'll be long dead and gone before it's even close to where I would like it to be.

        Thank you for your comment.  I'm always willing to listen to different opinions.    

        I want my country back
        and a good dream to stand up for . . .
        ~Greg Brown, "Homeland"

        by doghaven on Thu May 01, 2008 at 02:30:40 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  thanks to you too (0+ / 0-)

          if you haven't already then you might read this diary, which addresses your point about Wright. There's always more than meets the eye, especially with a guy like Rev. Wright. But all in all I agree with you.

          Say something you don't agree with!

          by Christian Coulon on Thu May 01, 2008 at 08:16:20 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  I did read that . . . (0+ / 0-)

            I did read the diary you linked and it gave me pause.  I'm a bit conflicted now about his  motivation (Wright's).  Whatever the situation, it is time to put it away, but I know they won't.  I read another diary yesterday talking about Chris Matthews bragging about his ratings being up and he credits it to the Wright story.  This is all they care about, ratings.  Disgusting.  I can't even watch these people anymore.  I listen to music and watch Keith/Stewart/Colbert for entertainment and get real information on the "internets."

            I want my country back
            and a good dream to stand up for . . .
            ~Greg Brown, "Homeland"

            by doghaven on Tue May 06, 2008 at 09:04:19 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  The zeal of the convert, (0+ / 0-)

    which Obama experienced in his 20s, is a powerful force.  He has matured over time.

    The transition from one generation to another is like giving birth, messy and bloody and painful and sometimes requiring a C-section.

    Wright was then, and he has done a good job.  Obama is now.  There's a difference.

    Democracy is comin' to the USA -- Leonard Cohen

    by slithytove on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:13:20 AM PDT

  •  The time to defend Wright (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Vyan

    was when all this began.  

    After that Q&A there's not much we do without harming ourselves in the process.  Too late for anything except what Barack did now.

    The day this started, I feel like we (including our visible "leadership") should have stood up with one voice and done everything we could to stop the destruction of an american hero and a man who has dedicated his life to the struggles for peace and justice we all believe in.  We didn't stand up for him.  We allowed the MSM to frame him and a lot of us even bought into it.

    What I think we saw the other day was a broken man who felt he'd been betrayed by the party he'd spent his life working for and building.  The people he speaks to and for are our most loyal group of constituents.  When he was unfairly swiftboated by the rightwing MSM we let him twist in the wind for a month until he finally lost his composure.

    I'm not saying anybody should endorse what he was doing the other day, but i do think we need to look at ourselves a little bit and take some responsibility for our complicity in his destruction.

    What he got destroyed around was a magnificent and poetic denounciation of the war.  I wish any of our leaders had had the courage to speak out against it at the time with the passion and commitment that he did.

    This is water under the bridge now, but I for one am not proud of how behaved during this incident.  He was one of us and we didn't treat him that way.  

    •  i don't agree (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Vyan

      I think we saw an aging but still brilliant man, whose community is rallying around him and refusing to let him be nullified by the MSM and the bullying culture of fear that they represent. For example, Bill O'Reilly and that nazi Hannity say things everyday that I find to be more hateful than anything that the intelligent and bombastic Rev. Wright say. But they are sanctioned by the powers that be, so that's OK. I disagree with your characterization of Wright, but I agree that Obama behaved smartly.

      Say something you don't agree with!

      by Christian Coulon on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:06:14 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Community rallying around him? (0+ / 0-)

        We're his community (or at least we ought to be) and we've done nothing like that.  

        Or do you think because he's black he isn't part of our community?  

        He's spent his life fighting for progressive values and we stood by and watched while he got swiftboated and now some us here are cheerfully dancing around his grave.  

        If his community only includes black people we have a far longer way to go.

        •  well, i would say that (0+ / 0-)

          the black community is in some respects a distinct community than the general liberal or progressive community if that is what you mean. I don't say that because he's black he isn't part of our community, but I do say that if you could get a real opinion from the black community you would find tremendous support for our Rev., unlike around here at the Kos community.

          Say something you don't agree with!

          by Christian Coulon on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:27:27 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  The black community (0+ / 0-)

            is the most loyal constituency our part has ever had, the most supportive of progressive values in our history.  We here at Kos, on the other hand don't feel the need to reciprocate that loyalty.  And then some of us wonder why people like Wright become embittered with us.  

            I am ashamed of this community right now.  We can't identify ourselves with our own base, a group that has supported our core values through thick and thin.  But they're different, they don't really count.

            If we want to stand up for an inclusive society maybe we should start asking ourselves to do some including too.

  •  Rev Wright Lost Me When (0+ / 0-)

    he threw up the Que sign. He's my frat, but that was totally not the time and place for that.

  •  It's important to allow complexity (0+ / 0-)

    I appreciate the diarist for elevating this discussion a bit.

    Let's not destroy the man, Wright, when in fact he has already faced so much sorrow. Parsing out the truth from the rev is challenging. Now that my fury over his performance has calmed down I can accept his almost shamanic revelations. We all know just how limited the tube is when it comes to conveying complexity. It remains that changelings have no place on the political stage.

    The thing that blew me away in your diary was the reference to Wright's statement on the color of his skin:

    What Rev. Wright was referring to was not the blackness of his skin - that would have been a meaningless statement - but that his skin is so white. He refers to the fact that in his past is the rape of his black female ancestors by white men - their "owners".

    When I heard Wright say it, I didn't get it. Now I do.

    Let's all keep listening to one another. Even our new clown friend. Wright is an amazing guy, even if he went off the rails a bit on this one.

    Obama and all of us can handle it.

    Yes, we can.

    •  thanks a lot (0+ / 0-)

      the response I've gotten pretty roundly proves my theory about the general conclusions people around here have arrived at. It's really nice to hear from an open mind who actually bothered to read what I wrote. Thanks again.

      Say something you don't agree with!

      by Christian Coulon on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:10:07 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I understand (0+ / 0-)

    where your coming from and I had hoped that this is the tact that Barack himself would take.

    But alas it was a bridge too far for him, and although I've written numerous diaries defending Rev. wright - here - here - here - here and here - I can see why.  

    America is simply not ready to openly and honestly address what Wright is bringing to the table. Obama isn't ready for it.

    He talks longingly about redemption, seeing the best in people and reaching out across the isle of division - but he can't do it with Louis Farrakhan, and now he can not longer do it with Wright.

    And the truly sad part is that that is probably going to make him more popular with Whites, even while he loses a bit of his commanding 90% domination of the Black vote.  And it's not like those black people are going to go to Hillary who was talking smack about Rev. Wright weeks ago - they're just going to sit this one out.

    It's a sad and disappointing thing overall, but it just might have saved Barack's chances at the Presidency.

    Vyan

    •  hey, thanks (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Vyan

      for the great response. My suspicions have been confirmed by so many other posters here. About what you said:

      "America is simply not ready to openly and honestly address what Wright is bringing to the table. Obama isn't ready for it."

      I agree and disagree. The Wright issue was going to come up in their face whether they wanted it or no, cause it's basically all the Rethuglicans have got on Obama. So better to frame the debate ourselves as soon as possible.

      Now I agree too that it would have been very moving had Obama stood up for Wright, and you and I would have agreed - but it would have been quite fatal to his candidacy.

      Make no mistake, Wright was right with his comments about Obama being a politician. He's a very clever one and he did the right thing. He is currently diffusing the most damaging route of attack against him.

      But this Wright controversy is no accident. It's a stroke of genius, mark my words. Right now we are both having the debate over race, and seeing Obama stand above it. He is condemning the "danger" of anger and bringing us together over the possibility of resolution. Meanwhile, a very sharp message has been sent to the superdelegates that the black vote isn't going to shut up if Clinton steals the nomination, and that they won't let their leaders be put down by the establishment.

      It's too clever not to be planned.

      Say something you don't agree with!

      by Christian Coulon on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:41:38 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 43 comments