Daily Kos

The Poor Get Diabetes; The Rich Get Local and Organic

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:05:23 AM PDT

Months and months ago, I asked for ideas for a 2008 Netroots Nation food panel and someone responded that we should address hunger. Someone else seconded it. Then Kerry Trueman of Eating Liberally suggested we invite Mark Winne to speak.

That seems like forever ago. Hunger wasn't the topic of quite so many newspaper headlines at the time. Which isn't to say it wasn't in the news. This year hasn't been a good one for anyone economically, and when our pocketbooks get hit, so do many people's tummies.

Since then - as the news about world food shortages grows louder and more desperate - Mark Winne agreed to speak at Netroots Nation and Netroots Nation accepted our food panel proposal! Also, I read Mark Winne's new book, Closing the Food Gap: Resetting the Table in the Land of Plenty.

Hopefully this diary provides enough info so you'll get an idea of what we'll be talking about at the food panel (although, keep in mind, Mark's one of four absolutely phenomenal panelists so this isn't the only topic). If you find this interesting, I HIGHLY recommend reading his book before NN08!!!

I fell in love with Closing the Food Gap by page 6 at the latest. And the book starts on page 3. Winne's writing style would hold a reader's attention even if he were writing, say, an 800-page treatise on slime mold. As it so happens though, the topic he write about is urgently vital to building a better society.

I don't know how to put it other than: Mark Winne is the real deal. He's been working to end hunger in our country since before I was born, and trying just about every single tactic imaginable to do it. That is not to say that he's been 100% successful. I think he'd be the first to point out that there have been a few failed experiments here and there. But as he shows in the book, he's learned from each of his experiences (good or bad) and he will always pick himself back up and try again.

What's the food gap the book's title speaks of? In the past, it was the fact that the rich ate and the poor didn't. Today, as Winne puts it, "the poor get diabetes; the rich get local and organic."

Winne points out that Americans cannot seem to put a hunger program in place solely for the purpose of feeding hungry people. In the past it was because draftees were failing their military physicals due to malnutrition, or as a subsidy to Big Ag. But feed the hungry just to feed the hungry? Not so much. And when someone needed to be thrown under the bus in these programs, usually it was the hungry.

A point he makes early on in the book is the effect Reagan had on hunger in America. When Reagan cut food stamps significantly, Winne witnessed the effects with his own eyes. Real people were hurting because of the numbers some Republican appointee in a budget office somewhere moved around on a spreadsheet. Winne writes:

I met Alice M. in 1983, just two years into the first administration of Ronald Reagan. She was seventy-nine years old, living alone . . . She received $256 a month in Social Security and an additional $32 a month in Supplemental Security Income (SSI), making her yearly income $3,456. This placed her significantly below that year's official federal poverty level of $4,680 for a single-person household.

Because she had a pacemaker and as generally nervous about being out in her high-crime neighborhood, Alice rarely traveled more than two blocks from her apartment building. Not able to drive, she did her food shopping by walking to a small nearby grocery whose high prices and lack of bargain brands kept mobile shoppers away. Since a nearby A&P Supermarket with better prices and more selection had recently closed, this store was Alice's only choice. . .

Before 1983, Alice's meager food budget had been stretched by her allotment of $44 a month in food stamps. In October 1982, however, her food stamps had been cut to the minimum allotment of $10 a month as a result of a Reagan administration measure reducing food stamps when Social Security payments increased. . . The first month that Alice's food stamps were cut, she was so mad she sent them back.

The private sector responded, of course, doing their best in a constant game of catch-up. Winne describes the food banks that sprung up, serving a dual purpose of disposing of food that would otherwise be wasted and feeding the hungry. Unfortunately, people often confuse the food bank's primary purpose as being the former, not the latter. Here's a particularly memorable paragraph about his work at a food bank:

No donation was too small, too weird, too disgusting, or too nutritionally unsound to be refused. I remember the load of nearly rotten potatoes that we gratefully accepted at the warehouse's loading dock and then promptly shoveled into the dumpster once the donor was safely out of sight. One of our early board meetings included a cooking demonstration by a group of local entrepreneurs who were trying to develop a market for horse meat. The product's name was Cheva-lean, which of course was taken from the French word for horse, cheval. The promoters reminded us that the French, the world's leading authorities on food, ate horse meat and, therefore, that our poor clients could certainly do the same. And to top that, I still have the recipes from the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Service that helped us use the moose parts that were proudly donated by representatives of the Connecticut Fish and Game Division when an unfortunate moose met its end jaywalking across I-84.

Another point about food banks is that the more food they have to provide, the more people show up to receive it. You'll never find the equilibrium where the food bank has enough food to feed all of the hungry because it doesn't exist. Winne notes that of course the way to end hunger is ending poverty - and a food bank hardly does that - but he also details a number of other strategies to fight hunger.

One thing he describes that I've lived through personally is that poor neighborhoods often have no access to grocery stores. Not only that, but bus routes are often designed very poorly for someone trying to go from a low-income neighborhood to a grocery store and back. Often it involves spending a long time waiting for buses and traveling in the wrong direction to catch a bus that can then take you where you are actually going.

Winne described a successful story in which he worked with his city to create a bus route to bring low income residents to a grocery store. He also talks about efforts to bring either co-ops or for-profit grocery stores into low income neighborhoods. It makes sense that a grocery store wants to locate itself where the profits are, but it doesn't make sense that a city government should allow entire neighborhoods to have no local access to healthy food.

Winne also talks about bringing farmers markets into low income areas. Like the grocery stores, farmers want to get the most bang for their buck when they choose where to sell their food. Winne's done some work dealing with this and he's found some strategies for success which he describes in the book.

The book does not give the 100% perfect solution to ending hunger and/or poverty because there isn't one, but he does give a thoughtful explanation of the methods he's tried and the lessons he's learned in his over three decades of work on the subject. I think the best summary of the book is the quote from Jane Goodall on the front:

It's heartening to find a book that successfully blends a passion for sustainable living with compassion for the poor.

I can't recommend this book more highly and I'm thrilled that we'll all have a chance to meet Mark Winne and hear him speak at Netroots Nation this summer. Additionally, The Fat Lady Sings and I are going to attend of Food Policy Council training Mark is leading in Santa Fe next Monday. I look forward to sharing what I learn with you next week.

Tags: hunger, Netroots Nation 2008, food, Mark Winne (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 54 comments

    •  and for great T-shirts! (8+ / 0-)

      Will Vegetables of Mass Destruction be available at Netroots Nation?

      (you need to put up the artwork as a standalone file, it's very impressive, much admired by Permaculture-activist friends)
      Raines
      delighted to hear y'all on the net-radio last night.

    •  relax.... McDonalds has ads with fruit in them (7+ / 0-)

      Elsewhere in this sorta news, Wealth Lowers Stroke Risk, No Surprise

      Researchers found that the least wealthy were three times more likely to have a stroke between ages 50 and 64 compared with those who were in the top 75th to 89th percentile in wealth (the very wealthiest outliers were excluded). Once people hit 65, however, all bets were off, and wealth no longer afforded them protection.

      *****

      Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, striking some 780,000 people annually. The idea that people who are better off are less likely to have a stroke—however you define "better off"—doesn't set off any surprise bells. We know that people lower on the socioeconomic scale tend to smoke, be overweight, consume alcohol, and suffer from diabetes in greater numbers than those with more resources. These are all risk factors for stroke. Along similar lines, the study found that subjects ages 50 to 74 who had less income, wealth, or education had higher rates of high blood pressure, smoking, low physical activity, heart disease, diabetes and being overweight—stroke risk factors all.

      But even when study authors adjusted for these risks, basically removing them from the equation, wealth and income continued to influence the likelihood of stroke (education turned out not to be predictive once wealth and income were factored in). This is where access to good-quality, reliable healthcare probably comes into play, say experts, as well as other less tangible advantages.

      The real surprise? This is from the Uber-rightwing US News and Empire Report.

      And how about that "good-quality reliable healthcare"? Are they commies or what?

    •  yes! (6+ / 0-)

      I agree with all of this.

      One small note of positive change. In poor and minority neighborhoods in NYC, esp. Brooklyn and Queesn, but also Manhttan and Bronx, there has been an improvment in the quality of food for sale. More fresh veggies, etc. I think general (yuppie) availibility is having a trickle down effet. Also an increase of new immigrants who are more into preparing own food. And yes, maybe even education.

      Alas, combo of crappy fast food and mediocre store offerings still exists. But maybe peaked, and corner turned. Maybe. gotta keep fighting.

      •  Wonderful news about NYC (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        shirah, Hardhat Democrat, jlms qkw

        It seems like cities as a whole are starting to get on board recognizing this is a problem and taking steps to combat it. In the book, Mark talks about bringing supermarkets to low income neighborhoods as well as farmers markets and community gardens - plus the anecdote about rearranging the bus routes.

        On a more personal note, when I lived in Northern VA in a poor area, I had a very hard time finding decent food to eat or getting transportation anywhere and I would think "Doesn't anyone care about us?" and realize the answer was no. The people in my neighborhood had no voice so we were left for whoever felt like taking advantage of us with high prices or junk food. However,   a few mos after I moved there, the city drastically improved the buses. They didn't add more routes but the buses started coming on time and that was HUGE.

  •  Expanding food stamps/WIC (12+ / 0-)

    would provide a faster, more effective economic stimulus than any "tax rebate" scheme, with the added advantage of helping people eat.

    Oh, wait.  Those are poor people.  Never mind. . .

    •  oh my, that is SO TRUE (9+ / 0-)

      You want to know what I learned recently? My farmer's market isn't set up to take food stamps why? Oh, because they don't want poor people at the market. Just found that out.

      •  Yes, but most CSA's do.... (5+ / 0-)

        "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

        by resa on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:25:28 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Who is "they"? (6+ / 0-)

        Our vendors would be happy to sell to anyone!  They probably would rather get rid of picky people like me who will ignore an entire stall full of farm fresh produce because I'm only buying X, Y and Z.

        BTW - even if you don't buy a thing, be sure to compliment the vendors on their product.  It doesn't cost you anything!

        I wish I was a restaurant - the one thing that slays me are vendors who supply local eateries.  They'll have something one week and then two weeks later, they're shipping all of it to the chefs, leaving us poor home cooks out in the cold!  Ah, them's the breaks and they have the good grace to apologize for selling out their stock.

        Proud member of the Cult of Issues and Substance!

        by Fabian on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:28:02 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  "They" is the market manager in this case. (6+ / 0-)

          From what I've heard, there is finally ONE market in all of San Diego who either does or will soon accept food stamps.

          •  Prolly just too lazy to deal with the paperwork. (4+ / 0-)

            I doubt the vendors care at all.

            Proud member of the Cult of Issues and Substance!

            by Fabian on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:32:16 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

          •  Cost (6+ / 0-)

            My main obstacles are a) cost for the machines that would enable us to take EBT, debit, and credit cards, and b) logistics. I don't have the money or the staff to deal with it this year. Hopefully next.

            While my City (who hired me to run our Market) is very much in favor of having an all-inclusive market, it will also take awhile for me to get everything in place. I'm hoping the statewide task force for local and organic food & farms will help create a market managers association - that way we can lobby the state for funds so that all of us can accept EBT.

            For now, I just ask vendors if they're willing to donate to the Foodbank right on the application. If they check yes, I give their info to the Foodbank and the Foodbank shows up Saturdays to do pickup after we tear down. One guy has dedicated part of his acreage for the Foodbank this year.

            There are too many of us who have withdrawn into our private lives because we think public life has nothing to offer. That has to change. -- BHO, 2004

            by LBK on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:41:47 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Seems like a systemic problem to me. (4+ / 0-)

              How simple it would be to subsidize the cost of those machines, particularly in poor areas.

              What I cannot for the life of me understand is the seemingly overwhelming resistance to putting money into the hands of the poor.  They likely do not have stocks or large savings accounts, or even loads of credit card debt, so where else will that money go but to stimulate our economy?

              Good on ya, LBK, for doing what you can in a senseless situation.

              Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. - Albert Einstein (-6.5/-7.33)

              by pidge not midge on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:57:33 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  It sure seems easy... (2+ / 0-)

                ... but there are a lot of factors that make it difficult for markets to acquire the technology. There's no one supplier, there're different rates being quoted, not all the machines do the same thing, and the USDA has been less than helpful in terms of provideing solid information. Seems to me that they should be providing the cash for markets to acquire the technology - for the machines, for other startup costs, and some assistance, at least for the first year, in offsetting the fees that are charged for the use of the machines. If I could get them subsidized, I could afford another staff person to help me manage the EBT/debit/credit station on market days. There's no way I could be that person and still do my job.

                Like I said, we're working on it, but things take so darn long sometimes...

                There are too many of us who have withdrawn into our private lives because we think public life has nothing to offer. That has to change. -- BHO, 2004

                by LBK on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:58:37 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

            •  There isn't money for it (yet) (2+ / 0-)

              It's a fight already to get as much assistance as there is, and regardless of accuracy there's a stigma about farmers markets being overpriced and frou frou. Particularly in the districts of many folks in Congress (or state legislatures) who are doing the necessary appropriating.  Much of the goodwill that the Food Stamp program has stems from it being the last-resort safety net that allows people to eat something when otherwise they'd eat nothing.  You start a slightly but significantly different debate when you stop talking about access and start talking about diversity.  It's a good debate to move forward with, but a distinct one nonetheless.

              All that said, I agree here that the fault is not likely with the people at the end of the line nor the people in the trenches of food assistance. EBT transactions work like debit card transactions- with a fee involved every time. Most places will eat the fee, but that fee is why gas stations or corner stores will often charge extra for using a debit card.  They either have too much volume or not enough volume to make it worthwhile. It's also why charges on a debit card will sometimes not show up for a couple days on your account- places save them up and transmit them in bulk. Also, it's not an easy or quick process to wade through all the paperwork. Laziness isn't necessarily the only motivator involved.

            •  More background (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              OrangeClouds115

              I preface this by saying the numbers may not all be exact, but they're darn close.

              Before food stamps switched to EBT, farmers markets accounted for less than 1% of redeemed benefits. Which doesn't mean recipients weren't shopping there, just that they weren't using their food stamps there.

              EBT machines are subsidized, but the requirement is that they do $100 in benefits/month. Since at a farmers market each stall would be a store, few if any are going to meet that threshold. It becomes even more difficult because the machine must be exclusively used for EBT- can't be used for other credit or debit purchases. Most folks are gonna opt to take credit/debit over EBT if they're investing in a machine.

              There's new stuff evolving like wireless terminals. In addition, there's an option for a market manager like you to set up a station as a single EBT point-of-sale for the entire market and have vendors purchase 'tokens' or whatever you want to call them within that umbrella.

              Might also be worth checking out the EBT Famers Market Report. It's from 2006 but it's pretty good.

  •  Like Many Other Societal Problems, (4+ / 0-)

    poor diet, which is often the diet of the poor, is promoted by our pervasive for-profit system. Although the total cost to society if far larger when people suffer health problems due to diet, corporations make a lot of money promoting bad food.

    It is most unfortunate that anything that contains even a hint of socialism is generally fought tooth and nail by private industry, and has difficulty obtaining any funding. That includes the use of government resources to promote the well being of our people. Ironically, it may be the HMOs and other for-profit health insurance companies that eventually push for a better approach in this regard.

    This is CLASS WAR, and the other side is winning.

    by Mr X on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:19:55 AM PDT

  •  I will look for the book (6+ / 0-)

    Our nation's current thought process on hunger barely goes beyond basic economic determinism:  no matter how hard you work, you eat what you can afford.  That is all. You could plot everything on a bell curve and win a Nobel Prize.

  •  Spreading the word... (4+ / 0-)

    I just posted a link to your diary to my good friend who runs the local food shelf and community kitchen. (She doesn't haunt blogs like I do!) She's an avid reader and I have little doubt that the recommended book will be purchased, read and shared with others in the food shelf network.

    This topic is very timely for both of us as we just put on a Medieval Feast as a benefit dinner for the food shelf. (Even our local State Senator came!) Not only did we profit over $1,000.00 for the cause, but gained a new freezer and refrigerator as donations! The entire reason for the benefit was to raise money to purchase a freezer, with a 'frig on the 'B' list! (No fear...there's always a 'C' and 'D' list with food shelves!) I can only say that raising awareness locally led to unexpected dividends!

    Thank you for your diary and I look forward to reading of your training experiences!

  •  "The poor get diabetes..." (4+ / 0-)

    And thanks to cultural globalization, we're exporting this phenomenon to developing countries worldwide. Scientific American had a really great special issue called Feast and Famine. It documented the rise of obesity and related diseases in developing countries, citing the appearance of American style supermarkets and the low cost of high sugar and fat content foods thanks to US subsidies and overproduction.
    It's a great read, I recommend it.

    •  that does sound wonderful, thanks! (6+ / 0-)

      On a related note, there is a TERRIFIC organization in Austin and I hope to introduce everyone here to them - the Sustainable Food Center. They run a bilingual free class for people who are at risk for obesity and diabetes (aka the low income/minority population) to teach healthy cooking and nutrition. It's so wonderful! They make it really fun and send the "students" home with a bag of groceries each week so they can make whatever they prepared in class at home. I hope to do a diary on it soon.

    •  Teaching people to cook for health is another (2+ / 0-)

      way of countering the diabetes factor. My husband is diabetic. Controlling it is a matter mostly of diet. Shelf goods in stores are full of the  worst things for diabetics (and promote diabetes) but simple foods and some among the least expensive can be prepared easily. In our town, we offer a class for our Mommy and Me program and at our senior center. Our local store is so expensive and the fresh foods brought in are frequently old and/or rotting. And we live in a rural area with ranches and farms around us and a fishing port that sends all the catch to big cities in California. Locally grown produce is expensive.

      Lest you think this is only a problem of the long-term poor, let me tell you that I worked as a teacher and university administrator and a therapist for 41 years and my retirement plus the truncated Social Security I get because I had a small pension puts me below the poverty line. If it weren't for my husband's retirement, I'd be hard-pressed to have shelter and food - it would have to be a choice. I dread the thought that I might be an imposition on our children at some point as they themselves struggle with the economics of the rich country of ours. Not all retirees are on cruises.

      This is insanity in a country like ours and there seems to be no plan to remedy our inability to take care of our own citizens. It's got to be a ground-up campaign to change this. We can't wait to take action in whatever ways we can create. One of the first steps is to uncover the "hidden poor" and to hear the voices of those who would rather die than tell you they are struggling. Thanks for this revealing diary.

  •  Culturally self-limited diet (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    LBK, Losty, Erica Jan

    Poor people can eat better than rich in the US and there's no excuse not to.

    The problem is hide-bound cultural preferences for what to eat, and a refusal to adapt.

    Giving them more money won't make them eat better, either, they'll just eat more of the same crappy food.

    In general, people just don't want to eat healthy, good, cheap food.

    Right now it's the height of dandelion season, a delicious, nutritious free vegetable. Almost no one will eat it, yet it is abundant and fre, and if you took an afternoon you could pick, clean and blanch/parboil enough to fill your freezer for months worth of valuable, nutrient-rich food. They will complain about high price of food, yet reject good food that is free. In this country we spend millions of dollars of a year on chemicals that will make us sick trying to kill a plant that cannot be killed and would provide us with free, nutritious, abundant food. (here in MI we also have a grotesque overabundance of deer. we could easily have a state program to slaughter 50k or more deer per year and butcher and distribute to the poor, but for political and cultural reasons this will never happen even though it would solve many nutritional AND agricultural problems, not to mention improve road safety).

    The problem is not poverty, the problem is that Americans are messed up in the head and only cultural change can fix that. I do not hold my breath.

    •  This is a very narrowminded viewpoint (8+ / 0-)

      and I ensure you it's also not correct. Please, please read the book Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich. She talks about what it's like to work a low wage job. The problem is TIME in addition to money. It's also transportation, storage, and cooking facilities. Yes, you can go eat dandelions - but can you do it if you are working 80 hours a week on 2 $10/hr jobs?

      A girl I worked with at Whole Foods (which starts workers at $10/hr) worked M-F 2:30pm-10:30pm and then reported to Wal-Mart to work 11pm-7am. Every day. She was like a zombie at work because she never slept. She had 3 kids. When can she cook, even if she has the money?

      •  I have read it (0+ / 0-)

        It's a lousy and patronizing book, IMO, not as patronizing as the one about waitresses, though, and has a few valid points.

        You can do a week's worth of cooking in about 4 hrs. You make large quantities (also benefitting from cheaper prices for quantity) and put in containers for a week.

        Also, in general, you only have kids when you can afford them, that helps, and is, like food preference, another cultural issue. As is where one chooses to live and shop.

        Many poor people will shop at food stores designed for poor people, instead of going to where the rich people shop. For a variety of perfectly valid reasons it is ironic and true that poor people's food stores are much more expensive and have much lousier quality than rich people's food stores. But people get the mentality "oh, I have to shop in the poor person's store." And they severely limit what they will buy, and when. And in general, they make terrible choices from their options.

        I'm sorry, but I have spent 30 years helping the poor and destitute, a near impossible task given that you cannot help people who will not be helped. 98% of viable solutions are rejected with "oh, I couldn't do that."

        And people have ridiculous notions of what they can and cannot afford.

        Try telling someone that a dog costs $2000 and given their income they must get rid of it. "Oh, I just couldn't do that." Or you can't afford a large TV. Or smoking. Or children. Or an Xbox. Or a divorce.

        •  you only have kids when you can afford them? (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Hardhat Democrat

          oh no you don't. Not in reality at least. The hospital that delivers the most babies in the country is Parkland, where I used to work. With the exception of the Parkland employees who are also patients, the patients are 100% indigent and I doubt many of them can afford as many babies as they have. But they sure have them. I'm not saying it's right, but it's reality.

          As for my friend at Whole Foods with the 3 kids, she COULD afford them when she had them. She was married. Her husband cheated and gave her an STD. He's a good for nothing bastard. So now she's got 3 kids and no 2nd income from a husband.

        •  Not really... (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          OrangeClouds115

          You can do a week's worth of cooking in about 4 hrs. You make large quantities (also benefitting from cheaper prices for quantity) and put in containers for a week.

          Not if you don't have the equipment to do so.  Or if you happen to live in an SRO with no kitchen facilities or a freezer to store the cooked food.

          You're assuming a whole lot here, the most obvious of which being that not every poor person has a fully stocked kitchen with decent cookware and a refrigerator / freezer to be able to take advantage of the time and monetary advantages of buying and cooking in bulk.

    •  I'm afraid you're missing the point. (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      OrangeClouds115

      A pound of bologna is much less expensive than a pound of chicken and takes only seconds to prepare, and it's infinitely more likely that bologna will be in stock at the neighborhood convenience store while chicken will not.

      "The trouble with being poor is that it takes up all your time." - William de Kooning

      Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. - Albert Einstein (-6.5/-7.33)

      by pidge not midge on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 07:04:02 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Huh? (0+ / 0-)

        Right, so people should not shop for food at local convenience stores.  Except if they have loss leaders like milk and bread at below grocery store prices.

        I just priced bologna at my local grocery store. $1.99/lb. Chicken was available for 69 cents.

  •  Farm Subsidies are also a culprit (3+ / 0-)

    The farm bill has traditionally subsidized foods that make us fat and unhealthy:

    The NY Times magazine had a very informative article last April - You Are What You Grow - It details the impact of the farm bill. I was surprised at how far reaching and negative it is.

       

    To speak of the farm bill’s influence on the American food system does not begin to describe its full impact — on the environment, on global poverty, even on immigration. By making it possible for American farmers to sell their crops abroad for considerably less than it costs to grow them, the farm bill helps determine the price of corn in Mexico and the price of cotton in Nigeria and therefore whether farmers in those places will survive or be forced off the land, to migrate to the cities — or to the United States. The flow of immigrants north from Mexico since Nafta is inextricably linked to the flow of American corn in the opposite direction, a flood of subsidized grain that the Mexican government estimates has thrown two million Mexican farmers and other agricultural workers off the land since the mid-90s. (More recently, the ethanol boom has led to a spike in corn prices that has left that country reeling from soaring tortilla prices; linking its corn economy to ours has been an unalloyed disaster for Mexico’s eaters as well as its farmers.) You can’t fully comprehend the pressures driving immigration without comprehending what U.S. agricultural policy is doing to rural agriculture in Mexico.

    I also thought this was really interesting - a researcher named Adam Drewnowski from the University of Washington wanted to find out why the the people with the least amount of money to spend on food are the ones most likely to be overweight?

       

    Drewnowski gave himself a hypothetical dollar to spend, using it to purchase as many calories as he possibly could. He discovered that he could buy the most calories per dollar in the middle aisles of the supermarket, among the towering canyons of processed food and soft drink. (In the typical American supermarket, the fresh foods — dairy, meat, fish and produce — line the perimeter walls, while the imperishable packaged goods dominate the center.) Drewnowski found that a dollar could buy 1,200 calories of cookies or potato chips but only 250 calories of carrots. Looking for something to wash down those chips, he discovered that his dollar bought 875 calories of soda but only 170 calories of orange juice.

       As a rule, processed foods are more "energy dense" than fresh foods: they contain less water and fiber but more added fat and sugar, which makes them both less filling and more fattening. These particular calories also happen to be the least healthful ones in the marketplace, which is why we call the foods that contain them "junk." Drewnowski concluded that the rules of the food game in America are organized in such a way that if you are eating on a budget, the most rational economic strategy is to eat badly — and get fat.

    There’s also some interesting information about Twinkies and farm subsidies.

    If you’re curious about who gets the farm subsidies, there’s a database with all kinds of information. Here’s a link to the list of the top recipients in 2006. Note these are corporate farms, Not family farms. #1 is Riceland Foods, Inc. of Stuttgart, Arkansas - $7,710,705.  From 1995-2006 this one corporation received the following payments:

    Rice Subsidies   $526,296,548
    Soybean Subsidies  $20,258,260
    Wheat Subsidies    $7,742,225
    Corn Subsidies   $44,799

    Click around in this database- there’s a lot of information.

    It is ironic our government is spending millions and millions to subsidize unhealthy foods and meanwhile they raise concerns about obesity and we have a health care crisis. If that money were used to subsidize fruits and vegetables instead, we go a long way to curbing the obesity epidemic and chronic conditions that contribute to our health care crises.

    It wsa also eyeopening to read the impact our subsidies have on the poor in other countries.

    •  be careful though (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Hardhat Democrat

      because the subsidies aren't an intuitive problem to fix, i.e. the simple solution of "get rid of the subsidies" or "subsidize healthy foods instead" won't necessarily work. It's far more complex than that.

      •  Simple solutions (2+ / 0-)

        are sometimes best, though not always.  The do, usually deserve a serious look.  

        Why are the two options you cite unlikely to work?

        •  the 2nd one is easier to explain than the first (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Hardhat Democrat

          Farmers do not like the effect of the subsidies because they promote overproduction. So the idea of "why can't we subsidize carrots?" would just screw the carrot farmers, according to farmers I've talked to who are experts on this stuff. Also - historically, only crops that can be stored long term get subsidized, so it's not like you can subsidize a strawberry if you need things that can be stored.

          Why can't we just end the subsidies? We have disgusting overproduction at the moment. The large, really bad, industrialized farms have deeper pockets than the small guys. If we cut off subsidies cold turkey, then the small farmers will go under, the big guys will buy their land, and we'll just end up with more consolidation than we started with, and that's bad.

        •  a better idea (or a few better ideas) are: (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Hardhat Democrat
          1. conservation programs. so that people's incentives are based on growing crops in a way that's good for the earth instead of growing crops to have the highest productivity per acre. that way they still get $ to make their ends meet but in a more positive way than they are now.
          1. capping subsidies. this was the grassley-dorgan amendment this year, which narrowly failed. They wanted to cap subsidies at $250,000. that would mean a small farmer would get a fairly meaningful subsidy but a huge farm would regard the $250k as just a drop in the bucket. the savings could go to conservation programs, which are horribly underfunded.
          1. a grain reserve of some sort. we used to do this. it smooths out the highs and lows in prices because when the price gets too low, the govt buys the crops and puts them aside, then sells them when the prices are high (like now).
  •  Unintended consequences & Ethanol (2+ / 0-)

    The Washington Post has a story today about the impact of ethanol on food prices and exports as more and more corn is going to ethanol production.

    GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS
    Siphoning Off Corn to Fuel Our Cars
    As farmers feed ethanol plants, a costly link is forged between food and oil.

  •  How to survive being poor, part1 (0+ / 0-)

    Transportation.

    This'll sound silly, but wherever possible, walk. You'll save money, save the environment and get exercise which will make you happier, give you more energy, and boost your immune system so you won't need our lousy expensive health care system as much. If you walk with someone, you can  use the walk time as talk time and grow your relationship.

    In most cases you do not need a car. You should only own a car if you cannot possibly get by without one. And the only  concerns that would qualify is transportation to or from work, getting food, or taking a household member to medical care when its not enough of an emergency for an ambulance, but serious enough that you can't wait for alternate transport, e.g. transit bus, taxi or neighbours.

    If you do need a car, just buy one, and to do that you need to save the money in advance. Car PAYMENTS are for suckers (or people with at least $500,000.00 in assetts and even then it's a bad deal) and a way of throwing away tons of money better spent on yourself. Also, car payments are bad because they psychologically trick you into buying more car than you can afford. What you need is an honest assessment of what you can actually afford, then save up that money, then buy the car. Don't put any of these carts before the horse. And if you can't afford a car, move to a place where you can live without one.

    Here's a good working plan to keep car expense to a minimum:

    Buy a car for $3,000 and naturally this means a used car. Your aim is to spend $3,000 for the car to be in good enough condition to run. So, if it's 3k or less and good to go, great, or you could get one for 2k that needs 1k of work to be good. That's fine, too. It's even good to buy one for $500 if it needs 2.5k of work, as long as you end up with a car in running condition for 3k or less. Your goal is to have the car run for at least 2 years. Of course, if you choose well, it will run for more than 2, perhaps many more. It's quite possible to get a car with 120,000mi already on it and run it for another 120,000 for 5 years, which is like hitting the jackpot, like getting 3 free years of car. So, think in terms of a car that must run for at least 2 years and cost no more than 3k to be roadworthy. Try to get the repair record for the car if you can, and always run a $12 VIN number check through Consumer Reports to check the car's history, in terms of major accidents, and also make sure you get the current blue book value. These days, most used car sellers are honest simply because if you are even remotely on the ball you'll catch them if they aren't and when you are buying a car maybe as often as once every two years, they can't afford to alienate you as a repeat customer.

    Budget $1,000/year for repairs. The simpler the engine, the easier it is to fix, but also the less likely it is to need repair. Old Toyota's and Nissan's run forever with a minimum of care. You may need to learn a stick shift, but since you'll be having a 4 cylinder, you'll need the extra control, especially in intersections or passing or merging traffic). Then again, check out the mechanics in your area, no sense in having a super reliable car if on the rare occasions it needs work you can't find anyone willing to do the work. Always get the car checked out by a mechanic before you buy it, preferably by one who will agree to work on it if you do buy it. You should be able to "borrow" any car you are interested in buying for 24 hrs to do this.

    Remember that many of these little old small foreign cars need the timing belt replaced after 100,000 mi or so, so unless you have proof that the thing has been replaced, assume it hasn't and pay to put one in, which can cost around $500, since it involves pulling the engine out, and since you're going to all that trouble, why not replace any of the belts that even remotely need replacing. Better to do it now than have to do it later. Also, if you can, check that the tune-up parts don't need replacing. Again, now is the time, and you've already budgeted for this within the initial $3,000 outlay.

    Now, the $1000 that you've budgeted for repairs, you probably won't be spending all of it, but don't be grouchy if you do have to. Just pay it, and be glad you budgeted for it. If you are lucky enough not to pay it, put any difference between expenses and the $1,000 into your Buy Another Car fund. Because as soon as you can, you want to buy another car.

    Ideally, you always stay one car ahead of the game. As soon as you can afford it, buy another one of those $3,000 for roadworthy vehicles and stick it away. I don't know why, but when you have one spare, the original is 17 times less likely to break down and you save a ton of hassle and money. I don't know why this works, but it does, trust me.

    Also, budget for changing the oil every 2 months or 2 thousand miles (I know they say 3 months or 3 thousand miles, but babying in this little way will payoff big in the long run). Be happy to spend this money, it will make the car last longer. Keep the tires inflated. Drive the speed limit (except for when you have to go faster to keep up with the flow of traffic for safety's sake) - you'll save money on wear and tear on the car, get the best gas mileage, and save money on speeding tickets and insurance hikes. If you need to get somewhere by a specific time, leave early and bring a book to read. Never be stuck having to drive fast if you can possibly avoid it. You wanna drive fast? Buy an old XBox and play Need For Speed and sit close to the screen and turn the sound up.

    Also do a test of your mileage with regular gas and with mid-grape and super. Often, with super you'll get enough of an increasge in mpg that it more than covers the increased cost of gas, plus your engine benefits from a cleaner more efficient fuel. If you can get an extra 5 - 7 mpg from super, it's a no-brainer. Also, never buy anything at a gas station except gas, no ciggies, snackies, drinkies or automotive supply-ies, not at 30 - 200% markup.

    Always budget for gas to be at least $2 /gal more than it currently is. Right now I am budgeting for $5 so I never grumble as the price goes up. And of course, any diff. between actual price and what is budgeted goes into the Buy Another Car fund. I currently have three. And I'm still socking it away for a fourth.

    Insurance, pay the least. The highest deductible, no major collisions fancy stuff. Just the cheapest. Remember, this car is expendible. Small damage you don't call in, you just ignore it and drive on. And if it's major, chuck the thing and pull the replacement out of the closet, no big thing. THat's the beauty of it. Just remember to buy cars that get good mileage so you spend less on gas and don't pollute the environment so much.

    Food and Beverage

    Beverage

    Water. Tap water. Filter it if you must. Tea is also an excellent beverage and cheap if you buy in bulk and make at home. You can get quite acceptable tea in dollar stores or at supermarkets, often for as little a penny per bag. To make a decent cup you need fresh cold water and a tea pot. Bring the water to a rolling boil, pour a little in the pot to heat the pot up, pour that out, throw in the tea bags (two bags will make three cups worth quite nicely) and then pour the water over the tea bags. Cover and let sit for precisely 5 minutes. It's OK with milk, lemon, honey, sugar, whatever, but it's also good plain, clocking in at 0 calories and a few pennies or less per cup. Ice tea is a good cheap drink for summer, especially nice with a little mint honey or lemon or all three. Coffee is cheap if made at home, though not as refreshing or cheap as tea.

    Soy milk is OK and cheap if you make it yourself, ridiculously expensive otherwise. Soak dry soybeans overnight in cold water, then throw the water out the next day. Grind the beans with some fresh water in a blender so it is all chunky then put the goo with extra water in a big pan and slowly bring it to a boil, then simmer until it no longer has a raw soybeans smell. You'll know by the smell, should take no more than half an hour, could go as quick as ten minutes. You can then if you like while it is still warm sweeten it with honey or sugar, then strain the chunks out after it cools, then store in the fridge, the colder the better. Good for cooking or you can use this with epsom salts to make your own tofu, much cheaper than store bought and every bit as good or better, since you can make it as dense as you like.

    It is also possible to take those chunky bits of the soy beans that you used to make milk and cook with chopped onion and a little garlic and some soy sauce to make a filler that you can add to ground beef or turkey (3 parts ground beef to 1 part beans) for use in spaghetti sauce, chili or meatloaf. However, most of the nutrition has already been extracted in the milk-making process, so this is really just a way of extending the meat and adding bulk.

    You can make a very acceptable lemonade by making a syrup of sugar and water, Use this as the base and add some reconstituted lemon juice from those big bottles you can buy very cheaply, and add tap water and ice.

    Regular soda pop is way too expensive for poor people to afford, and it's also extremely unhealthy. You can make better drinks simply by using a water and sugar syrup base and adding flavourings and water as you did with the lemonade above. Many ethnic food stores, and increasingly supermarkets with ethnic sections, sell syrups you can use for making your own soft drinks. You can use club soda or sparkling water for making it more like soda pop, although this will likely bring the cost up to what you would pay for store-bought soda, although the ones you make would be tastier and healthier and would be worth it for an occasional treat.

    Peter Vella makes an acceptable box wine variety, the Chablis, which you can find for anywhere from $9 - $14 for a 5 liter box. There's no reason not to have a decent glass of wine as an occasional treat even if you are poor. This is also good for all types of cooking. Most other box wines taste too bad to be worth it, though.

    Really crappy beer can be made to taste quite good if you add a little bit of Guiness stout. Mix one bottle of Guiness to 3 or 4 bottles of crappo beer in a pitcher and you'll be pleasantly surprised. You can also make some interesting liquers with crappo vodka and milk, sugar and coffee, or orange juice. Crappo wine goes OK with a little lemon, ice and club soda. Crappo whiskey can enliven a coffee after dinner.

    For snacks with drinks, popcorn is still dirt cheap if you buy the real thing in four pound sacks (store it in bottles in the freezer, and make it frequently, but brush your teeth afterwards). Microwave popcorn is unhealthy, vile and expensive. You can experiment with flavourings to pour on the popcorn.  A little bit of garlic salt, dried herbs, olive oil, grated parmesan, chili powder and lime juice, all sorts of things can make a simple 5 cent bowl of popcorn into a real treat. Also, you can make your own corn chips by using corn tortillas (a big bag is dirt cheap) and cutting into wedges and then either deep fry for a short time (like 20 seconds) or just spray with oil and bake. This is good if the tortillas are too stale to use otherwise. You can also do the spray and bake chips with flour tortillas and pita bread too, a great way of using stale stuff that's still good.

    Food and Beverage

    Meat

    Vegetarianism is a wonderful thing, but unless it is part of your religion, it's a luxury few poor people could ever afford. Simply put, meat carries a nutritional blast you can't afford not to take advantage of. You don't need a lot of it, in fact, it's probably something better used as a seasoning than a full ingredient, except as an occasional holiday treat. A little can go a long way. But it gives you something you really can't get anywhere else, at least not for that kind of money.

    A good rough guide is to only eat meat once every three or four days and eat about 3 or four ounces at a time (the old "about the size of a pack of playing cards" rule). This way you get the maximum nutritional benefit for the minimum cost. You could eat meat more often if smaller amounts, e.g. a portion of spaghetti with a sauce that has an ounce of meat, or a bowl of chili that has 2 ounces of meat in it. Some dishes with ham you can get a satisfying meat "fix" with as little as half an ounce, ham in an omelette or with pasta and vegetables, e.g. Aim for no more than a dollar per serving for the meat, and try to go for much less if you can. Two or three slices of bacon, chopped with scissors, can make a spaghetti carbonara. One small can of tuna can go into a big salad that can serve four people. One small can of sardines, mashed with mayo, parsley, lemon juice, onions and capers or olives can go spread on three or four sandwiches.

    Talk to a butcher or the meat person at the supermarket to find when to buy what meats and what cuts, as there can be tremendous seasonal variations in price, and only buy when the cut you want is at its seasonally lowest price. In November you can buy very cheaply turkey necks and giblets to make wonderful soups or stews if you would just learn how to cook them. Sometimes pork liver can be extremely cheap.

    Because you are rarely eating meat, you don't have to worry so much about fat content (a small amount of meat fat in your diet is actually good for you) and can eat a much wider range of meats than rich bastards, who gorge themselves to death. It is also a bizarre and pleasant coincidence that sometimes the most flavourful and tender cuts are also the cheapest and all it takes is learning how to cook them properly.

    For example, the top blade cut of beef is more tender (as proven by blind tests) than all other cuts of beef except fillet mignon, but because it is less lean and has a line of gristle through the middle to impart flavour, it is actually tastier. It is sold in some places as patio steak, petit steak, and flatiron steak. Typically I buy it for $1.99/lb when it's on sale. It is actually a piece about  6 to 8 inches long from the shoulder that is nicely marbled and has a line of gristle through the middle. It can be bought in one piece and used for roasting or to cut up for stews, but is usually cut into steaks, either in store or at home. You can get them thin, but they are best at about 1 inch thickness. And a single steak can be anywhere from 2 to 6 ounces, making for easy portion control.

    Heat a cast iron skillet to 6, toss in some sea salt. Meanwhile dry the steak with a paper towel, the pan must be hot, and the steak dry, when it hits the pan. When a drop of water in the pan sizzles away instantly it is ready. In a separate little pot heat one cup of wine to which you have added a chopped shallot or two so that it cooks down rapidly to half its volume as the steak cooks. Put the steaks in the pan and wait 1 minute then turn (should be nicely browned, and if the sides are very pink, hold them to the pan heat for a few seconds to seal). let the other side brown for one minute. Then turn again to the original side and turn the heat down to 4. Top with sea salt, fresh ground black pepper and maybe fresh ground coriander. Let cook for 4 or six minutes, until the juices start to look clear instead of red or pink. then turn over and let cook for 1 more minute on the other side. Then remove to a plate and let sit for 5 minutes, while you attend to the sauce. Add the reduced wine and shallots to the cast iron pan and scrape off any burnt bits with a fork and stir them into the sauce (if you want to be decadent here you could also add a little dijon mustard, maybe some whole peppercorns, black red or green, maybe a touch of rosemary or sage, stir well, and when all the scrapping and optional flavourings are added, throw in a good big pat of very cold butter and stir  till the sauce thickens (monter au beurre), then immediately take off the heat and our over the steaks and serve at once. With a simple side of boiled potatoes, green beans and a salad with french bread and a glass of decent cheappo wine this is a meal fit for a king. If the gristle is very thin you can simplly eat it but if it is thick you must cut around it at the table.

    Another excellent cut, flavourful and tender is the eye of the chuck steak, sometimes called Manhattan steak.

    Similarly, Chicken thighs are the most flavourful, tender and usually cheapest part of the chicken.

    And you won't find a more flavourful cut of pork chop than the country rib cut. (dry the meat, rub with salt pepper and sugar and any other spicings you want, like cajun or greek seasoning. place in a cold non stick pan with the largest parts or bones towards the center, turn the heat up to 6, should sizzle in about two minutes, then turn, should look nicely browned and brown on the other side for 2 minutes then turn back over, drop heat to 4 and cover, cook for 6 minutes or so. Should be cooked through, leave a little longer if necessary, then remove to a plate cover with foil and let sit for 5 minutes. If you want, make gravy/sauce with all the juices and fat in the pan while the meat sits, serve with rice and some zucchini or green peas. If you did greek style seasoning, any leftover can be cut up and used to fill pita sandwich with yogurt, onions tomato and cucumber).

    Fish and seafood: forget it, you can't afford it unless you catch it yourself. A can of sardines or tuna now and then, a tin of smoked oysters as a stocking stuffer at Christmas, that's about it. Most of it's all poisonous stuff from China anyway, so try not to miss it too much.

    Food and Beverage

    Shopping and Staples

    They keep saying that poor people are fat because the only food they can afford is food that is fattening and unhealthy, but this is simply not true. It is quite possible to buy very healthy food for very little money IF one is willing to change one's outlook, abandon old cultural habits, try new things, learn some basic cooking techniques, abandon finickiness, and learn how to shop better.

    If you live anywhere with access to land it is a good idea to grow or gather as much of your food as you can. If you live in a rural area you can do quite well buying at roadside stands, Amish farms, flea market food vendors, and farmer's markets. If you have friends who raise food you can network with them to barter for their extra produce. The goal here is to get as much fruit and vegetables as you can from outside of industrial
    agricultural production channels. Generally these are more likely to be organic (without the big pricetag associated with that name in stores).

    Also, and more importantly, they are likely to be cheaper, fresher, tastier and more nutritious than what you get in stores. It is often amazing how far $10 worth of food money can go in such a context. Also, these vegetables can be a lot safer. Store potatoes, e.g. come out of fields where tons of chemicals are sprayed on from airplanes. Green peppers from stores are perhaps the most heavily coated with chemicals and waxy goo. Green onions and spinach are also suspect these days. It's just all around safer, cheaper and better to grow or buy as much produce as you can outside of the industrial agri-business grid.

    However, if you have no choice, you have no choice: it is still better to buy produce in stores than not to have any produce. Eat as much as you can afford, and certainly eat some every day. Never go without the basic ones: onions, garlic, cabbage. Frozen veg are OK if you have to, and it's not a bad buy to get big bags of mixed veg when they are on sale and just routinely add a half cup or so to most dishes that you cook.

    Basically, if you are poor, in a grocery store, you want to avoid the center of the store, where all the processed food is, and stick to the walls, where the real food is. Milk, cheese, bread, juice, meat, produce, those are all along the outside walls. You only want to venture into the inner aisles for a few staples: rice, pasta, oatmeal, popcorn, powdered milk, tea and coffee, dried beans, canned tomatoes. these are things you want to keep your kitchen stocked with, good, simple, basic, healthy, cheap food. An excellent book of recipes and ideas for cooking good food from basic staples, one I
    actually recommend that poor people spend good money on to buy, is "What to Cook...when you think there's nothing in the house to eat", by Arthur Schwartz, Harper Perrenial 1992/2000 (isbn 0-06-096432-4). It is worth it alone for the Bread and Allium Soup recipe, for using up stale bread.

    Whenever you can, save money in big chunks (like $200 or $300 spare for "golden opportunities")  so you can use economies of scale to save money. A 50 lb sack of potatoes for $7 at harvest time will go a long way, much better than the $3 for 5 lbs you get the rest of the year. Try to buy your rice in big sacks of 10 or 25 lbs. Cheap and broken rice is just fine, you can eat Uncle Ben's converted when you're rich. Dried beans are best in bulk, too (only keep a couple cans on hand for extreme emergency) , but buy and cook a batch first if you can to test before buying a 25 lb sack. Very old beans can take a long time to cook, and that can drive up your utility costs and you don't want to be stuck with 25 lbs of garbanzos that will never cook to softness. The beans that cook the quickest are lentils (green, brown and red), split peas, and black eyed peas, none of which require prior soaking. If you can, cook a huge batch of dried beans at one time and put meal size (or the size of what an expensive pre-cooked can of beans would be) in containers in the freezer. You can save a lot of money this way, and the process of freezing further breaks down the fiber in the bean, making them easier to digest.

    Pasta is one of the best bargains in the world, since you can get really high gourmet quality for next to nothing if you only stick to dry pasta, and stock up when it's on sale, even cheapo pasta is still really great. As soon as you can, master the making of a simple sauce using olive oil and garlic (you warm the oil, not cook it). Then build from there, adding things like hot pepper or parsley or leftover crumbled bacon or finely diced
    ham or finely chopped onion or peppers or fresh tomatoes or peas and ham or chopped mint or capers or..... you get the idea, but be sure to add a little bit of parmesan on top as a treat. If the price permits, buy a variety of different shapes and sizes so it's not just the same old elbow macaroni or spaghetti each time. Be mindful of the cooking time, since five minutes less of high boil will save you money, especially if you are having pasta a few times a week.

    Bread is cheap if you only buy it on sale. Often loaves that regularly go for $3 will sell for $1, stock up. Unfortunately, it is not cheaper to bake your own. Bread is one of the only foods (orange roughy fish is the other) which can be frozen, thawed and refrozen repeatedly without being dangerous, so plan on freezing. Also, there are many wonderful things you can do with bread that has gotten old (but hasn't yet gone moldy). Many soups can be made from a base of stale bread. There's also bread crumbs, croutons....

    Stay away from ALL packaged meals, convenience products, frozen meals, canned goods (except canned tomatoes, puree or sauce, plain canned corn, and  evaporated milk). Yes, even packaged mac and cheese (unless you are Canadian, where Kraft dinner is a religious sacrament), and if you want mac and cheese, make a huge batch of the real thing and freeze portions for later. Much cheaper, much more nutritious, and much tastier.

    See, the problem is with packaged or processed or convenience foods is that they only SEEM like they're cheaper or more convenient. Mostly they are super expensive crap, but the poor people who buy them haven't figured that out yet, or they are so tired from working hard that they over-estimate the "convenience" involved. Ramen noodles, for example, about 2 cents worth of fried dough, with a tiny packet of brown salt and msg. Total production cost about 2 or 3 cents. Even when they sell it for 10 cents the markup is huge. The idea itself isn't bad if you do it like this: Buy in bulk at an asian food store some thin noodles, you can get all kinds. The rice vermicelli is great for this, but there are many wheat based and even bean based noodles that are nice. While you're at it, get some dried bean curd and dried mushrooms. At home soak the bean curd and mushrooms in some boiling water. When reconsituted, chop and add to a pot of water, bring to a boil and you can then add some dried boullion (although it's better to make this with homemade broth), and some dried onion, maybe a couple of shrimp, leftover meat or scrambled eggs, maybe some mixed frozen veg, and then the noodles, and cook for a couple of minutes, so the noodles are soft. An egg broken in and stirred til cooked is nice. But leave the cheapo prepackaged ramen noodles on the shelf, they are not a bargain. If you must buy them, throw away the "instant soup" packet. And if you can't even do that, then only use at most half of the packet, you don't want to be putting that stuff in your body.

    You can make a really good version of Shake 'n Bake by breaking up some saltines in a blender and pour into a plastic bag, add a little garlic salt, some oregano or Italian herbs, a little bit of  pepper, and a very small amount of parmesan, maybe some paprika and perhaps cayenne if you like a little heat. Add a tablespoon of olive oil and then put in some pieces of chicken or pork and shake to coat, then bake. If you are doing chicken
    legs for kids, coat and cook in a 450F oven for one hour and tell them it's fried chicken and they will believe you, trust me, and it's actually good for them this way. Hamburger helper, just cook extra macaroni next time you make it, add to hamburger and spaghetti sacue, kind of gross but cheap and not too bad. You don't need convenience or prepackaged foods, they are expensive, unhealthy, and usually inconvenient, ften taking longer than the real thing. You can cook real rice in 15 minutes, you don't need Minute Rice, which is just expensive nutritionless shredded cardboard.

    Most packaged foods are just expensive packets of salt. You can buy real salt much cheaper. Consider buying produce that is getting old, but learn how to select for quality. Oddly, some things are better or no worse for being marked down.

    Marked down avocadoes, for example, are often perfectly ripe while the full price ones might never ripen. Artichokes that look bad can often be perfect inside. You really have to learn about how to choose vegetables. Learn from someone who knows. Often your best guide is actually the merchants themselves, especially in smaller markets. When you do buy a bunch of older stuff, use it quickly or don't buy it. Doesn't matter how
    cheap the stuff is, if you have to throw it all out, you wasted money. But try learning recipes for sudden windfalls. Got 5 lbs of old mushrooms for a buck? Make duxelles (you cook the water out and then puree with butter and maybe some walnuts or almond, keep in the freezer in little tablespoon sized lumps, adds a blast of mushroom flavour to soups and stews or pasta sauce, and the older mushrooms with lots of brown spots will actually give better flavour for this. Lots of bell peppers? Make roast pepper strips in garlicky olive oil.

    Finally, consider shoping at "ethnic" food stores for certain things. Sacks of rice, exotic sauces, spices, especially spices, although you might want to pool your purchases with several other poor people and divvy up the bags of pepper, cumin, cayenne, coriander, etc that you got. Much better than getting the small bottles of ancient crappy spices at the supermarket.

  •  Thanks for the diary (2+ / 0-)

    the book looks like an incredible read and its great that Netroots has such a dedicated panelist.

    Wish I could go, but will have to settle for reading the book - thanks for the headsup.

    •  we'll be liveblogging it and I'm hoping (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Hardhat Democrat, okamichan13

      that Mark will be willing to do a "celebrity guest blog" thing here so people can ask him questions directly. If you check the book out and want to ask a question at the panel, please feel free to email me. We'll have to figure out how to work that w/ the liveblogging so people who aren't there can participate.

      Also - depending on where you are, perhaps he'll be speaking or doing a booksigning in your area at some point. I don't know what he's up to with that but I know he's been going around the country doing these food policy council trainings. I almost went to one in Milwaukee but opted for Santa Fe instead because it was better timing and closer (and not Wisconsin in February).

  •  Good stuff, and a great book... (0+ / 0-)

    I'm re-reading Chapter 7 again right now, and it's made me want to go through my still-unpacked boxes and find Michele Simon's "Appetite for Profit", and read through that one again...

    I'm somewhat switching my focus again back to advertising issues for the moment, and hope to write something on that soon.

Permalink | 54 comments