Daily Kos

NY Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver - Worthless Political Hack

Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 12:16:38 PM PDT

The New York Times today said Democrat Sheldon Silver was "unworthy of his office" because he failed to push through the NY State Assembly congestion-based pricing plans which were supported by the mayor as well as the federal government.

The New York Times is correct - Silver is THE symbol of everything wrong with NY State Government and in particular the legislative process in Albany. We in the Netroots have a long and storied history of challenging entrenched politicians when they're become out-of-touch and continually vote against their constituents concerns. This year Sheldon Silver is facing a viable challenger in Paul Newell. He deserves our contributions and support in his challenge to one of the most entrenched symbols of Albany's inability to get anything done - Sheldon Silver.

When you read about Sheldon Silver these are some of the quotes that pop up the most often:

A survivor of the old Democratic clubhouse

...the speaker is a throwback to the clubhouse era: secretive, insular and too close to the powerful interests that sustain his majority.

...a cautious defender of the status quo, more inclined to block other people’s proposals than to enact his own, more interested in winning good deals than making good policy.

You get the idea. Silver is cautious and a throwback to the smoke-filled room days of the Democratic party machine. He routinely arranges the defeat of bills on which he has spoken little and then offers no explanation of why he voted the way he did in the first place.

The most recent example of this was congestion-based pricing in Manhattan. Silver represents the lower east side of Manhattan as well as Tribeca, the financial district (including Ground Zero) and parts of Williamsburg in Brooklyn. His district is heavily dependent on public transportation because surface traffic is so heavy along with its attendant ills like air, water and soil pollution. The bill as proposed and supported by NY Mayor Bloomberg wasn't perfect but it was better than it was when it was proposed.

As the New York Times said today:

It is not just the federal grant that Mr. Silver has taken from New Yorkers. Without congestion pricing, mass transit won’t have the nearly $500 million that would have been raised annually by charging most cars $8 and trucks $21 to enter Midtown and Lower Manhattan during the busiest hours on weekdays. That money would have helped bring public transportation, including express buses and ferries, to commuters who have few options for getting into Manhattan.

But do we know how many Assembly members opposed the bill or exactly why or even why Silver opposed the bill? No. Because, again:

Backed by his Democratic conference, the speaker killed congestion pricing in the most cowardly way: without even holding a vote. Mr. Silver said so many members of his own conference were against the plan that it would never pass. How many? Who knows? The speaker hid behind closed doors to keep the public from watching his cronies do the deed.

This is just the latest and greatest example of Silver killing something that would have actually benefited his district. He's now been in office for more than 30 years so his record is rich with examples of Silver standing against the needs of his constituents in favor of demands from special interests:

In 1999, Silver was instrumental in the repeal of New York City's commuter tax, which taxed non-resident workers similarly to city residents. This was a great benefit to those commuting to work in the city from surrounding areas, but came at a tremendous cost to his own NYC constituents. Silver was criticized by city leaders for removing the tax, and though after 9/11 he has suggested he would support reinstating it, he has taken no steps to do so.

Let's restate that: in 1999 Silver voted to repeal a tax which his own constituents didn't pay, thusly causing a huge budget deficit for the City of New York and resulting in a 20% property tax increase for NY residents - ensuring the tax burden was increased for those in his district. Does this sound like a representative who considers himself beholden to the people?

No? That's because he's not, he's beholden to his contributors and his employer, a large litigation firm with the State of New York:

Silver has taken major contributions from the Dolan family, owners of Cablevision, the Knicks, the Rangers, and Madison Square Garden, and then personally brought a stop to the development of the West Side Stadium for the Jets, which Cablevision strongly opposed because it would pull revenue from Madison Square Garden.

Silver has long been criticized for his employment with Weitz & Luxenberg, one of the state's larger litigation firms. This has led some to accuse Silver of having a conflict of interest, as he has consistently blocked medical malpractice and other tort reform in Albany. Weitz & Luxenberg insists that Silver's ties with the firm are "negligible" but Silver has refused to disclose the details of his employment or the salary he receives from the law firm. [11]

Sheldon Silver can't even be bothered to vote "Aye" on the Sexual Orientation Non-discrimination Act which has been floating around NY state government for over 30 years!

Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act

The Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act adds actual or perceived sexual orientation to the state's existing laws which prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, and credit on the basis of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sex, disability or marital status.

Pride Agenda's Position: SUPPORT
Sheldon Silver's Position: NO VOTE

He represents an urban district, heavily trafficked and multi-ethnic and his votes read like he represents an all-white upstate district dominated by the elderly and Republicans.

Fortunately those in Sheldon Silver's district now have a choice in the upcoming primary and Silver knows it. He's recently began polling mentioning Paul Newell's name. And after this most recent vote he may have more reason than ever to worry.

Paul Newell is a progressive voice for New York City:

Paul Newell has fought for over a decade for progressive values. Whether working to elect progressive leaders, preserve Yiddish culture or bring needed services to children orphaned by AIDS, Paul has always believed in working together to achieve real change.

Sheldon Silver is a blot on the Democratic party and represents everything wrong with the Assembly in Albany. Time and time again he's put the needs of the powerful above those of the weak and defenseless in his district. He's the ultimate symbol of the worthless, entrenched incumbent who feels he answers to no one. But he does, he answers to the voters of his district and this primary they'll have a choice.

Please, consider a small donation to show Sheldon Silver that he should be aware the days of uncontested primaries are over. Silver's political days are numbered and both the city and state of New York will be far better off without him.

Contribute to Paul Newell.

Tags: Sheldon Silver, NY State Assembly, Paul Newell, Reform Politics (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 46 comments

  •  Get Sheldon Silver out of office! (15+ / 0-)

    and the best way to do so is to contribute to Paul Newell.

  •  Shelly's Big Ideas: (9+ / 0-)

    Mixed use development for downtown bad! More office space no one wants to rent good!

    Hulk smash congestion pricing!

  •  This would be great for Hillary to step into (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Paul Newell

    LOL. "Exit the presidential race. You could be governor of NY" and then Hillary laughed and laughed and laughed until the cows came home.

    Sorry I have to run to the Senate floor to abolish torture.

    by bten on Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 12:29:10 PM PDT

  •  Silver is a disgrace. (7+ / 0-)

    He's as slimy as his Republican counterpart, Joe Bruno.

    But he brings home the baconpastrami for the old people in his district, and they're the ones who vote.

    Hige sceal že heardra, heorte že cenre, mod sceal že mare, že ure męgen lytlaš

    by milkbone on Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 12:34:17 PM PDT

  •  silver right for once (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    boran2, Chuckie

    im no fan of silver, but congestion pricing was a silly idea. no one drives around downtown for fun, so it wouldnt deter anyone. it would tax bridges that have been free for decades. theres no guarentee that the money would actually increase total mta spending (when lottery taxes began partly funding education, albany cut state funding in response) , and philosophically, theres a big difference between a toll to come into a city and a toll to get into one elite part of the city. good riddance.

    •  If "for fun," we mean "when there are (5+ / 0-)

      perfectly good mass transit options," then there are tons of people driving into the city for fun.

      •  Have you been on the subway lately? (4+ / 0-)

        No, well that's probably because the trains were too crowded already...and that's probably because they never run right or on time

        Well, at least outside of Manhattan anyway

        •  Every day. (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Paul Newell

          It's fine.  I live out in the boonies of Brooklyn, by the by.

          •  Ahh, please tell me you take (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Paul Newell

            the F, D, Q or B, because those trains are remarkably well run at the expense of the A, C, E, 2, 3, 4, 5, J, M and Z.

            It is well known that the A train will never leave Jay St before the F, but the F will absolutely leave before the A.

            I live third to last stop on the A train, where 15 years ago there might have been about 12 people in the  a train car at 6pm on a weekday. When I work in the city on Mondays (Long Island the rest of the week) and come home, standing room only.

            I don't know about your trains, but the A line can't handle any more people.

            •  That makes more sense. The A is notoriously (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Paul Newell

              the crappiest, and I'm aware of the F as the train with uncannily bad timing.    

              3rd to the last on the A?  That's truly out there.  

              At any rate, I take the N&R.  It's SRO much of the time, but waddyagonnado?  They could all use some improvement (both capital improvements and scheduling improvements), and hopefully the congestion pricing fees could be plowed back into the system.

    •  No NEED for cars in lower Manhattan (6+ / 0-)

      Great mass transit.  We SHOULD make it harder and more expensive.  You didn't have this level of car traffic 40 or 50 years ago - and don't HAVE to have it now.

      We have absurd numbers of PUBLIC SERVANTS with FREE parking driving into lower Manhattan.  The SHOULD be taking mass transit.  

      Sorry - no sympathy for a fireman driving 2 hours to get to work from Fishkill.... why ISN'T he living in NYC?

      And for all the higher-ups....... they should try mass transit... it might be better if THEY had to use it too....

      And you do NOT need all the 'black cars' chauffering execs into Manhattan from Greenwich - THEY CAN TAKE THE TRAIN TOO - or PAY (PERSONALLY, NOT chargeback to the company) for the priviledge.

      A car coming into or leaving Manhattan in Rush Hour should have 4 people MINIMUM

      We NEED to start reducing individual car traffic (most with one occupant or a driver and passenger) and INCREASING mass transit.  Congestion pricing WORKS.

      •  Fine then some of that money if spent needs to (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Paul Newell

        not just go to the NYC transit but to the Path the MetroNorth and LIRR as well. I mean if the goal is to really reduce traffic alls fair. Do you know that a 10 zone monthly on the LIRR costs about $300 a month and an apartment in the outer bouroughs 1 bedroom is at a minimum of $1200-1300 a month and thats in a bad neighborhood.

        •  I know I need to go to school here and (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Paul Newell

          its an economic choice I've had to make.

        •  Uh... 'yes' - why I lived in the Bronx for years (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Paul Newell

          it was an affordable option.  Took the Lex downown to work. Much cheaper than Metro North - though the ridership was Waaay loonier (but this was the 80's).

          LOTS cheaper than moving back to Westchester - even with a break on rent (got to rebuild my parent's old place when they moved out - it was too much of a mess to sell...... no bargain for us but measurably safer at the time)

  •  The subtext for this action by Silver (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Paul Newell

    is fairly obvious for anyone involved in NY politics this action made no sense and was a slap in Patterson's face. When Spitzer replaced Pataki Silver went from the minority in the room with 3 guys to the junior partner in the Majority, and the very junior partner given Spitzer's personality, This was a message to Patterson and Bruno of one thing and one thing only. You need me, I'm in charge. To Bruno it said you are going to have to fight tooth and nail to hold the senate, and you have to respect me. To Patterson it said I'm now the senior partner in this majority. That's what was behind this for silver it was never about the money and he did it in spite of the fact that it was bad for his district. Silver cannot lose that district to solve the issue its important to win the Senate in NY that should be NY dems sole goal I personally will be working against Trunzo next year.

  •  Silver is a problem on this and many issues (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Shane Hensinger, Paul Newell

    I've very rarely read anything good about Silver.  I personally think Congestion pricing is good for mass transit and very good for the environment.  tens of thousands cars are sitting in traffic for hours each day just poluting our environment.  I understand the arguments against it and there could be some validity for those arguments as well.  

    My biggest disagreement is that he should allow this to go to a vote thereby allowing voters to see where their politicans stand on this important issue.  And he should be taking some leadership to see if there is room to compromise or some alternative.  Too much political decisions are being made in NY behind closed doors.  Open govenment is a joke in NY.

    "The woman's life is misery; for God's sake, people, at least give her a few good songs". NYT review of The Color Purple

    by arogue7 on Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 01:02:33 PM PDT

    •  But see (0+ / 0-)

      there will still be tens of thousands of cars sitting in traffic for hours each day...in The Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Long Island, Northern New Jersey and Westchester County and even in the city those who can afford to drive, who are usually the ones who do, will still do it. It won't change a damn thing environmental wise. It was essentially a tax on those who drive into Manhattan everyday, which is fine, but when it comes to NYS fiscal governance, I become more conservative. This state doesn't have a clue on how to spend money. I have no reason to believe congestion pricing will lead to any mass transit improvements. Over the years we've increased fares, passed a bond initiative and they're still beginning for money.

  •  Actually, the SONDA vote shocked me. (3+ / 0-)

    I'm sorry, but if even Democrats in deep red states like Georgia and North Carolina can embrace the proposition that basic principles of anti-discrimination protection  in the workplace can apply to lesbians and gay men, it should be a foregone conclusion that a Democrat in downtown Manhattan should be able to do the same. That Silver didn't vote yes on SONDA is an absolute shame.

    Neither can I believe Silver's position on congestion pricing. If we can't adopt measures to discourage drivers from emitting carbon into the atmosphere in the area of the country with the most developed mass-transit alternatives, and with the promise of further reinvestment in mass-transit to come from the proceeds of congestion pricing, then it's obvious no one is ever going to be asked to sacrifice at all to reduce carbon emissions. In which case, in short, we're toast.

    •  But this is so wrong (0+ / 0-)

      it will NOT reduce any carbon emissions...people will still be driving, just not into Manhattan...instead they will be driving to The Bronx, Queens and any place they can put their car close to Manhattan to hop trains...it's already being done.

      •  So someone from Jersey City will (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        andydoubtless, Paul Newell

        drive to Queens to take the train rather than take the PATH to Manhattan instead of just taking it from Jersey?

        NOT.

        •  My guess is (0+ / 0-)

          people from Jersey City don't drive into the city anyway.

          I'm talking about people from Bayside, Laurelton, Cambria Heights, Glen Oaks, Whitestone, St. Albans, Throgs Neck, Country Club, College Point.

          Another factor to consider, before I took my current job, I had a job in New Jersey for about a year where I used my car. I was based out of Hoboken and had to drive all over North Jersey. Since I didn't make enough money to afford living there, I drove everyday from Queens to Hoboken...through Manhattan. What choice did I have? If I didn't need my car, I would've taken the train, but I needed a car to do my job.

          The price of gas ended up forcing me to find other work, but there ya go.

  •  The Times was right...almost (3+ / 0-)

    I like the idea of congestion pricing for Manhattan.   Living on Staten Island, it wouldn't cost me any more than the tolls I already pay now and to be honest- I never drive into Manhattan except on the occassional Sunday.

    Yet, I don't think that the plan would have done everything proposed and in the end would not have been worth the hassle and costs.  I've seen it in action in London- it can work in some places.  I just don't think NYC is one of them.

    On Shelly Silver... he is a hack.  He is horrible.  New York state government has been a mess going back to when it was the colonial government.  We were the colony that couldn't even agree on what to do on Indpendence in 1776!

    Silver constantly plays into the upstate/downstate divide; whenever he can disrupt things to show how powerful he is- he does.

    While the entire NY State government- including the legislature should be completely revamped, getting rid of Shelly Silver to some far, far away island... (maybe somewhere in the South Pacific)....would be the single greatest improvement in running NY State since Verazanno first sailed into our harbor in 1524.

    Yes, I really think he is that bad.  

    On the topic of mass transit in this city, if the politicians really wanted to do it, they could:

    1. Build the trans-harbor frieght tunnel to get thousands of trucks off the roads. (This project was proposed over 80 years ago and the Port Authority was created just for the purpose of building it...we're still waiting.)
    1. Make sure the 2nd Ave Subway is completed in full.
    1. Replace the crumbling Gowanus expressway with a dual-deck tunnel that has room for trains from Staten Island.  (YES- a train for the over 100,000 people who commute everyday from Staten Island to Manhattan!!  For those who don't realize it, almost 500,000 people live on Staten Island- small compared to the other four boroughs, but we'd be the largest city in many states.)
    1. Move forward with the Access to the Core tunnels- new tunnels for NJ Transit and Amtrak into Manhattan that would double capacity.  It is amazing, but there are only the two tunnels built a century ago that cross the Hudson.
    1. Ban delivery truck traffic in Manhattan during the daytime.
    1. Raise parking fees in Manhattan.
    1. Build more park and ride garages in the outer boroughs and suburbs so more people take the trains and express buses.
    1. Extend NJ Transit to go from Penn Station to Grand Central Terminal.

    All of this is perfectly feasible.  There is no technological barrier to any of it.  The only barriers that exist are political leadership, political will, and money.

    If we had the first two things, I am certain a funding mechanism could be established to provide the billions of dollars needed to fund these massive projects over a 20 year period.

    I am convinced that ALL of these things will happen.  We have no choice.  If they don't, this city will come- litterally- to a halt.

    To the GOP: "You have sat here too long for any good you have done. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"

    by oxfdblue on Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 02:02:03 PM PDT

    •  I concur (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Paul Newell, oxfdblue

      Build more park and ride garages in the outer boroughs and suburbs so more people take the trains and express buses

      This is key...where I live there is an A train stop right off the Belt Parkway used by many people who drive to it from Eastern Queens. There's no parking except for a giant vacant lot that is used as a makeshift parking lot even though there are No Trespassing lines. Why not use that eminent domain laws SCOTUS gave them for some good, take the land and build a damn park and ride. If the government can uproot families to build a shopping mall, certaintly it can take a big ugly vacant plot of land and make something useful out of it.

  •  I'm pretty sure SONDA passed. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Shane Hensinger, Paul Newell

    I'm not defending Silver, but I'm pretty sure SONDA passed the Assembly in 2001 and became law in New York in 2003:

    http://www.prideagenda.org/...

    The real question is, why did it take so long? And also, there's a problem with enforcement because our state judicial system is so screwed up.

    BTW, in addition to Paul Newell, there's another guy running against Silver, Luke Henry. www.lukehenry.org.   There's going to be a downtown Manhattan candidate forum for this race and another race (state senate - also a primary challenge to an incumbent).  It will be on a Sunday in late Aprilor May.  Check out www.dfnyc.org for updates.

Permalink | 46 comments