Daily Kos

Climate Change Denial Now Infects Textbooks

Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 11:08:00 AM PDT

The Houghton Mifflin Company has just institutionalized climate change denial in the new edition of American Government, a popular text used in advanced government and civics classes at the high school level. This volume was written by James Q. Wilson and John J. DiIulio Jr.  The chapter on environmental policy could have been written by Exxon-Mobil or the American Enterprise Institute.

Does the name John J. DiIulio ring a bell?  Here is a snippet from Wikipedia:

John J. DiIulio Jr. is a political scientist, Frederic Fox Leadership Professor of Politics, Religion, and Civil Society and Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania and served as the first director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives under President George W. Bush from early 2001 to August 2001. He was the first senior Bush advisor to resign and was succeeded by Jim Towey. He has authored numerous studies on crime, government, and the relationship between religion and public policy. He is also the co-author of the textbook "American Government" with James Q. Wilson.

James Q. Wilson has a similar pedigree. He was a member of the Reagan administration and has served on the board of directors for an electric power distribution company (now known as National Grid):

...a member of the Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime (1981), the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (1985-90), and the President's Council on Bioethics. He is a former president of the American Political Science Association. He has served on the board of directors for the New England Electric System, Protection One, RAND, and State Farm Mutual Insurance.

He is also in charge of academic disinformation "chairman of the Council of Academic Advisors" for the American Enterprise Institute.

Among his great honors:

He was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush in 2003.

Given this background, it is hardly surprising that Wilson and Delulio would produce a slanted presentation of climate science aimed at high school students.  

Some of the gems from Chapter 21 (Environmental Policy):

"It is a foolish politician who today opposes environmentalism. And that creates a problem, because not all environmental issues are equally deserving of support. Take the case of global warming. Global warming is enmeshed is scientific uncertainty." (p. 559)

"The earth has become warmer, but is this mostly the result of natural climate changes, or is it heavily influenced by humans putting greenhouse gases into the air?" (p.559)

"On the one hand, a warmer globe will cause sea levels to rise, threatening coastal communities; on the other hand, greater warmth will make it easier and cheaper to grow crops and avoid high heating bills." (p. 559)

"But many other problems are much less clear-cut. Science doesn't know how bad the green-house effect is." (p. 566)

Dr. James Hansen has written a powerful rebuttal to the intellectual dishonesty in Wilson and Delulio's text - Hansen letter (pdf).  He cogently summarizes the evidence that climate change is significant, attributable to human activity, and will have profoundly negative effects on human civilization.

Update: (h/t berning) Here is concluding summary from Center For Inquiry analysis of the Wilson/DeIulio text on the environmental policy.  (The analysis on five other issues is also worthwhile).

The textbook’s treatment of global warming consists, for the most part, of false and misleading statements. Contrary to the textbook’s assertions, the scientific community is not “divided over the issue” of global warming. Today the scientific community debates not whether temperatures and ocean levels will rise, but how quickly they will continue to do so because of heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions.13 It is inexcusable to misinform students of American Government about such an important policy issue. The textbook’s discussion of global warming should be revised immediately to reflect the settled consensus of the scientific community.

Friends of Earth have initiated a letter writing campaign to complain to the publisher.  The goals of the campaign are to pressure the publisher to revise the book and alert state governors about the problem.

Although I applaud the efforts of Friends of Earth, vigilance on the local school board level is critical. If your school district has adopted Wilson and Delulio's text, letters to the local school board and newspapers may be far more effective than efforts aimed at the publisher or governors.

Tags: Climate change, denial, disinformation, textbooks, AEI, George W. Bush (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 30 comments

  •  Tips, comments, etc... (27+ / 0-)

    One of my favorite quotes from James Hansen comes from his letter to Prime Minister Rudd of Australia.

    Yet the science is unambiguous: if we burn most of the fossil fuels, releasing the CO2 to the air, we will assuredly destroy much of the fabric of life on the planet.

    Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

    by DWG on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 11:09:39 AM PDT

  •  Contacting the publisher is easy... n/t (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    jre2k8, DWG, forgore

    "Newspapers are unable, seemingly, to discriminate between a bicycle accident and the collapse of civilization." George Bernard Shaw

    by PhotogHog on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 11:16:09 AM PDT

  •  this is a big deal... (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    marina, Mother Mags, DWG, rconnors, Losty

    Thanks for this info, DWG--I hadn't heard about this before.  

    Just wrote a letter of my own (as one who's given the firm business) to HM, though I agree that those of us who don't give business to the company generally might be better off contacting local decision-makers.  Text below, in case anyone wants to cut and paste parts of it:

    Dear Houghton Mifflin editors,

    I am writing to express my deep concern about the recently published 8th edition of DiIulio and Wilson's American Government.  I am an instructor of college-level writing courses, and have been quite satisfied with the Houghton Mifflin materials I have used in the past.

    However, I will not continue to assign these materials in my classes, nor will I encourage my students to purchase your style handbooks.  I cannot in good conscience give business to a publishing firm that is willing to print blatantly ideological misinformation about the environmental problems we are currently facing.

    I urge you to review the letter you have recently received from James E. Hansen, director of the Goddard Institute, in which he characterizes your textbook as profoundly mistaken, misleading, and out of step with the current scientific community.  Neutrality is hardly an easy thing to achieve, but a high school government textbook is no place for deliberate misinformation about scientific matters.  And until this problem is corrected, my classroom will have no place for Houghton Mifflin textbooks.

    •  Thank you (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Mother Mags, ALL

      That letter will provoke some consternation at HM because it means lost revenue.  I love this sentence.  

      I cannot in good conscience give business to a publishing firm that is willing to print blatantly ideological misinformation about the environmental problems we are currently facing.

      Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

      by DWG on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 11:44:49 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  outrage sorta writes itself! (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Neon Mama

        Which is not to say, of course, that this textbook isn't outrageous.  If they wanted to treat the so-called controversy in a science textbook, in a setting where students were thinking and arguing about scientific evidence, I at least could see some justification for it.  But in a government textbook this is just product placement for a big lie.  

  •  this is an advanced textbook? (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Miss Jones, marina, Mother Mags, DWG, Neon Mama

    The text sounds like it came off the "Conservapedia" website.  I can't wait to hear what the book has to say about the Constitution, the Supreme Court, the New Deal, and any other inconvenience to executive power or corporate greed.

  •  Who is the market for this? (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Miss Jones, DWG, Neon Mama

    And, we really need school board members / school administrators to be writing to the publisher.

  •  Key resource (4+ / 0-)

    The Center for Inquiry has released a full analysis of the textbook's biases including issues beyond global warming here.

    •  I updated with a quote from CFI analysis (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      walkshills

      They do a fantastic job of going through this book and commenting on six issues, including climate change.  Thank you for bringing it to my attention.  

      Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

      by DWG on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 12:27:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  This is all the more serious because (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Mother Mags, DWG, Neon Mama

    Houghton Mifflin has just purchased Harcourt and Holt Reinhart, and so there is virtually only one "800 pound gorilla" in the textbook market. There is also Pearson/Prentice Hall which is much smaller, but Houghton pushes the market.

    The NEA (teacher's union) should get involved in this.

  •  Be sure to click on the Amazon links (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    DWG

    to say that the review pointing out environmental bias is helpful to you, and to tag the book with the "BIAS" tag.

  •  The gorilla in the textbook market: Texas (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Mother Mags, DWG, Neon Mama

    At least that's the way it used to be.  Texas purchases books as a state - the entire state gets the same books.  Most states operate at the district level, so they don't have the same clout.  This has long given conservatives an edge up in the textbook publishing business.

    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt

    by Phoenix Rising on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 12:15:43 PM PDT

    •  Texas does have hearings on textbooks (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Mother Mags, CParis

      The 'crazier than thou' set tends to show up in full force.

      I don't know if every state goes through a similar process, but if they do, then there is the opportunity to combat this at the state level.  

      "But their gift is an empty snake, Carrying hypocrisy in its mouth like venom" - Sami Al Hajj

      by walkshills on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:04:45 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  That's the point of my post (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Mother Mags

        Most states don't do statewide review and approval; Texas buys in bulk, or at least awards contracts statewide, so they have a very large say in what goes in to textbook content and what stays out.

        Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt

        by Phoenix Rising on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 05:00:29 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Deep South follows Texas, unless we manage to (0+ / 0-)

    go get on the "textbook review" committees. Then politicians stick finger in pie thru battles about "evolution disclaimer" type bills to pander to loud lunatic fringers.

    Local boards often lazily figured if Texas passed it, their local nutcases won't kick up a big fuss either, so just rubberstamp.

    In sample below: Don't know if "regulatory approval" is still "pending."   I don't feel any monopolistic moves should be approved --- since it silences truths.  Protest to regulators?

    If you click thru on Wiki box content below -- YES INDEED --- Mitt Romney is Bain Capital and Carlyle Group (of Poppy Bush ties) is/was toe tapping in The Blackstone Group.  
    Brainwashing via "mass media" is not just for tv, radio, magazines, stink tanks.  Our next generation brains are being polluted.  And our tax bucks pay for it.

    Wikipedia is good place to START hunting tentacle connections to plutocrat publishing.

    In 2001, Houghton Mifflin was acquired by French media giant Vivendi Universal. In 2002, facing mounting financial and legal pressures, Vivendi sold Houghton to private equity investors Thomas H. Lee Partners, Bain Capital, and The Blackstone Group.
    On December 22, 2006, it was announced that Riverdeep PLC had completed its acquisition of Houghton Mifflin. The new joint enterprise would be called the Houghton Mifflin Riverdeep Group. Riverdeep paid $1.75 billion in cash and assumed $1.61 billion in debt from the private investment firms Thomas H. Lee Partners, Bain Capital Partners and The Blackstone Group.[1] Tony Lucki, a former non-executive director of Riverdeep, will remain in his position as Houghton Mifflin's chief executive officer.[2]

    On July 16, 2007 Houghton Mifflin Riverdeep announced that it signed a definitive agreement to acquire the Harcourt Education, Harcourt Trade and Greenwood-Heinemann divisions of Reed Elsevier for $4 billion. This acquisition is pending regulatory approval.
    On December 3, 2007, Cengage Learning (formerly Thomson Learning) announced that it had agreed to acquire the assets of the Houghton Mifflin College Division for $750 million, pending regulatory approval.

    De fund + de bunk = de EXIT--->>>>>

    by Neon Mama on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:26:27 PM PDT

Permalink | 30 comments