Daily Kos

SC State Sen. Kent Williams Defends Dumping Pregnant Dog at Kill Shelter

Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:19:42 PM PDT

I'm a contributing editor and blogger for a nationally syndicated pet feature, and I do a lot of coverage on the ongoing movement for animal control and shelter reform in the United States. So when I saw an April 1 diary from adigal alleging that South Carolina State Senator Kent Williams had dumped his pregnant German Shepherd at a local animal shelter, where she'd given birth to her litter, it grabbed my attention.

I wasn't able to find any confirmation on the story, and there was no follow-up here on Daily Kos. Then I got the flu, and it chewed up my vocal cords, and it was a few days before I was able to get back on the story. But when I did, what I found out was even worse than the original post suggested.

Crossposted from Pet Connection.

It's undeniably true that some people don't give their pets the kind of care and commitment I'd like to see. Still, I get tired of the endless blaming of pet owners who bring their animals to shelters when they can’t keep them anymore, given how few resources most communities have to help them find ways to do that, and the increasing housing and foreclosure crisis that’s devastating this country right now, leaving people and their pets without much in the way of options.

But here’s one guy who gets absolutely zero sympathy from me. He’s Democratic South Carolina State Senator Kent Williams, also the deputy administrator of Marion County, and the dog lists and blogs have been buzzing for a week with reports that he had dumped his pregnant German Shepherd at the local kill shelter.

However, not everything you read on the Internet is true (shock!), and I couldn’t find any corroboration of this story. None of the people reporting it responded to emails asking for more details, and since I lost my voice three days ago to some hideous respiratory virus, I wasn’t able to follow up with phone calls as I had planned.

Friday the story was published in a South Carolina news outlet, and picked up by Yahoo News. And far from being not as bad as reported, it’s worse.

Marion County’s deputy administrator, said he was only trying to help when he adopted three animals from the Marion County Animal Shelter late last year.

Williams said his brother has one of the dogs, his mother has another and he kept a female German shepherd. His dog was kept in an enclosed fenced area of his yard, he said, with an automatic feeder and watering device for the dog’s comfort.

But things did not go well for the dog and Williams.

The dog soon became a nuisance and jumped the fence frequently. Williams decided around March 19 to have the county animal control officer pick up the dog and return it to the Marion County Animal Shelter, from which he adopted it.

Once Williams returned the dog to the shelter, it was evident it had become pregnant. Just a few days after its arrival, it delivered eight puppies.

It turns out that state law requires all pets adopted from shelters be spayed or neutered after adoption (hint to South Carolina: that needs to be before adoption, ya think?). Why didn’t the good Senator comply with the law?

Williams said he did not have the dog spayed because he hoped to breed her.

Williams said he didn’t just dump the dog out, he was trying to find someone to care for her. He also said he fully intended to retrieve the dog if she was not adopted.

"I stand by my decision (to return the dog). I don’t know of a better alternative. I love dogs, but believe I was doing the right thing to return it to the shelter so it could be readopted. The action I took was in the best interest of the dog ...," Williams said by telephone earlier this week. "It could have gotten killed along the highway. And if I truly didn’t care about the dog, I probably could have just let it roam. As a citizen, I exercised my right to surrender the animal to the shelter."

This man is an elected official, making decisions for the state of South Carolina. He adopted three dogs, gave two of them away, threw his unspayed female GSD out in an insecure pen in the yard with an automated watering and feeding system, wasn’t smart enough to figure out how to keep her from escaping her pen, and oh yeah, apparently is deputy administrator of a county that has an animal control system that sounds like the poster child for the shelter reform movement:

(Shelter director Jerry) Coleman said he would like for everyone to understand that no one wants to ever put a dog to sleep, but that the population of animals gets out of control and it is the only viable control option.

Others disagree and say finding the dogs home, educating the public about the state’s laws and having responsible pet owners spay or neuter animals are the only viable control options.

[...]

The Marion County Animal Shelter is off U.S. 76 behind the Marion County Prison Camp. It has one part-time employee, and inmates work at the site to help keep it open. Built in March 1997, it is under the direction of Coleman, who also serves as the Marion County public buildings and grounds director.

There are 27 pens for dogs and several cages for cats upstairs in the old potato barn redesigned for use. This past year, the county spent about $16,000 in improvements to the shelter.

The dog, now named Gretchen, gave birth to her puppies in the shelter, and they all got into the hands of rescue and are by some reports doing fine, and others, not so fine. One news story ran saying the new mom bit one of her rescuers, and her rabies vaccination record (also a requirement in South Carolina) was nowhere to be found, not even at the shelter where she was adopted.

As the political blog FITSnews.com pointed out:

Assuming these accusations are true, this could develop into a really serious problem for Williams. How come? Well, for starters, the last time we checked people really, really like animals. As in a lot.

Yeah. We do.

Tags: dogs, animals, pets, shelters (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 20 comments

  •  Sigh. I think I drove through Marion County (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Ray Radlein, bobdevo, Lashe

    on the way back from the beach on Sunday.

    I thought something sucked. I just didn't know what.

  •  Whoa up there, Mr. WIlliams . . . (10+ / 0-)

    You say you didn't spay Gretchen because you wanted to breed her, but then when she got pregnant (which is, I believe, the very defintion of breed) you dumped her at the shelter.

    Who writes your excuses, dude??

    "we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex" Dwight D. Eisenhower

    by bobdevo on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:34:36 PM PDT

  •  what really gets me... (12+ / 0-)

    ...is he adopted a dog and, based on his description, just leaves it in the back yard all the time with machines providing food and water.

    If you're just putting a dog in the yard while you're at work, you don't need an "automatic" feeder or waterer.  You only need those when you're going to be gone for an extended period of time.

    What kind of asshole adopts a pet with no intention of of treating it like an actual pet?  Dogs are not farm animals.  you don't keep them in pens.

    What the heck?

    •  Yeah, that was part of the "worse" (4+ / 0-)

      The more details that emerge, the worse this story gets. I started out somewhat skeptical, since I couldn't find anything to substantiate what I was hearing via the diary here and some rescue forum discussions, all citing the same untraceable rescue report, but when I saw his "defense," I just went... this is a DEFENSE?

    •  And to add insult to injury... (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Lashe, drbloodaxe, operculum, CalGal47

      And he also made animal control come and get her. He didn't even take her to the shelter himself.

    •  My neighbor keeps a little dog in their backyard (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      nio, Lashe, imabluemerkin, drbloodaxe

      It's out there 24/7, and it's miserable. I swear, one day I'm going to sneak over there, steal it, and take it to rescue. It breaks my heart.

      On the other hand, I have giant breed dogs, and they are house dogs. No dog, big or small, wants to be outside looking in the window at its master. They want to be inside, part of a loving family.

      John McCain traded your $10 job for $5 and called it a bargain.

      by dawnt on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:49:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Indoor vs outdoor debate (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Lashe, drbloodaxe

        I'll be honest, I believe dogs should live indoors and have written on this subject. I agree with that wholeheartedly. BUT... one thing that troubles me is when there is an issue on which there really is no debate, such as the contamination of pet food in last year's pet food recall, how easy it is to let the bad guys off the hook by letting the debate shift focus to an issue on which there IS debate -- in that case, commercial vs homemade foods, or even just "natural" vs "regular" pet foods.

        No matter what I think of some pet foods, the bottom line is, if you go to the store to buy some, it shouldn't have poison in it.

        Similarly, although I don't support letting dogs live outdoors, there are perfectly kind, responsible people who do so. They don't let their dogs run loose or get pregnant, adopt animals from shelters and then dump them, ignore and break laws, and neglect their pets.

        To me, the issue isn't that Sen. Williams kept his GSD outdoors. It's his entire rationale for why he dumped her at the shelter, and the condition she was in when she got there, and his callous disregard for her welfare and the law.

      •  I hate that. (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        exNYinTX, Lashe, dawnt

        yeah, animals should be allowed plenty of time to roam around in a natural environment, but when it's time to sleep or bad weather or whatever, you owe it to your animal companion to share the climate controlled comfort zone you inhabit.  

        Heck, mine sometimes boot me out of my own bed.

        Got a problem with my posts? Quit reading them. They're usually opinions, and I don't come here to get in arguments.

        by drbloodaxe on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 01:56:22 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  I have an aunt and uncle... (0+ / 0-)

        ...that have 2 dogs (one of them a giant) that probably SHOULDN'T be house dogs but they wouldn't dream of leaving them outside all the time.

        I can't even imagine.  Domestic dogs are bred to desire human company.  You don't just sit them outside by themselves all the time.

        I am officially boggled.  and I wonder if this was some cheap political ploy from the beginning.  he wanted brownie points for adoping a pound puppy and ended up shooting himself in the foot for mistreating her.

        Amazing.

        Also what kind of pound doesn't spay dogs THEMSELVES?  I have gotten all my cats from pounds and unless they're too young, they come spayed beforehand.  You don't get a choice.  

        •  Giant breeds often need an indoor home (0+ / 0-)

          2 dogs (one of them a giant) that probably SHOULDN'T be house dogs but they wouldn't dream of leaving them outside all the time

          Lots of people think that giant breeds should be outside because they're big, but most of the giant breeds are more prone to health problems than other dogs, and they actually need indoor homes. Great Danes are a perfect example of this. They live shorter lives when they live most of their lives outdoors. Saint Bernards are more hardy, but their lifespan still increases (albeit not s much) when kept as house dogs. Neopolitan Mastiffs often die of heatstroke, even in temperatures around 90 degrees F.

          I have several friends who do giant breed rescue, and none of them will place any dog without visiting the adopter's home and ensuring that the dog will be kept indoors.

          John McCain traded your $10 job for $5 and called it a bargain.

          by dawnt on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 09:47:38 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Again... this is true but it becomes a diversion (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            CalGal47

            I have giant breed dogs. They sleep on my bed with me, and on beds on the floor of my bedroom. I agree with every word you're saying.

            But when we let the focus on something like this get shifted into the debate on indoor vs outdoor, it lets the broken system that let Williams get this dog, treat her the way she did, and then dump her slither off the hook while we argue about indoor vs outdoor.

            •  Do we have to ignore one to discuss the other? (0+ / 0-)

              If it helps, I'll explicitly say that I'm not trying to minimize what he did. I agree that it was wrong. But I really don't think it's ever a good idea to ignore one problem just because another one is important.

              John McCain traded your $10 job for $5 and called it a bargain.

              by dawnt on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 10:43:44 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Yes, we do... for a minute (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                CalGal47

                This is exactly what happened during the pet food recall. People got off onto their personal rants about what's in pet food and homemade diets and kibble being bad and this corporation or that corporation being bad, and we argue about those things all the time. They're always there in the background. They're not going anywhere.

                But during a specific crisis or incident or case, when we revert to those background debates and battles, when we move our focus off the thing on which pretty much everyone agrees -- things like don't put poison in the pet food and don't neglect or abandon your pets -- the only ones who benefit are the bad guys, who slip out of the crosshairs while we argue about the same things we argue about even when this isn't going on, how best to care for our animals.

                Those battles will be there when we're done. I'm not suggesting that we ignore them forever or even for a long time. But we need to stay on target when we're looking at an entrenched systemic abuse, and not let our message get diluted or diverted.

                Of course I'm not saying anyone has to be silent on an issue they believe in. I'm just trying to mention that it has consequences when we move so rapidly off the specific abuse we're looking at into these general philisophical debates.

                For example, when I was asked by reporters during the pet food recall how I feed my own dogs and cats, I told them the truth: I've fed a homemade diet since 1986. But I always followed that up immediately with a statement like, "But regardless of how someone chooses to feed their pets, they have the right to walk into the store and know the food they're buying doesn't contain poison." Just so they wouldn't drag me off into some pointless debate about commercial foods that did nothing more than let the pet food industry and slack regulators get the heat turned off them for a minute.

                And the homemade diet discussion is still here now, and I can use the pet food recall when I discuss it. I haven't lost my chance to make that connection. And the indoor vs outdoor dog debate will be here tomorrow, too, and we can use this case as an example then, as well.

  •  Wow (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ChristieKeith, dawnt
    That's just completely fucking stupid of Williams.
  •  Could have been a lot worse.... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    joyful

    You know, many people...including the Amish....believe that only humans have souls........and treat animals accordingly.

    There are probably dogs suffering terribly psychological problems in the homes of the wealthy who pamper them but don't let them be dogs.

    {Paris Hilton maybe?)

    And just why, as a nation, don't we take adequate care of ALL living things?

    Best Diary of the Year? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/23/03912/3990

    by LNK on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 02:16:19 PM PDT

  •  Having spent a lifetime in South Carolina... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ChristieKeith, CalGal47

    ...I have grown to really despise the notion that all of us folks down here are just ignorant hicks. I've tried hard to dispell the notion, and then this guy turns up...

    Sigh.

    I need a strong drink and a peer group.--Ford Prefect

    by Donald Drennon on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 04:02:25 PM PDT

  •  He originally adopted 3 dogs? (0+ / 0-)

    Hopefully the ones with his brother & mother are fairing better.  No vaccination records either?  Please tell me this guy doesn't have kids!

Permalink | 20 comments