Daily Kos

Outrage - the Sichuan earthquake & Bush

Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:34:39 AM PDT

The Washington Post is rightfully attacking China's refusal to allow international experts into Sichuan to help in relief experts, arguing correctly that such refusal not only endangers its own citizens, but provides ideological shelter for the Burmese Junta's similar approach to Monsoon relief:

Yet China is contributing to the mounting man-made disaster in Burma even as it rescues its own citizens. The communist government has adopted the position that it will welcome international aid for earthquake victims, but not foreign aid workers -- the same xenophobic stance that Burma's military junta has taken...

More below the fold...

Yes, please, take China to task for refusing entry of experts to critical regions in a crisis where minutes and hours can make the difference between life and death for thousands.  But, as long as we're pointing fingers, let's remember who set the stage for this kind of "xenophobia":

Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco said today she is "disappointed and frustrated" by the refusal of the federal government to accept millions of dollars in aid and other assistance offered by U.S. allies in the aftermath of the 2005 hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

The Bush administration turned down multiple offers of aid and support from U.S. allies, according to more than 10,000 pages of cables, telegraphs and emails from U.S. diplomats obtained by a nonprofit watchdog group under the Freedom of Information Act.

Again, from the Post:

While indirectly bolstering the junta's resistance to foreign assistance, China is also shielding Burma from pressure to open up. It has led the opposition at the U.N. Security Council to proposals that humanitarian aid be authorized for Burma without the regime's consent, under the U.N. doctrine known as "responsibility to protect." Beijing also resists a milder proposal for a U.N. resolution ordering Burma to accept relief and allow rescue efforts...

Almost certainly it will not do so unless compelled. The U.S. and European forces have the option to act unilaterally -- and they should not rule it out, though such an operation would be fraught with obstacles and risks. The Bush administration and its allies must meanwhile insist that the Security Council formally debate a resolution mandating that Burma immediately accept a U.N.-coordinated relief and rescue operation. China must understand that its refusal to cooperate with such an effort will make it complicit in the loss of Burmese lives and in the crime against humanity that Burma's generals are committing-- and that the offense will not be forgotten before the opening of the Beijing Olympics.

I'm not exculpating the Junta or PRC here, I'm just pointing out a fact.  In its approach to the Katrina disaster, Bush administration has once again set a dangerous standard that third-world dictators can cling to.

And no mention of the hypocrisy in the US media.  No call backs to the Bush administration's refusal to accept international aid while chaos and death visited New Orleans.  Instead, we take at face value the US efforts in the security counsel to compel Burma to accept international aid.  Can you imagine the reaction of the Bush administration if the US had been compelled to accept the (much-needed) help of the international community in 2005?

Un-fucking-believable.

Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't have accepted aid, I'm saying that only petty tyrants find that saving face is more important than saving lives.

I will give the dictators in Burma and Beijing credit for this.  None of them were stupid enough to be shown eating cake while their people were dying:

Tags: China, Myanmar, Burma, Bush administration, Katrina, Responsibility to Protect, natural disaster, international relief (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 53 comments

  •  tip jar (11+ / 0-)

    Remember to contribute to Mercy Corps if you want to help efforts in Sichuan and Burma.

    •  Agreed. But. (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      beijingbetty

      I'm a bit skeptical it would accomplish much at this point because the enemy is time and the clock is running out very quickly given the devestation.

      But it's wrong headed and if even a few lives would be saved, it's an inexcusible error.

      I think the reason is Chinese are feeling very defensive about the Olympic boycots and this is contributing to a surge of nationalistic sentiments. You may think I'm rationalizing or making excuses but I'm not; you have to understand how Chinese people here feel today. I think you can go to Chinese blogs and read for yourself. So much emotion and unreasonable conclusions, but there is a reason why.

      As a Chinese, I think you know where this comes from and where it goes. The wounds are old, but they are very deep and pride makes fools of us all. I always hear Western people dismissing us "Get over it" they say. Well, if I were to say that to a Western person I would face consequences so I bite my toungue.

      I wish the International Community could understand that and let China have a few moments of sunshine that would build the right kind of confidence it needs and wants, but it's not going to happen. It's just too much to ask.

      And so we have this defensive behaviour that does no one good.

      Mr Hu and Mr Wen are actually trying their best and have accomplished a lot, but what the outside will see is this. They won't see they ended 2000 year old agricultural taxes and school taxes tovgive rural people a break.They won't see that they have changed course to shift resources from the developed coastal cities to poor interior provinces. They won't see that they have taken a strong stand against corruption, or for the environment or for the rule of law in a way that never existed in 5,000 years.

      They will see this and say they are bad leaders and that Chinese are the worse for it.

      Yes, thier decision is wrong. But so is the frame around the picture.

      Sad, that. No matter how much progress China makes, it will still be second class in western eyes.

      Sorry to be so frank, but that's my feeling too. Maybe I have the desease. Sorry if I'm too hot, this is a difficult week. Despite heroic efforts, few of the missing will susvive, I think there will be 30,000 casulties.

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:50:46 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  It is tough (0+ / 0-)

        I'm looking at it from a western perspective - why the US actions have given cover to Burma and China in their refusal to admit experts.  I am attacking both the western leaders (in the US) and the eastern leaders for valuing face over human lives.  BOTH are wrong for it - but I certainly understand the reflexive defensiveness of Chinese people, and I think they're entitled to it.

        Me, personally, I don't think Hu and Wen are terrible leaders, but I think what they've done they've had to do to make sure rural China didn't explode into riots.  So, how much can I value their efforts which seem to have been made simply to ensure the survival of the PRC regime?  Certainly the progress can't be discounted, either.

        It's a tough line to walk.  And, for me, I feel like the US cannot ask of China and Burma what it doesn't do itself.  That is simple hypocrisy.  But this feeling doesn't prevent me from criticizing either Washington or Beijing, of course.  I think we all, Americans and Chinese, should expect the best from our leaders

        •  I understand. (0+ / 0-)

          I understand your perspective, I lived in the USA 9 years and Germany for 2 and this changed my mind about a lot of things too.

          Hu and Wen are sincere. I don't think they are just reacting to unrest. Why? Because they are really trying to refrom the party and solve real problems for people. They are pushing legal reforms to modernize the system. They are taking action on the environment, labor and basic human rights to balance development. For example, reform the property rights of citizens so local governments and developers can't just push people off their land without compensation such as the last 20 years. That in the US Constitution too.

          If you read the doctrine they are promoting it's about fainess. You know, Chinese people need that to go straight, Chinese people really need to change there thinking.

          Big charater posters and slogans can seem superficial but it's how to get people to follow and think, otherwise they just go their own way and it's chaos. Western people see that and react, think it's authoritarian mind control but it's the very traditional way and what people understand.

          You can read Wens speech from this week, all the right words about the party and such, but what was he saying? He was setting the direction and telling people to cooperate and not pannic, to do their best. Big Brother. Chinese Big Brother, not Western Big brother, but they look the same.

          So 10,000 people donated blood in one day. That's China, right?

          When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

          by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:01:07 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  China admits foreign rescue teams (0+ / 0-)

      It seems you have friends in high places. Today China reversed position and is receiving rescue teams from Taiwan, Japan and Korea.

      And tonight CCTV-9 has a special show with a panel of international earthquake experts to discuss the situation, the cause, the building problems and what lies ahead. Including also representatives of emergency services frankly discussing the situation and problems they facing.

      Maybe they will broadclast this on CCTV International if it's available in your area suggest to watch.

      Maybe I'll make a follow-up diary tonight but needs some time.

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:39:14 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Not totally defending China's leaders, but... (7+ / 0-)

    China has a history of xenophobia that predates Bush...it goes back centuries - and actually does have some grounding in historical events.

    •  Absolutely true (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Cyber Kat, serrano, yesivotedforbush

      Just as they have a history of torture.  But the US should be setting an example to improve these regimes, not giving them excuses to cling to these practices.

      •  Running around the world to aid foreigners.... (0+ / 0-)

        while Americans are suffering here at home, contributes to people in places like WV thinking that the government doesn't give a shit about them.

        Be safe Barack Obama.

        by David Kroning on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:44:41 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  This is pretty poor logic (4+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          downandout, serrano, koNko, Pager

          Are you really arguing that America shouldn't be assisting those in need overseas?  That's pretty much the only way we can keep our international reputation afloat at this point.

          Our international reputation = willingness of countries to work with us = finding a solution to Iraq = reducing number of West Virginian soldiers who die overseas.  Oh, and it also creates jobs at homes for the experts, contractors, and relief organizations who help those in need.

          The American people are only as stupid as they are treated by their government.  You seem to think they're pretty dumb.

          •  The Chinese... (0+ / 0-)

            ...have killed our pets, they have tried to poison us with toothpaste and lead painted toys.  They shot down one of our airplains and held the crew hostage.  They threaten to shoot down our satellites with laser beams.  

            Forgive me if I'm not jumping all over myself to give them aid that they don't want from us anyway.

            Be safe Barack Obama.

            by David Kroning on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:57:21 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  You mean the Chinese GOVERNMENT, (7+ / 0-)

              right? I'm sure you aren't intentionally generalizing an entire country in that statement, just as we hope our international friends are not referring to us when they speak of the horrors and atrocities our government is currently committing around the globe.

              Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn't mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar. Edward R. Murrow

              by Pager on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:59:02 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

            •  The difference (7+ / 0-)

              between the Chinese government and the Chinese people is the same as the difference between George Bush and you.  If you want them to make that distinction, then you should be willing to see the difference between Hu Jintao and a teenage girl working in a sweatshop.

              •  If they don't like their government... (1+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                beijingbetty

                let them rise up and change it.  Looks like that's what we're doing at the moment.

                I'm fed up with people saying that America has to be the world's savior.

                It's the same bullshit message that has us still fucking around over in Iraq.

                Be safe Barack Obama.

                by David Kroning on Wed May 14, 2008 at 08:02:33 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  Come on (6+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  downandout, Cyber Kat, serrano, koNko, Lashe, Pager

                  you're comparing our ability to elect a new President with an armed overthrow of an entrenched autocratic regime?

                  And the invasion of Iraq with sending doctors and rescue workers to a disaster zone?

                •  Your feelings about China are well known. (2+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  zenbowl, Pager

                  Why not just be honest and say you hate us?

                  Free speech allows that.

                  When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

                  by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:11:38 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

                •  Would you accept .. (2+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  zenbowl, beijingbetty

                  Chinese Aircrat Carriers with cruise missles and submarines armed with nuclear weapons patrolling the US coastline?

                  Would you accept Chinese militaqry bases with nuclear weapons established in Cuba?

                  If yes, please Diary the subject and explain why that would be acceptable. How many Americans would agree?

                  When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

                  by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:17:51 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

            •  Question. (3+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              zenbowl, amRadioHed, beijingbetty

              Which counbtry has more nuclear weapons pointed at the other?

              What would be the American military response if a chinese millitary aircraft spying onvthe US violated US airspace?

              Which country has a larger military budget than the rest of the world combined?

              Remember Star Wars?

              Oh.

              When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

              by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:06:54 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

            •  Come on David. This is silly. (3+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              zenbowl, koNko, Pager

              The pet food was melamine contamination. The toothpaste was glycerin substitute that never should have been shipped. The toys with lead in the paint were made TO SPECIFICATIONS given by Mattel -- it was not the fault of the Chinese factory that made them.

              All of these problems have regulatory solutions. They were not deliberate acts to inconvenience or harm Americans. They were the kinds of quality problems that happen with globalization.

              It wasn't personal towards America. Why make it so personal towards the Chinese?

              Living Overseas? Get your absentee ballot: http://www.votefromabroad.org

              by beijingbetty on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:36:42 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  Well And It Seems To Me A Good Business (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            zenbowl, Cyber Kat

            Idea would be to develop a Blackwater like company that focuses on rapid response to thing like this instead of killing folks.

            Let us not forget New Orleans. Visit Project Katrina.

            by webranding on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:57:38 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

        •  Can't we do both? (4+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          zenbowl, koNko, Lashe, Pager

          We would certainly have more funds for aid if we weren't conducting an unjust occupation of Iraq.  Seems to me we could do more for our image abroad helping people, instead of dropping bombs on them.

          OWW4O
          (Old White Woman 4 Obama)
          OWW40's Unite!

          by Cyber Kat on Wed May 14, 2008 at 08:13:27 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  I think you are very wrong. (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          zenbowl, beijingbetty

          America is right to offer humanitarian aid and China is wrong to draw the line it has, just as America refused aid for Kastrina, It's just foolish pride. That's the point here.

          This is a humanitrain crisis. It's about peoples lives. People are dying under rubble from an earthquaqe. Can't you see that?

          Are you really a liberal? What does that mean?

          When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

          by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:01:45 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Well, they are a country of... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    beijingbetty

    more than a billion people.  

    Perhaps they have enough experts of their own?

    Just saying.  

    America had trouble even letting the Canadians come and help during the Katrina disaster.

    •  When you have (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Cyber Kat, mango

      tens of thousands of your citizens buried in a mountainous province with hard-to-access villages, you can never have enough experts and help in digging them out.

      •  I don't agree...China is a world power. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        beijingbetty

        Let them take care of their problems, unless they ask for help.

        Be safe Barack Obama.

        by David Kroning on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:45:52 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  China is not a world power (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Cyber Kat, koNko

          and those living in rural villages in Sichuan province on a dollar a day certainly cannot rely on Beijing to help them out now.

          •  I don't quite agree. (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            beijingbetty

            China has put great resources on this problem and made a very quick response. I don't think there is any issue of willingness or lack of organization at all.

            The problem is the scale of the disaster is too great to handle and time is so short. Whatever is available is not enough.

            And that is why I agree with your main point that the decision to refuse experts is wrong.

            I wrote 2 Diaries on it this week. It expresses what I saw and did and think. The effort here by the governement has been great,

            More than 10,000 people in Sichuan donanted blood is the past 24 hours. PLA marched theough impassable roads to get to the villages and worked all night and day for 2 days without sleep. Behind them came 30,00 more to clear the roads so tent hospitals could be set up.

            But it's not enough. 5 or 500 more doctors would help.

            When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

            by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:35:47 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Conditions in China and Burma are horrid (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    zenbowl, Cyber Kat, mango, Lashe, David Kroning

    China has mobilized its military to help its people. Burma's military thugs are stealing relief supplies. Yet, China has enable the thugs in Burma to maintain control so they are culpable too.

    Bush has degraded America's position in the world in so many ways that we are no longer able to command the respect required to mobilize the international community to save the people of Burma. Meanwhile a tropical disturbance is adding more rain and misery to Burma's suffering people.

    Much of the worst hit area in China is not accessible without clearing roads because landslides have cut off access. Landslides have wiped out entire towns according to reports. The situation there is dire, but I don't know how we could help.

    "It's the planet, stupid."

    by FishOutofWater on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:48:05 AM PDT

  •  i do have to be honest (11+ / 0-)

    their response was almost instantenous. They outperformed us in Katrina and the Myanmar junta.

    this isn't meant to be a pro-Chinese government post, but I'm impressed at their ability to mobilize fast in a disaster.

    Central PA Kossacks Austin is a big greeeen fog. (-0.12, -3.33)

    by terrypinder on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:50:03 AM PDT

    •  It's true that they're mobilizing quickly (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      webranding, koNko, Lashe, JFinNe

      and probably out-performing the Bush administration in terms of the money and effort given to search and rescue.  But it's also true that this earthquake and the help needed make Katrina look like an walk in the park.

      Even if Beijing's efforts to save face cost a single life, that was too great a price to pay.

      But, back to your point, if Beijing's response efforts make America's efforts to save its own look paltry in comparison, the Bush administration -- well, I was going to say should be ashamed, but it's clear that's not possible.

  •  Well The New Orleans Angle Hits Hard For Me (5+ / 0-)

    and generally speaking I get that at some level too much and/or unorganized help might actually hinder the efforts in China. But if we have some very specific talent they ought to want our help.

    A perfect example is my father has a friend that gets sent all throughout the world cause he and his dog are about the best at finding people in rubble.

    Let us not forget New Orleans. Visit Project Katrina.

    by webranding on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:50:06 AM PDT

    •  Too much unorganized help can hurt (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Cyber Kat, koNko

      which is what they get when they mobilize a zillion soldiers and then refuse entry to folks like your father who can actually make a difference.

      •  It very well organized. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        zenbowl

        It's just not enough.

        People pitched in immediaely.
        Officials set about organizing activities immediately
        Mr. Wen was on site in hours and worked through the night to relay the situation to Beijing at once.
        Every TV station has banners with call in numbers for each village to report missing people to compile lists for rescue and provide information about missing/found.
        Radio stations are broadcasting messages from people to their familly members because the telecom infrastructure is broken.
        Everyone has to live outside because there's no time to check the buildings so the government has forbidden people to return now to avoid making the situation worse if more buildings collapse.
        And rescue work is around the clock.

        I think this is what can be done.

        It's just not enough. 500,000 buildings are down or seriously damaged. 35,000,000 households are displaced.

        If you want to know my feeling it's here.

        Surely I agree your main point.

        When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

        by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:58:18 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Well To Your Point About Bush (7+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    zenbowl, Cyber Kat, koNko, mango, Lashe, Pager, JFinNe

    refusing aid in the aftermath of Katrina is really important. One of the things that always amazes me when I talk to folks in other nations is how aware they are of our government while I know almost nothing about theirs. They're paying attention.

    That Bush would slam China or Burma while doing the exact opposite just a few shorts years ago isn't something I think goes unnoticed on the world stage.

    Let us not forget New Orleans. Visit Project Katrina.

    by webranding on Wed May 14, 2008 at 08:03:42 AM PDT

  •  I would love to see a show of hands... (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    zenbowl, amRadioHed, koNko, beijingbetty

    Who here has been to the mountainous area around Chengdu? That is where most of the horrendous damage is and because it's on twisty as hell two-lane roads is why they did not have outside aid workers come in.

    And of course the outside aid workers probably do not speak a lick of Mandarin and even then they would probably have trouble in rural areas with folks that only speak the local dialect (and believe me the local spoken dialects can sometimes not even be understood by native speakers).

    Here, let me illustrate with pictures, check out some of the mountain pictures (some graphic photos here so be forewarned) of where the roads are so fractured that the army had to walk into these areas. The army has been trying to get troops into the area, but rain has hampered their efforts until yesterday. The aid workers that got to the epicenter walked a lot of the way there because of the weather.

    Also there are over 100,000 troops already in the area and more are on the way there.

    I'm sick of how the western media is treating this disaster. Why isn't the MSM bitching about something like this:

    Japan has provided China with satellite images of the devastated area and China hoped to get images from the United States, France and Canada under an international accord on disaster aid, state media reported.

    The US hsa delayed to let the Chinese use satellite images and the Canadians said yes, but they cannot do anything until next week from what I've read.

    •  I think you're right about something. (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      beijingbetty

      More workers to clear the rubble probably wouldn't help and would be too late on the scene. It's really a race against time and local people are best to do that.

      But more doctors would be good, because there's so many injured and broken bones have no language. Besides, enough people speak English that they could translate basics between doctor and patient, that would be a good job for young students.

      The medical service will take weeks so doctors would help. You know, China has a shortage of doctors so they shouldn't refuse such help.

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:12:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  US has spy-sat images (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    zenbowl, koNko

    of the disaster struck area but has not released them.

    Canada has promised to schedule a flyby with their satellite -- on Friday.

    Living Overseas? Get your absentee ballot: http://www.votefromabroad.org

    by beijingbetty on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:43:42 AM PDT

  •  I'm confused (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    koNko

    What help is China refusing?  They are accepting supplies.  They are moving in thousands of their own troops and civilian personnel.  What are we trying to send them?  Digging experts?  I think they have those.  Medical experts?  They have hospitals, is there evidence that there isn't enough medical care in the area?  Supply distribution experts?  China has a huge civil service which can do that.

    I'm all in favor of international aid, but I'm honestly not clear what China is refusing that they actually need.  It reminds me back during the tsunami, when India refused international aid.  They managed alright without it.  

    •  My Opinion. (0+ / 0-)

      They are refusing "experts" but accepting supplies.

      I think more Doctors would be useful because we have a shortage in the whole country and it will be weeks to treat everyone.

      Setting up field hospitals is done but I see the doctors are so busy working around the clock, why not have more?

      When harmonious relationships dissolve, respect and devotion arise; when a nation falls to chaos, loyalty and patriotism are born - Daodejing (paraphrased)

      by koNko on Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:16:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  To be honest, I don't see significant negative (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    weasel, koNko

    impact for the relief effort if the Chinese do not let in foreign aid workers.

    They have resources, man power, knowledge, and will. Their response has been impressive. They have been open with reporting on the crisis as it unfolds, with first reports hitting the wires from Xinhua within 20 minutes of the quake.

    The situation on the ground is a complete catastrophe. China needs to focus, and tend to her own and is doing so. This is emergency response that is required --- they need to rely on simple, clear channels of communication.

    One thing China is asking for are high resolution spy sat pictures of the areas they cannot reach. The US has taken some and is surveying.. but has yet to offer the pics to the Chinese. The US has been known in the past to offer sat imagery to countries as assistance during relief efforts.

    Let's hope we step up...

    Living Overseas? Get your absentee ballot: http://www.votefromabroad.org

    by beijingbetty on Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:04:38 PM PDT

Permalink | 53 comments