Daily Kos

How Clinton could force her way onto the ticket as VP

Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:39:48 AM PDT

Did you know that, at the convention, not only is there a general roll call vote for delegates to elect their presidential nominee, but then there is also a separate roll call vote to elect the vice presidential nominee? A lot of people don't.

But you can bet the Clinton people know this. Even Mark Penn. And if she wants to be vice president, there's not really much that can be done to stop her. More after the jump.

This scenario was crystallized with an article on Real Clear Politics today. To sum it up, things go as projected and Obama wins the nomination by about 150 delegates. That gives Obama 54% of the convention delegates and Clinton 46%, which makes Hillary the closest second-place finisher in recent history. Her entire margin of defeat is equal to about 20% of the superdelegates at the convention.

So Obama selects Webb, Richardson, Sebalius, or anyone but Hillary to join his ticket before the convention. However, Hillary decides she wants to be VP and makes a concerted effort to win the nod. All she has to do is convince 20% of the superdelegates that an Obama-Clinton ticket is the best. ticket. EVAH. Combine that with the 1900 or so delegates she'll be bringing to the convention, and she'll have the VP slot. Webb, Richardson, or whoever will be what is technically known in the political world as S.O.L.

Here's a good excerpt from the article above that shows how hard it might be for people to say no to Hillary again:

Just consider for a moment the final phone call with Bill Clinton when the super delegate had to tell him he or she had decided to go with Obama. Clinton," It's time to make a decision. Hillary needs you and I need you. We've been through a lot together. When you needed me I was there, now we need you".

Super delegate, "Mr. President, this is the hardest thing I've ever had to do, but I'm going with Obama because (whatever). Ask me for anything else Mr. President, but I've got to do this". Clinton, "I'm very disappointed and personally hurt, but do what you think you have to do. So long."

Now imagine its June 4th and Clinton calls again. Clinton, "I know Obama has enough votes to win, but I wanted you to know Hillary has decided to run for vice president at the convention. You know there are two roll call votes at the convention: first president then for vice president. I know you are voting for Obama for president. Fine, but I want your commitment to vote for Hillary for vice president."

You imagine being on the floor in Denver. Hillary's delegates, NEARLY HALF THE DELEGATES, are demanding she be on the ticket. These are true believers who have stuck with Clinton through thick and thin. To them, putting Hillary on the ticket is a crusade.

Most Clinton delegates are women, most Democratic voters are women, and they're going to just accept some middle aged white governor that Obama is rumored to want? No way. They are in your face. Hillary supporters from back home are jamming your Blackberry. This and more horror scenes flash through your mind in a nano second.

Then it occurs to you; if the roles were reversed and Obama came close to winning and wanted to be the vice presidential candidate, could you imagine the convention saying no?

Remember, this doesn't have to be a convincing argument for all the superdelegates. It just has to convince 20% of them for the plan to work.

I don't know about you, but in her most recent speeches, she's starting to sound like someone who wants the V.P. slot. We all know what bringing the Clintons onto the ticket (note the plural) would mean. Obama may be too gracious to bring up Monica, Whitewater, and the rest of the 90's, but you can bet the Republicans won't be so gracious. Forget the talk about changing the electoral map - we would go back to the same 2004 style fight, where all the states are more or less decided except for Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. And can you imagine the campaign ads the GOP could make, with the goldmine of negative things the vice presidential candidate has said about the presidential candidate?  "He's elitist". "He doesn't cross the commander-in-chief threshhold".

Like a lot of you, I'm totally against having Hillary on the ticket. But my question is: how can we stop it?

Tags: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, vice president (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 51 comments

  •  tip jar (24+ / 0-)

    As always, all proceeds will be donated to the "Please Dear God, Make Hillary Stop!" fund.

    "We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin

    by CaptUnderpants on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:40:51 AM PDT

    •  Compelling (3+ / 0-)

      and frightening.

      I wonder if we'd ever see it.  If the threat is serious enough, I expect Obama would agree well ahead of time to make Clinton his VP to avoid any controversy.

      •  Neither compelling nor frightening (10+ / 0-)

        Some posters here sound like little kids at camp telling ghost stories to scare themselves. First of all, the Clinton camp has shown that it has no effective grasp of arcane procedure that trumps everyone else's including the Obama campaign's. Remember Texas?

        Second of all, Clinton has proposed a LOT of things that "could" happen if everyone cooperated with her extreme but technically legal manipulation of the system -- but no one is cooperating. Remember all of these delegates would have to agree that Hillary's plan is the best -- and right now, they are all saying "no way, Hillary" to her earlier "Here's how Hillary COULD win the nomination" plan of getting all the super delegates to flood her more qualified and experienced way.

        This is far-fetched. I doubt she even WANTS to be vice president, a role in which she's essentially be Obama's flunky. And if by some weird fluke she were forced on him against his will, he csan define the terms of her office, right down to stripping her staff and making her duties strictly ceremonial. She doesn't want this. Compared to being Senator, this is a crappy job.

        We're retiring Steve LaTourette (R-Family Values for You But Not for Me) and sending Judge Bill O'Neill to Congress from Ohio-14: http://www.oneill08.com/

        by anastasia p on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:55:20 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Interesting, but unlikely (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      beltane, Joe Beese

      Remember, the people Hillary is trying most to convince (the supers) are the people least likely to believe her.

      Her plan cannot succeed unless it makes sense to them, and if it makes sense to them (as unappealing as it sounds to us), then there probably is some merit to it.

    •  yes but no (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ObamaLovingExDemocrat

      just like she can fire John Dean and she can put in a plank supporting nuclear attacks against Iran. not.
      What Obama wants he will get and there won't be any messing around with that hot property, not by his own delegates.

      fouls, excesses and immoderate behavior are scored ZERO at Over the Line, Smokey!

      by seesdifferent on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:16:08 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  We can't stop it, of course, but Obama can (0+ / 0-)

      All he has to do when he submits Richardson (my favorite anyway) as his vp choice, to wax eloquent in that speech on the convention floor, saying;

      "In searching for a Vice President to run with me, I need someone who believes in the type of campaign I intend to run - a clean, principled, but hard fought one - and who shares the vision for a unified country that this campaign has been about from the beginning. Of course, it also helps that Governor Richardson has impeccable foreign policy credentials, and will be a valued ally to me in the White House."

      Or something like that, wherein he highlights all Hillary's deficiencies in talking up his nominee.  I'm sure there are other points he could make in that same vein, highlighting Hillary's weaknesses at the same time he's touting his choice.

      "Well, yeah, the Constitution is worth it if you can succeed." -Nancy Pelosi, 6/29/07.

      by nailbender on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:21:50 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Oh, and there's one more thing he could do: (0+ / 0-)

        Announce his VP in the next few weeks, making the choice a pre-convention deal.  This would have the effect of putting his choice out on the stump ahead of the convention, and in the limelight where it becomes much harder to unseat somebody from.

        Hillary would scream, at which point the Obama campaign could point to her own floating of that same tactic back at the beginning of the year when she sent up a trial ballon of Jim Webb becoming her VP choice before the primary even got underway.

        "Well, yeah, the Constitution is worth it if you can succeed." -Nancy Pelosi, 6/29/07.

        by nailbender on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:26:38 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Read this.... (8+ / 0-)

    that is how it is stopped.

    Hillary Clinton brings nothing to this ticket, but more drama.

    Other things can be offered to HRC, and after seeing Edwards with Obama, yesterday, they are the future, not the Clintons.

    •  I hope you're right, but... (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      elmo, Empower Ink, Joe Beese

      the problem is that she only has to get a small amount of delegates to flip for this plan to work. And I would wager that there are probably at least 20% of them who have the idea that combining Obama and Clinton means they somehow win states like Virginia and West Virginia, Georgia and the "important states" like Pennsylvania.

      "We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin

      by CaptUnderpants on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:50:26 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  that's why it should be stopped (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Empower Ink, Joe Beese

      not how. Ironically, the only thing I see stopping Clinton from being able to do exactly what this diarist describes is the way she's burned her bridges in the party the last few months of campaigning. You can't retreat over those bridges once you burn them down.

      But it worries me greatly how small a number of delegates would need to be persuaded that this crappy idea is actually a good one.

    •  Not. She'll play potential obstructionist (0+ / 0-)

      with internal party support, which in our politics means she'll be in position to dictate terms.

      Obama's is no saint and he's not stupid; he's a politician like the rest of them and he will have no choice but to deal.  Its clear: If he can't deal with the Clintons, then he won't be able to unite the party.  The central pillar of his campaign message and persona will crumble.

      He's too smart to let that happen.  But he's supporters aren't.

      Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -- Mark Twain.

      by dcrolg on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:25:32 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Because losing the nomination.. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Joe Beese

    .. and still forcing your way on the ticket is a REALLY GOOD IDEA.

  •  reality will set in, not clintonality (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    dwellscho, indybend, cfaller96, Joe Beese
  •  unhhghg... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Joe Beese, ObamaLovingExDemocrat

    I'm going to crawl into a hole and pretend you never posted this Diary.  But I'll tip you for bringing it to our attention.

  •  Convince 55% of Democrats that they are wrong... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Osiris, Joe Beese

    http://www.usatoday.com/...

    Other than that it is a tough argument to beat when the majority of Democrats want Hillary as VP

    Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

    by dvogel001 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:55:15 AM PDT

    •  Yeah, and a majority wanted her for Prez (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      icebergslim

      a year ago, according to the polls.  Now?  Not.So.Much.

      Polls are snapshots, not predictors, dvogel001.

      Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

      by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:03:05 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  43% of Obama supporters... (0+ / 0-)

        want her for VP as well...just saying...not pushing it...I will vote/support Obama if he puts Mickey Mouse on the ticket...even though not a majority it is still a significant number...

        I trust that Obama will make the right decision Hillary or no Hillary he will have a good reason for it and will explain it to the Democrats and the American people...

        Peace...Go Democrats!!!

        Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

        by dvogel001 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:10:18 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Soooo...a majority DON'T want her on the ticket (0+ / 0-)

          and I have to wonder in what fantasyland you think that number is going to go up, not down.  If you're not pushing it, then stop talking about it, because it's NOT going to happen.

          Stage 3 of grief is the bargaining stage, which is behind all this VP talk.  Stage 4 is depression, which is when I expect Hillary supporters to figuratively crawl into a figurative hole and just not want to even vote in November, and/or perhaps contemplate divorcing themselves from politics altogether.  I anticipate they'll move to that stage when Obama "locks it up" by hitting the 2,025 number, probably in early June.

          But give Hillary supporters some credit and some time.  They're not idiots.  They will come around to Stage 5 (acceptance) before November, and they will pull the lever for Obama.

          Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

          by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:19:24 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  that means 57% of Obama supporters (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          askew, cfaller96

          want someone besides Clinton.  I think the 57% who do not want Clinton will prevail.

          Bush repealed Godwin's Law with a Signing Statement.

          by Mad Kossack on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:19:39 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  But he's "not pushing" the idea. Nope. n/t (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Mad Kossack

            Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

            by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:55:00 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  I don't understand you folks... (0+ / 0-)

              we cannot have a conversation about why 55% of all Democrats want Hillary as VP and what to do about it without you all getting your backs up and being negative towards me...I have been very consistent about my positions and have no hidden agendas here...

              I am in full support of Barack Obama in the GE and I believe that he will prevail...the question becomes what is the best way for that to occur and cause party unity for the best change ticket in our generation...

              My first choice for VP is Richardson...but in reality other than choosing a Republican, I really do not care very much because most people will be voting for (or against) Obama's change message not who he picks for VP...that can help in the margins and I am sure that Obama will use his usual great judgement in this decision...

              Peace...and take a deep breath...not everything has to be a pro-Hillary anti-Hillary battle just because we are on DKos...

              Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

              by dvogel001 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 09:21:20 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Speaking of taking a deep breath... (0+ / 0-)

                you cite a poll that states a minority of Obama supporters want Hillary on the ticket as evidence of...what, exactly?  And then you go on to insist that you're "not pushing" the idea.  Ok, and...?

                If you're really not pushing the idea, then why the hell does a minority of Obama supporters represent evidence to you what the majority of those supporters would want or accept?  That same majority just told you in the poll that they DON'T want it, yet to you somehow that represents evidence that they DO want it...?  WTF?

                But yeah, sure, you're not pushing the idea or anything.  Ok.

                I think you should take a deep breath, and drop it.  The conversation has already occurred- it's not going to be necessary, and thus it's not going to be supported.

                Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

                by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 10:53:29 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  Well my point was... (1+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  cfaller96

                  that 55% of Democrats overall support Hillary as VP and 43% of Obama supporters/Democrats support Hillary as VP which is a clear majority of Democrats and a large minority of Obama supporter/Democrats...nothing more nothing less...

                  My point is how can we work together to change these numbers...I suspect that many of these numbers reflect Democrats' feelings that we need a united party in November and this is the way to have a united party...so to bring this full circle to diffuse the issue, if we can find other ways to show the Hillary and Obama Democrats can unite then the main reason for Hillary being on the ticket will be diffused...

                  Yes there will be some who say "well she deserves it" but it will be a very small number at that point.

                  The other thing that would help would be to have a poll commissioned that suggested 1st and 2nd choices to see who the Hillary VP supporters would like to see as VP if Hillary is not a choice...then that information could be considered as well...

                  Again, this is not about Hillary, this is about uniting the party for victory in the change agenda...

                  Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

                  by dvogel001 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 12:19:45 PM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

                  •  I agree with you there... (0+ / 0-)

                    The other thing that would help would be to have a poll commissioned that suggested 1st and 2nd choices to see who the Hillary VP supporters would like to see as VP if Hillary is not a choice...then that information could be considered as well...

                    Yeah, which is exactly why this "Do you want Hillary as VP?" talk is premature, and somewhat useless.  Obama deserves to make his own decision on this, and until he makes his selection, we don't know how Hillary supporters will react.  It would be far more informative for them to be polled on people other than Hillary, to try and derive what they really want.

                    But right now these questions pretty much just egg on the "Hillary or else!" mentality that doesn't help the Party.  Ugh.

                    Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

                    by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 12:59:16 PM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

    •  This is early. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      indybend, ObamaLovingExDemocrat

      By the time the convention and GE starts in the fall, nobody is going to care about this.

      Next, don't think the Obama Campaign is not doing polling on Hillary Clinton.  NOT FOR DEMOCRATS.  Remember she is revered and respected for DEMOCRATS.  They are polling independents and Republicans.  Ones who will vote for Obama or leaning.

      That is what will sink her.  We don't need a lightning rod for the GOP on the ticket, nor do we need a reminder of the Clinton's Greatest Hits.

      They have not been vetted POST Bill Clinton's presidency.  Their money dealings are highly suspect and questionable and don't even start with that Clinton Library.

      She really has too much baggage.  And that polling was of DEMOCRATS, we need more than Democrats to win this election, remember that.  We don't need folks fired up to vote against Obama because Clinton is on the ticket.

  •  that 55% stat will not last . . . (0+ / 0-)

    it is just part of the bargaining stage for McMonster supporters....


    HRC is not VP material.

    Oh, Jesus: protect me from your followers!

    by trippinsf on Thu May 15, 2008 at 06:59:39 AM PDT

  •  Eh, plausible but unlikely (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Joe Beese, ObamaLovingExDemocrat

    All she has to do is convince 20% of the superdelegates that an Obama-Clinton ticket is the best. ticket. EVAH.

    Well, that's MUCH easier said than done, given that right now she is unable to convince these very same superdelegates that a Clinton-Obama ticket is the best.ticket.EVAH.  I wonder how much the Supers are really listening to her anyway.  It seems she and Bill are having a huge problem convincing any superdelegates to go with her at all, let alone go with her on a floor fight.

    Besides, this overlooks the fact that the supers are weak people that don't want to be involved in this mess.  Once it becomes clear that Obama is the nominee and once Hillary concedes that, the supers will be in NO MOOD for yet another fight that only benefits the Clintons and possibly weakens the ticket a few months before the election.  No way do they take that risk.

    Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

    by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:00:10 AM PDT

  •  So, in order to get the VP slot (3+ / 0-)

    she would offer a vivid demonstration of why so many people do not want her to   be VP in the first place?

    Aside from all the baggage she would bring to the ticket, most of the reservations about her taking the number two slot have to do with the likelihood that she would refuse to be controlled by a President Obama, that she would be a loose cannon, doing whatever she pleased, whenever she pleased. Any attempt to strong arm her way onto the ticket, and greatly undermining Obama's viability in the process, will be seen for exactly what it is, and will be rejected by the majority of the delegates.

    •  if her campaign pulls this... (0+ / 0-)

      there will be a lot of folks who are convinced it's time to drive a stake through the heart of the Clinton machine.  

      Bush repealed Godwin's Law with a Signing Statement.

      by Mad Kossack on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:21:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  And why would the Supers want this? (0+ / 0-)

      after a bruising primary, a vast, vast majority of the Supers are just going to relieved that the battle is over.  But, what, a magical pony phone call from Bill Clinton will suddenly get them all charged up for yet ANOTHER bruising fight, only this time it will occur on the convention floor?

      No.  Won't happen.  That would be insane.

      Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

      by cfaller96 on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:53:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  They're politicians (0+ / 0-)

        If they haven't endorsed Obama yet, it's because they don't want to take any risks.  So this is the perfect idea to them.  Why choose?  Support both.

        •  No, it's because they didn't want to interfere (0+ / 0-)

          if you listened to Supers talk, they really, really, really wanted the voters to resolve this.  They didn't want to be involved at all.

          But they were forced to, so now they're slowly coming in behind Obama.  And there's plenty of gossip out there that the undecideds are simply giving the Clintons space to exit in their own way before they back Obama.  I speculate that they're simply trying to stay out of it so that voters don't perceive them as "pushing" Hillary out.

          Besides, if they're so risk-averse, why would they take the risk of opposing the next president's VP pick?  We conveniently forget that Obama is going to name his own pick at some point in June or July.  Why exactly would the Supers then decide to fight him on the convention floor on this, just a few months before the general election?

          Jesus, if they don't want to take any risks, that would be a weird way of showing it.  They don't want this, and they won't do it.

          Civic spirit drowns in a hurricane of mere survivalism - McKenzie Wark

          by cfaller96 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 09:53:22 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  I'm sure she'd be thrilled with her new VP office (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tethys

    over in the Naval Archives in Anacostia.

    " Let us stop, look and listen. Let us not give this president or any president unchecked power. Remember the Constitution." Sen Rob't. Byrd 10/11/02.

    by LEP on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:14:52 AM PDT

  •  Not gonna happen. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tethys, ObamaLovingExDemocrat

    Political conventions are no longer "political conventions" - they are a show.  Theatre.  Choreographed down to the last step, including balloon drops, prayers and musical numbers.

    The powers that be will not allow anything to happen to change the storyline - a happy, united Democratic party, charging to an historic victory behind the agent of change, Barack Obama.  Having the delegates bypass Obama's VP pick (announced long before the convention) for Hillary just does not fit the narrative.

    Any party that would lie to start a war would also steal an election.

    by landrew on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:16:08 AM PDT

  •  You can't. Her numbers & support are there (0+ / 0-)

    This is politics, for all the marbles.  If anyone knows how to works deals, esp within the party with this type of political opportunity, its the Clintons and their party supporters.

    I'd get used to the idea if I were you and start to figure our what you'll wear to the Obama-Cilnton inauguration.

    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -- Mark Twain.

    by dcrolg on Thu May 15, 2008 at 07:19:48 AM PDT

  •  Uh uh. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ObamaLovingExDemocrat

    Not gonna happen.  No matter what.  The party will coalesce around their nominee and he will get to pick his V.P.  

    It's a "logical" argument but nonsensical.  

  •  No way to stop it, assuming she wants it. (0+ / 0-)

    Well, there is one way.

    You could nominate her for president.

    Actually, this might even be the perfect way to sabotage Obama... become his VP, drag him down in the general election, he loses. She runs again in 2012, and if he also runs again, she can claim he's already lost once, despite her strengthening the ticket.

  •  Why this Will NOT happen (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    CaptUnderpants, cfaller96

    The nomination of Barack Obama as the nominee is nothing less that a complete repudiation of the Clintons. I am sure that many of her supporters will want her to have the VP slot.  But I do not think the superdelegates, even the ones who support Hillary now, will be calling for her to be VP.  

    Many of the superdelegates who support Hillary pledged their vote when they thought she was the inevitable nominee.  Most of them are not willing, for reasons of loyalty and honor, to back off from their endorsements.  But that doesn't mean they NOW believe that Clinton will be the next nominee.

    Keep in mind, too, that supers are aware of the power Barack will have as President.  Already he is helping down-ticket Democrats get elected. Many of these supers are elected officials and will want Barack's favor. I don't think a vast majority of Supers will go against the wishes of the man most likely to be our next President.

    Also, the party leaders, like Pelosi have said no unity ticket is going to happen. Furthermore, Reid has said that Clinton won't even be Majority Senate Leader.  It's over for Hillary. She better hope she can distinguish herself in her remaining years as a senator so she can re-elected and perhaps resurrect her career. But Dems are saying, "exit left, lady."

    She won't be the VP. I promise.

  •  All MoDo memes of "emasculating" Obama aside ... (0+ / 0-)

    ... it's a generally accepted practice that the nominee gets to name his own choice of veep on the ticket (and someday that "his" will be a "her"). Beyond that, the odds of the convention superdelegates allowing Hillary to divide the Democratic Party just before we go into the general election campaign strike me as being somewhere between slim to none.

    Just my .02 cents' worth, but at some point Clinton is going to have to consider the damage such moves will do to her own name and reputation in the party.

Permalink | 51 comments