Daily Kos

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge – a photo diary with an action item

Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:29:54 PM PDT

On Tuesday morning, I was listening to President Bush’s press conferenceon the radio as I drove to work. He once again had me frustrated that not once in his years in office has he made an effort to be my president - what's new. But this bit really got my attention:

The Department of Energy estimates that ANWR could allow America to produce about a million additional barrels of oil every day, which translates to about 27 millions of gallons of gasoline and diesel every day. That would be about a 20-percent increase of oil -- crude oil production over U.S. levels, and it would likely mean lower gas prices. And yet such efforts to explore in ANWR have been consistently blocked.

snip

Well, I'm hoping now people, when they say "ANWR," means you don't care about the gasoline prices that people are paying.

Below the fold, I’ll explain why.

Summer solstice in the Arctic Refuge.

Let me translate President Bush's words for you: If you are opposed to drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, you are an elitist who doesn’t care about the price hard working Americans have to pay for gas and oil.

Well, I’m a hard working American who opposes drilling in the Arctic Refuge. This diary is my attempt to explain why.

I could go step-by-step through Bush's speech and point out the deceptions and falsehoods, of which there were many. I could point out that the American Petroleum Institute has launched a slick advertising campaign on TV and online promoting more oil exploration here in the US. I could talk about the need to get Polar Bears listed as an endangered species but others have already done that. I could also summarize all of the facts about why drilling in the Arctic Refuge won't have an impact on the price we pay at the pump, or that it's damn well time to have an energy policy that favors renewable energy over petroleum.

Instead, I want to get at the fundamental core issue - call it a value - that the Arctic Refuge represents for me. The words of Terry Tempest Williams express my sensibility so much more eloquently than anything I could invent myself.

In the open space of democracy, beauty is not optional, but essential to our survival as a species.


View across the North Slope toward the Arctic Ocean - oil derricks could soon become part of the landscape if oil companies and Republicans get their way.

Over the past decade, I've had the privilege of visiting the Arctic Refuge several times. It's a place of austere beauty so everwhelming that it can break your heart. Spending time in the Arctic is learning to share the landscape with creatures large and small, curious and indifferent, migratory and not. And finding yourself becoming attuned to the rhythms of nature in a way that's difficult to do in our busy work-a-day lives.

The Porcupine herd of caribou gets a lot of attention in discussions about the Arctic Refuge because Area 1002 is where most of them spend their summers, having their calves and fattening up for the winter (see below for a list of off-line sources used for this diary).

A couple of caribou wondering if I'm friend or foe.

The North Slope is essential for their ability to survive. But caribou are only part of the story.

Summmers in the Arctic are filled with plants and animals frantically reproducing and replenishing their food resources, using nearly every minute of the 24 hours of daylight to make sure that they and their progeny can survive the next year. For those that stay in the Arctic, the winter will be ferocious and cold even with the effects of global warming that are brcoming apparent. For animals that migrate, they will need every ounce of energy to survive their migration so that they can repeat the cycle next year.


Dall Sheep lambs have a very high mortality rate during their first winter. These rams have survived a few winters.


Muskoxen were once extirpated from Alaska. It's not clear how well they are doing since being re-introduced.


Arctic Grizzly Bears, while formidable in their own right, are considerably smaller than Grizzlies south of the Brooks Range. Arctic Grizzlies have a lot less protein in their diets because salmon don't spawn in streams of the North Slope.


Arctic Foxes are pure white in the winter and dark gray in the summer. This one is midway between the two phases.


The Arctic Wooly Bear Caterpillar takes fourteen years to mature. Once it has metamorphosed into a moth, it no longer eats and must mate quickly if its genes are to survive for another generation.

Flowers in the Arctic have adapted to their cold and windy environment by staying close to the ground as dwarf versions of their warmer climate equivalents or by developing bowl-shaped flowers in which the temperature in the bowl is several degrees warmer than outside. Insects hang out in the flowers just to warm up.

Also, there are no big trees because growing tall requires more sunlight than is available in the Arctic. A knee-high willow can be many decades old. There are a few stands of alders in protected gulleys - they are the northernmost deciduous trees - but they are small compared to deciduous trees in the forests of the lower 48 states.


The faces of Arctic Dryads follow the sun through the 24 hour Arctic days.


Arctic Lupine and Wild Peas carpet the ground with lovely shades of purple and fill the air with a sweet scent.

And the birds, the birds, the most amazing creatures, some of which migrate thousands of miles to take advantage of the Arctic summer bounty to raise their chicks. There is an abundance of seeds, insects, and other birds (and their eggs) to feast on over the summer. Some birds migrate from South America and even parts of Africa and Asia to spend their summer in the Arctic. There are birds as large as a Sandhill Crane and as small as a Gray-headed Chickadee. There are swans and geese and multitudes of songbirds that sing at all hours. Some of the birds in your backyard today could be in the Arctic in just a few weeks. About 70 species of birds nest and breed in Area 1002. The linked article summarizes the impacts on birds if oil development were to occur.


The Semipalmated Sandpiper, weighing only about an ounce, migrates from the north and central coasts of South America to breed in the Arctic Refuge.


Its well-hidden nest requires vigilance when walking across the tundra. One of the parents will sound an alarm or pretend it has a broken wing to lead you away from the nest.


The flashy Ruddy Turnstone, about the size of a dove, will aggressively chase away Long-tailed Jaegers looking for a scrambled eggs breakfast.


She lays her eggs in a shallow scrape on the ground.


Long-tailed Jaegers spend thier winters at sea. During nesting season, they live on lemmings and other birds' eggs (probably their chicks, too).


Their eggs are about the size of a large chicken egg.


Willow Ptarmigans are year-round residents. They rely on their camoflage to protect them from predators. It doesn't work as well in the summer as in the winter when they are pure white.

I hope these photos give you a sense for the wonders of this place. I'm not a religious person but the Arctic fills me with something spiritual.

Next, of course, is taking the value of "beauty" and turning it into something concrete. First, a few facts to inform our actions.

A brief history (this is a link to Senator Patrick Leahy's page about the Refuge - I like it for its synopsis. There is lots more info available on-line so get out there and Google if you want more):

- The Arctic National Wildlife Range was established in 1960 by President Eisenhower.

- In 1980, President Carter and Congress expanded the Range, renamed it, and set aside the 1.5 million acres of Area 1002 for future potential oil development, subject to approval by Congress.

- Area 1002 is the last 5% of Alaska's northern coastal plain that is not already open to oil and gas development.

- A modest increase in vehicle fuel efficiancy could save far more oil than could ever be produced from the Arctic Refuge.

- Since 1980, there have been many attempts to open up the Refuge for development, rejected each time with bipartisan support.

Another useful resource can be found here. Area 1002 is shown on maps with the distribution of Polar Bear dens, Muskox Habitat, and important stream for fisheries.

OK - as promised in the title of this diary here comes the action item part. Actually, there are several actions identified but participate at the level that works for you.

Recent rhetoric coming from Bush, the Republicans, and the oil companies suggest to me that there is a behind-the-scenes coordinated effort to get drilling in the Arctic Refuge approved before Bush leaves office - by hook or by crook. I could be wrong but I'm sure the above folks are fully aware that the next Congress (and likely next President) will be more likely to pass permanent protection of the Refuge than they will be to approve drilling. So it's their last shot at what they see as a necessity.

Action Item #1
If you have only a little time, please contact Senate Leader Harry Reid, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senator Barbara Boxer (Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee), and Representative John Dingell (Chair of the Committee on Energy and Commerce). Also, your own Congressional representatives. Let them know that you support permanent protection of the Arctic Refuge (including Area 1002), and that you are opposed to any efforts to develop it.

Most Democrats have voted against developing the Refuge but they'll need to know we support them if the debate does become heated. You know the argument - you liberals are more interested in caribou than you are in national security, energy independence, economic prosperity blah blah blah.

Action Item #2
If you can stand to have a little more email, consider signing up for alerts from two fine organizations working on behalf of Arctic Refuge:

Alaska Wilderness League (There's a link on their home page for contacting your reps about Refuge Protection.)

Natural Resources Defense Council Action Center

Both organizations will send timely notices when a phone call or email is needed on legislation, etc.

Action Item #3
If you can afford it, consider a donation to one or both of the above organizations. They do good work. The Alaska Wilderness League is currently fundraising for an education drive. For $5, you can help educate 5 people about the Arctic Refuge and the need to preserve it, $50 will pay for a tabling event.

If you've made it this far, thanks for reading! Together we can make sure that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow is a beautiful unspoiled place shared by all of rather than an oily mess used to line the pockets of a few.

Off-line sources used for this diary:

A Naturalist's Guide to the Arctic (1994) by E.C. Pielou

Guide to the Birds of Alaska (2003) by Robert H. Armstrong

Alaska's Wild Plants: A Guide to Alaska's Edible Harvest (2003) by Janice Schofield

Alaska's Mammal: A Guide to Selected Species (1995) by Dave Smith and Tom Walker

Mammals of Alaska (1996) by Kathy Doogan

Tags: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, ANWR, Alaska, framing, environment, Arctic, birds, wildlife, wilderness, global warming (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 61 comments

    •  Beautiful diary! Some things are worth more... (10+ / 0-)

      ...than a tankful of gas, the elite wealthy, stockholding 5%-ers, or as Bush likes to say, "his base". And I agree on another point you made too:

      Photobucket

      We owe future generations more than a pictoral library of "what the ANWAR used to look like before Big Oil got their greedy hands on it"!

      "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars". William Jennings Bryan

      by ImpeachKingBushII on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:46:29 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I remember as a child in London (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        tgypsy, pigsfly77586

        We had the coal strikes.

        Because of this, the power company would dim the lights half an hour before the power was to go out.  The power would go out and we would set up our candles and put our charcoal grill out on the balcony.

        Because of this, and just a general love of pre-industrial history, I can imagine what life would be like without gasoline or electricity.  And I would probably do just fine.  Even without Daily Kos.  Especially now I have bought a farm.

        How would you manage without electricity or gasoline?

        •  Well. I'd manage well... (0+ / 0-)

          ...your question assumes a premise that I've always had both comodities up to this point in life. I haven't always had them. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who's lived on the streets before, or out of a dumpster, or without a car. It would be rough going, but I did it before and survived through it all. Raised with nine horses, and with an unbreakable code of chivalry and honor, and growing up in a time when a man's word was his bond; I've always felt like I'm living in the wrong century anyway.

          In fact, this afternoon, and in view of the direction our nation is turning, I was just thinking of that possibility again. And I wondered out loud to myself, "how many people could adapt and overcome the culture shock involved, if suddenly our world came crashing down overnight? And what if the dollar fell flat on its face, and everyone who were millionaires became paupers? If those who had never experienced hunger before, or the feeling of not knowing where they would get their next meal, or the next night's sleep in a real bed were; how would they react? Or would they simply cease to exist"?

          The world survived quite well, actually, for thousands of years, when there no "modern" conveniences. It's the modicum of change, the fear of change, and the adapting to change that scares the hell out of people! I think I'm mentally prepared for almost anything that happens, short of a nuclear strike on America by another nation that is just sick and tired of us bullying the world and monopolizing its finite resources, as if it were the world's emperor--and it is not.

          I function best under pressure. What worries me the most is that most people will simply go into panic mode, or they cannot or will not adjust, once the initial panic of going from a 1st-rate superpower, whose former world were their oyster, and who had everything handed to them as a birthright, and every convenience in this life; for them to fall headlong into the depths of poverty overnight, and inconvenience so quickly as if the past were all a whisper and a dream.

          "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars". William Jennings Bryan

          by ImpeachKingBushII on Sun May 04, 2008 at 10:04:11 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  I know (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca, tgypsy

      I had some criticism below, but it's not directed at you or the stunning photo diary you have put together.  

      Nice pictures.  Alaska really is the most beautiful place in the world.

      Think you have all the answers? prove it

      by Snuffleupagus on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:09:11 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Thank You (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca, JVolvo, tgypsy, moose67

      It brought tears to my eyes.  Beautiful diary, fabulous pics and a special shout out to you, tgypsy.  

      The criminal minds of Bush and his ilk are beyond comprehension.  I just hope it's not too late.

      Cheers.

      Another Proud Edwards Democrat.

      by lzachary on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:25:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  We must protect ANWR... (11+ / 0-)

    because there is no reason for us to drill there. We need to get off of oil period, not just foreign oil. It is one of the last true "wilderness" areas left in the world, and we must protect it from exploration.

    Also, I just did a paper about the Exxon Valdez oil spill for my environmental history. We need to stop drilling in Prudhoe Bay and tear down the trans-Alaska pipeline before we have another disaster.

    "The only thing I would trust Dick Cheney on is if I had a dead hooker in my hotel room." --Jon Stewart

    by DemBrock on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:37:46 PM PDT

  •  Great pics, BTW!!! (8+ / 0-)

    "The only thing I would trust Dick Cheney on is if I had a dead hooker in my hotel room." --Jon Stewart

    by DemBrock on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:38:11 PM PDT

  •  I think we should drill there and off the coast (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Snuffleupagus

    but stop leasing any lands for under market value, use every cent of that money to limit oil use (either spent on mass transit infrastructure, renewable non-carbon/centric power infrastructure, etc.)

    and only as part of a much broader plan which takes into account agriculture, shipping [shift to rails, electrify them, localize]  

    I think it's worth it to do the drilling if that drilling will get us the votes to pass a comprehensive plan that will actually get us well on the way to solving all of our problems [we will need to act immediately in winter/spring 2009, and it seems highly unlikely that we'll have the votes to do so/overcome a Senate filibuster without a compromise/concessions; and drilling/nuclear would be the best compromises in that they wouldn't be softening other necessary measures, in my opinion)

    Because all those animals you mention, they're screwed anyway, if we continue as is.

    •  Unless you can actually think of (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Snuffleupagus

      some other way to get Republicans on board; if not that, it'll have to be CTL or no real solution as a concession.

      I'm just noting that now so you can all prepare yourselves for it, as that's the best we can hope for.

    •  I respectfully disagree (12+ / 0-)

      The Arctic Refuge represents compromise already. This last piece of the North Slope needs to be protected.

      •  Why? The animals will mostly be dead under your (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        tgypsy

        scenario because of climate change.

        •  Unless you have an idea on how to get (0+ / 0-)

          Republicans to vote for a comprehensive energy plan that's less damaging.

          Or you think we have any time to wait.

          Cause it seems pretty certain that we won't have 60 non-Alaska Democrats in the Senate come January 2009.

        •  my scenario is to preserve the Arctic Refuge (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          trashablanca

          There's a lot in your original post that I agree with - dealing with the big picture, modifying leasing, etc. What I don't agree with is your conclusion that all of the animals will die if we prevent drilling in the Refuge. Forgive me if I'm being a little dense here but there's seems to be a leap of logic that I'm not following. I understand filibusters and all that but your approach sounds more like destroying the planet to save it - allow drilling everywhere (i.e., continuing dependence on oil) to buy Republican votes on climate change. Please help me understand a little more clearly.

          •  Allow drilling everywhere because (0+ / 0-)

            we will still need oil while we're changing our infrastructure, and that will buy Republican votes to make it happen:

            This plan would ideally include things (in addition to what I said above) like:

            * prohibiting the transport across state lines of materials used to build housing below a certain density  except as part of a plan approved by some sort of Federal Planning Commission (or something like that) * Minimal tax break for building green buildings and an excise tax for buildings not up to green standards [this would hopefully include things like greenroofs and such, except where the roof is covered with solar panels or those other things to collect solar heat] * Excise tax for unsustainable cars [cars getting below  certain gas mileages; this in addition to even higher CAFE standards]

            etc.

            •  so many good ideas (2+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              trashablanca, kafkananda

              but still a conclusion that I can't agree with. It would sorta be like a FISA bill with all the good parts but with telco immunity left in. I certainly hope that we don't have to reach the "compromise" you propose before we can get decent energy policy legislation passed.

              •  As much as I hate to say it, I agree with DL (0+ / 0-)

                Right now, we could work a deal on ANWR.

                But when gas goes over $5, $7 a gallon, the pressure to develop it will be too great.  It will be another gold rush.

                As much as I hate to admit it, as world reserves are depleted, the desperation is going to be incredible.

                Would we be doing the better thing long-term by coming up with a deal now, or waiting until we are at the tipping point?

    •  thank you (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Catesby, DemocraticLuntz, tgypsy

      I tried to say something like this around here years ago and got shouted down bad.

      We could open the 1002 (which is a fraction of ANWR) and limit the allowable footprint.  Use every penny of tax revenue (estimated at hundreds of millions annually) for alternative energy research and/or environmental projects.

      Heck, we could vastly expand the size of national parks.  By opening a million acres on the north slope we could add millions of acres to protected lands.

      Unfortunately this just isn't how the environmentalist movement in this country works.  ANWR is a 'symbol' and opening it for exploration is unthinkable to some, it's  basically holy.

      Think you have all the answers? prove it

      by Snuffleupagus on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:53:30 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Area 1002 (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        trashablanca, kafkananda

        is a fraction of the Refuge but it is the fraction that is critical habitat for the caribou and breeding birds.

        The Refuge is a heck of a lot more than a symbol to me and a lot of other folks for this reason. Everything is connected to everything else.

        So instead of giving up this piece of undisturbed wilderness for other land, why not figure out a way to do both?

    •  Like robbing banks to build prisons... (5+ / 0-)

      ...there isn't enough money-or gasoline in the world to justify, mitigate, or otherwise convince me that destroying that pristene land in the name of Big Oil, makes any sense.

      It's like this attitude Bush has & what Bush has done to the people of Iraq: "I'm gonna make you 'free' if I have to kill every man, woman, and child in Iraq". Everything that man has ever touched has turned to crap! Why should we trust him and his cohorts any more than we already have? Trust is earned. That ship has sailed many moons ago!

      "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars". William Jennings Bryan

      by ImpeachKingBushII on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:57:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  More like killing thousands of innocent Germans (0+ / 0-)

        (and American troops) in order to stop Hitler, Eichmann and the Nazis.

        •  Wat to go DL you just said a thread killer... (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Hardhat Democrat, trashablanca

          ...pal, invoking you know what. That's a cheap way to try and win this debate. Well, I'm not biting today. You got the diarest to agree with you upthread(which I would've died before agreeing with handing the ANWAR over to Big Oil). Now you're invoking this most ridiculous line of argumentation. Oh well, enjoy debating yourself. I'm done here.

          "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars". William Jennings Bryan

          by ImpeachKingBushII on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:04:45 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  you said that (1+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Catesby

            there was no way you would sacrifice ANWR to 'big oil.'

            I think his response point was that sometimes things are such a great threat that you are forced to make big sacrifices.  The debate is just how much you could get in compromise to open ANWR and just how big a sacrifice that would be (I argue that it's a small one, and mostly symbolic at that -- when compared to the environmental sacrifices we make all the time).

            Think you have all the answers? prove it

            by Snuffleupagus on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:11:44 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  Thanks for your analogy (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        trashablanca

        I'm going to ignore the responses down thread...

      •  My theory is (0+ / 0-)

        that although we have only become dependent on oil for the past couple of generations, when it runs out, you will see a massive die-off in the human population.  Although humans have survived through the vast majority of their existence without mechanical power, there is no way we can support our current numbers without oil.

        And humans, without their massive overbreeding, and without their oil, will fade into just another species of mammal and allow the earth to return to a more natural balance.

        Perhaps it will be the rich that will survive.  Temporarily.  But without us 'normal' people, they will soon learn that they have to plant, tend and harvest their own crops (without machinery so it will be a backbreaking job), they will struggle to move materials and build a home, again without machinery.  In short, the rich will become just like the rest of us slobs.

        I don't have children, so I don't really have a vested interest in the future.  But I see the future for humans as being much like the past.  And can we cope with that?

  •  Gorgeous! (11+ / 0-)

    I have been actively fighting the exploitation and desecration of ANWR for 15 years.  Any Democrat who votes for oil exploration or extraction in this virgin area should be vigilently attacked and ousted in a primary.  The future is reduction in all fossil fuels -- not just foreign oil.

    Thank you for a great diary -- and I know it will get a second play in Meteor Blades' Eco-diary roundup on Saturday.

    My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total. Barbara Jordan 1974

    by gchaucer2 on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:39:23 PM PDT

  •  Can't we just (5+ / 0-)

    Leave on little corner of the world alone and not fuck it up?

  •  environmentalists hoodwinked (6+ / 0-)

    c'mon people.  When are we going to realize that ANWR is a gimic?

    The oil companies don't care THAT much about this place.  While environmental activists have managed to prevent ANWR from being opened the Bush administration has raped the environment.  Oil expansion will happen abroad, places like Russia, without the same kind of environmental controls we see in the US.

    It's funny to watch sooooo much lower 48 environmental energy spent on ANWR.  Want to see an environmental disaster in Alaska?  How about googling 'Pebble gold mine' ?   They're trying to construct one of the world's largest open pit mines right in the heart of the state.

    The facts are that neither side really wants ANWR to go anywhere.  The big environmental groups have a cash cow with ANWR cause it's a hot button environmental issue that gets people riled up and giving money (even while the Republicans block measure that could be FAR more important for the environment and we can't seem to get the American people to care).  And, oil companies and big business can enjoy letting people think they've had a major victory over them while they continue to rake in record profits.

    Americans have been played on ANWR.

    you can troll rate me if you want, but I haven't attacked anyone personally or said anything offensive and it depresses me with things on dkos disappear for disagreeing...

    Think you have all the answers? prove it

    by Snuffleupagus on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:50:06 PM PDT

  •  We must also think of the Native Peoples farther (6+ / 0-)

    North that depend on the Caribou for their way of life. The US and Canada have tortured these people enough, and it is time to pay back some of what we owe them. We need a green energy for the future, not more of the same. Our very lives depend on it.

    "Though the Mills of the Gods grind slowly,Yet they grind exceeding small."

    by Owllwoman on Sun May 04, 2008 at 03:58:21 PM PDT

  •  Worth the wait (6+ / 0-)

    for all the wonderful pictures to download on a dialup connection.
     We must keep up the fight.  Jan. '09 can not come soon enough.

    My Karma just ran over your Dogma

    by FoundingFatherDAR on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:01:28 PM PDT

    •  Sorry bout that (2+ / 0-)

      I included "photo" in the title as a warning. Glad you enjoyed the pix.

    •  Cheap DSL (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca, FoundingFatherDAR

      Not to denigrate your ability to afford an internet connection, but googling around can get you some not-very-publicized cheap deals on DSL.

      I saw an article that the phone companies were offering  $15 internet service via DSL (the modem is free) due to some negotiations (with the Feds? I don't remember) and that $10 and $15 monthly plans were available.  

      I love in the San Francisco Bay Area and am paying $15, for a kinda slow but faster than dialup service, plus I don't have to tie up a phone.  And it was cheaper than the $22/month dialup, or $50/month DSL that SBC/AT&T was officially offering.

      http://www.engadget.com/...
      http://arstechnica.com/...

      [/end threadjack]

      Spineless. Blue. Slow. Leaves trail of slime. Hit it with something - if it doesn't hit back, it's a Democrat. -- Bucky looking at a slug in "Get Fuzzy"

      by Lurtz on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:27:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thx. I live mid-peninsula, so will check it out. (0+ / 0-)

        My biggest issue with DSL is I currently rent, so I'm not willing to pay a lot of up-front installation costs (if any) that would be lost when I move to more permanent housing.

        My Karma just ran over your Dogma

        by FoundingFatherDAR on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:59:27 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Beautiful (8+ / 0-)

    I hope this makes it to the rec list.

    As usual, Bush is lying. Interior estimates of recoverable oil have been nearly doubled to increase pressure for lease and exploration.  The second part of the Bush lie is that the production level he describes is the maximum peak production and would be sustainable for months.  The oil will no measurable impact on gas prices. The only benefit will be to the oil companies.  The cost in terms of environmental impact will be great.  

    We do not need independence from foreign oil - we need independence from fossil fuels and other carbon based fuel sources.  

    Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

    by DWG on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:02:20 PM PDT

  •  I must admit I'm a bit envious (5+ / 0-)

    Beautiful photos. It seems so pristine, it is sad to think of it being ruined by global warming, heavy metals, and resource extraction.

    "Interesting. No, wait, the other thing: tedious." -Bender

    by patrickz on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:02:37 PM PDT

  •  Awesome diary! (6+ / 0-)

    Alaska is the only state I've never visited and I just love the pictures!

    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly."

    by Viceroy on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:03:40 PM PDT

  •  The huge fraud about ANWR... (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    trashablanca, dougymi, tgypsy, kafkananda

    ...is that any oil extracted will be part of the world wide pricing structure which is controlled by OPEC. Oil is a fungible commodity we won't get a price break because it's "our oil".
    OPEC is in fact an illegal organization as it is a cartel, but, because it is a cartel made up of governments - the world lets them slide while they screw everyone blind.
    Drilling in ANWR has nothing to do with America's oil supply but it has a great deal to do with the oil company's bottom line.

    "A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy.".... Benjamin Disraeli -8.25 / -5.64

    by carver on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:21:28 PM PDT

    •  I agree about oil prices (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca

      I stayed away from this topic in the diary because I'm not knowledgable enough to take it on here. I do know that I'm tired of having my $s siphoned off to the OPEC countries and oil companies and not getting a whole lot back.

  •  Thank you for this diary. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    trashablanca, tgypsy

    I'll do my part and make some calls, write letters, whatever needs to be done to preserve this beautiful land.

    Here you are with a handful of holes, a thumb up your ass and a big grin to pass the time of day with. - The Wild Bunch

    by jazzence on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:22:56 PM PDT

  •  For those looking for talking points (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    trashablanca, tgypsy

    against GOPers who want to drill in the Arctic Refuge or who claim that we're not drilling enough domestically, I can point you to this post.

    Refuge Watch -- news from America's national wildlife refuges

    by Naturegal on Sun May 04, 2008 at 04:25:04 PM PDT

  •  From what I have read (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    OHdog, tgypsy, pigsfly77586

    the oil extracted from ANWR is dark thick stuff unlike the light sweet crude that comes from the middle east. Most of the Alaskan oil is shipped to Japan and S. Korea for refining and their use. We don't even benefit directly from our own oil!  It would take approximately 8 years for big oil consortiums to set up the equipment to drill and ship ANWR oil at the cost of billions of dollars. It is estimated there is probably only 10-12 years worth of oil there anyway. Why don't the oil companies use those billions to develop alternative energy sources? Then we could save one of the last best wild places on Earth.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - JFK

    by moose67 on Sun May 04, 2008 at 05:18:14 PM PDT

  •  Your photos bring life to ANWR! :) (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tgypsy, moose67

    ... for us folks who often see a 2-dimensional map with borders.  Together with your incredibly well written blog from actual personal experiences at ANWR, your diary is exceptional!  

    And I hope that you'll be able to share many more photos and insights about the diversity of life at ANWR -- its creatures and habitats -- a vital ecosystem that must be protected and preserved.

    OT: Were you also able to record this in video? (ie YouTube or other?)

    Thanks so much for sharing! :)

    •  Thaks so much for your kind words (0+ / 0-)

      No videos unfortunately. Some friends on one trip recorded a few snippets of video on their digital camera but just a minute or two of stuff. I don't think they posted any of it on a public site.

  •  Wow! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tgypsy

    Thanks for the education and personal touch.  You are so lucky to have been there....

    -7.62, -7.28 "We told the truth. We obeyed the law. We kept the peace." - Walter Mondale

    by luckylizard on Sun May 04, 2008 at 05:39:38 PM PDT

  •  2,2 years worth of gasoline for the USA (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    desserae, tgypsy

    And that is if all of the estimated 16 billion barrels was extracted and all was put into gas for the USA. Which is not probable since only about 10 to 12 can be economically extracted. Of course, little to none of that oil will really make it into the lower 48 since like North Slope oil now, the ANWR oil will go to China and the rest of the Far East.

    Personal Freedoms: Born 1215. Wounded 2001. Died 2006. Resurrected: 2009

    by OHdog on Sun May 04, 2008 at 06:12:34 PM PDT

  •  Thanks for this beautiful diary! n/t (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    tgypsy

    "My True Religion Is Kindness" -- The Dalai Lama/---/Do you know why 350ppm is important?

    by JohnnyRook on Mon May 05, 2008 at 12:01:59 PM PDT

Permalink | 61 comments