Daily Kos

Washington Times: Clinton's New Delegate Math

Tue May 06, 2008 at 05:30:23 AM PDT

Christina Bellantoni of the Washington times reported on the efforts of the Clinton campaign to change the fundamentals of the delegate math need to win the election.

Here's the link, summary after the jump.

Hillary Clinton is once again attempting to move the goal posts to suit her candidacy. Her campaign is making the claim that the coveted 2024.5 delegates we all thought were necessary to clinch the nomination is no longer the magic number.

DURHAM, N.C. — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign yesterday tried to redefine the delegate math for securing the Democratic presidential nomination, signaling its willingness to wage a divisive battle with front-runner Sen. Barack Obama through the summer.

...

Top Clinton aides said the nominee must win based on a tally that includes delegates from Florida and Michigan, which held January primaries that were disqualified by party rules. The campaign's "Delegate Hub" Web site identifies 2,208 as the total delegates needed to be nominated, or 183 more than the threshold of 2,025 set by the Democratic National Committee's rules.

"That's what we believe is the standard for deciding this — who has the majority of the total delegates including Michigan and Florida to decide the nomination," said Clinton strategist Geoff Garin.

The article goes on to point out that Sen. Obama could reach the 2024.5 number before the end of the primaries, in spite of the Clinton spin.

Mr. Garin said "neither candidate" will have the needed delegates by June 3 when the last votes are counted in South Dakota and Montana. But Mr. Obama, should he win over a large bloc of superdelegates — elected officials and party activists who help decide the nomination — could get to 2,025 by then.

I know there are definitely clips of her saying "Neither one of us will have the necessary delegates to win" when defending against her coup by superdelegate. Does anybody know if she ever said "Neither one of us will reach the 2024" at one of those occasions, because that would look pretty silly in light of this new argument.

Poll

Isn't that just shameless

62%126 votes
9%19 votes
16%34 votes
10%22 votes

| 201 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Hillary Clinton, Washington Times, Nomination, Delegates (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 22 comments

Permalink | 22 comments