Daily Kos

America's Next Vice President

Wed May 07, 2008 at 07:53:49 AM PDT

The media have apparently come to the conclusion that Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for president with one month left in the primary campaign.  Editors at the national publications and executives at the cable news networks are no doubt disappointed at the imminent end of the primary battle (whether it is this week, May 20, or June 4) and the expanded audience that comes with it.

The Obama campaign can provide these outlets with a new way to capture the public's attention.  A way that pre-empts the traditional lull between the wrapping up of the primaries and the convention.

The Obama campaign should make the summer an exercise in political reality television with a broad casting call for the Vice Presidency.

This summer programming should not be a completely open casting call.  Vetting of contenders ought to limit the number of viable choices down to a manageable number, perhaps eight to ten.  Those candidates would then spend the summer up to early August on the campaign trail making the strongest case possible for why Barack Obama should be president.  Each contender could coordinate message with the Obama campaign and then go off onto the trail with his or her personal spin on the campaign's talking points.  

The result would be a campaign with many surrogates fanning across the nation, surrogates that the media would actively follow to wonder whether each one was America's next Vice President.  Candy Crowley and Nora O'Donnell could continue to follow the several possible #2s diners and county fairs in places like Altoona, PA and Terre Haute, IN.  The voters there would get energized advocates for the Obama campaign coming to town, and the media would get some intrigue to cover.  Imagine CNN's Ballot Bowl working with the following scenario.

It's July 6.  Reporters are spread across the nation seeing the next potential Vice President.

On tonight's program:
Katherine Sibelius is on a flight from Topeka to Columbus, Ohio, where she will talk about solutions to the mortgage crisis.

Virginia Governor Tim Kaine is manning a voter registration table at the state fair in Richmond.  Evan Bayh is doing the same thing at a county fair in Terre Haute, Indiana.

John Edwards and his wife Elizabeth are leading a town hall in Athens, Ohio, ridiculing John McCain's health care plan as one that will not insure seriously ill Americans.

Wes Clark is in Tyler, Texas talking about how the Iraq War needs to end and focusing on improvements in the VA.

Bill Richardson is in Tuscon, Arizona discussing the end of the war as well.

Also talking about the war, Joe Biden is holding a town hall in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Russ Feingold is giving a speech in Beloit, Wisconsin savaging John McCain's support of the Patriot Act.

Chris Dodd is in a town hall in Concord, New Hampshire, discussing the Obama campaign's restoration of habeas corpus.

Hillary Clinton
is talking to customers in a diner in Doylestown, Pennsylvania about health care costs.  Meanwhile, her husband Bill is on a bus tour across rural Arkansas talking about how he believes in the audacity of hope.

You get the idea.  These politicians (and others I have not mentioned) would talk about the issues they are already talking about, framed so that they would be part of the Democratic nominee's platform.  Yet because of the intrigue over whether any single one would become the next Vice President, all would get media coverage as they advocate on behalf of the Obama-??? ticket.

Instead of getting one high-profile surrogate for the summer campaign by selecting a running mate in June or July, Obama would have several fanning out across all 50 states, expanding the effective reach of the campaign without exhausting any one person.  He could also see how effective and energetic these surrogates are at making his case.  The race for the vice presidency would also create a media narrative of a Democratic party unified towards a common goal -- reclaiming the White House.  The Clintons would be shown out on the stump tireless advocating for a candidate they had been fighting for months as Wolf Blitzer and Tim Russert speculate whether Hillary would be on the ticket.  Chris Dodd and Joe Biden would get regular appearances on Face the Nation and This Week as the shows speculate whether either man might be the nominee.

Two weeks or so before the convention, Barack Obama could make his selection public (a selection that of course involves vetting beyond simply seeing how good the candidates are on the stump, extending to who he feels comfortable having on the ticket), followed by a joint tour across the nation to Denver.  All of the putative VP candidates would get speaking slots at the convention, and perhaps more of them would get airtime on TV due to the coverage of them over the previous few weeks on the trail.

The ticket could then campaign on through the fall, and perhaps (just perhaps) the media might give a little more oxygen to the remaining surrogates as they discuss the importance of a Democrat in the White House on specific issues.  The party is seen as unified, the surrogates get more coverage, Obama gets a lot of high-profile people out on the trail for him in every corner of the nation, and the media gets some kind of horse race to pull them through the dog days of summer with increased audiences and ad revenue.

I can think of worse summer programming.

Tags: 2008, elections, president, vice president, Democratic Party, media (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 28 comments

  •  Anyone but... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    lams712

    Bill Richardson or Hillary Clinton.


    ````
    peace

    Basketball Diary - Will Obama Be the First Hoopster in the WhiteHouse?

    by peace voter on Wed May 07, 2008 at 07:54:52 AM PDT

  •  tips (5+ / 0-)

    There's a lot of air time to fill between the end of the primaries and the end of August.  Why not structure a narrative so that all that time is spent covering campaighn surrogates rather than inventing scandals?  

  •  OBAMA-BILL BRADLEY 2008 (0+ / 0-)

    85% of New Jersey Vote

  •  Anyone but Clinton, Bayh, or LIEberman. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Urizen, lams712

    No more DINOS!!!!!

    St. Ronnie was an asshole.

    by manwithnoname on Wed May 07, 2008 at 08:09:02 AM PDT

  •  How about a western kid? (3+ / 0-)

    What better way for Obama to make friends in Denver than picking someone like Mark Udall, the Rep from Boulder?  Just a thought.

  •  How about Claire McCaskill? (4+ / 0-)

    She can sound sweet while being extremely tough. She knows how to handle the media. She's a moderate and a white woman from the Midwest who would help the ticket in the Midwest and the Mountain West, including New Mexico, Washington and Oregon.

    •  I agree, but... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      magi

      MO really sucks for Democrats. We got lucky to have a strong candidate in her last time around. We're not likely to be able to replace her with a Dem if she becomes Veep. I'd rather go with someone just as charismatic, but without the downside of leaving a black hole behind.

      Someone like a former governor would be a better choice.

      •  My argument for McCaskill is that she is a killer (0+ / 0-)

        ... campaigner. Sebelius, not so much. McCaskill is very good with media. She takes shit from no one and she can do it in a way that does seem belligerent.

      •  I'm in Missouri (0+ / 0-)

        and honestly, the only reason she won was due to the fact that Talent was a do nothing yes man.  The seat would go red for sure.  I'm still not convinced she'll retain her seat the next time around..  JMHO

        "I served my country. I played High School Football!" -Al Bundy

        by magi on Wed May 07, 2008 at 08:50:43 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  indeed (0+ / 0-)

      She's already proven herself as an effective surrogate.  The list above is by no means exclusive, and I wouldn't mind CNN covering a dozen or more Democrats as they make the case for an Obama presidency.

  •  Totally agree... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Nuisance Industry, lams712

    but I'd add Janet Napolitano to the list.  Jim Webb might also get a tryout.

  •  Kate Sebelius.... (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Urizen, magi

    ....would be a great choice and would push forward the "change" theme. Coosing somone with "experience" like Webb or Clark, etc. would be tacitly admitting a "weakness". If Obama wants to frame the campaign as being about CHANGE, he would be wise (in my humble opinion) to not play into Republican hands and make "security" a big issue. Most polls show the economy, healthcare, etc. are the most important issues. The war is big too, but the country is largely in an anti-war mood, so I just don't think "security" will be that big a deal if we don't make it one. The perception of "security" is McCain's only possible advantage over Obama, so we shouldn't even acknowledge it.

    "...if my thought-dreams could be seen, they'd probably put my head in a guillotine...." {-8.13;-5.59}

    by lams712 on Wed May 07, 2008 at 08:16:39 AM PDT

  •  Richardson is the most obvious choice (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    lams712

    I think it's trayze important for us to dispel the notion that we're basically an east coast party.  For me that disqualifies Dodd, Kaine, Webb, and Biden.

    Hillary just plain nooooooo.

    I used to think Wes Clark would be perfect, but we've moved away from needing the military cred as much as we need economic cred.  Besides, much as I love him (he was my preferred candidate for pres before Barack got into it) he's not a particularly good politician.

    I must admit I don't know a lot about Sibelius.  If I did I might think differently.

    Richardson has a lot of upsides: executive experience, westerner, hispanic, DC cred, former Clintonista, decent if low key campaigner, diplomat experience.  And a beard (for the all important facial hair demographic).

  •  the next v.p. (0+ / 0-)

    former sen. lincoln chaffee. he voted against the war and is moderate on the social issues and may bring in a few more republicans disgusted with the lunatic fringe.

  •  National Security, Patriotism (0+ / 0-)

    The GOP will make this election about national security, patriotism, national security, national security, patriotism, and national security.

    And they will make Obama's first four years about that as well.  For forty years, since the wake of Vietnam, Democrats have struggled miserably- miserably- with our image and credibility on matters of national security and defense.  And the GOP has exploited this lethally.

    President Obama will have to extract us from the Iraq War, re-tool the conflict in Afghanistan, begin a proper search for Osama bin Laden, dramatically alter the PATRIOT Act, and radically overhaul the entirety of our war on terror.  And with any move he makes, right or wrong, President Obama will be labeled a retreat-nick, a terrorist appeaser, a weakener of our military, and just another clueless Democrat who doesn't understand defense.  The national security tasks ahead are enormous, they are complicated, and they are extraordinarily messy.  Mistakes along the way are a guarantee.  No president could hope to navigate an error-free course out of the Bush mess.  And just as Democrats have been getting drilled on national security for 40 years, Obama will get drilled anytime there is a mistake- and even when there isn't one.

    The ONLY formidable defense against this is a VP who brings unassailable national security credibility and unassailable patriotism to the table.

    And it is shortsighted every time people bring up the laundry list of domestic policy Democrats.  I don't care what an adorable netroots darling your fave VP choice is.  Get over it.  This isn't just about Obama's electability.  This isn't just about Obama's presidency.  This is about healing the single greatest weakness of the Democratic Party.  This is about ambitiously re-defining what it means to be a Democrat.  This is about putting our party in a greater position of strength than it has seen since FDR.

    You have three choices:

    General Wes Clark, Senator Jack Reed, Senator Jim Webb.

    And Webb has disqualified himself on so many fronts, that you have two choices:

    General Wes Clark: NATO Supreme Allied Commander, living legend

    Senator Jack Reed: Army Ranger and Paratrooper, one of the most Progressive politicians in America.

    A or B.  Take your pick.  And please spare us the cutesy domestic choices.  We don't have that luxury.

  •  Oh swell... (0+ / 0-)

    politics meets American Idol?

    "You have attributed conditions to villainy that simply result from stupidity"

    by newfie on Wed May 07, 2008 at 08:38:35 AM PDT

Permalink | 28 comments