Daily Kos

PBS "Carrier": A Mixed Blessing

Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:36:26 PM PDT

Watching the PBS series "Carrier" was a revelation, but not always a pleasant one...

The PBS documentary "Carrier" was an eye-opener, especially for an old civilian such as me. As a retired high school teacher I was particularly interested in the kids as they told their stories, especially since, as any teacher watching the series would attest, we’ve known these kids, shared their lives and heard these same stories.

We’ve nurtured these kids, wheedled and cajoled them, laughed and cried with them, and when all the motivational tricks failed we’ve probably all thrown up our hands and sent ‘em down to the office. So it was a revelation to see that archetypal wiseass who was the bane of your existence for up to four years trying real life on for size, and for the most part finding it a pretty good fit.

From that perspective, then, the series was a truly rewarding experience. But certain aspects of the show were troubling, particularly segment on religion and faith. I approached the hour with a fair measure of misgiving, having been following, and covering, the heavy-handed attempt to Christianize the military that has reached crisis proportions and shows no signs of letting up.

Frankly, I expected this hour to reveal a bunch of wild-eyed Christian warriors piloting the USS Jesus, nee Nimitz, toward her inevitable rendezvous with her millennial destiny. Instead, we were shown what appeared to be a paradigm of religious tolerance and diversity, with any number of Protestant and Catholic observances taking place. There was even a small coven of practicing Wiccans aboard, a handful of Muslims and at least one token Jew who maintained he’d not been hassled at all.

Part of me wanted desperately to believe what I was seeing, since it seemed to fly in the face of all that I’d heard, read and reported. Perhaps, I thought, there may still be some reasonably enlightened religious folk, especially among the chaplain corps, who actually get it and were playing by the rules because they thought it was the right thing to do.

On the other hand, I told myself, this series was produced by Mel Gibson, whose own track record on religious tolerance is of course dubious at best. What also started bouncing around in my brain pan was the old adage that if it sounds too good to be true it probably is. So I got in touch with Mikey Weinstein of the MIlitary Religious Freedom Foundation, who has been the point man on this issue for some time now, to get his take on the series, particularly the religion segment.

Weinstein had indeed watched the show, and he too was concerned that art was not exactly imitating life where matters of shipboard faith were concerned. In fact, among the nearly 8,000 service people and their families who have contacted the MRFF with concerns, complaints and anguished cries for help are a dozen or so from the Nimitz. Because of sensitivity and security concerns, and that fact that these are open cases, Weinstein would not elaborate on the nature of the grievances, but he did characterize a couple of the incidents as "vicious."

Regrettably, this appears to be consistent with the tone and substance of many of the cases that have been widely reported, from the Weinstein family’s own ordeals at the Air Force Academy to the story of Jeremy Hall, the atheist GI whose personal safety has been threatened by fellow soldiers after news of his lawsuit against the Army went public.

So, as much as I would like to believe what I saw in the faith segment, it appears that we may have been shown a Potemkin facade, at least as far as a truly balanced presentation is concerned. And that’s a shame, because a lot of what we did see appeared to portray the American religious experience at its freewheeling best. But just as much of a large ship’s activity takes place below the water line, and therefore remains largely unseen, so too, it seems, can a similar case be made for an unseen current of religious extremism flowing unchecked below the line, under the radar, out of sight, out of mind.

On balance, therefore, "Carrier" was a mixed blessing. It was well crafted, and at its best insightful and moving. It’s just too bad that there couldn’t have been a little more filmic  and intellectual honesty devoted to an issue that remains, to our national detriment, the elephant in the room.

Tags: pbs, carrier, mikey weinstein, mrff, mel gibson (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 22 comments

  •  Looking for trouble and finding it? (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ladybug53

    I didn't see the show, but every time good old Mikey's name comes up, I start reaching for the salt.

  •  I thoroughly enjoyed the series (7+ / 0-)

    Worth watching.  Especially for someone who has never served in the military and comes from a long line of people who, when drafted, do their time and get the hell out.

    A different world.  I'm sure some major editing occurred, but I still found it refreshingly honest.  There's not much from the armed services that's honest these days.  At least there was some criticism of the Navy and the war.

    My dogs think I'm smart and pretty.

    by martydd on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:44:31 PM PDT

    •  My experience on a carrier in another war (10+ / 0-)

      another century is that yes, religious services were available, but on my ship only a couple hundred sailors attended services and most not very regularly.

      Never once was I ever asked, induced, ordered or intimidated to attend services of any kind.  I did attend a memorial service for two shipmates who died, but that was it.  There was absolutely no pressure to attend religious services, and there was no tension between religions.  I never saw it.

      I expect that this program had some focus on the religious issue because it is intended for wide dissemination, and at some level is a recruitment vehicle.

      I would say the portrayal of flight deck life is accurate, but the program somewhat skimps on showing what life is like in a large berthing area, where maybe 100 or 200 sailors are confined to living in a very small area. Remember that there are 5000 men and women on a ship that is 1/4 mile long.  There was no look at this aspect of life.

      Also not a whole lot of information about the less glamorous parts of the life of a sailor.  The only thing they showed somewhat is work in the kitchens, which is grueling and long.  The young woman was accurate in her dislike of that part of the work, which is called "mess cooking" which many low ranking sailors go for some period of time before moving to what they are actually trained to do.  Food is generally served about 22 hours a day on a carrier, and the job is never done.

      I suspect that for about 4800 sailors on that ship, religion rarely enters their mind.  For those who want to partake, their needs are taken into account.  To me, this is not anything like the stories that have come out of the Air Force Academy.

  •  I saw some of the episodes and thought it (6+ / 0-)

    was a pretty amazing series. The crew just let it all out and barely held anything back. It seemed a lot of them came from places that were run down and they felt they weren't going anywhere. It was really eye opening.

  •  My ex-Navy husband saw some of it (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ladybug53

    and thought it was quite good.

    Obama's my candidate! Fired up in Texas - let's turn Texas BLUE!

    by blue armadillo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:47:31 PM PDT

  •  I liked this series (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ohwilleke, ladybug53, lgmcp

    It's basically like living in a college dorm but with less room and more discipline. And as a gay man I found the attitude of most on the ship towards other gay service men and women to be pretty progressive. Frankly I was a little shocked about how open some on the ship were.

    the shane life The story of a boy alone in New York City. God help the city.

    by Shane Hensinger on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:50:56 PM PDT

  •  I found it interesting. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ladybug53, lgmcp

    I thought the religious segment was too long, especially the Pentacostal service, which went on and on.

    The most disturbing part to me was the Marine who was in charge of sexual harassment/abuse education. Did he rape the female airman? I think so. We later see him being promoted and trying to reconnect with his wife after returning home. I hope his wife watched the series.

    I had no idea Mel Gibson had anything to do with it.

    •  Good point (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      roses, ladybug53

      I too found the incident with the Marine to be a bit disquieting.
      However, it raises an interesting point. If the armed services can essentially adopt a sexual harrassment policy of no-means-no, why shouldn't the same principle apply to any unwanted personal advances, including unwanted religious evangelizing or proselytizing?
      Just a thought...

  •  like serving fast food (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ladybug53
    My friend who watched the series said something interesting about it.
      She went to a fast food joint and it reminded her of the way people worked on an aircraft carrier.
       I thought that was pretty profound.
  •  Don't know about the religious aspect (7+ / 0-)

    because I missed the faith segment.  Maybe PBS will rebroadcast the series.  During my entire 20 year naval career (1976-96), I never observed or experienced any religious pressure, intolerance, etc.  It's possible that the evangelicals have changed things since my time.  My gut feeling, based on things I've read in the last few years, is that it's not so much in the Navy, but it's more prevalent in the Air Force.

    From my experience as a catapult officer on USS Enterprise, 1984-1986, the show did an excellent job of showing the lives of our sailors.  Much has changed in the last 20+ years.  There were no women on carriers back in the day.  There were no phone calls home from the middle of the Persian Gulf.  Email hadn't made it into the fleet back then.  But the daily grind of life aboard a carrier is otherwise unchanged.  The kids who routinely work 18 hour days are the most underpaid public servants this country will ever know.  I'm proud to have served with them.

    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others. - Groucho Marx

    by VALuddite on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:02:08 PM PDT

    •  I was an enlisted man on a conventional (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ladybug53

      carrier during Vietnam.  On our cruise we launched and recovered over 15,000 planes (long cruise).

      I agree with your assessment and it squares with what I said in a comment above.

    •  Same here (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      ladybug53

      I was on 'gators, but I never saw overt proselytizing.  I dropped into the RP's space one to check out their library, pretty cool, and they usually scheduled good stuff for port visits.   That was very cool.

      The chaplains were busy, all faiths, doing general admin and personnel stuff, but I was never harassed or coerced.

      Now, in boot camp, we were marched to chapel, voluntarily, but it was a quiet peaceful place to take a nap away from the instructors.

      Those who hear not the music-think the dancers mad

      by Eiron on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:41:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  One of the virtues of a carrier (3+ / 0-)

    which in turn operates as part of a larger carrier group of several ships with hundreds more sailors each, is that the operation is so large, and the practical necessity of bureaucratic compliance is sufficiently great, that they have to operate "by the book" to function.

    Also, life in the Air Force and Navy hasn't changed a lot as a result of the two regional wars we are fighting at the moment (in Iraq and Afghanistan), because very few members of those forces have direct, on the ground contact with hostile forces.

    For 97% of the people in a carrier group, there are few practical difference between engaging in exercises and conducting training flights on one hand, and engaging in the low level combat operations (like small bombing runs, interdiction and anti-piracy actions) they are enountering now.  Even Navy pilots who actually end up dropping bombs in war zones are often doing so from high altitudes, with modest personal risk relative to training operations (because ground threats have mostly been eliminated and there are no enemy aircraft), and are basically implementing information from forward observers to drop guided bombs.

    Our sailors and airmen aren't commoning home, for the most part, dead, or with PTSD, brain injuries, and shatter limbs.  

    "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities" -- Voltaire

    by ohwilleke on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:46:34 PM PDT

    •  Even in Little Tiny Commands (0+ / 0-)

      a sub crew might only be 60-80 men, but trust me, everything is always by the book.

      As for your last sentence, I'm sorry to say that significant numbers of our sailors and airmen have been drafted into Iraq for ground duty.  Some of them are sharing in the same fate as combat troops (don't forget the Marine's medics).  Very distressing.

      Stop rewarding bad behavior.

      by FLDemJax on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:09:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I Agree (0+ / 0-)

    with the sentiment of the rest of the Navy folk who have spoke up about religion. In my branch of the Navy, submarines, there was never any issue about religion one way or the other. If anything, devoutly religious people were the victims of some friendly ribbing about it. I never saw any proselytizing or serious pressure to become any religion. Just like in Carrier, there was every religion imaginable. - I was in '74 - '94.

    To the rest, yes. It is amazing that we can take a bunch of kids and turn them into men who can do amazing things, like run an aircraft carrier, fly planes, and drive around under the ocean.

    Stop rewarding bad behavior.

    by FLDemJax on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:05:49 PM PDT

Permalink | 22 comments