Daily Kos

Hillary's New Path to the Nomination

Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:13:57 AM PDT

It seems Hillary Clinton's new path to the nomination has been forged. Based on her and her strategist's statements over the last day or two, this path rests on one bold claim: Obama can't win white voters and is therefore unelectable.

Here's what their path to the nomination looks like:

Today: Hillary and her team drop not-too-subtle cues to the media that Obama cannot win the "working, hard-working Americans, white Americans" Democrats need in November. They will say Obama's support among white Americans is dwindling.

May 13: Hillary wins West Virginia by 20 points.

She holds a huge celebration/rally. Hillary thanks her supporters and again questions why Obama is struggling with the white working class. She will talk about how West Virginia is a traditional Democratic state, a "swing state" if she is the nominee against McCain. She will point to the primary results as proof that only she can beat the Republicans in West Virginia.

The re-energized media will ignore the fact that Obama was never favored to win West Virginia. Eager for the horserace to continue, the media will pick up Hillary's narrative. The media will wonder aloud if Rev. Wright has "scared away" white voters. They will ask whether Obama can beat John McCain in November without the support of white voters, while ignoring his strong support among whites in earlier states.

Meanwhile, Hillary continues to plead with supers to hold their endorsememnts until June 3 when "all voters will have had a chance to be heard." Hillary, Bill and Chelsea blanket Oregon.

May 20: Hillary wins Kentucky decisively and makes Oregon "closer than expected."

"What's wrong with Obama?" the Hillary camp will ask again. "Why can't he close the deal?" She will point to Kentucky exit polls showing her strong support among hard-working whites. She will claim a "comeback" in Oregon where she was down by "20 points" just a month earlier. She will more strongly than ever make the argument that Obama cannot win the general election without white support. Howard Wolfsen will talk about how voters are giving "a second critical look at Barack Obama" and how "Hillary has proven she can win the states that matter."

The media will play along. "Obama's White Problem" will be the topic of the Sunday morning and cable news shows. More clips of Rev. Wright will be played. The question "is Obama too black" will be asked.

June 1: Hillary wins Puerto Rico, as she has been favored to do for months. A huge celebration will follow. Hillary will claim to have strong broad-based support among hard-working whites, blacks, Hispanic and Latino voters.

With Obama's perceived "white problem" firmly implanted in the media, Hillary campaigns hard in Montana and South Dakota, hoping for positive movement in the polls.

June 3: Hillary hopes to win at least one, maybe both, of the states. If she can perform better than the expectations, she will claim a tie -- or an outright victory. If she can pick up even a handful of superdelegates after June 3, she will use it as "proof" that the nomination isn't sealed. She will then take the nomination to the convention floor.

*  *  *  *  *

Of course, this is only speculation. My hunch is that Hillary won't have the resources to pull this off unless she dips heavily into her own bank account. And I'm not sure there's the stomach among top Democrats to see this strategy played out; someone would step in and end it. But if she were to go down this path, it has the potential to further divide and polarize the electorate and damage Obama in the process.

UPDATE: Math won't matter to Hillary. They've already made that clear.

Tags: Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, white voters (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 40 comments

  •  There's a problem with the narative (9+ / 0-)

    May 20: Barack Obama exceeds the 1627 pledged delegates threshold to take a majority of all available pledged delegates. Combined with Super Delegates, Barack Obama exceeds the rewuired 2025 delegates for nomination.

    Obama is declared the winner.

    Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities.

    - Albert Einstein

    by Walt starr on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:16:28 AM PDT

    •  This strategy is like the Iraq war (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Samer, Catte Nappe

      Just like the neocons who thought it would be a "slam dunk" to oust Saddam and bring democracy to Iraq.

      It's a plan, not a very good plan, but a plan nonetheless.

      Who cares if there is still no chance for her to be the nominee, she seems compelled to keep moving on, damn the consequences.

  •  You forgot Hillary's position on MI and FL (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Samer, orangeuglad

    A key part of her strategy has to be seating those delegations in a way that is favorable to her.  She is now proclaiming the exclusion of those delegations as a civil rights issue.

  •  Race politics (0+ / 0-)

    John W. McCain, Bush's third term.

    by aaraujo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:18:19 AM PDT

  •  I fear this too (5+ / 0-)

    but I don't think she'll be within single digits in Oregon.  They are already voting by mail right now, and the Obama inevitability claims by the media will probably put Oregon away.  Obama will be going there on Friday and Saturday just to make sure.

    I think Obama may carry Oregon by a Wisconsin size margin or more.

    And Clinton will win WV and KY by 25-30% margins.  And quite frankly, Obama would have lost these states even if Clinton dropped out today.  He would have lost these states to Uncommitted if Clinton was not on the ballot.

    John McCain's Something for Everyone Plan: Military draft for youth, SS benefit cuts for elderly, Middle Class destruction, stock market plunge for wealthy.

    by IhateBush on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:18:51 AM PDT

  •  it was over at the end of Feburary... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    slinkerwink, Caelian, Shhs

    why couldn't Hilary win once in 11 contests...

    if was over before march started and it was Hilary's inability to take a single contest during that time that ended it...just took a while for the body to realize the head was removed...

    g

    There is no trickle down, because greed expands to absorb any excess. DevilsTower

    by thegelding on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:19:23 AM PDT

  •  I think you're right on target. (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    jeepdad, Samer

    The Clinton campaign is blowing race-baiting dog whistles left right and center.  Hillary is all about triangulating.  She'll keep blowing that dog whistle until it starts to sink in with her 'base' - whites without college educations - that Obama is the 'black' candidate.  Whether it's true or not, that's the narrative she wants.  Ultimately, this triangulation comes this way - she either forces the Party to give her the nomination, convincing them that Obama is unelectable, or she poisons his well so that he loses in November and she can run again in 2012.  

    I think this her strategy.

    •  Hopefully the Obama campaign has a strong (0+ / 0-)

      under the radar message system to contact the super-delegates. They need to understand that political self-immolation is not in their own political self interest.

      But I see signs this is happening.

      Dan Gelber

      George McGovern

      Jennifer McClellan

      Obama needs to tread carefully and woo obvious Clinton-ista types to jump ship first in order to blunt a counter-attack based on HRC being "ganged up" on. Good timing shall be essential (not too fast and not too slow) but thus far Obama's campaign knows the right political rhythms to play.

      If Barack Obama drew a line in the sand and Harry Reid stepped across it, then what?

      by Bill White on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:32:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  You forgot 5/31 (0+ / 0-)

    Get FL & MI delegates counted in her favor...at the DNC Rules Committee meeting

    Obama/Whoever He Chooses '08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

    by dvogel001 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:22:11 AM PDT

  •  Schuler withdraws endorsement (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Caelian, jeepdad, Scarce, Catte Nappe, Shhs

    From (of all sites) Fox News:

    There were reports that another superdelegate, North Carolina Rep. Heath Shuler, was endorsing Clinton. But he later said he was not endorsing anybody. Rather, he said he would pledge his support at the August convention to whomever won the popular vote in his district, if the nomination is still up for grabs. Clinton won his district.

    So basically he's saying "I'll endorse during the convention but not before." And if Clinton is forced to drop out before it? Then obviously Obama, the only remaining candidate, won his district.

    Robert A. Howard, Tangents Reviews

    by Tangent101 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:22:37 AM PDT

  •  you forgot to mention the confederate flag (6+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Caelian, mndan, GW Chimpzilla, cph, Shhs, Julia C

    pantsuit and her great great grandfather, jefferson davis

    from bulgaria, with love

    by memofromturner on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:23:04 AM PDT

  •  Calm down with the paranoia (4+ / 0-)

    This campaign is too heated to end abruptly.

    Let it spin down.  Let her go through WV and KY.  Let her speak to her own supporters so they know she is ending it on her own terms, otherwise they will be less likely to come home.

    Just because she is not out in front in a hair-shirt begging your forgiveness for ever challenging the Annointed Obama doesn't mean she is plotting to destroy the party she has dedicated her life to.

    Thinking men can not be ruled. --Ayn Rand

    by Wisper on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:24:15 AM PDT

    •  If Hillary is wanting to "wind down" the campaign (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      housesella, sheddhead, Erik W, meatwad420

      why is she out there talking about Obama's problems with working class white voters? Should'nt she be talking about the importance of these voters  supporting the Democratic nominee in November -- whether it's Obama or herself?

      Don't Legitimize Fox News.
      "Democrats have the heart to care."

      by jeepdad on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:34:09 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Once Obama took and held the lead (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    slinkerwink, Samer, Shhs

    the only way Hillary could win was for the super delegates to take the nomination away from a fabulous candidate who happens to be black.  Even on my worst days in this campaign I have never believed that will happen--the supers are Party people and, for the most part, will be too smart to permanently alienate this important part of our coalition.

    Ironically, Hillary's distasteful talk about 'hard-working white voters' is making it harder for the super delegates to do what she wants.

    It's over.  We just have to wait for the closing ceremonies now.

  •  As far as the Clintons are concerned, it is never (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    yellowdog, pikkel, heart4idaho

    over. I think you always have to anticipate what your enemy is planning and counter it. Make no mistake with all the happy talk by Barack and Hillary on Tuesday night, the Clintons are the enemy. Too many times in this campaign, we all thought Obama was the nominee and Hillary came back. When you are ruthless and will do anything to win, you have nothing to lose, so you try anything, as offensive as it might be. I think the Obama campaign should try really hard to cut down her margins in W. VA and Kentucky, they have the resources, as well as maintaining their lead in Oregon. They are never going to let go of Florida and Michigan, and are using it for all it's worth, even to the extent of making those people vote Republican in the General. I think the Clintons care nothing about bringing the party together, they only care about winning, and will do whatever they have to to achieve that goal.

  •  The Clintons may pursue this (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Samer, Shhs

    however who will follow them? Rahm Emmanuel for example. Or Ed Rendell?

    The most loyal loyalists might prefer political self immolation to drinking the Obama Kool-Aid but how many others truly desire to go down with the ship? All at great cost to their own political future.

    Super-delegates are weather-vanes IMHO (especially the elected ones). How do THEY benefit personally from standing with Clinton if she does this?

    If Barack Obama drew a line in the sand and Harry Reid stepped across it, then what?

    by Bill White on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:26:53 AM PDT

  •  I think you have captured their plan.... (0+ / 0-)

    This is what they are going for.  Will it work?  I doubt it.  But who knows? Now that the media narrative has changed, the Clintons might have a hard time getting this result.  But that won't stop them.  They are being driven now by voices only they can hear.

    Any party that would lie to start a war would also steal an election.

    by landrew on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:27:28 AM PDT

  •  I wonder how it will play if... (0+ / 0-)

    Our presidential nominee dips into her own pockets for campaign money when McCain takes public financing.  Or when Democratic Congressional candidates run against self-funding Republicans and are powerless to criticize them because Clinton is self funding herself as well.

    Hmm, I doubt the Clinton campaign can see past tomorrow.  I would love to see their strategy memo from 2007, when they envisioned how this nomination fight would proceed.  That would be an eye opener.

    If what you suggest above is indeed what the Clinton camp is planning, odds are that it won't go as planned for them again.

    Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come -- Victor Hugo

    by BasharH on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:34:44 AM PDT

  •  You mean.. (0+ / 0-)

    the "I Win Whites, And He's Black?" strat?

  •  Clintons cannot execute this plan alone (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Caelian, Shhs

    They need allies, allies willing to risk political self destruction if they get it wrong.

    The current signs point towards weakness among Camp Clinton super-delegates and little or no weakness among Camp Obama super-delegates.

    If Barack Obama drew a line in the sand and Harry Reid stepped across it, then what?

    by Bill White on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:38:58 AM PDT

  •  Additionally, (0+ / 0-)

    they can hold their breath for a major Obama toe-stubbing.  Thanks for deliberating on the plan, potentially. I've been curious about what is said inside the Clinton tent. Don't you wonder? Now there's a diary idea.  

    Stay calm, cool, collected.

    by heart4idaho on Thu May 08, 2008 at 07:46:35 AM PDT

  •  They're in for a rude awakening... (0+ / 0-)

    ...if they think they can convince South Dakota to move into the Clinton column.  The farm bill with the Orwellian name, the "Freedom to Farm Act," which basically was the Gingrich Congress' way of converting the farm subsidy system into a lucrative trough for big agribusiness, was only 12 years ago, and did serious damage to family farm operations.  Folk remember that, and that Bill Clinton gladly triangulated along with it.  Farm Bureau types might still defend it, but they're more likely to be Republicans.

    Prog

    "No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream." --MLK

    by Progressive Witness on Thu May 08, 2008 at 09:18:25 AM PDT

Permalink | 40 comments