Skip to main content

A friendly warning to everyone (including myself) who is celebrating the unprecedented success of the Obama money machine: be careful what you wish for.

There are many factors in the perfect political storm that is forming around Obama: outrage at the Iraq war, generational shifts in key American communities, and the extraordinary charisma of the candidate himself, among others. But none is more important than the arrival of such a fresh and appealing political persona right at the moment when Web 2.0 social networking has matured to where it is a viable political tool. As a result, the outsider candidate is awash in a pile of cash that dwarfs anything the country has ever seen, a sum not even dreamed of by even the most callous and corrupt insiders of old: over a quarter of a billion dollars so far, and he is two months away from even being declared the nominee. Sources in the Obama campaign are saying the campaign may bring in $100 million more in June alone.

From the outset, pundits had predicted this might be the first US presidential campaign in which the sum total of money raised by all candidates topped $1 billion. Take the curve of Obama’s fundraising over the last few months and project out through November, and it appears that Obama could raise a billion dollars by himself!

Among Obama supporters, like myself, this has been celebrated as an Internet-driven turning of the tables on the kind of money politics that has dominated America for so long. 1.5 million people have given Obama money, and nearly half of them have made donations of $200 or less. (All these small donors – who the campaign is in regular contact with via email – can legally give much more, which is one reason why it might not be that far-fetched to extrapolate his current fundraising curve for 5 more months.)

Surely this sort of opening-up of political campaign financing has to be counted as a huge victory for democracy, right? All those years of hype about the democratic potential of the Internet are finally coming to fruition.

There is another side to this, however, that I think it is important to keep in mind: national American politics is now going to be much more expensive than it has ever been, by a long shot.

Some perspective: in 2004, GW Bush raised $367 million, a historic record. Obama will raise more than that before the convention.

Or look at it this way: just under half of Obama’s contributions have been in amounts of $200 or less. For demonstration purposes, let’s say that the average small donation was $100. If you do the math, that works out to small donors giving Obama $70 million, leaving big donors responsible for $200 million. With luck someone with better data than I have will respond to this blog with more detailed numbers. Whatever the actual numbers are, it will work out that the huge majority of Obama’s money has come donations over, not under, $200.

Yes, this is a wonderful thing that the Internet has democratized political financing in an unprecedented way. What is even better, the fact that the progressive guy figured out the new money regime first may catapult him from freshman senator to the White House, opening one of the most exciting chapters in American political history.

But it is not insignificant that in the process, vast sums of money are flooding into the political arena. Remember that until we suddenly found ourselves on top, most of us Obama supporters thought it was crucial to make American politics less expensive, not more.

What will be the real long term impact of all this on American politics? I don’t know, and I think anyone who claims they can see into that crystal ball needs to calm down. When the smoke has cleared, I think we will find that, as is so often the case, new technology once widely adopted, won’t make anything better: rather, it will take our same old problems and play them out again, with slightly different dynamics, but on a much larger scale.

Originally posted to Think Harder on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 01:30 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Great diary... (0+ / 0-)

    Accepting no gratuities?

  •  Tip jar please. (0+ / 0-)

    Its the delegates that count

    by Morgan Sandlin on Wed Jun 11, 2008 at 02:01:35 PM PDT

  •  Great Diary (0+ / 0-)

    This is a though I often have just before hitting the "Contribute" button on a politcal website, and I think it is excellent that you bring it up.  This is the reason that I believe the absolute most important thing that Barack Obama can do after getting into office is pass campaign finance reform providing for 100% public funded elections.  Not only would this decrease the excessively long campaign season, all candidates and issues would be on equal footing.

  •  In the long term I think it will be good.... (0+ / 0-)

    As you state, we are in the middle of a perfect storm, years of anger built up against the political machines that have taken over politics and the sudden realization that we as small donors can actually impact any race we choose to involve ourselves in.

    By removing the need for a prospective candidate to work through the traditional money-raising regimen that quickly excludes those who do not march in lock-step with the big donors and the party regulars,a prospective candidate can take their fund-raising on line, target groups that he would be simpatico with and raise money there.

    If big corporations can't control the elections through the normal channels, they can be eliminated from the process.  Legislation could be passed to truly reform the process and bring in average individuals who wouldn't even consider running until now.  

    The down side would be that eventually people would become complacent and op out of the process as their anger subsides and they feel comfortable with the people in office.

  •  I see your point , and ... (0+ / 0-)

    you made it well , but just consider for a moment that if Obama had only raised half of what he did , would he still have come this far . I do think so . But there is a stronger point to make , and that is if we only count money to say our candidate has won because of good finance , we are taking much for granted that it is ultimately the message and not the money . I should like to think that Obama will win because he has a vision for the country , a much needed fix , and not just because he can outspend his opponent .
    A poll for the mind - If John McCain and Barack Obama were given only ten million dollars each to canvas the countryside , who would , could be the victor ?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site