Daily Kos

I have no where else to go

Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 06:59:26 PM PDT

My father worked as a union worker at Caterpillar. He made a living wage and was able to provide for our family. His job sucked. In the summertime the factory was hot as hell. Most of the jobs were tedious. Right before he retired, he actually had a job he enjoyed. He tested and troubleshot finished tractors. Most days, the tractors functioned properly. But when one had a problem, and my dad had to hunt down the short in the thousands of wires, he actually felt like he was working. When he found the bad connector, replaced it, and the electical system worked right, he was happy. He would come home in a such a happy mood.

Then Reagan came.

No one hired since the '80s had near the healthcare and pay my dad had. All of the support structure that relied on these jobs atrophied. Grocery stores closed. The political class cared more about the few corporate leaders, and their profits, than the entire mid to lower level income strata that would be wiped out.

My parents are lucky. They still have decent health care and a retirement check. This was the result of decades of fights before them. But it died. No one hired from the '80s had what my father had.

My cousins are all in serious problems. They would find a job, a job enough to pay the bills, but not enough to pay for health care. Then one of my nieces or nephews would get sick. It's not like my cousins weren't working, it is that in many areas there are no jobs that pay enough to pay bills and health care.

Welcome to small town America.

The American government has nothing for them. No idea how to make them part of the corporate farming system. Nothing on how to make them keep from starving. Nothing on how to keep them from losing their homes in Katrina. It did have this neat system where it would sell overpriced houses to people that couldn't afford them, and the people that bought them hoped the prices would go up enough so they could resell them, but that busted.

So Obama comes along. Says he is different. He 'stands' for things. He will not be belligerent against Iran. Then political forces put him in a position where if he goes against their war with Iran, he will look weak. He now supports the bill against Iran. He looks weak.

The corporate media and Bush do a massive campaign on FISA. He caves. He looks weak.

Does he not realize that it is not him. This election is not about getting him elected. It is about getting people in power that actually care about the average American. Not Exxon. Not AT&T.

By buying into the 'centrist' mantra, he is not being a centrist. He will lose most Americans. Does he actually care about changing America? Will he attack the pundits that frame the debate? Will he attack the AEI?

I will vote for Obama. He is far better than McCain.

But that doesn't mean I won't be critical of him. Very few people on this blog would vote for McCain. And this blog should not be a mindless cheerleading for a candidate.

But I have no one to turn to. Most of my family live paycheck to paycheck. Gas prices are killing them. Health care is scary. People say all sorts of things. They have for decades. Jobs still suck. Health care sucks. 35 years after we said we would wean ourselves from foreign oil, we are still reliant on foreign oil.

The AEI still sets foreign policy. William Kristol and John Bolton still get national attention. War with Iran still gets airwaves. Everyday. In op-eds in almost every paper in America. Far more people are calling for war on the airwaves and in op-eds that are saying how stupid it is.

Tags: Barack Obama, 2008 elections, president, economy, campaign (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 23 comments

  •  Criticize him.... (11+ / 0-)

    after you work your ass off to get him elected.  

    I don't buy into this crap that criticizing him makes him a better candidate.  We have until November to convince people to vote for the man--that is not long at all.  

    Every second we waste picking nits is another vote lost.

    Try as you might, you cannot spell HOPE with the letters GOP.

    by David Kroning on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:04:19 PM PDT

    •  Why? (5+ / 0-)

      So we get another candidate that doesn't understand reality?

      That will let the AEI set the debate because he has too big of a head?

      Obama can not do shit by himself. Carter was president, and tried to do good. He had no system in place to counter the power bases in America that were against him. All people think of is failure.

      I want to see some type of system in place to take on the power structure in America that supports the oil companies, the drug companies, etc.

      When I see that, I'll get excited. If his idea is to cave to them, then no I will not support. If he has some secret plan ala Nixon on how to deal with them, I don't trust him.

      I don't believe in individual people.

      •  Obama is investing in down-ticket races (0+ / 0-)

        all across the country, precisely so that he WILL have the mandate he needs to finally put through the progressive changes we need and which have been ignored for the better part of the past 40 years.

        Now is the time for us to work our asses off to get him, and to get those down-ballot candidates, elected. If they can't do shit once elected, we hold their feet to the fire. Right now, with 4 short months to go, is not the best time to tear our hair out over what might be needed political posturing in order to make happen what we so direly need to make happen.

        I think at this point by demanding purity, we are undermining our own cause. If we can get Obama and a substantial Democratic majority elected, I will fully expect them to do what we need them to do. In the meantime, I am not at all interested in hurting our prospects by demoralizing volunteers and contributors here or elsewhere.

        And yes, I am both a volunteer and a contributor. And this hand-wringing stuff has been extremely demoralizing. Do we not at least owe our fellow Democrats, you know, the regular ones who work their asses off not as staff or consultants or as elected officials, that tiny much for the next few months?

        Sheesh, if it does not work out the way I hope that it will, I will join in all of the criticism and call for accountability. But for now, this stuff is hurting us nobodies who are trying to finally get what we need here, because it filters up to the traditional media and gets played as the tired and usual "Democrats Are Dividied!" "Disorganized Dems!" horsehockey that has cost us too many victories in the past.

        Please, if you cannot find a way to go out and work on a campaign yourself, would you please be so kind as to be considerate of those of us who are doing so? If your work schedule/family life/whatever preclude your canvassing for our candidate or registering new voters, my request to you is this: Could you please cheer on those of us who are and provide some moral support? Many of us are spending our own money on these efforts because we believe that this election is so important. To come home and see things on the pundit shows or newscasts quoting "influential bloggers" or saying how Obama is losing netroots support can become really deflating and discouraging, even if we have signed up 35 or 40 new registrations that day that we have in hand to deliver to the election commission. And by the way, my county election commission is about 40 miles away, and ain't nobody reimbursing me for gas.

        Thank you for your consideration. Sorry for the length of this post.

  •  We may need a new New Deal soon enough. (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    soms, David Kroning, Polly Syllabic

    What do you mean by this

    He now supports the bill against Iran.

    ?

    It's a neighborly day in this beautywood. Relentless!

    by ablington on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:06:20 PM PDT

  •  Two things (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    soms, Polly Syllabic

    1 - You should look harder for "places to go."  Here, and an Obama presidency, are hardly the answers you need if your despair is as great as your writing indicates.

    2 - Don't lose the forest for the trees in this election.

    OK... 1 more.  It is "AEI" not "The AEI" in most such writings.  It's illogical, like "RBI," but so it is...

    •  I write about what is America (6+ / 0-)

      And from your tone, I guess you don't realize what is happening in most of America.

      And why they don't relate to the politics on display, and don't vote.

      The only person that can afford to be a councilman is a developer. The only person that can run for local office is a developer or businessman that has more money than he knows what to do with.

      Work your way up to Senators. Their millionaires.

      Who represents Americans? There is no system in place that allows for Americans to be represented. Only the subset of successful corporate class.

      Which is why Dodd's speech last night was so out of place. The system doesn't support the American Constitutional ideals. It represents AT&T.

      Though they do spend millions on creative ads to make you think they do.

      •  And...do you think this is a new problem? (5+ / 0-)

        The rich and well-connected commercial elite have run this country since George Washington--he owned more land than anyone in Virgina.  

        In relation to the rest of the men and women in the Senate, Barack Obama is poor.

        As a member of a visible minority, he has not (even with his Ivy League education) had access to the upper-echelons of power that corrupt most Washington elite to the core.

        We have a candidate that is about the best we can ever hope to have...and all many here can do is criticize him for not being good enough.

        Try as you might, you cannot spell HOPE with the letters GOP.

        by David Kroning on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 08:05:33 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Sorry (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        soms

        Your view is too stark.

        This

        The only person that can afford to be a councilman is a developer. The only person that can run for local office is a developer or businessman that has more money than he knows what to do with.

        Isn't true.  It may be most frequent, but your use of "only" and such betrays a didactic worldview.  It's much more diverse than you are willing to admit.

  •  Please use first names in tags. Here are the tag (4+ / 0-)

    guidelines.

    I have said before, that our real work starts on January 21, 2009. That's when we need to organize. That's when we will need to organize LTE campaigns, and ad buys and when marching in the street may, just may mean something again.   That's when we need to find a primary challenger for every Blue Dog "Democrat" for the 2010 race.

    January 21, 2009.

    Ferengi Rules of Acquisition: #34 "War is good for business...but only from a distance, the closer to the front lines, the less profitable it gets"-8.25, -6.21

    by Jacques on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:12:31 PM PDT

    •  I have already written (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      snootless, Polly Syllabic

      Several LTEs defending Obama. (which were published)

      I can chew gum and walk at the same time.

      I think the Washington Post crew has a hard on against Obama. I had drafted a long diary last night on it until I saw that teacherken had already had one with the basic points.

      Cohen uses the POW excuse just like McCain did right after the Keating-5 deal came out.

      Utter bullshit.

      That doesn't mean I'm going to say Obama is God.

      I do not like the direction he is taking. Maybe it's 30 years of being burned by politicians promising things, then backtracking, that I want to see something other rhetoric.

      I want to see he understands how the media agenda is set. I want to see he understands just how evil the AEI is.

      I gave the same critisism against Hillary Clinton.

      Frank Gaffney Jr. pushed Bill Clinton to bomb Iraq in 1998. Frank Gaffney Jr. pushed for the Iraq war. Frank Gaffney Jr. is pushing for the Iran war.

      Where is the pushback? HR 326?

  •  You're going to be waiting (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Polly Syllabic

    for a long time to be excited.

    I want to see some type of system in place to take on the power structure in America that supports the oil companies, the drug companies, etc.

    When I see that, I'll get excited.

    Historically, America has not had this kind of structure, from the revolutionary period through the gilded age through to today. FDR and the New Deal were something of an anomaly, in that people were in such an f'ed up position that something had to be done, and even then, it took a long time and didn't totally displace those power structures.

  •  FIRST...GET HIM ELECTED (0+ / 0-)

    opps, I had the cap lock on:\ Gas is high... electric is high...how are you going to heat your house next winter...got enough water in your well...got a basement that's not flooded...got a house that's still on it's foundation...oh, I forgot, you don't    have a job because it's in a flooded area. America,
    listen..."you don't got shit when the river floods."
    Well, actually, you do have "shit" when the river floods. Who's paying your pay check in the "MID-WEST". The media is saying "nothing" about your day tomorrow.  ASK!!

    "The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins." - Oliver Wendell Holmes (1841-1935)

    by Polly Syllabic on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:38:06 PM PDT

  •  "Then, Regan Came...." (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    snootless, Ammo Hauler, soms, sherijr

    ... and workers at Catapillar plants voted for him, because he spoke to their moral values; against abortion, for religion.

    And Regan made their employers wealthy, and did nothing for our health care.  And he told us he would do that, too.  

    George W. Bush said the same thing.  But union members liked him, and not Al Gore. Or that smarty-pants John Kerry.  George was loud and belligerent and angry at all the right times.  Kerry looked like a debate team co-captain.

    Never mind that GWB has changed the tax laws so that now, the richest 1% of America owns as much as the poorest 90%.   And McCain wants the inheritance laws to be so that the children of the richest 1% can wipe their shoes with our children.

    Karl Rove got the slogan right for the democrats this year.  

    "Had enough?"

    Or do you want some more of McSame?

    •  Exactly. Asshats like Reagan and Bush didn't get (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      soms

      to be President in a vacuum.

      Social conservatives - who I am guessing were well represented in the Midwest and Southern electorate working in manufacturing - decided that it was more important to control this nations morals than to vote for their best interests.

      The same goes for those who let racial wedge issues dissuade them from voting for a Dukakis instead of a Bush I, for letting Reagan's 'welfare queen' image push them toward the Republican Party.

      So Obama comes along and instead of marveling at the contrast between his ability to string more than two words in a coherent sentence compared to President Malaprop, some of us are nit-picking that he hasn't done exactly what we would like him to do.

      Let's get him elected first - then work with him to get meaningful change.

      I guarantee that McCain won't be the better choice for labor.

  •  Nice to hear a voice from small town America! (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks for providing your important perspective.  

  •  The country is in danger of becoming a 3rd world (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    soms, sherijr

    nation. Honestly I don't think it matters how much the candidate "gets it" so long as the candidate wants this country to keep having a middle class and is smart enough to do something about it. Obama wants that and I believe can do it. A lot of the rest of the world is made up of countries with very poor people, very rich people, no one in between and a government that keeps it that way.
    We are in danger of that here in America RIGHT NOW.
    McCain, with his Milton Friedman economics, will continue to lead us down that path.  
    Obama wants this country to keep its middle class, its sense of opportunity, its potential for hope.

  •  lovely and heartfelt (0+ / 0-)

    and right on.

  •  I Thought Your Diary was OK! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    soms

    Then I read your comments and now I'm not sure...

    Support the Netroots Candidates! A VETO-PROOF majority in 2008!!!

    by InquisitiveRaven on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 08:30:52 PM PDT

Permalink | 23 comments