Skip to main content

Of course, Barack Obama's stance on the FISA "compromise" bill has sparked debate and some anger.  There has been some polarization as well:  "hey, don't you want to win this November?  Lay off!" and the "blind loyalty is bad; look at what it has done to the Republicians" and to our country.

More below the fold.

Of course, Obama has put himself in a tight spot, to say the least.  Even the Republicans are taunting him as being "spineless"  and are openly saying that it is just a matter of time that he caves in on Iraq as well.

The article I linked to goes on to say that changing one's mind isn't always a bad thing; in fact one of the knocks on President Bush is that he "stays the course", even if the course leads off of a cliff.  Sometimes, one needs to admit that the current course is wrong, or that a previous decision was bad.

Example:  Remember George H. W. Bush going back on his "read my lips, no new taxes" pledge?  In fact, he had to raise taxes at that time; it was the right thing to do.

But the danger is, of course, is that one just goes around telling groups what they want to hear, regardless of their intentions.  In fact, Obama has campaigned on the "Tell people what they need to hear, not what they want to hear" theme.

So what about this blind faith versus benefit of the doubt?

Blind faith is, IMHO, just going along without thinking and pretending that doubt isn't there.  That does no one any good and can be dangerous.  Look at where that got this country recently.

On the other hand, there is "benefit of the doubt".  

Giving the benefit of the doubt can be a wise course of action in many circumstances.  Consider the following:

  1. Benefit of the doubt is temporary, and the leader's right to the BOD is based on performance.
  1. The leader often has access to information that the rest of us do not have (yes, Bush and the Republic party leaders used this one on us)
  1. The leader has been known to have good, honorable intentions (this doesn't apply to most of the Republic party leadership)
  1. The leader is a brilliant person (this certainly doesn't apply to our current President, no matter what Harriet Miers thinks :-) )
  1. The leader has had a history of displaying good judgment (true for BHO, false for GWB)
  1. The leader has produced good results in the past (BHO's campaign proved itself; GWB's administration has been a comedy of errors)

So, where I disagree with Obama on the FISA bill and where I have voiced my disagreement, I am, at this time, willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

It is beyond question that he knows far more about the details than I do, and it is reasonable to assume that he is smarter and has better judgment than I.

So, for me, he gets the benefit of the doubt, for now.  He could certainly lose that, but he hasn't as yet.

A political aside

This might turn out ok.  In this issue, BHO might be having a Sister Souljah moment ("standing up to those liberals") and we might be having one as well:  our vocal displeasure is proof that we are seeing him realistically.  We aren't a group of deluded, hypnotized followers.  We can and will disagree with him from time to time.

Originally posted to onanyes on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:11 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'll be checking in from time to time. (8+ / 0-)

    I am at home, cleaning up prior to a trip to Austin, Texas.  My Texas family are were huge HRC supporters, but they are not even thinking about voting for "more of the same" McCain.

    When liberals saw 9-11, we wondered how we could make the country safe. When conservatives saw 9-11, they saw an investment opportunity.

    by onanyes on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:13:01 AM PDT

  •  I'm with you (4+ / 0-)

    I HATE!!!! the FISA bill, but I'm not getting my knickers in a twist over the instant apocalyspe.

  •  agreed (3+ / 0-)

    he's earned from me some room to maneuver.

    "I ain't so afraid of losing something that I ain't gonna try to have it." Zoe (Firefly)

    by geejay on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:17:03 AM PDT

  •  Blind faith or benefit of the doubt... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Killer of Sacred Cows

    is leaving out complete disagreement but I'll vote for him anyway.  

    "Why don't presidents fight the war? Why do we always send the poor?"

    by o really on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:40:12 AM PDT

  •  The question for me is "Does he share my values?" (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Killer of Sacred Cows, angel d

    I believed that Obama shared my values before he announced he supports a bill with retroactive immunity.

    Since then, I don't.

    I still want Obama to beat McCain because the likelihood that a decent number of  Obama's appointees will share my values is greater than the likelihood that a decent number of McCain's appointees will share my values.

    •  Does he share my values? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nanobubble, geejay

      I don't know about you, but I have a lot of different values.  No one shares all of them, not even my wife of 20 years.

      In no particular order, and not exhaustive:

      Obama is Pro-Equality on marital benefits.  Do I wish he were in favor of allowing "Marriage" for everyone.  Yes, but I can't have anything.

      Obama is in favor of using the tax code to redistribute wealth.  Do I wish he were also in favor of radical tax simplification.  Yes, but I can't have everything.

      Obama is not in favor of abolishing the death penalty.  But I'm confident that he will work to limit its racially biased application.

      The single biggest value that I share with him is that he is in favor of thoughtful, nuanced political discussion.  He is intelligent and values intelligence over sychophanty in those who surround him.

      I am excited about Obama as I have never been excited about a candidate because he shares more of my values than any other in my lifetime.

      If your values are different, then all I can say is Please Vote.  Vote for the candidate who comes closest to sharing your values.  If that is Nader, then so be it.  If it is Obama, then we're on the same team.  If it's McCain, then you're on the wrong site.  If it's Barr, then you've forgotten his years in congress or you're really on the wrong site.

      For most people on this site (and I have faith, most in the country) it will be Obama who comes closest to sharing your values.  If you wait for the candidate who agrees with you completely, then it will be a long wait.

  •  Great diary (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    onanyes

    I'm tired of having Obamabots tell me to STFU because their great and glorious leader is beautiful, infallible and has a secret plan to protect the 4th Amendment.

    Your arguments on the other hand, are actually persuasive.  Which isn't to say I'm changing my mind about withholding my support from Obama, but if he does something good in the future I just might be persuaded to come back into the fold.

    This country does not have the luxury to entertain idiocy as if it is reasonable. --Digby

    by Thought Crime on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 12:01:40 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site