Daily Kos

Failing American Energy Policy

Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 05:40:14 AM PDT

The New York Times has a fine articletoday summarizing the failure of American energy policy over the past many years.  Given the current gasoline price of more than $4 a gallon there is much concern among people of all economic positions in the nation.  Everyone is suffering the consequence of decisions made over the course of the past 30 years or more.

Entire industries are reeling — airlines and automakers most prominent among them — and gas prices have emerged as an important issue in the presidential campaign.

Over the last 25 years, opportunities to head off the current crisis were ignored, missed or deliberately blocked, according to analysts, politicians and veterans of the oil and automobile industries. What’s more, for all the surprise at just how high oil prices have climbed, and fears for the future, this is one crisis we were warned about. Ever since the oil shortages of the 1970s, one report after another has cautioned against America’s oil addiction.

Where did we go wrong?  In large measures the source of trouble may be seen in our own driveways.  Americans are now and have been for years obsessed with large vehicles.

Nearly 70 percent of the 21 million barrels of oil the United States consumes every day goes for transportation, with the bulk of that burned by individual drivers

For many years low cost gasoline was part of American culture.  We built houses far from centers of business and continued to drive everywhere we wished to go.  Today we are paying the price of our neglect.

In 1975 the first corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards were passed.

LARGELY as a result, oil consumption in 1990 totaled 16.9 million barrels, basically on a par with the 17 million barrels consumed in 1980, even as the economy grew substantially.

A proposed revision of the CAFE standards to raise the average to 40 miles per gallon failed.

Amid furious opposition from Detroit, liberal Democrats from automaking states, like Carl Levin of Michigan, joined conservative Republicans like Jesse Helms of North Carolina to block new CAFE standards

The argument at the time included automakers responding to public demand.  People bought more larger vehicles instead of smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles.  I'd argue this was in large part due to advertising pressures as automakers made the larger vehicles seem more attractive and macho.  The better profit margins on larger vehicles (especially SUV's) made the pressure on automakers even more decisive.

Since the 1970's

global consumption [of oil] has taken off, rising to 85.2 million barrels a day last year from 76.3 million in 2000.

BY 2001, oil prices were slowly creeping up, but few seemed to notice, perhaps because the march was slow and steady.

But the handwriting was on the wall for those willing to take notice.  The automakers missed the call and continued to build and market their profitable gas guzzlers.

Now even politician regret their previous stance on CAFE standards.

...onetime CAFE opponents like Mr. [Mike] Castle [R-DE] now say they wish that Congress had acted sooner.

Nice to see him on the right page for a change, but now is much too late.  

The crisis is upon us today.  The pain of the current market will not ease any time soon.  Solutions lie in the distant past.  Today we must face the situation and look for long term solutions.

"It’s a shame we’re doing this now instead of 10 or 20 years ago," says Mr. Castle, who supported the legislation last year.

But where was he in 2001 when he voted against raising CAFE?  Hindsight is wonderful but today we need honest foresight in Congress.

Solutions are not going to be found easily found.  Foreign car makers are much better positioned to take advantage of the rise in gasoline prices and the changing demand of American consumers.  Detroit is seeing the profit margins of large vehicles dropping faster than the companies are able to respond.  The Chrysler plant here in Delaware is closing for an 8 week period this summer to retool for a pair of hybrid vehicles.  The entire American auto industry must move as fast as possible to produce smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles.

Our government needs to invest in research and development to insure technological advance into the future.  The current crisis is one more warning sign about a future we must face.  Our society must take a look at housing development patterns.  We must begin to improve our mass transit opportunities.  We can no longer afford our oil addiction.

The pain of today is not to be relieved any time soon.  We must demand accountability and truth from our elected officials.  We must insure a future for our children and our grandchildren by moving to renewable energy sources and we must make the move very soon.  Bluewater Wind will supply a small fraction of our electricity.  We need a great deal more resources like that.  We must move to electric cars or to hydrogen powered vehicles.  There is much work to be done.  If we fail to move today we stand to lose much more in the future.

Together we can face this situation.  Americans have shown themselves to be resourceful and flexible over all these many years.  We can face the issues of today if we stand together and take action.  We stand together or we fall apart.

Customary campaign reminder:  I am on the campaign trail these days.  I am an old time, long time, hardcore, Progressive Democrat.  Please check out the website or the ActBlue page and support the campaign as your circumstance allows.  Your help is needed for the effort to succeed.  Contributions of all sorts, both moral and monetary are most appreciated.  There are also chores a person may do from any place in the world.  If you are interested.  E-mail me directly and we can negotiate (Jerry at Northington zero eight dot com).

Peace.

Tags: New York Times, energy, CAFE, DE-AL, 2008, elections (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 46 comments

  •  The pain of tomorrow may be greater than the pain (18+ / 0-)

    of today.  We as a nation must take decisive action and we must do so today.  We can no longer afford to wait.  The future we leave our children depends on actions taken today.

    Many thanks for reading.  Peace.

    Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

    by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 05:41:30 AM PDT

  •  interesting that several of us focusing on energy (6+ / 0-)

    in our postings today

    you are correct - there was no meaningful reason for people like Levin to have opposed raising CAFE standards.  I understand the thinking, because I sold cars briefly in 1995 and the profit on a SUV was about 3 times that on a sedan.  There was NOTHING to stop American car makers from making more efficient vehicles.   And had they chosen to sell the sexiness of saving money, or being able to use your money for something other than gasoline, we would now have CAFE at 40 mpg, insetad of less than 2/3 of that.  Think of the savings were we to cut our consumption of gasoline by 1/3!

    Good luck on the campaign trail.

    Peace.

    do we still have a Republic and a Constitution if our elected officials will not stand up for them on our behalf?

    by teacherken on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 05:46:35 AM PDT

  •  Energy policy? What energy policy? (7+ / 0-)

    We have an energy policy? Coulda fooled me. I just thought that business and consumers were left to run amuck, in true conservative Republican fashion. Silly me.

    •  LOL. (3+ / 0-)

      Right you are.  We have a policy of failure to benefit the public.  The only policy we seem to have these days is one of support industry and rob the consumer.  In that arena the Repubs do a fine job.  Too bad for all of us.  

      Do you think we can turn this mess around one day?  What are we going to leave our grandchildren?

      Peace.

      Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

      by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 06:03:38 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  We'll come up with an answer. (3+ / 0-)

        Consumers aren't buying into the "drill, drill drill!" routine - they're conserving. It's the only meaningful way to spend less on energy. Eventually, we'll find our way to a new energy source.

        Now, the only real question is how much it's going to hurt getting there.

        •  The degree of pain we will suffer (3+ / 0-)

          is not predictable at all.  Maybe pain is the only driving force that will at last bring the public around.  

          Do you really think people are seeing through the "drilling" rhetoric?  That is not my sense here in DE but maybe in the nation the situation is better.

          Peace.

          Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

          by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 06:35:01 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Yea, it's going to take some pain... (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Cronesense, possum

            Maybe pain is the only driving force that will at last bring the public around.  

            Taking a look at history, I think it's fairly obvious we as americans (in a macro sense, individuals are generally smarter, but the herd isn't) are only going to respond when initeria hurs too much.  Even with sound leadership, it's going to take $5-6 gas to start seeing fundamental changes.  

            -- Hope is the adrenaline of the mind. --

            by Druid800 on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 07:39:45 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  My greatest fear is $6 gasoline. (2+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Cronesense, Druid800

              The poor will suffer most as always.  The rich will still not get the message no matter the costs.  Maybe when ordinary workers are no longer able to get to a workplace others will begin to notice.  Ripples to a tsunami is a situation I fear but that may be the final solution.

              Peace.

              Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

              by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 07:41:57 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Yep, it's always that way... (2+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Cronesense, possum

                The poor disproportionaly take our burdens for us.  And I certainly didn't mean to sound flippant about $6 (or more) gas.  Personally, I'm thinking that somewhere north of 5, the current rumblings will start to become the beginnings of a revolt...and I don't like to think what form that will take.  We have not had serious, sustained unrest in this country in a long time...I fear what it will look like.

                btw...good luck with your Campaign.  

                -- Hope is the adrenaline of the mind. --

                by Druid800 on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 07:48:05 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  Thanks, Druid800. (1+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  Cronesense

                  I appreciate the support.  

                  Time will tell what the future holds.  If we take collective action today maybe we can forestall a real revolt, but action is necessary and must be definitive.  No more wishy-washy catering to corporate interests.  We have no time for that pandering these days.

                  Peace.

                  Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

                  by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 07:53:25 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

          •  I'm an optimist. (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Cronesense, possum

            I'm looking at what people are doing, not what they're saying. More oil would be nice, but no one's betting on it working - they're spending less at the pump, buying energy efficient cars, and changing their habits.

            Now, some people are coming up with dumb ways to conserve. (Stockpiling gas in your closet? Bad idea.) But most people are coming up with pretty good ideas, like buying fuel efficient cars and cutting down on unnecessary trips. Eventually, the herd will find its way down the right path, whatever that might be.

            But then again, I am an optimist. We can hope.

            •  I am the eternal optimist. (1+ / 0-)

              Recommended by:
              Cronesense

              We see our friends changing their habits like you say.  And fuel efficient cars are in such local demand one must wait for months and pay a premium even then.  The herd is moving.

              The question is will the herd move fast enough?  That remains to be seen.  I have real hope but until the dream is a reality I worry.

              Peace.

              Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

              by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 08:01:45 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  "Fast enough" is relative. (2+ / 0-)

                Recommended by:
                Cronesense, possum

                It'll move fast enough to stave off apocalypse. The human race is not going to crash and burn because of the End of Oil. We've had energy crises before - England was once denuded of trees due to the demand for firewood. Eventually, we figure it out, in our slow, lumbering sort of way.

                We will not, however, move fast enough to prevent some people from really suffering. It happens. How many, and how much, remains to be seen.

                •  Mankind is ever lumbering along. (1+ / 0-)

                  Recommended by:
                  Cronesense

                  What an apt phrase you put forth.  That evokes an image of Neanderthal man and his stooped posture, but the movement of society through the ages has always been plodding at best.

                  Americans are flexible and strong.  We will weather this storm.  We will weather best if we stand together and find ways to help those in most need.

                  Still the future remains to be seen as always.  Hindsight is 20:20.  History will tell the tale one day.

                  Thanks.  Peace.

                  Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

                  by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 08:09:01 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

  •  Failing whom? (4+ / 0-)

    Why are the meetingsw of Cheney's Energy Task force still being shrouded in secrecy? What exactly was being done back in the early days of this administration that has led us to this point? Why has no one even asked about this cabal since the price of gasoline has exploded?

    CHRISTIAN, n. One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor. A. Bierce

    by irate on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 05:59:10 AM PDT

  •  Live for this quarter's profits (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cronesense, possum, gildareed

    and forget about any long term planning.  That is the American model and we are seeing the results.  Everyone here at DK has seen this coming.  We are not brilliant, but we do have some common sense.  What is wrong with those we elect to Washington?  Are they simply brain-dead?  Or so corrupt that the future of our nation comes in second to corporate contributions.

    Elect Northington to U.S. Congress!  Throw Castle out!  That's the ticket.  

    •  We need to hold our politicians (3+ / 0-)

      accountable at every level today.  We, the voting public are in some measure responsible by not asking for responsible action.  

      Politicians get inside the Beltway and find lobbyists with large amounts of money and their minds are swayed.  Then there is the herd mentality of DC.  We must fight in a collective manner to end all that.

      Thanks for the kind words.  I am grateful for the support.  Peace.

      Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

      by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 06:21:33 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Removing quarterly profit incentive (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Cronesense, possum, gildareed

    from stock market. Not sure how you'd do it, but so much of what is done in american industry is done for short-term gain, as someone mentioned above. This leads to decisions that give a temporary bump, but no long-term gain.

    Cheney should be subpoenaed about the Energy Meetings and hauled up on contempt charges if he doesn't appear before congress on C-Span. if he won't do it now, wait till he's out of office.

    And companies and lobbying groups should not be allowed to contribute to campaigns beyond the individual limit of $2,300. Period. Companies are not people and shouldn't be allowed to spend more money to influence elections than regular voters are.

    And that's just the beginning.

    •  How about public financing of elections (3+ / 0-)

      instead of fund raising?  That might solve some of the issues.

      Changing the corporate mentality to one of public good versus quarterly profit may take a monumental move in American thinking but that is the right way to go.  If all CEO's were to see the end benefit of overall good for workers and consumers we'd be a long way toward a better society.

      The beginning is a very good place to start.  How do you rate our chances of seeing the changes we need in the next administration?

      Peace.

      Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

      by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 06:48:01 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Chances? (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        possum

        How do you rate our chances of seeing the changes we need in the next administration?

        I don't think it will all be accomplished by one administration, unfortunately. These types of changes are as much cultural as they are political. But I do think the next administration - assuming it's an Obama administration and not a McCain administration - can take concrete steps that would chip away at some of the mindset, re-regulating in areas the Reagan "revolution" deregulated, for instance, and demanding "fair trade" in addition to "free trade" and reinvesting in infrastructure and our people. These are the types of long-term goal-setting that an administration could achieve, IMHO.

        •  Thanks, mediaprof. (0+ / 0-)

          Good thoughts.  I believe the new administration (I am confident of an Obama administration) will begin to make the course corrections we need.  Moving to fairness in all aspects of government is important.  Fairness, openness, and accountability in government would go a very long way toward bringing our nation to a position of world leadership once again.  Taking baby steps one at a time will in the end result in the mountain being climbed.

          Peace.

          Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

          by possum on Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 05:39:59 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Actually by law...corporations are people...nt (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Cronesense, possum

      "I would like to see less people go to church on Sunday and more people volunteering among the poor and hopeless"

      by comeinpbrstreetgang on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 06:55:39 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Supply and demand.... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    eeff, Cronesense, possum

    is a big piece but not the only piece to our woes.  Conservation and investment in alternative, renewable sources are huge in ridding us of our dependence on fossil fuels.  

    Technology already exists to bring us light years from where we are now.  Those who control the oil market, though, have little interest in forging ahead with these investments until every possible penny is made with oil.

    Until we have a cop back on the beat to regulate oil trading like we do for every other commodity trader, the cost of oil will continue to be artificially inflated.  Until we get tougher on conglomerate mergers, we will continue to have too much power concentrated in too few hands.  5 big oil companies control over 50% of US refining capacity.  We need to close the Enron loophole and we need to have a ceiling or limit on the number of contracts any 1 company can land at 1 time.

    In my neck of the woods, Louisiana is sitting on a wealth of sugar cane.  It is more potent and cleaner than corn conversion, and it does not drive up the price of sugar since only the covering sheaths of waste are used.

    Push for Voter-Owned Clean Elections: Be A Citizen Co-Sponsor

    by gildareed on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 09:27:39 AM PDT

    •  There are so many fine alternatives. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      eeff, gildareed

      The issue is getting people to pursue them and to do so very soon.  Demand for gasoline has been down for a few months in the US.  Worldwide demand for oil is rising and that makes for a poor market for us with the weak dollar.

      And commodity traders need lots of some sort of regulation.  In the US that may be accomplished but with the world market what it has become I wonder if that will be enough to stem the tide.

      Peace, my friend.  I hope all is very well with you and yours.  Thanks for visiting.

      Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

      by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 10:29:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Bring Back The Stanley Steamer :-) (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    possum

    You run out of fuel, you take your hatchet out...

    Well maybe not but there are many alternatives that may be made available from cellulosic ethanol to algae fuel.

    Brazil now makes ethanol from sugarcane quite economically but I don't suppose I need to tell anyone here the problem with using such a crop.

    New Cyclone Engine Runs on Almost Any Fuel

    Some of my favorite fuels were chicken fat and orange peelings.  Swamp gas isn't bad either but rather prosaic now.

    See here but I warn you there is some itsy bitsy possibility the engine may not live up so well to the hype. :-)

    My point rather is that we might just be looking in the wrong places for fuel.

    My Swedish cousins invented the solar-powered airplane ("Watch out for those &^%$&^ clouds, Ollie").  Only Germans seem to think that we Swedes have superior intelligence.

    Sun worshiping isn't my favorite religion.  Try to be tolerant of heresy if you will.

    Best,  Terry

    •  Looking in the wrong places for fuel (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      eeff

      is an understatement.  The oil, gas, and coal industries have kept us in the dark for years.  We must pursue every alternative.  Sugar cane and other cellulose sources are much better for fuels than corn will ever be in the overall scheme.

      Sun is fine in its place.  Solar is not the only source of renewable energy we should purse.  We need the entire spectrum and need to be looking to use each source to its best advantage.

      Thanks.  Peace.

      Jerry Northington, D.V.M., for Congress, DE-AL. Elect a real Progressive Democrat in '08.

      by possum on Sun Jul 06, 2008 at 01:02:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 46 comments