Daily Kos

Air Force--Does it Make a Person Proud?

Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 08:28:29 AM PDT

Not me.  I think assassinating people by remote control is both unethical and cowardly.  Apparently, some of the leaders of our Air Force aren't too comfortable with that they've been doing, either.

Air Force officer in Alaska dies in likely suicide

By DAN JOLING

ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AP) — The officer who commands an air force wing in Alaska has died of a gunshot wound that likely was self-inflicted, authorities said Monday.
....
Tinsley was named base commander in May 2007. He had served as an F-15 instructor pilot, F-15C test pilot, wing weapons officer, exchange officer and instructor with the Royal Australian Air Force.

His previous 22-month assignment was executive officer to the Air Force chief of staff, Gen. T. Michael "Buzz" Mosely, who resigned in June under pressure in an agency shake-up.
....
Walberg said Tinsley was not under investigation or undue stress.

Actions speak louder than words.

No stress here either.  After all, trucks don't experience stress.

Air Force truck carrying rocket booster overturns

By JAMES MacPHERSON

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A truck carrying a rocket booster for an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile tipped over on a northwestern North Dakota road on Thursday, but no one was injured and there was no threat to the public, an Air Force official said.
....
The booster rocket, which is 66 feet long and weighs 75,000 pounds, was being hauled in an enclosed trailer, and a convoy of security personnel was escorting the truck, Burg said.

The booster rocket and the transport rig likely will remain in the ditch at least until Friday, he said.
....

Trucks end up in ditches and planes crash--all by themselves. Even in the Jerusalem Post.

Pilot killed as F-15 crashes in Nevada during US Air Force training
By ASSOCIATED PRESS

A pilot was killed and another injured on Wednesday when an F-15 jet crashed in the Nevada desert during a US Air Force training exercise.

Air Force spokesman Andrew Dumboski said the two-seater plane went down at about 11:30 a.m. on the Nevada Test and Training Range outside of Goldfield, Nevada.
....

Doing stuff on the ground does seem safer.  But who picks up the pieces?

Air Force Looks to Laser-Proof Its Weapons
By Noah Shachtman July 30, 2008 |

Real-life laser weapons aren't here, yet. But they're getting closer. Which is why the Air Force is starting to look for ways to laser-proof its bombs and missiles -- with spray-on coatings, no less.

A new Air Force request for proposals asks researchers to come up with ways to find "retrofittable laser protection for weapons." In tests, U.S. and Israeli ray guns have shown the ability to melt holes in all kinds of munitions.

If you watch the video, you'll probably notice that the controllers of the laser are sitting at consoles in, likely, air-conditioned comfort.  These are not, however, armchair warriors.
Neither are the pilots who are going to be trained at Crew Training International.

Crew Training International announced Wednesday that the U.S. Air Force has chosen the Memphis-based company to provide contract training to pilots of Predator drone aircraft, a deal worth $60 million-$80 million.

CTI beat out 17 other corporations which put in bids for the contract.

CTI will add 50 new employees to help handle the increased workload, with the majority of the new jobs to be located at U.S. Air Force bases in Nevada and New Mexico. ....

Besides the Predator training contract, the deal will also put CTI on the ground floor to provide future training programs for other Air Force drones, called Unmanned Aircraft Systems by the military, which Mullen believes will play a big part in the military's future....

This must be an example of taking "industrial base concerns" into account, as the Congress is about to require in the Boeing tanker award.  It's also an example of the continued privatization of our military.

However, it seems that civilian rules of conduct are being left behind as consoles directing robots replace boots on the ground.

Now, this may just be wishful thinking, but it should give us pause....

Intimate Ground Support

August 1, 2008: As U.S. ground combat forces are withdrawn from Iraq over the next few years, the U.S. Air Force is planning on taking over the task of providing a lot more of the protection for the American troops still down there.
...
The air force plans to replace the quick reaction teams with air power. This will consist of armed UAVs, that can quickly sort out the situation by providing live video to army commanders, and precise firepower in the form of Hellfire missiles and 500 pound smart bombs. There are even smaller missiles, than the 107 pound Hellfire, available for UAVs, and these will be used to minimize civilian casualties.
...
It is expected that, for many years to come, there will still be Islamic radicals in Iraq, and that these groups will seek to kill or capture Americans.
...

Of course, they can't do that, if there aren't any there.  But, that's another matter.  As are the civilian casualties.  Turns out that these UAVs rely on GPS.

NTSB investigates Raytheon Cobra crash at US Air Force Academy
By John Croft

A Raytheon Cobra unmanned air vehicle crashed at the US Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado on 28 July as school administrators evaluated the platform for use in its advanced airmanship course for cadets.
...
According to the NTSB, the Raytheon team had surveyed the athletic fields before the flight and had programmed the GPS waypoints for a rectangular course using the Cobra's ground control station. After a normal autopilot take-off and route, the single-engined UAV was returning to the road for landing when it undershot the turn from base leg to final.

Operators commanded the aircraft to make another approach, upon which the Cobra overshot the turn from base leg to final. Rather than take over manual control, the operators elected to let the Cobra automatically correct its path, but in the process, it struck the light pole.

No doubt a well-lighted athletic field that wasn't actually in use for athletics at the time.  UAVs dispatching hellfire missiles in the middle of Baghdad are, doubtless, much more accurate.  And when they crash in Iraq there's no picky NTSB to investigate.

New UAV control system may cut Predator losses

By Chris Pocock
June 18, 2007
Aircraft

By the time the U.S. Air Force took delivery of its 120th Predator unmanned air vehicle, nearly half of them (56) had been destroyed–some to enemy fire, but most to accidents. No pilots were harmed in the making of this statistic, of course. But at $4 million per Predator, that’s $224 million, a cost that cannot be ignored. And other UAVs have had similar problems.

Raytheon believes that its newly designed universal control system (UCS) will dramatically reduce the loss rates of unmanned systems. The company’s Intelligence and Information Systems (IIS) business took note of the substantial research that blames human factors for many UAV accidents. Raytheon then hired two former Predator operators, put them together with its own systems engineers and came up with a "cockpit" that revolutionizes operator awareness and efficiency, according to the company.

"The Predator ground station displays are ike an engineering diagnostics station, with complicated menus, and "M-keys" with functions that are easily confused," Katie Heilner, technical support engineer with Raytheon IIS, told Aviation International News. As a former sensor operator on Predators with the U.S. Air Force, she should know. "Aircrews today need superior control interfaces and situational awareness," said Michael Keaton, also with Raytheon IIS. He, too, is an experienced UAV operator, having commanded a Predator squadron with the USAF.

The UCS is a total redesign of the way unmanned systems are controlled, even down to the ergonomically designed chairs for the operators. They include inflatable bladders that can be individually adjusted, and a memory stick so that each operator can preserve his or her own comfort settings. The same chairs are used by emergency telephone operators in the U.S.

I was going to skip this, but the title is just too good to pass up:

Tanker trash talk

With the Pentagon perhaps just a week or so away from sending out a request for proposals on the Air Force tanker, the ongoing war of words between Boeing and Northrop backers has turned more ugly.

You can hear the audio here
http://share.ovi.com/...

Tags: Air Force, UAV, drones (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 12 comments

  •  Tips for pride. It's important to the (5+ / 0-)

    Air Force.  

    How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

    by hannah on Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 08:30:45 AM PDT

  •  Stress in the Air Force was real in the old (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Gary Norton, Ice Blue

    Air force, and I am sure it is real in the new.

    time constraints, mission constraints, pig-headed leadership blunders where a designated fall guy takes the rap are all features known to our military regardless of branch, but the pressurization of the US Air Force has to be experienced to be believed.

    In flightline ops, maintenance, especially the crew chiefs were always on the go, and then you compound this with blockheaded administration that acts like it knows nothing of management practice and you have a SNAFU.

    What saves the air Force are a few, and there are far too few of them, skilled, level-headed, unflappable Chief and Senior Master Sergeants who know their fields inside out and are not afraid to teach their charges a better way of doing the job.

    Today, 8/19/08, 4144 Americans, and untold Iraqis are dead, tens of thousands more maimed. Bush lied, how soon before your family pays the price for that?

    by boilerman10 on Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 08:39:10 AM PDT

  •  Please read my last diary (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Gary Norton

    Titled: Nuclear Black Market

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    It got buried. I reference it here because the lead story in your diary is about the suicide of a staff memeber who worked for Mosely, and he is one of the officials who was forced to resign, and the other announcements in Gates' presser about those resignations is the focus of my diary.

    The MSM buried the details of Admiral Donald's investigation. In order to find more detail, you have to go to the Financial Times and the Huffington Post, which I link in the body of the above linked diary.

    I connect some dots with a proposed narrative, linking several stories together and suggesting they are related. Lots of food for thought, and plenty of starting places for more investigation.

  •  Not really sure of your point. n/t (0+ / 0-)

    I belong to no organized party. I am a Democrat. Will Rogers

    by thestructureguy on Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 09:00:10 AM PDT

    •  The point (0+ / 0-)

      Is in my narrative hypothesis.

      The missing pieces of nuclear weapons were bait for Iranian officials who defied their own government to acquire nuclear weapons technology.

      The only purpose that dealing these weapons pieces to Iran can serve is to wrongfoot Iran and make a case for war. The only kind of war that will destroy Iran's nuclear fuel industry is nuclear war.

      http://www.dailykos.com/...

      http://www.dailykos.com/...

      In these two diaries, I explain the real cassis belli for war with Iran: Cheney's nest egg. Iran's enrichment program isn't a threat, and it isn't illegal under the NPT. What it IS: a competitor for nuclear fuel producers, like Europe and the US.

      Cheney (and, probably Rumsfeld too) have a motive to commit nuclear black market crimes. Read the background I give in these two diaries, and then look at my sources in the latest diary.

      If I'm correct, then a major espionage story IS breaking. Needless to say, illegally transferring nuclear weapons technology to hostile countries is treason.

      Consider this: a staffer for Mosely commits suicide in Alaska? Dude had a highly prized position in DC and suddenly he's dead in Alaska?

      The scientist who was facing arrest for the Anthrax attack has also committed suicide. Somethin's up. How many more dead bodies til Rumsfeld and Cheney are grabbed?

      •  Well, I agree with your scenario. (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        taraka das

        The most dangerous people aren't into wealth, they're into power.  Power was what the oil monopoly was about.  Oil has escaped from centralized control--too many nations have it and the market controls it.
        For people who are into monopoly, electric power generated from uranium fuel is doubly attractive because there's a good excuse to keep the fuel sequestered and "protected."
        Iraq was about two things.  The first thing was to gain a military foothold on the sub-Asian continent which had evaporated in Vietnam.  The second thing was to gain more control over oil--not to reduce or maintain the cost, but to INCREASE it to make nuclear economically viable.
        The allegations about Iraq's nuclear ambitions were both true and false.  It was important to squelch the development of nuclear fuel processing capacities in the region (including Iran).  The prospect of weapons grade uranium being produced provided an excuse to intervene in the area to short-circuit fuel production.
        On the other hand, the concern about Iran is valid.  The U.S. has set up mega-bases to monitor and patrol the hemisphere and the personnel (mostly Air Force) are actually sitting ducks for missiles from Iran and I have no doubt that should their presence be accepted by the people of Iraq, the missiles China has sent to Iran will be used to root them out.
        The U.S. Air Force is in an untenable position in Iraq.

        How do you tell a predator from a protector? The predator will eat you sooner rather than later.

        by hannah on Fri Aug 01, 2008 at 10:23:06 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Comments about oil, uranium, power and wealth (0+ / 0-)

          The most dangerous people aren't into wealth, they're into power.  Power was what the oil monopoly was about.  Oil has escaped from centralized control--too many nations have it and the market controls it.

          First, power and wealth. Maybe I didn't make my argument about Cheney clear: It's about power AND wealth, but the wealth part, in Cheney's case, has been ignored by investigative journalism. Going back a couple of decades, this guy has cashed in on protection racket cons and illegal black market rackets and has escaped scrutiny.

          You can go all the way back to the 1970s to dig up the crimes this guy has been involved in. All the way back to the beginning of his career in the Nixon Administration. We brought Nixon down, but many of his gangster cronies escaped scrutiny and prosecution.

          Currently, Cheney is involved in an attempt to create a uranium cartel, stick taxpayers with the bill for it's $250 billion start-up, and then pocket billions in pure profits for him and his progeny. Yet another fascist, aristocratic dynasty.

          This part of the story about China's nuclear contracts, Iran's attempt to build a nuclear fuel industry, and Cheney's hell-bent effort to abuse his power as vice president to start another imperial war, has gone virtually unnoticed.

          Second, I disagree that a "market" decides the price of oil. There are several cartels, and this has been the case for a very long time. These cartels are controlled by relatively few people, an aristocracy. In Saudi Arabia they come right out and tell you they are royalty. The powers that royalty has is no less than the powers of the nobility who control the rest of the cartels. It isn't a market, and it's certainly not free.

          Third, I agree with your assessment of the imperial motives for the Iraq War. The imperial motives included long-term military plans to wage more wars in the Middle East and Central Asia over oil, in addition to the motives that you give. That's why the occupation of Iraq in a non-negiatiable item for the Bush Administration, and why they built so many permanant bases.

          Fourth, I also agree with your views on nuclear fuel: the weapons capability is an excuse. The media again fails us here by not questioning this excuse. All the way back to the Eisenhower Administration, nuclear scientists and proponents of nuclear power have assured us that development of nuclear power DOES NOT pose a risk of nuclear weapons capability. Soooo, they've been lying to us for 50 years? Or they are lying to us now?

          Fifth,  I again apologize for not connecting a couple of dots I have presented. In my Iran War Plan diaries, I make the case that Iran's nuclear fuel industry WILL NOT, and CAN NOT produce a nuclear weapons capability.

          In order to divert nuclear fuel, processed at 5% enrichment, into a program that produces weapons grade uranium (better than 95% enriched) Iran would have to build at least three more facilities in order to accomodate the necessary processes to create a weapon. It's not as simple as running the uranium through the centrifuges a few more times.

          If, as the Bush Administration claims, they may be doing that secretly  , then the secret activity would have to be concealed. It is not possible to conceal such activity unless the activity is physically connected to existing, legal facilities. I give this info out in my Iran War diaries.

          I also point out that the existing facilities are under an international inspection regime consisting of 150 nuclear inspectors who monitor the nuclear fuel program daily. This is almost NEVER DIVULGED to the American public bythe press. Instead, a nonexistent threat is hyped and fear of the unknown is assumed and exploited.

          RUSSIA is overseeing Iran's nuclear programs in addition to the IAEA. Is the Russian press perculating with "nuclear threat" hype? NO. Why not? Because Russia is the other party, besides Iran, who will benefit from an Iranian nuclear fuel industry. They know very well what's going on inside Iran, and they aren't worried that a rogue nuclear weapons power is emerging on their border!

          The Middle East and Central Asia aren't going to be plunged in war and chaos AGAIN over the ambitions of arrogant, presumptious fanatics led by Dick Cheney, whose main aim is to make his family into American royalty.

          But in order to ensure that, we have a part to play.

          I'm trying to do what I can.

          Sixth, in the third diary I wrote, about the nuclear black market, I address a motive for Cheney and others to create a cassis belli for war with Iran by secretly passing nuclear weapons technology to Iranian military officers. It makes sense if you realize that the claims about Iran's enrichment process CANNOT BE a cassis belli, or, nuclear power proponents have been lying to us about proliferation threats for 50 years!

          If the Treasury Dept has already taken the step of identifying the military officers on the receiving end of the black market, then the Iranian government is placed in the position of having to arrest those individuals if they want to preserve their claim to abiding by treaties. I allude to a secondary motive by the Bush Administration in the Nuclear Black Market diary: lumping in enrichment program officials with the black marketers.

          Even when they are in the right, the Bush Administration tries to exploit the opportunity to cripple the enrichment program!

          Seventh, what will the Iranians do with this? Well, if they investigate it and conclude that the military officers who bought nuclear weapons technology on the black market violated fatwas by the Supreme Leader, they'll have to execute those individuals for treason. Think about what that means on our end.

          Last, there is a story that I don't reference in any of the diaries, but it is significant. Remember the contracts Cheney is trying to negotiate with the Chinese on behalf of Westinghouse and other corporations? Well, the Chinese have weighed in. They are going with the Russians and the Iranians. Hence the missile sales. So much for the payday for the Iran War Plan.

    •  Feast your eyes on this bit of info (0+ / 0-)

  •  wars (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    hannah, taraka das

    wars should be fought with knives. KIlling a human should be personal.  If you are willing to kill someone , you should be willing to feel the warmth of their blood, hear their screams, hear their pleas, watch the life fade from their eys, smell the piss as the dead body releases control of its bowels.If you arent even willing to do that, then what right do you have to steal someones life?

    Pushing a button and going to lunch makes killing to easy.

  •  There's no evidence (0+ / 0-)

    that I can see to support your insinuation that the apparent suicide of that US officer was because "some of the leaders of our Air Force aren't too comfortable with that they've been doing", unless you know something that you didn't specify.

Permalink | 12 comments